Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Hi Adrienne: Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is helping people get disability. I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's website if you want to know more. I am getting tested in order to confirm my suspicions and getting in line for whatever treatment might be available in time for this condition, because I am tired of living like a turnip. Helen > Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) > > So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? > Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? > > To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? > > I can see that it certainly would help if you are trying to get on disability. > > Any ideas? At least one person said they were going to Cheney to get tested; did he tell you why to do it? > > Thanks, > Adrienne > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Hi: I would think any dr giving such an important observation concerning ones health would always want data to back up what he has discovered. clearly that's why one sees all of the references in medical journals. sadly the FDA, Soc Sec, etc only look at test results NOT hearsay. Besides isn't most of the medical field more interested in facts than just what you say? If I have a problem I like to have a clear answer to it and I would think that most persons would even if there is no remedy at that time. at least then one would know what to search for a remedy. Dr Cheney has gone through a lot of persecution in the medical field for what he has discovered and yet he has stood by the CFIDS/ME patient. it would only be natural that he would want data to back up what he has learned. just my opinions/thoughts, n. Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? I can see that it certainly would help if you are trying to get on disability. Any ideas? At least one person said they were going to Cheney to get tested; did he tell you why to do it? Thanks, Adrienne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 > Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question > > > Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) > > So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? > Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? > > To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? > You may have a " Q " problem but that is not a clear indicator that the heart is the problem. There are a number of factors that influence cardiac output, blood flow or " Q " . I'm writing an article that I hope will give people a better understanding of " Q " . When you see some of the influencing factors that affect " Q " you will better understand why " Q " is low. It may not neccessarily be a problem with the heart. (although for some people heart problem is a possibility, however, I suspect that the majority of people with CFS-FMS do not have heart problems, but they do have " Q " problems.) All the best, Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Please note that despite whatever Cheney said about heart failure that Peckerman said the findings in the severe CFS patients were on the low end of normal - therefore they probably wouldn't help with disability. helen9jora <helen9jora@...> wrote:Hi Adrienne: Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is helping people get disability. I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's website if you want to know more. I am getting tested in order to confirm my suspicions and getting in line for whatever treatment might be available in time for this condition, because I am tired of living like a turnip. Helen > Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) > > So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? > Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? > > To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? > > I can see that it certainly would help if you are trying to get on disability. > > Any ideas? At least one person said they were going to Cheney to get tested; did he tell you why to do it? > > Thanks, > Adrienne > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 But " Q " is a measure of the heart's functionality at a given moment in time. The correlation is between Q and disability. So, ok, if you are disabled in terms of exertion, you have a Q problem. Unless the research is not adequate or incorrect, degree of disability reveals Q problem. What is the point then in measuring (testing) your Q.? THAT is the question I am asking. Adrienne Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question > > > Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) > > So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? > Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? > > To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? > You may have a " Q " problem but that is not a clear indicator that the heart is the problem. There are a number of factors that influence cardiac output, blood flow or " Q " . I'm writing an article that I hope will give people a better understanding of " Q " . When you see some of the influencing factors that affect " Q " you will better understand why " Q " is low. It may not neccessarily be a problem with the heart. (although for some people heart problem is a possibility, however, I suspect that the majority of people with CFS-FMS do not have heart problems, but they do have " Q " problems.) All the best, Jim This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Gosh, Jim, you are probably correct. I remember reading a study showing that CFSers had 50% smaller adrenal glands than normal controls. (Don't ask me to reference it, I can't remember) That is why CFS/FMS is such a difficult condition to treat. Mike C. > You may have a " Q " problem but that is not a clear indicator that > the heart is the problem. There are a number of factors that > influence cardiac output, blood flow or " Q " . I'm writing an article > that I hope will give people a better understanding of " Q " . When > you see some of the influencing factors that affect " Q " you will > better understand why " Q " is low. It may not neccessarily be a > problem with the heart. (although for some people heart problem is a > possibility, however, I