Guest guest Posted January 27, 2006 Report Share Posted January 27, 2006 Hi, all. Ever since trying to understand the case of Thorstenson on this list six years ago, I've been puzzled by the above question. Since then, we've been hearing from several other PWCs who developed sensitivity to foods and supplements that contain sulfur, after they had developed CFS. Before they had CFS, they could tolerate sulfur- containing foods well, which tells us that there wasn't a very serious genetic problem involved. Since I had become convinced that glutathione depletion was involved in many cases of CFS by the time I encountered 's case, this seemed like a particularly perverse feature of her case. She clearly needed more chemically reduced sulfur, but she couldn't tolerate it. As my kids say, " What's up with that? " Now that I've been learning more about sulfur metabolism, I have come up with an idea about what might be at the root of this problem, and I want to suggest it here. As you may know, all the sulfur compounds in our bodies, with the exceptions of sulfate and taurine, must eventually pass through sulfoxidation to become sulfate, the excess of which is excreted in the urine. The key step is the reaction that converts sulfite to sulfate, and this reaction is catalyzed by the enzyme sulfite oxidase. Sulfite oxidase is one of the three enzymes in the human body that require molybdenum as a cofactor. (The other two are xanthine oxidase, which produces uric acid from purines, and aldehyde oxidase, which is involved in the metabolism of alcohol.) In order to be in the active form needed by these enzymes, molybdenum must be incorporated in a substance called molybdopterin. Here's the key point: The synthesis of molybdopterin requires two SULFUR atoms, and they have to come from CYSTEINE! So...there's the vicious circle. Cysteine goes down (because of a set of genetic factors together with some combination of physical, chemical, biological and/or psychological/emotional stressors, which together result in depletion of glutathione, which produces oxidative stress and puts a block into the methylation cycle and/or the transsulfuration pathway), and now you can't make enough molybdopterin, so now you develop a sensitivity to reduced sulfur containing substances, and you can't tolerate ingesting cysteine, which is what you really need! was able to climb out of her vicious circle by taking supplementary molybdenum and Epsom salts and starting with small amounts of reduced sulfur compounds and working up as she could tolerate it. In view of the above, I think I now understand why that worked. (Now I would suggest adding taurine, also.) It is basically a pump-priming operation, as we would call it in engineering. In order to get the pump to pump water, you have to put some water in it. Fortunately, this is possible to do. It isn't easy, and it doesn't happen right away, but I think it will work, at least for many PWCs who have sulfur sensitivity. Now I have to rethink my longstanding explanation for alcohol sensitivity in most PWCs. Is it really due to NAD+ depletion in the liver, producing a combination of hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis, or is it actually due to buildup of acetaldehyde because of a block at aldehyde oxidase as a result of inability to make molybdopterin fast enough? Hmmmmm. Maybe both are involved. The first mechanism would also involve aldehyde buildup, but for a different reason. I guess the way to tell would be to run a blood test for glucose and lactic acid on a PWC who is alcohol-intolerant and has just drunk some alcohol, but I think there would be some ethical issues involved with doing that, aside from the difficulty in recruiting a volunteer! So I guess we'll have to leave that unresolved for now! Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.