Guest guest Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 I'm finally getting around to reading Parcell's article outlining the general points of the methylation cycle and its relationship to health. It's interesting reading -- both to see what I've been doing right all these years, as well as to get direction for what might be done better in the future. Early on in the article, he says: " To determine the therapeutic effect of SAA supplementation in HIV infection, 40 patients with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and 29 patients without ART were given treatment for seven months with approximately 600 mg NAC administered every other day. (35) The main outcome measures were the change in immunological parameters including natural killer (NK) cell and T-cell functions, and the viral load. N-acetylcysteine caused a marked increase in NK cell activity and raised CD4 counts, serum albumin, and glutamine. The immunomodulating effect of NAC supplementation suggests the HIV- induced cysteine depletion may be a way in which the virus compromises the immune defense of the host. " All well and good...but I've been taking 1200 mg of NAC daily (600 morning and night) for over four years now. And when I had my NK cell function tested at FFC a few months ago, the numbers were, to quote the technical phrase used by the doctor, " in the toilet. " Which suggests that, while NAC may boost NK cell activity in HIV patients, it did diddly squat for me. There are obviously a lot of components to this cycle -- I'm not a total science dummy, but I don't expect I'll ever fully understand the chemistry here -- and it seems likely that there's something else that might be missing in this equation. Any thoughts as to what might be missing in this scenario? Thanks, Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 In a message dated 2/19/06 10:26:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mercuria@... writes: Perhaps, in some people, the SAMe doesn't activate. For those people, methionine might do the job instead. Sara Methionine is what becomes activated into SAM-e. Methionine by itself doesn't do much unless it comes bundled in a huge piece of very rare prime rib, mushrooms optional. mjh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2006 Report Share Posted February 19, 2006 On Feb 19, 2006, at 7:09 PM, foxhillers@... wrote: > Did Rich say why he suggests Methione since SAM-e is its activated > form? Not sure; we'd have to ask him. My best guess is that he's trying to open the sulphur pathways in a specific order that systematically ensures that no channel is left unprimed as you move down through the system; and that no potential blockage is left untouched. The protocol seems to be designed (to my untutored eye) to maximize the likelihood that if you can't jimmy a door open one way, you can do it another. Perhaps, in some people, the SAMe doesn't activate. For those people, methionine might do the job instead. > By the way, in about 2001, on cfs_research, Pall suggested I > try TMG > in place of SAM-e to save money. Evidently, for some the TMG > provides the > same benefit. TMG didn't do a whole lot on its own; though today, at least, it seems to be softening the harsher effects of the SAMe a bit. One of the things I plan to do when I've done the whole sequence and have ridden it awhile is (with Rich's guidance. hopefully) see what I can remove from the cycle and still get the benefits. Seems doubtful that I'll need to take all six items indefinitely -- though it that's what it takes, of course, I'll do it. > Keep me posted, please. Thanks. I will. It's really good to not have to be doing this alone. Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.