Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to reduce their blood volume. Unfortunately one of the compensatory things your body does during heart failure is increase blood volume in order to get blood to the tissues; this unfortunately exacerbates the problems with the heart. If you dont have diastolic dysfunction this shouldn't be a problem. There were several parts of the interview I didn't 'get'. When asked why CFS patients hadn't been diagnosed with heart problems he said because the parameters of diastolic dysfunction had only recently been worked (mid 90's). That hasn't stopped many many people without CFS from being diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction since then - I dont know why it wouldn't stop CFS patients from the same. His idea that decreased adrenal function is the cause of the post exertion fatigue seen in CFS was really surprising to me. The post exertional fatigue seen in CFS has been described as being unique to the disease but low adrenal functioning certainly is not. Post exertional fatigue is not found in 's disease - a disease that is defined by its very low cortisol output. Almost all studies have found the hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and day out fatigue of 's patients. In fact 's disease patients can and should exercise altho some of them have to increase their medication. Some of the medications used in 's disease have been tried in CFS (fludrocortisone) and dont work. I dont know if anybody other than Cheney has suggested low cortisol output to be the cause of post exertional fatigue. In fact he hasnt suggested it until now; it does fit his theory of diastolic dysfuncton. Maybe I'm missing something but I dont get that at all. Cortisol has probably been the most well studied substance in CFS. marypmichel <marypmichel@...> wrote: Hi, In reference to this interview (post #91374) I was struck by the sentence under #14 " Good hydration is important but excessive fluid or salt might be counter-productive " For years I've tried to get enough water and sometimes reach my saturation point before the usual recommended amount. I've also been seriously considering starting the Salt-C protocol. I've recently tried to raise my intake of salt and again seem to reach a saturation point. I have a gene for CFS and for Mold and tested positive for Bb. According to Dr. Shoemaker my issues are CFS and Mold - not Lyme. So, my questions are: What do you think Dr. Cheney's reasoning is behind this statement? Would the Salt-C protocol be counterproductive for some of us? How would excessive water and/or salt affect the person with CFS? Best Wishes to you All, This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 > Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and day out fatigue of 's patients. I had a question about the above statement. My post exertional fatigue begins not right after exercise but (usually) within 18 to 24 hours and is much more than just fatigue, it sets off a host of symptoms including that fluey feeling and ... it lasts easily for weeks, but USUALLY months. Do others also experience this as the statement above suggests otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Hi Cort, The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the right balance there. About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. Florinef does help some PWC's and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to get off of it. Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic difference. I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't work, because for some percentage it doesn't? Katrina > Hi, > In reference to this interview (post #91374) I was struck by the > sentence under #14 > " Good hydration is important but excessive fluid or salt might > be counter-productive " > > For years I've tried to get enough water and sometimes reach my > saturation point before the usual recommended amount. I've also > been seriously considering starting the Salt-C protocol. I've > recently tried to raise my intake of salt and again seem to reach a > saturation point. I have a gene for CFS and for Mold and tested > positive for Bb. According to Dr. Shoemaker my issues are CFS and > Mold - not Lyme. > > So, my questions are: What do you think Dr. Cheney's reasoning > is behind this statement? Would the Salt-C protocol be > counterproductive for some of us? How would excessive water and/or > salt affect the person with CFS? > > Best Wishes to you All, > > > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Hi Cort, " Almost all studies have found the hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. " That is so because studies are being done on mixed group of patients. There are stages while adrenal function goes worse and worse. I have lived all of them.At some stage you are hyper not hypo. So,if you get mixture of CFS patients with low and high cortisol function you can never get a reasonable result.I am SO glad and excited that Cheney got aware of this fact. I am hoping that research will more concentrate on HPA axis problems as soon as possible.Hope that happens before it is too late for me. " Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and day out fatigue of 's patients. In fact 's disease patients can and should exercise altho some of them have to increase their medication. Some of the medications used in 's disease have been tried in CFS (fludrocortisone) and dont work. " That is because your pituitary does not stop pushing or your adrenals does not stop producing cortisol (Some kind or communication problem between the two.That needs further investigation) once they start working. You exercise,you get stimulated and this state does not change for long term as long as your adrenals are able to produce some cortisol. You produce and produce all the cortisol you have until you deplete all the stores or power of adrenals. That takes some time, time period depending on the status of your adrenals.That is why ians don't have post exertional fatigue.They don't have any problems with their HPA axis.Their problem is low cortisol throughout the day. I an not feeling so well,but I could not stop writing answer to this post as it really got me excited. I thank to all who have answered my inquiries on various subjects. I read them and they were very helpful but I will be able to answer when I feel fine. Best wishes and thanks. Nil Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to > have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt > diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not > good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to > fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble > accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more > trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Florinef is take as a replacement for aldosterone.I am also taking my aldosterone in the form of adrenal cortex extract together with other 40+ adrenal hormones.I wouldn't be able to write this note without it. So,you can count me on patients who are helped by aldosterone support.Best wishes.Nil Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > > Hi Cort, > > The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among > patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still > have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that > if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids > and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. > > I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the > right balance there. > > About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, > too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. > > Florinef does help some PWC's > and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to > " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. > It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to > get off of it. > Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic > difference. > > I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any > long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't > work, because for some percentage it doesn't? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Hi, Katrina. " kattemayo " <kattemayo@...