suspect that the majority of people with > CFS-FMS do not have heart problems, but they do have " Q " problems.) > > All the best, > Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 > But " Q " is a measure of the heart's functionality at a given moment in time. " Q " is the measure of blood flow, ie. cardiac output, as determined by Ohm's Law (yes same name as the law which determine the flow of electricity). It is not necessarily a measure of the hearts functionality. The heart can be okay and a person could still experience low " Q " . All the best, Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 FYI- i got a cardiac output (CO) measurement using a test called echocardiogram. The CO was low but the cardiologist insisted that I had a 'normal heart'. He must have said to me 'normal heart' 7-8 times which I guess was an attempt to calm my worries. I don't know if anyone knows, but I would imagine that the echocardiogram test is better recognized by the 99% of asshole docs who know nothing about CFS. (Please pardon my 'French', but I live in Dallas where there aren't any CFS knowledgable docs-everyone has to vent occasionally, I won't do it again). Mike C (the CO test was 12 years ago-I should do it again because my stamina is way down even tho I am active) > " Q " is the measure of blood flow, ie. cardiac output, as determined > by Ohm's Law (yes same name as the law which determine the flow of > electricity). It is not necessarily a measure of the hearts > functionality. The heart can be okay and a person could still > experience low " Q " . > > All the best, > Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 I wonder if I should go hear Cheney speak and ask why the 'Q' test is better than the echocardiogram or stress echo test?? Of course if anyone on this list knows, it could save me from asking a stupid question. I live in Dallas. Mike C. -- In , " helen9jora " <helen9jora@y...> wrote: > Hi Adrienne: > > Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is > helping people get disability. > > I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of > course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. > > He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this > subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's > website if you want to know more. have been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Hi Mike C. Don't ever think that any question is stupid. I used to feel that way and sometimes I still do but I try to ask anyway. Most likely you would be asking a question that everyone else would like to ask. N. Re: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question I wonder if I should go hear Cheney speak and ask why the 'Q' test is better than the echocardiogram or stress echo test?? Of course if anyone on this list knows, it could save me from asking a stupid question. I live in Dallas. Mike C. -- In <mailto: >, " helen9jora " <helen9jora@y<mailto:helen9jora@y>...> wrote: > Hi Adrienne: > > Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is > helping people get disability. > > I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of > course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. > > He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this > subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's > website if you want to know more. have been removed] This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Good observtion. Maybe the 1/2 normal that you refer to below have Lyme or something very similar to CFS/cardiomyopathy. Mike C. > You might reflect on the fact that about half the CFS patients in that study did not have any abnormaliies in stroke volume (Q). In fact if you look at the studies on stroke volume in CFS only one was able to find it without breaking CFS patients into subgroups as Peckerman did. been removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Don't know if this is the type of heart involvement in Cheney's theory, but here are two studies showing heart involvement from Borrelia infection. The first, an animal test, shows that ALL of the animals inoculated with Borrelia developed a heart problem, carditis. The second discusses a specific Borrelia Burgdorferi case reports a heart problem that was resolved, presumably by treatment (the abstract is not clear on this point, but I believe that is what is inferred). --Kurt Lab Invest. 2004 Nov;84(11):1439-50. Cardiac involvement in non-human primates infected with the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Cadavid D, Bai Y, Hodzic E, Narayan K, Barthold SW, Pachner AR. Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. Cadavidi@... To investigate cardiac involvement in the non-human primate (NHP) model of Lyme disease, we inoculated 39 adult Macaca mulatta with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strains N40 (BbN40) by needle (N=22, 14 immunocompetent (IC), seven permanently immunosuppressed (IS), and four transiently immunosuppressed (TISP)) or by tick-bite (N=4, all TISP) or strain 297 (Bb297) by needle (N=2 IS), or with B. garinii strains Pbi (N=4, 2 TISP and 2 IS), 793 (N=2, TISP) or Pli (N=2, TISP). Five uninfected NHPs were used as controls. Infection and inflammation was studied in the hearts and the aorta removed at necropsy 2-32 months after inoculation by (1) H & E and trichrome-staining; (2) immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis; (3) Western blot densitometry; and (4) TaqMan RT-PCR. All NHPs inoculated with BbN40 became infected and showed carditis at necropsy. The predominant cells were T cells, plasma cells, and macrophages. There was increased IgG and IgM in the heart independent of immunosuppression. The B-cell chemokine BLC was significantly increased in IS-NHPs. There was increased deposition of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC) in TISP and IS-NHPs. The spirochetal load was very high in all BbN40-inoculated IS-NHPs but minimal if any in IC or TISP NHPs. Double-immunostaining revealed that many spirochetes in the heart of BbN40-IS NHPs had MAC on their membranes. We conclude that carditis in NHPs infected with B. burgdorferi is frequent and can persist for years but is mild unless they are immunosupressed. Cardiol Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):185-7. Lyme carditis: restitutio ad integrum documented by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Karadag B, Spieker LE, Schwitter J, Ruschitzka F, Luscher TF, Noll G, Corti R. