Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

When Legal Drugs Kill

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://www.worldfreeinternet.net/news/nws115.htm

SOURCE: Reprinted from the 27 April, 1998, issue of Newsweek magazine.

Excerpted in the public service of the national interest of the American people.

WHEN LEGAL

DRUGS KILL

100,000 Die Every Year

By Kalb

NEWSWEEK

It was to have been Jerry and Sagen's first New Year's Eve together as a

married couple. But on that morning in 1996, says Jerry Sagen, " I awoke to

hear her dying. " As gasped her last breaths, Jerry dialed 911 and

frantically blew air into her lungs, but it was too late. At first the death of

the

healthy 45-year-old woman was a mystery. But lst month an answer was stamped

onto

's death certificate: accidental death due to a toxic level of the

antihistamine Hismanal. (While not commenting on the case, Janssen

Pharmaceutica,

the maker of Hismanal, said it is difficult to confirm a drug as the ultimate

cause of death and stressed that " it's been taken safely by a huge number of

people. " ) For Jerry Sagen, 53, it was unfathomable. " You're numb, " he says; " you

can't believe it happened. "

For millions of Americans, prescription drugs are a way of life - about 2

billion are dispensed each year. We rely on them for everything from allergies

to

diabetes to depression. But in a study published last week in The Journal of

the American Medical Association, researchers found that adverse reactions to

prescription drugs may rank somewhere between the fourth and sixth leading

cause of death in the United States. Dr. Bruce Pomeranz, a professor at the

University of Toronto, and his team analyzed 39 studies conducted in American

hospitals over four decades (the study was funded by a scientific-research

group).

Of 33 million patients admitted to hospitals in 1994, more than 100,000 died

from toxic reactions to medications that were administered properly, either

before or after they were hospitalized. And more than 2 million suffered serious

side effects.

Drugs by nature are powerful substances, and individual responses are

unpredictable. While the study didn't look at specific drugs, it has been

documented

that antihistamines, in combination with the wrong antibiotic, can lead to

abnormal heart rhythms; in rare instances the result can be fatal. ( Sagan

was taking an antibiotic with the Hismanal, though that combination has not been

linked to her death). Mixing drugs isn't the only problem. Blood thinners

alone, for example, can cause fatal internal hemorrhaging. " We have to realize

drugs are not magic bullets, " says Pomeranz. " They don't just hit the tissue we

want them to hit, they hit all the other tissues as well. "

He and others say the Food and Drug Administration must work harder to

address the problem. Though the FDA has been lauded for a much-needed increase

in

the number of new drugs it approves each year (a record 46 in 1996), critics say

it hasn't done enough to monitor medications once they're on the market. The

FDA requests reports on adverse drug reactions from hospitals and physicians,

but few participate in this voluntary program. Information that might warn of

- or perhaps even ward off - side effects is buried in doctors' offices and

hospital wards. " It's the best FDA system in the world, but it's not enough, "

says Pomeranz. " We need more post-market surveillance. "

The FDA says it hopes to soon launch a computerized system that will make it

easier to report adverse drug reactions. Monitoring medications is " terribly

important, " says Friedman, the FDA's acting commissioner. " We want to

give more attention to this. " But surveillance isn't the FDA's dominion alone.

" I see problems at every link of the safety chain, " says , a

senior fellow at the Washington University Medical Center and author of

" Prescription for Disaster. " He says physicians need to be much more cautious

about the drugs - and drug combinations - they prescribe. And patients need to

become wiser consumers. While the Pomeranz study didn't deal with patients who

misread or disregard warning labels - taking an incorrect dosage, for example -

that is a serious cause of adverse reactions.

Some experts raised concerns about last week's study, noting that the

hospitals surveyed were all teaching hospitals, where patients are sickest and

receive the most drugs. And while 100,000 deaths is 100,000 too many, those

represent just .32 percent of hospitalized patients. " When you realize how many

drugs

we use, " said Dr. Lucian Leape of the Harvard School of Public Health, " maybe

those numbers aren't so bad after all. " Pomeranz isn't warning people to stay

away from drugs. " That would be a terrible message, " he says. " But we should

increase our vigilance. " That's a prescription everybody can live with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...