> wrote: The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction... ***Do you have a GNB3 gene variant as may be found on your Genovations cardio panel that you had done through Dr Cheney? I have one and noticed that that this polymorphism is associated with Diastolic Dysfunction in the heart like Peckerman et al found in PWCs. ***My post, message#91142, from earlier this week about this GNB3 connection has a link to the study on pubmed that shows it. I wonder if Dr Cheney has noticed this in his patient files as he probably has compiled more Genovations test data for PWCs by far than any CFS researcher out there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 We're probably into the subsets thing again! I guess everybody has try things on an individual basis and see how they go. Both Cheney and Bell have talked in the past about how many CFS patients are resistant to increasing blood volume even though it appears they are in need of it. Even tho my CFS symptoms are milder than most on this list I have always had trouble lying down. When I had my worse MCS symptom I would have to lie down the middle of the day and would nauseous for hours afterwards. I dont think they're studying florinef or other volume enhancers\ although I could be wrong. Hurwitz should be finished with a big study on low blood volume and red blood cells that should spur more interest in that subject. The research community isnt really interested parsing things out into subsets in CFS yet; that job falls solely on the shoulder of physicians like Cheney who have to figure out who will do well at what. It must be a very interesting and not very easy job. yildiz <yildiz22@...> wrote: Florinef is take as a replacement for aldosterone.I am also taking my aldosterone in the form of adrenal cortex extract together with other 40+ adrenal hormones.I wouldn't be able to write this note without it. So,you can count me on patients who are helped by aldosterone support.Best wishes.Nil Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > > Hi Cort, > > The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among > patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still > have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that > if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids > and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. > > I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the > right balance there. > > About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, > too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. > > Florinef does help some PWC's > and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to > " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. > It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to > get off of it. > Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic > difference. > > I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any > long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't > work, because for some percentage it doesn't? > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Thats an intriguing idea but Cheney did not say in that interview that CFS patients are hyper and hypo, he said they became hypo after exercise. You would think as well that if they were both hyper and hypo t hat some studies would have shown them to be hyper. There certainly is more research on the HPA axis going on though. The hypocortisolism is one of the more consistent findings in CFS. I'm sure the 'big' neuro-immune grant by the NIH will fund several extensive studies in t his area. Are you saying that once CFS patients get stimulated to produce cortisol by exercise that for some reason it doesn't get shut off? But they keep on pumping it out until their adrenals are exhausted and that is the cause of the post exertion malaise? That certainly is interesting. You're saying that something is telling the adrenals to work and that it is the communication in the HPA axis that is faulty - not the poor adrenals - who are just responding as best they can to this message? If right that certainly is an intriguing idea. I going to check if they've monitored cortisol response to exercise over time in CFS patients. yildiz <yildiz22@...> wrote: Hi Cort, " Almost all studies have found the hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. " That is so because studies are being done on mixed group of patients. There are stages while adrenal function goes worse and worse. I have lived all of them.At some stage you are hyper not hypo. So,if you get mixture of CFS patients with low and high cortisol function you can never get a reasonable result.I am SO glad and excited that Cheney got aware of this fact. I am hoping that research will more concentrate on HPA axis problems as soon as possible.Hope that happens before it is too late for me. " Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and day out fatigue of 's patients. In fact 's disease patients can and should exercise altho some of them have to increase their medication. Some of the medications used in 's disease have been tried in CFS (fludrocortisone) and dont work. " That is because your pituitary does not stop pushing or your adrenals does not stop producing cortisol (Some kind or communication problem between the two.That needs further investigation) once they start working. You exercise,you get stimulated and this state does not change for long term as long as your adrenals are able to produce some cortisol. You produce and produce all the cortisol you have until you deplete all the stores or power of adrenals. That takes some time, time period depending on the status of your adrenals.That is why ians don't have post exertional fatigue.They don't have any problems with their HPA axis.Their problem is low cortisol throughout the day. I an not feeling so well,but I could not stop writing answer to this post as it really got me excited. I thank to all who have answered my inquiries on various subjects. I read them and they were very helpful but I will be able to answer when I feel fine. Best wishes and thanks. Nil Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to > have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt > diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not > good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to > fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble > accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more > trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 I was able to find this study, - it showed significantly lower ACTH levels in CFS patients both before and after exercise but normal cortisol. Maybe theproblem is upstream of cortisol??? I dont think they've really delved into that too much. SInce the neuroimmune grants are targeted at the brain maybe they get into some good HPA axis/brain stuff that will show us something. Too bad it wasnt $14 or $40 million dollars they were will to spend. Cort Psychosom Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;64(6):951-62. Related Articles, Links Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity in chronic fatigue syndrome and health under psychological, physiological, and pharmacological stimulation. Gaab J, Huster D, Peisen R, Engert V, Heitz V, Schad T, Schurmeyer TH, Ehlert U. Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Trier, Germany. jgaab@... OBJECTIVES: Subtle alterations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have been proposed as a shared pathway linking numerous etiological and perpetuating processes with symptoms and observed physiological abnormalities. Because the HPA axis is involved in the adaptive responses to stress and CFS patients experience a worsening of symptoms after physical and psychological stress, we tested HPA axis functioning with three centrally acting stress tests. METHODS: We used two procedures mimicking real-life stressors and compared them with a standardized pharmacological neuroendocrine challenge test. CFS patients were compared with healthy control subjects regarding their cardiovascular and endocrine reactivity in a psychosocial stress test and a standardized exercise test, and their endocrine response in the insulin tolerance test (ITT). RESULTS: Controlling for possible confounding variables, we found significantly lower ACTH response levels in the psychosocial stress test and the exercise test, and significantly lower ACTH responses in the ITT, with no differences in plasma total cortisol responses. Also, salivary-free cortisol responses did not differ between the groups in the psychosocial stress test and the exercise test but were significantly higher for the CFS patients in the ITT. In all tests CFS patients had significantly reduced baseline ACTH levels. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that CFS patients are capable of mounting a sufficient cortisol response under different types of stress but that on a central level subtle dysregulations of the HPA axis exist. cort johnson <cortttt@...> wrote: Thats an intriguing idea but Cheney did not say in that interview that CFS patients are hyper and hypo, he said they became hypo after exercise. You would think as well that if they were both hyper and hypo t hat some studies would have shown them to be hyper. There certainly is more research on the HPA axis going on though. The hypocortisolism is one of the more consistent findings in CFS. I'm sure the 'big' neuro-immune grant by the NIH will fund several extensive studies in t his area. Are you saying that once CFS patients get stimulated to produce cortisol by exercise that for some reason it doesn't get shut off? But they keep on pumping it out until their adrenals are exhausted and that is the cause of the post exertion malaise? That certainly is interesting. You're saying that something is telling the adrenals to work and that it is the communication in the HPA axis that is faulty - not the poor adrenals - who are just responding as best they can to this message? If right that certainly is an intriguing idea. I going to check if they've monitored cortisol response to exercise over time in CFS patients. yildiz <yildiz22@...> wrote: Hi Cort, " Almost all studies have found the hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. " That is so because studies are being done on mixed group of patients. There are stages while adrenal function goes worse and worse. I have lived all of them.At some stage you are hyper not hypo. So,if you get mixture of CFS patients with low and high cortisol function you can never get a reasonable result.I am SO glad and excited that Cheney got aware of this fact. I am hoping that research will more concentrate on HPA axis problems as soon as possible.Hope that happens before it is too late for me. " Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and day out fatigue of 's patients. In fact 's disease patients can and should exercise altho some of them have to increase their medication. Some of the medications used in 's disease have been tried in CFS (fludrocortisone) and dont work. " That is because your pituitary does not stop pushing or your adrenals does not stop producing cortisol (Some kind or communication problem between the two.That needs further investigation) once they start working. You exercise,you get stimulated and this state does not change for long term as long as your adrenals are able to produce some cortisol. You produce and produce all the cortisol you have until you deplete all the stores or power of adrenals. That takes some time, time period depending on the status of your adrenals.That is why ians don't have post exertional fatigue.They don't have any problems with their HPA axis.Their problem is low cortisol throughout the day. I an not feeling so well,but I could not stop writing answer to this post as it really got me excited. I thank to all who have answered my inquiries on various subjects. I read them and they were very helpful but I will be able to answer when I feel fine. Best wishes and thanks. Nil Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to > have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt > diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not > good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to > fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble > accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more > trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 cort johnson wrote: > > Thats an intriguing idea but Cheney did not say in that interview that CFS patients are hyper and hypo, he said they became hypo after exercise. < I should send you a picture I have of Dr Cheney's office. My house is directly behind, and you can see the short flight of stairs leading up to the door. Literally overnight, I went from being a Hang Glider instructor who ran wind-sprints all day long, holding onto students flying wires to control the glider in the initial " launch and land " learning phase - to not even being able to climb those stairs without clinging to the handrail and resting halfway. This was a hallmark of the Incline Village epidemic. " Post Exertional malaise " ? What " exertion " are they talking about? Standing up? Trying to feed yourself? Crawling to the bathroom? I would wake up after " resting " feeling worse and more destroyed than when I lost consciousness and fell into the catatonic collapse that doctors think is just " sleeping " . I only got the joy of experiencing " post exertional malaise " after a couple of years when I recovered enough to walk the length of the driveway. Literally overnight after the flu-like illness from Hell! And the doctors call this " Deconditioning " . Dr Cheney knows this full well but I believe that he is just trying to avoid excluding other types of CFS by not saying " NO Exertional Malaise " . - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Me too. In a message dated 2/18/2006 11:25:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, ballady4@... writes: > I had a question about the above statement. My post exertional fatigue > begins not right after exercise but (usually) within 18 to 24 hours > and is much more than just fatigue, it sets off a host of symptoms > including that fluey feeling and ... it lasts easily for weeks, but > USUALLY months Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Hi Cort. > Thats an intriguing idea but Cheney did not say in that interview that CFS > patients are hyper and hypo, he said they became hypo after exercise. Okay I think I need to explain this you said " " Almost all studies have found the hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. " .I am on the word " minor " now. They find it to be minor because their test group consists of mixed CFS patients. Some being hyper and some hypo. So,the result comes out as " Minor " hypo.Actually late stage patients are hypo and the earlier stage patients are hyper. Some in between.So,the thing that needs to be done is to separate patients into groups.stage 1,stage 2,stage 3,etc Than it will be seen that stage one patients consistently high in cortisol whereas late stage patients are consistently low. If you mix these groups together you can get no meaningful results. You would think as well that if they were both hyper and hypo t hat some studies would have shown them to be hyper. There certainly is more research on the HPA axis going on though. The hypocortisolism is one of the more consistent findings in CFS. I'm sure the 'big' neuro-immune grant by the NIH will fund several extensive studies in t his area. at earlier stages cortisol levels are high. But at that point exhaustion is not so evident. So that may be the reason not many of these patients are not included in the studies. > Are you saying that once CFS patients get stimulated to produce cortisol > by exercise that for some reason it doesn't get shut off? But they keep > on pumping it out until their adrenals are exhausted and that is the cause > of the post exertion malaise? Yes. exactly.Once you are exposed to a stimuli you can not calm down it time. There is a delayed response to stress removal.Once stress is removed form normal people they calm down after some time but for CFs patients it takes much more time or the cortisol levels to come down. > > That certainly is interesting. You're saying that something is telling > the adrenals to work and that it is the communication in the HPA axis > that is faulty - not the poor adrenals - who are just responding as best > they can to this message? Exactly.There is a communication problem some where in HPA axis. " Danger is gone " message is not being taken or processed in time.If patient is at earlier stages of the illness and adrenals are able to produce some cortisol,than not much exhaustion is observed but as illness progresses and adrenals start loosing their ability to respond than severe exhaustion sets in. At this late stage of the illness,I can observe this very clearly on my body.Let me give you an example. When I read your first note on Cheney's latest interview,I was extremely exhausted. I even had difficulty to read the list notes,but the second I read it I got very excited. Was happy that Cheney was aware of this issue. This was a stimuli for me. An from that time on I am over activated.I can not relax myself and I am eating my adrenals at this point.Actually I am very tired but I can not feel it. I was extremely tired 3 hours ago. How come I am so active since this three hours and do not feel any need for rest.Overstimulation has taken the control.Tomorrow I will be in crash because of this. So,at the end,`Poor adrenals` get exhausted and become really poor adrenals.But no matter how poor,depleted they are, this communication problem goes on.So,even if patients get well for a while for some reason,they soon re-deplete their adrenals as the main problem at hpa axis is not resolved. > If right that certainly is an intriguing idea. I going to check if > they've monitored cortisol response to exercise over time in CFS patients. yes I think there was such a study somewhere. it was found that cortisol values of CFS patients normalized at much later time than the normal group. Sorry I don't have it now. best wishes. Nil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 I recently read that said there are two broad types of CFS patients; those who are absolutely disabled and are never not fatigued and those who are able to engage in some exercise and recover to some extent by resting. I'm just very glad I never fell into that first category. erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote: cort johnson wrote: > > Thats an intriguing idea but Cheney did not say in that interview that CFS patients are hyper and hypo, he said they became hypo after exercise. < I should send you a picture I have of Dr Cheney's office. My house is directly behind, and you can see the short flight of stairs leading up to the door. Literally overnight, I went from being a Hang Glider instructor who ran wind-sprints all day long, holding onto students flying wires to control the glider in the initial " launch and land " learning phase - to not even being able to climb those stairs without clinging to the handrail and resting halfway. This was a hallmark of the Incline Village epidemic. " Post Exertional malaise " ? What " exertion " are they talking about? Standing up? Trying to feed yourself? Crawling to the bathroom? I would wake up after " resting " feeling worse and more destroyed than when I lost consciousness and fell into the catatonic collapse that doctors think is just " sleeping " . I only got the joy of experiencing " post exertional malaise " after a couple of years when I recovered enough to walk the length of the driveway. Literally overnight after the flu-like illness from Hell! And the doctors call this " Deconditioning " . Dr Cheney knows this full well but I believe that he is just trying to avoid excluding other types of CFS by not saying " NO Exertional Malaise " . - This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 On Feb 18, 2006, at 7:30 PM, cort johnson wrote: > I recently read that said there are two broad types of CFS > patients; those who are absolutely disabled and are never not > fatigued and those who are able to engage in some exercise and > recover to some extent by resting. I'm just very glad I never > fell into that first category. I dunno. Over the course of 20+ years, I've spent considerable time in both of these categories. It hasn't been an either-or for me. Rather, it was a long decline over a period of about 15 years, with years of stasis punctuated by several big, hard bumps along the way. Each bump took me down a little further (though they were generally followed by a slow improvement over a couple years, I'd never get anywhere near as well as I'd been before) -- until the last one (1993) finally left me unable to get back up again for six long years. In the end, " resting " didn't really do it. Though I'm sure I wouldn't have recovered without large doses of that, too, it only got me so far. By the end of the six years, it was pretty clear that I was stuck, and no amount of rest was going to bring me back out of it. It wasn't until I started treating the damage -- allergies, thyroid, hormonal whackouts, sulfur issues (in a limited way), sleep disorders, and so on -- that the fog began to clear. Actually, it seems possible that I may have hit another mid-sized milestone. Working Rich's protocol, today was the day I started taking 400 mg of SAMe. Twelve hours later, all I can say is: WOW. I clearly need to cut out the SJW when I take this -- the first two hours, I had a wicked serotonin headache. But after that, I felt like...well, like I really, seriously needed to put down the books, pull on my jacket, and go outside for a very long walk. Like I had too much energy to just sit still. Like maybe I could get some real exercise, and it might feel bone-deep good. My body WANTED it. I seriously believed I would never feel that craving for movement again in this lifetime. It felt wonderful. Beyond a few stretches and some heavy lifting, I didn't indulge that impulse today. But my husband and I have agreed to try a slow 45- minute walk after church tomorrow. I'll see how I do with it. If I don't hurt on Monday, maybe I'll go ahead and try a gentle yoga class on Tuesday. (Dare I dream?) The fear of post-exertional payback has been the last big hurdle standing between me and that last 15% of recovery. Everything else is pretty much back, except my ability to take that kind of overt physical stress. (I'm even handling 25 hours of schoolwork a week, and the deadlines that entails. It's pushing me a bit, and the house looks like hell, but I'm not yet redlining my stress meter.) It's starting to look possible that Rich's methylation program might be the key to that final door where my last bit of stamina can be recovered. I'll keep you posted. Also: I have no appetite whatsoever, probably due to the elevated serotonin levels. Less food, more exercise....could this be the year I finally start dropping the 40 pounds I gained during all those years in bed? That would be nice.... Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Cort - I think you are very correct on all points in your msg below. Indeed, a standard treatment for heart failure is diuretics, to reduce blood volume and heart preload. And you are also correct on the absence of post exertional fatigue in 's Disease, which produces insufficient cortisol and aldosterone. These patients are fatigued all the time, and exercise does not make it worse. Prime example is President F. Kennedy, who had very serious 's Disease, but maintained a high energy level (most of the time), with high doses of IV hydrocortisone and oral fludrocortisone acetate. At JFK's autopsy, the pathologists said his adrenal cortex was almost non-existent. But the continual administration of hydrocortisone, fludrocortizone and perhaps some amphetamine allowed him to be a very energetic and effective man, to say the least. I had my cortisol tested about a year ago and it was very normal.. I was disappointed, as I thought if it was low, the above hormone therapy might bring me up to JFK energy level.. Sorry pal; you have CFS, not 's disease.. If JFK had had CFS, he would now be an unknown... Cort, thank you for your great work for us all - Mort Caldwell in West Virginia Biomedical Engineer and Physiologist CFS since 1994 Age 65 and at about 15% functionality. Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question > IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to > have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt > diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not > good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to > fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble > accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more > trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to reduce their > blood volume. Unfortunately one of the compensatory things your body does > during heart failure is increase blood volume in order to get blood to the > tissues; this unfortunately exacerbates the problems with the heart. If > you dont have diastolic dysfunction this shouldn't be a problem. > > There were several parts of the interview I didn't 'get'. When asked why > CFS patients hadn't been diagnosed with heart problems he said because the > parameters of diastolic dysfunction had only recently been worked (mid > 90's). That hasn't stopped many many people without CFS from being > diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction since then - I dont know why it > wouldn't stop CFS patients from the same. > > His idea that decreased adrenal function is the cause of the post > exertion fatigue seen in CFS was really surprising to me. The post > exertional fatigue seen in CFS has been described as being unique to the > disease but low adrenal functioning certainly is not. Post exertional > fatigue is not found in 's disease - a disease that is defined by > its very low cortisol output. Almost all studies have found the > hypocortisolism in CFS to be 'minor'. > > Post exertional fatigue is a bizarre symptom; it means your symptoms are > greatly increased not only just after exercise but for a day or two after > exercise. It appears to be very different from the general day in and > day out fatigue of 's patients. In fact 's disease patients > can and should exercise altho some of them have to increase their > medication. Some of the medications used in 's disease have been > tried in CFS (fludrocortisone) and dont work. > > I dont know if anybody other than Cheney has suggested low cortisol > output to be the cause of post exertional fatigue. In fact he hasnt > suggested it until now; it does fit his theory of diastolic dysfuncton. > Maybe I'm missing something but I dont get that at all. Cortisol has > probably been the most well studied substance in CFS. > > > > marypmichel <marypmichel@...> wrote: > Hi, > In reference to this interview (post #91374) I was struck by the > sentence under #14 > " Good hydration is important but excessive fluid or salt might > be counter-productive " > > For years I've tried to get enough water and sometimes reach my > saturation point before the usual recommended amount. I've also > been seriously considering starting the Salt-C protocol. I've > recently tried to raise my intake of salt and again seem to reach a > saturation point. I have a gene for CFS and for Mold and tested > positive for Bb. According to Dr. Shoemaker my issues are CFS and > Mold - not Lyme. > > So, my questions are: What do you think Dr. Cheney's reasoning > is behind this statement? Would the Salt-C protocol be > counterproductive for some of us? How would excessive water and/or > salt affect the person with CFS? > > Best Wishes to you All, > > > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each > other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment > discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2006 Report Share Posted February 18, 2006 Sara SAM-e was my life-giver, too. I got a hit with the very first 200 mg dose in Sept 1999. May I suggest that you take 200 mg before breakfast and another 200 mg between 2 and 3 pm? This might make it easier and smoother. I find if I take SAM-e much after 4 pm I am like the energizer bunny most of the night. Glad to wake up to such good news from you. Don't forget that SAM-e needs B6, B12, folic acid to keep homocysteine level. mjh In a message dated 2/19/06 1:20:02 AM Eastern Standard Time, mercuria@... writes: > Actually, it seems possible that I may have hit another mid-sized > milestone. Working Rich's protocol, today was the day I started > taking 400 mg of SAMe. Twelve hours later, all I can say is: WOW. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Cort wrote: >>>>>I don't think they're studying florinef or other volume enhancers\ although I could be wrong. <<<<< Cort, Not sure if I'm reading this right. But for any who were not around...in 94, Rowe...s Hopkins ...had THE big breakthrough that hit the CFS airwaves...he was studying teenagers with Neurally Mediated Hypotension- (NMH)...and noticed that their bedridden state for dasy after a syncope episode resembled...CFS. So he tested CFS teenagers for NMH (Tilt Table, etc)...sure enough, they had it. PReviously it was thought that all NMH meant total fainting,but this was near faint/syncope...for days, or longer, cause episodes kept happening...crashes in between. So, they put people on Florinef 1st, and some others. TO retain Electrolytes and pump up the volume. Becasue communication between brain and heart backward (a nerve?). ( " Maybe viral origin/damage) " We stand up...BP's supposed to go up, but with us it goes down...blood pools in ankles. We all across the country were going on Florinef...people were getting out of bed... Plus high fluids and salt. 3 of us locally had dramatic improvement...Jahn Hiber and I lectured on it locally. Then Jahn flew friends and family in from all over, threw a big bash for all of us in Carmel, suites and all. Coctail party, banquet,media...gave speech, threw away handicap sticker...pronounced himself cured. and I were holding steady...watching him and ourselves to see what this drug might do to us. We kind of lost track of him and the rest of the research. Before or after Florinef, I got Melanoma, surgery(95) We heard Jahn crashed, I got a few letters, he was in Alaska, Carmel, etc.then precarious, then NIH. I got some long term warnings on Florinef, but no details. Then I lost touch with , Jahn developed more complications...he had ALS,RA from before...big $$ crash...-- more complexities. Jahn is on the Memorial list, same as Bob. For 4 or 5 years,I lost one CFS friend a year to Suicide. I was trying to stay on my feet, and get updates on Rowe's work. ANd running local support group, and suicide prevention on phone. I could still stand up some and articulate, got severely shaky if off of it a day or 2, so stayed on it. Me and my PCP were in this alone. Ever since I came on-line, I have trid to find more info. But no/little response. By now, Rowe's work and low blood volume would be referenced but with this " Florinef did not pan out part " . Weird. Oddly, the NMH/low blood volume was all I found on the Mayo Clinic site. And when I went there, (2003?), for my Movement Disorders, the Internist knew about it, and it only. Several tests of the Autonomic System were ordered for me, then canceled. Very surreal... So, here I am, still on Florinef and Gookinaid with Diastolic Heart Failure (Dr, Cheney calls G. " pre-load " ). And, Cort, PS, Dr. Cheney said this: we are " erratically circulating low blood volume. " That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Well, only a couple of chapters, that is. Still walking pneumonia, on Doxy now. Sorry for detail + shorthand. Katrina kattemayo@... In , cort johnson <cortttt@...> wrote: > > We're probably into the subsets thing again! I guess everybody has try things on an individual basis and see how they go. Both Cheney and Bell have talked in the past about how many CFS patients are resistant to increasing blood volume even though it appears they are in need of it. > > Even tho my CFS symptoms are milder than most on this list I have always had trouble lying down. When I had my worse MCS symptom I would have to lie down the middle of the day and would nauseous for hours afterwards. > > think they're studying florinef or other volume enhancers\ although I could be wrong. Hurwitz should be finished with a big study on low blood volume and red blood cells that should spur more interest in that subject. > > The research community isnt really interested parsing things out into subsets in CFS yet; that job falls solely on the shoulder of physicians like Cheney who have to figure out who will do well at what. It must be a very interesting and not very easy job. > > yildiz <yildiz22@...> wrote: > Florinef is take as a replacement for aldosterone.I am also taking my > aldosterone in the form of adrenal cortex extract together with other 40+ > adrenal hormones.I wouldn't be able to write this note without it. So,you > can count me on patients who are helped by aldosterone support.Best > wishes.Nil > Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A > question > > > > > > Hi Cort, > > > > The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among > > patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still > > have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that > > if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids > > and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. > > > > I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the > > right balance there. > > > > About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, > > too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. > > > > Florinef does help some PWC's > > and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to > > " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. > > It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to > > get off of it. > > Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic > > difference. > > > > I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any > > long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't > > work, because for some percentage it doesn't? > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Thats quite a story! Just so you know where I'm coming from with this fludrocoritsone stuff - all I have is studies cited on PubMed. They obviously dont explain the range of CFS experience...too many people have stories like yours but that is where I get my info. Heres what I have with regards to that - two studies that did not show a difference overall in CFS. Obviously it made a big difference for you...but thats what doctors like Cheney are for - to figure out what works for who. Fludrocortisone acetate to treat neurally mediated hypotension in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Rowe PC, Calkins H, DeBusk K, McKenzie R, Anand R, Sharma G, Cuccherini BA, Soto N, Hohman P, Snader S, Lucas KE, Wolff M, Straus SE. Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, s Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. CONTEXT: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are more likely than healthy persons to develop neurally mediated hypotension (NMH) in response to prolonged orthostatic stress. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of fludrocortisone acetate as monotherapy for adults with both CFS and NMH. . CONCLUSIONS: In our study of adults with CFS, fludrocortisone as monotherapy for NMH was no more efficacious than placebo for amelioration of symptoms. Failure to identify symptomatic improvement with fludrocortisone does not disprove the hypothesis that NMH could be contributing to some of the symptoms of CFS. Further studies are needed to determine whether other medications or combination therapy are more effective in treating orthostatic intolerance in patients with CFS. Am J Med. 2003 Jun 15;114(9):736-41. Related Articles, Links Combination therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone does not improve symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. Blockmans D, Persoons P, Van Houdenhove B, Lejeune M, Bobbaers H. Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. .Blackmans@... PURPOSE: Chronic fatigue syndrome has been associated with decreased function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Although neurally mediated hypotension occurs more frequently in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome than in controls, attempts to alleviate symptoms by administration of hydrocortisone or fludrocortisone have not been successful. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of combination therapy (5 mg/d of hydrocortisone and 50 microg/d of 9-alfa-fludrocortisone) on fatigue and well-being in chronic fatigue syndrome. METHODS: We performed a 6-There were no differences between treatment and placebo in patient-reported fatigue or well-being There were also no between-group differences in fatigue measured with the Abbreviated Fatigue Questionnaire, the Short Form-36 Mental or Physical Factor scores, or in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Low-dose combination therapy of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone was not effective in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. kattemayo <kattemayo@...> wrote: Cort wrote: >>>>>I don't think they're studying florinef or other volume enhancers\ although I could be wrong. <<<<< Cort, Not sure if I'm reading this right. But for any who were not around...in 94, Rowe...s Hopkins ...had THE big breakthrough that hit the CFS airwaves...he was studying teenagers with Neurally Mediated Hypotension- (NMH)...and noticed that their bedridden state for dasy after a syncope episode resembled...CFS. So he tested CFS teenagers for NMH (Tilt Table, etc)...sure enough, they had it. PReviously it was thought that all NMH meant total fainting,but this was near faint/syncope...for days, or longer, cause episodes kept happening...crashes in between. So, they put people on Florinef 1st, and some others. TO retain Electrolytes and pump up the volume. Becasue communication between brain and heart backward (a nerve?). ( " Maybe viral origin/damage) " We stand up...BP's supposed to go up, but with us it goes down...blood pools in ankles. We all across the country were going on Florinef...people were getting out of bed... Plus high fluids and salt. 3 of us locally had dramatic improvement...Jahn Hiber and I lectured on it locally. Then Jahn flew friends and family in from all over, threw a big bash for all of us in Carmel, suites and all. Coctail party, banquet,media...gave speech, threw away handicap sticker...pronounced himself cured. and I were holding steady...watching him and ourselves to see what this drug might do to us. We kind of lost track of him and the rest of the research. Before or after Florinef, I got Melanoma, surgery(95) We heard Jahn crashed, I got a few letters, he was in Alaska, Carmel, etc.then precarious, then NIH. I got some long term warnings on Florinef, but no details. Then I lost touch with , Jahn developed more complications...he had ALS,RA from before...big $$ crash...-- more complexities. Jahn is on the Memorial list, same as Bob. For 4 or 5 years,I lost one CFS friend a year to Suicide. I was trying to stay on my feet, and get updates on Rowe's work. ANd running local support group, and suicide prevention on phone. I could still stand up some and articulate, got severely shaky if off of it a day or 2, so stayed on it. Me and my PCP were in this alone. Ever since I came on-line, I have trid to find more info. But no/little response. By now, Rowe's work and low blood volume would be referenced but with this " Florinef did not pan out part " . Weird. Oddly, the NMH/low blood volume was all I found on the Mayo Clinic site. And when I went there, (2003?), for my Movement Disorders, the Internist knew about it, and it only. Several tests of the Autonomic System were ordered for me, then canceled. Very surreal... So, here I am, still on Florinef and Gookinaid with Diastolic Heart Failure (Dr, Cheney calls G. " pre-load " ). And, Cort, PS, Dr. Cheney said this: we are " erratically circulating low blood volume. " That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. Well, only a couple of chapters, that is. Still walking pneumonia, on Doxy now. Sorry for detail + shorthand. Katrina kattemayo@... In , cort johnson <cortttt@...> wrote: > > We're probably into the subsets thing again! I guess everybody has try things on an individual basis and see how they go. Both Cheney and Bell have talked in the past about how many CFS patients are resistant to increasing blood volume even though it appears they are in need of it. > > Even tho my CFS symptoms are milder than most on this list I have always had trouble lying down. When I had my worse MCS symptom I would have to lie down the middle of the day and would nauseous for hours afterwards. > > think they're studying florinef or other volume enhancers\ although I could be wrong. Hurwitz should be finished with a big study on low blood volume and red blood cells that should spur more interest in that subject. > > The research community isnt really interested parsing things out into subsets in CFS yet; that job falls solely on the shoulder of physicians like Cheney who have to figure out who will do well at what. It must be a very interesting and not very easy job. > > yildiz <yildiz22@...> wrote: > Florinef is take as a replacement for aldosterone.I am also taking my > aldosterone in the form of adrenal cortex extract together with other 40+ > adrenal hormones.I wouldn't be able to write this note without it. So,you > can count me on patients who are helped by aldosterone support.Best > wishes.Nil > Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A > question > > > > > > Hi Cort, > > > > The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among > > patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still > > have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that > > if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids > > and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. > > > > I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the > > right balance there. > > > > About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, > > too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. > > > > Florinef does help some PWC's > > and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to > > " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. > > It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to > > get off of it. > > Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic > > difference. > > > > I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any > > long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't > > work, because for some percentage it doesn't? > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 That's really great. If you feel like you can say this is really working and are stable on it would you be willing to answer the following questions and I'll post it on my website? How long have you had CFS? What made you change your protocol? (test results, doctor's advice, etc?) What did you change? What is your protocol? How long have you been on it? What are your results, how have your symptoms changed? Have any blood tests, etc. changed? On a scale of 1-10, 10 being healthy, what were you before and what are you now? Is there anything else you'd like to add? Mercuria <mercuria@...> wrote: On Feb 18, 2006, at 7:30 PM, cort johnson wrote: > I recently read that said there are two broad types of CFS > patients; those who are absolutely disabled and are never not > fatigued and those who are able to engage in some exercise and > recover to some extent by resting. I'm just very glad I never > fell into that first category. I dunno. Over the course of 20+ years, I've spent considerable time in both of these categories. It hasn't been an either-or for me. Rather, it was a long decline over a period of about 15 years, with years of stasis punctuated by several big, hard bumps along the way. Each bump took me down a little further (though they were generally followed by a slow improvement over a couple years, I'd never get anywhere near as well as I'd been before) -- until the last one (1993) finally left me unable to get back up again for six long years. In the end, " resting " didn't really do it. Though I'm sure I wouldn't have recovered without large doses of that, too, it only got me so far. By the end of the six years, it was pretty clear that I was stuck, and no amount of rest was going to bring me back out of it. It wasn't until I started treating the damage -- allergies, thyroid, hormonal whackouts, sulfur issues (in a limited way), sleep disorders, and so on -- that the fog began to clear. Actually, it seems possible that I may have hit another mid-sized milestone. Working Rich's protocol, today was the day I started taking 400 mg of SAMe. Twelve hours later, all I can say is: WOW. I clearly need to cut out the SJW when I take this -- the first two hours, I had a wicked serotonin headache. But after that, I felt like...well, like I really, seriously needed to put down the books, pull on my jacket, and go outside for a very long walk. Like I had too much energy to just sit still. Like maybe I could get some real exercise, and it might feel bone-deep good. My body WANTED it. I seriously believed I would never feel that craving for movement again in this lifetime. It felt wonderful. Beyond a few stretches and some heavy lifting, I didn't indulge that impulse today. But my husband and I have agreed to try a slow 45- minute walk after church tomorrow. I'll see how I do with it. If I don't hurt on Monday, maybe I'll go ahead and try a gentle yoga class on Tuesday. (Dare I dream?) The fear of post-exertional payback has been the last big hurdle standing between me and that last 15% of recovery. Everything else is pretty much back, except my ability to take that kind of overt physical stress. (I'm even handling 25 hours of schoolwork a week, and the deadlines that entails. It's pushing me a bit, and the house looks like hell, but I'm not yet redlining my stress meter.) It's starting to look possible that Rich's methylation program might be the key to that final door where my last bit of stamina can be recovered. I'll keep you posted. Also: I have no appetite whatsoever, probably due to the elevated serotonin levels. Less food, more exercise....could this be the year I finally start dropping the 40 pounds I gained during all those years in bed? That would be nice.... Sara This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Hi Cortt, I live in Belgium and I think that the second study wasn´t done on real cfs patients. It was done by Boudewijn Van Houdenhove, a psychiatrist, he is well known here for his views on cfs and throughout the years he has done a lot of harm for cfs patients. About ten years ago he said that cfs was linked with childhood abuse and all kinds of trauma. The last few years he talks about people with cfs being unable to cope with the demands of modern society and social and family life and that they have a de-regulated stress system. He is very shrewd with what he says in interviews, he will never openly say that people with cfs have an attitude problem and are uncapable of holding their own in life, but when you read between the lines this is what it basically comes down too. He of course uses graded exercise therapy and behaviour therapy. He has his own psychosomatic department at the university of Leuven and he advises our parliament on cfs and is very influental. He writes lots of books with titles like " Tired in Times of Stress " and he says the RNASE-L test is a pseudo objectifying strategy. He most likely works with people who have psychological problems and who are depressed and because they are also tired he can get away with saying they have cfs and use them in every study he can with the intent to show that there are no physical abnormalities in cfs and that it is all psychological. So I think we can strike out that study as having any value. Take care, > > Thats quite a story! Just so you know where I'm coming from with this fludrocoritsone stuff - all I have is studies cited on PubMed. They obviously dont explain the range of CFS experience...too many people have stories like yours but that is where I get my info. Heres what I have with regards to that - two studies that did not show a difference overall in CFS. Obviously it made a big difference for you...but thats what doctors like Cheney are for - to figure out what works for who. > > Fludrocortisone acetate to treat neurally mediated hypotension in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. > > Rowe PC, Calkins H, DeBusk K, McKenzie R, Anand R, Sharma G, Cuccherini BA, Soto N, Hohman P, Snader S, Lucas KE, Wolff M, Straus SE. > > Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, s Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. > > CONTEXT: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are more likely than healthy persons to develop neurally mediated hypotension (NMH) in response to prolonged orthostatic stress. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of fludrocortisone acetate as monotherapy for adults with both CFS and NMH. . CONCLUSIONS: In our study of adults with CFS, fludrocortisone as monotherapy for NMH was no more efficacious than placebo for amelioration of symptoms. Failure to identify symptomatic improvement with fludrocortisone does not disprove the hypothesis that NMH could be contributing to some of the symptoms of CFS. Further studies are needed to determine whether other medications or combination therapy are more effective in treating orthostatic intolerance in patients with CFS. > > Am J Med. 2003 Jun 15;114(9):736-41. Related Articles, Links > > Combination therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone does not improve symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. > > Blockmans D, Persoons P, Van Houdenhove B, Lejeune M, Bobbaers H. > > Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. .Blackmans@... > > PURPOSE: Chronic fatigue syndrome has been associated with decreased function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Although neurally mediated hypotension occurs more frequently in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome than in controls, attempts to alleviate symptoms by administration of hydrocortisone or fludrocortisone have not been successful. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of combination therapy (5 mg/d of hydrocortisone and 50 microg/d of 9-alfa-fludrocortisone) on fatigue and well-being in chronic fatigue syndrome. METHODS: We performed a 6-There were no differences between treatment and placebo in patient- reported fatigue or well-being There were also no between-group differences in fatigue measured with the Abbreviated Fatigue Questionnaire, the Short Form-36 Mental or Physical Factor scores, or in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Low- dose combination therapy of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone was not effective in > patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 In a message dated 2/19/06 6:54:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mercuria@... writes: 4. TMG 5. SAMe (where I am now) 6. Methionine Sara Did Rich say why he suggests Methione since SAM-e is its activated form? By the way, in about 2001, on cfs_research, Pall suggested I try TMG in place of SAM-e to save money. Evidently, for some the TMG provides the same benefit. My kid got really sick so I never did that although just for the heck of it, I did add TMG about a gram a day last late summer. See no evident difference from it. I was so sick, vulnerable and a recent widow plus caregiver to a medically fragile crisis prone kid when I started SAM-e that I did not dare do anything to set me back further. I stayed on 200 mg of SAM-e for a month before increasing it by adding the 2 pm dose. Keep me posted, please. mjh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Mel & Cort, I don't understand why Cheney recommends the salt/potassium drink a couple times a day for ME/CFS patients if you are correct that blood volume needs to be reduced. We already have low blood volume in this disease, which is the reason for the salt/potassium drink. Can you enlighten me on that? Thanks, Du Pre Website: http://www.angelfire.com/poetry/soareagle/index.html " By words the mind is winged. " Aristophanes Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A question Cort - I think you are very correct on all points in your msg below. Indeed, a standard treatment for heart failure is diuretics, to reduce blood volume and heart preload. Mel From Cort > IIF you have diastolic heart problems then the last thing you want to > have is high blood volume and dinking alot of fluids, having a high salt > diet can cause you to raise your blood volume. High blood volume is not > good with diastolic dysfunction because it gives the heart more blood to > fill with - particularly when you lie down. The heart already has trouble > accepting the blood presented to it; adding more to it just gives it more > trouble. Patients with heart failure often take drugs to reduce their > blood volume. Unfortunately one of the compensatory things your body does > during heart failure is increase blood volume in order to get blood to the > tissues; this unfortunately exacerbates the problems with the heart. If > you dont have diastolic dysfunction this shouldn't be a problem. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 In a message dated 2/19/06 6:54:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mercuria@... writes: Glucosamine (2 g a day is too much for someone with borderline sugar issues), Sara Try MSM in its place. Inexpensive at Sam's Club. I've taken as much as 10 grams a day and works for me better than Glucosamin with or without Chondroitin. mjh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 Hi Cort, Yes, I was guessing that might be where you were coming from, and that's why I wrote about it. I also forgot to say that Rowe's study was published in Jama. Surely this would be findable. Even more so, I wonder what happened to his follow-ups, because I'm sure it went beyond one study. They were working on various protocols, because some were not tolerating Florinef at all or just it alone. Another was I think atenelol, something like that. Maybe some beta blockers? It's so weird because I cannot emphacise how big this was at the time, announced in all the CFS publications, and mainstream news, too. That often would say Is Salt the answer to CFS? This is how/when I also heard the frightening stories of the TTT, and long term relapse for some CFS patients after doing it. SO, that was a big debate, whether to get it or not, and if Dr. could/would put us on Florinef without it. (There is an in-office " Poor Man's TTT " that can be done). I knew that Rowe kept studying this and tweaking protocols, but just could never find a Doctor to help me with this, or understand it enough myself. The various protocols were written up in CFIDS publications for quite awhile. Then, next thing I know, all I see is the studies you cited, like the whole thing was a bust. KEvin has provided a valuable insight into that! I wonder if it's yet another case of real CFS research getting *un-funded*, as has happened many times, giving the impression that it was irrelevant, or the Scientist abndoned us and CFS. I see SStrauss on the 1st study. That's a big chill right there. He is nearly single handedly responsible for a decade of CFS research $$ wasted on psych/depression. Reading Osler's Web about him is very illuminating about where our early research went and how we come to still today, or worse than ever...to be mixed up with CF/Psych patients, and dismissed so thoroughly by Medical profession and Society. EVEN THOUGH, by now there are reams of impressive (and scary) Scientific findings about ME/CFS. Now we have Simon Wessely himself and cohorts dominating the publishing of so-called CFS research. SW himself and cohorts (such as White) has been connected to US Govt/CFS for sometime, including the plans for new name/definition. Simon Wessely's life long passion has been the study of Hysteria, and Mass Conversion something or other. Which is how he views,lectures, publishes on ME/CFS/CFIDS. About Dysautonomia, which NMH is one example of, I went to some Dysautonomia sites in those days, and found some CFS patients there with very severe (life-threatening) forms. (I always wondered if that happened to Jahn). THe Mayo tests would have ruled out Multiple System Atrophy, Shy-Drager's, etc. (the severe forms). My reading at that time revealed that Movement Disorders like I have can result from Autonomic failures and also can accompany...Mitochondria Disorders. Why those tests were canceled is completely unknown to me. Cort, another thing I want to clarify, is that I have only been Dr. Cheney's patient for under a year. I am not sure that he himself would have put me on Florinef...only that he knows why it is working for some of us, and that I cannot just be taken off of it. I think he had other ways that he addressed the NMH...licorice, salt, Gookinaid, and other. Related to the Heart problem, Did you catch the part where I said he refers to Gookinaid as " pre-load " ? Take care, Katrina > > Florinef is take as a replacement for aldosterone.I am also taking my > > aldosterone in the form of adrenal cortex extract together with other 40+ > > adrenal hormones.I wouldn't be able to write this note without it. So,you > > can count me on patients who are helped by aldosterone support.Best > > wishes.Nil > > Re: Dr Cheney Connecticut Interview - A > > question > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cort, > > > > > > The fluid salt, hydration thing is about a balance that varies among > > > patients. I do have the Diastolic Dysfunction, and Dr. Cheney does still > > > have me doing them, including Gookinaid (Hydralyte). What he said is that > > > if I (or anyone) feels worse when lying down...to lighten up on the fluids > > > and skip the Hydralyte for hours before going to bed. > > > > > > I do find that my salt tolerance is worse now, so have to find just the > > > right balance there. > > > > > > About the Florinef...you said what I have seen recent years' studies say, > > > too...but that's not true as a blanket statement. > > > > > > Florinef does help some PWC's > > > and I am one...dramatically. As I have described it, it enabled me to > > > " stand up and hold a conversation " ...and continues to, 10 years later. > > > It's unknown what damage it caused me too, and now I may not be able to > > > get off of it. > > > Wish 'd know what else to do, but I did not, and Florinef made dramatic > > > difference. > > > > > > I wish there were more written about the people it does help...and any > > > long term side effects. DId they just stop studying, and say it doesn't > > > work, because for some percentage it doesn't? > > > > > > > > > > > > > This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 On Feb 19, 2006, at 3:34 AM, foxhillers@... wrote: > SAM-e was my life-giver, too. I got a hit with the very first 200 > mg dose in > Sept 1999. It's almost as big a jump as getting on thyroid was. I'm even starting to look at all the things I might be able to eliminate from my meds box if this works as well as it might. The SJW is already history. 5-HTP may not be far behind. Glucosamine (2 g a day is too much for someone with borderline sugar issues), Kyolic, maybe my laxative herbs....yeah, I'm getting way ahead of myself, but it's fun to think of where I might be in a year if this really takes. If I could get my 90 pills a day down to 50-60, what a wonderful world it would be. Given the hyperthyroid symptoms I had yesterday, it also seems possible that I'll need to reduce my thyroid and DHEA again (I had to back off from 120 to 100mg on the thyroid when I started the B12/ glutathione shots last summer). This suggests that boosting glutathione is very effective at improving my thyroid function -- somebody here was asking about this recently, and I now have reason to think this is certainly the case for me. > May I suggest that you take 200 mg before breakfast and another 200 mg > between 2 and 3 pm? This might make it easier and smoother. Good advice. Thank you. This morning (after waking up with the exhausted feeling that I'd been shoved up against the Good Health wall, perhaps a little TOO hard) I made several adjustments: 1. Eliminated the SJW entirely (I'd already dropped my evening dose last week in anticipation of the SAMe; today, I quit the AM dose as well). 2. Dropped back to 200 mg of SAMe (for a rest, if nothing else) 3. Boosted the TMG to 750 mg (the plan is to ultimately take it to 1.5 g). The upshot is that I'm not as weird and high as I was yesterday; but I also don't feel quite as " wow, " either. And the extra TMG is making my bowel a bit sulferous and strange. That also happened for a few days when I added the taurine a few weeks back, so I'm going to proceed with the expectation that this too shall pass (until it doesn't). Tomorrow, I think I'll go back up to 400 mg of SAMe, trusting that adding TMG and axeing the SJW will, together, make it all go better. If it's a problem again, though, I'll take your suggestion to split it. My experience over the years has been that anything powerful enough to create a strong improvement is also likely to need a fair amount of tweaking before I learn to live with it. So I'm willing to patiently work this through for the week or two it will probably take to figure what to combine it with, how much to take, and what else I need to do to get the most out of it. > I find if I take SAM-e much after 4 pm I am like the energizer > bunny most of > the night. > > Glad to wake up to such good news from you. > > Don't forget that SAM-e needs B6, B12, folic acid to keep > homocysteine level. I'm already on injected B12, so that's not an issue. Rich's protocol accounts for this, actually. He has me introducing new stuff once every week or two, in a specific order: 1. B6 (pHp)/Mag (the magnesium was also a huge hit when I first took it) 2. Taurine 3. Folinic Acid 4. TMG 5. SAMe (where I am now) 6. Methionine So I'm heading down the homestretch. The early returns are that I am definitely getting some good benefit from this protocol; but I'll reserve final judgement until I've been on the full load for a month or two, and can really see what differences it made. I'll report back at length then, so Rich will have the data points for his " proof of concept " study. Thanks for your insight. Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.