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Lyme disease is a tickborne illness that could cause, weeks to months later, complications involving the joints, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system. We report a case of cardiac manifestation with transitory higher degree atrioventricular block and dysfunction of the left ventricle. Complete resolution without signs of myocardial scar is demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Copyright 2004 Lippincott and Wilkins Publication Types: * Case Reports Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Cheney in his discussion (via Carol) said it is the only test that can be performed sitting upright and that is when the problem manifests, not while lying down. THAT'S what's new!!! Adrienne Re: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question I wonder if I should go hear Cheney speak and ask why the 'Q' test is better than the echocardiogram or stress echo test?? Of course if anyone on this list knows, it could save me from asking a stupid question. I live in Dallas. Mike C. -- In , " helen9jora " <helen9jora@y...> wrote: > Hi Adrienne: > > Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is > helping people get disability. > > I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of > course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. > > He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this > subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's > website if you want to know more. have been removed] This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Theres an interesting connection here - Lerner, who is about the only one who did cardiac research in CFS for years, is now studying Lyme prevalence in CFS - finally someones looking into that. You can check out what he and others are doing at http://www.phoenix-cfs.org/EYE%20ON...The%20Researchers.htm yakcamp22 <yakcamp22@...> wrote: Good observtion. Maybe the 1/2 normal that you refer to below have Lyme or something very similar to CFS/cardiomyopathy. Mike C. > You might reflect on the fact that about half the CFS patients in that study did not have any abnormaliies in stroke volume (Q). In fact if you look at the studies on stroke volume in CFS only one was able to find it without breaking CFS patients into subgroups as Peckerman did. been removed] This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Not a stupid question at all. Cheney is basically saying his test is the only way to diagnose heart malfunction in CFS. We should find out why this particular test as opposed to others is so important. I hope you ask that question and report back the answer. Natasha Vidan <prayjerusalem@...> wrote:Hi Mike C. Don't ever think that any question is stupid. I used to feel that way and sometimes I still do but I try to ask anyway. Most likely you would be asking a question that everyone else would like to ask. N. Re: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question I wonder if I should go hear Cheney speak and ask why the 'Q' test is better than the echocardiogram or stress echo test?? Of course if anyone on this list knows, it could save me from asking a stupid question. I live in Dallas. Mike C. -- In <mailto: >, " helen9jora " <helen9jora@y<mailto:helen9jora@y>...> wrote: > Hi Adrienne: > > Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is > helping people get disability. > > I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of > course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. > > He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this > subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's > website if you want to know more. have been removed] This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Thats a good point. Adrienne <duckblossm@...> wrote: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why would we need to get tested??? Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants more data to accumulate? To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? I can see that it certainly would help if you are trying to get on disability. Any ideas? At least one person said they were going to Cheney to get tested; did he tell you why to do it? Thanks, Adrienne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Thats interesting; it kind of clears up why Lerner is doing a study on lyme in CFS. http://www.phoenix-cfs.org/EYE%20ON...The%20Researchers.htm " Kurt (web) " <kurt@...> wrote: Don't know if this is the type of heart involvement in Cheney's theory, but here are two studies showing heart involvement from Borrelia infection. The first, an animal test, shows that ALL of the animals inoculated with Borrelia developed a heart problem, carditis. The second discusses a specific Borrelia Burgdorferi case reports a heart problem that was resolved, presumably by treatment (the abstract is not clear on this point, but I believe that is what is inferred). --Kurt Lab Invest. 2004 Nov;84(11):1439-50. Cardiac involvement in non-human primates infected with the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Cadavid D, Bai Y, Hodzic E, Narayan K, Barthold SW, Pachner AR. Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. Cadavidi@... To investigate cardiac involvement in the non-human primate (NHP) model of Lyme disease, we inoculated 39 adult Macaca mulatta with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strains N40 (BbN40) by needle (N=22, 14 immunocompetent (IC), seven permanently immunosuppressed (IS), and four transiently immunosuppressed (TISP)) or by tick-bite (N=4, all TISP) or strain 297 (Bb297) by needle (N=2 IS), or with B. garinii strains Pbi (N=4, 2 TISP and 2 IS), 793 (N=2, TISP) or Pli (N=2, TISP). Five uninfected NHPs were used as controls. Infection and inflammation was studied in the hearts and the aorta removed at necropsy 2-32 months after inoculation by (1) H & E and trichrome-staining; (2) immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis; (3) Western blot densitometry; and (4) TaqMan RT-PCR. All NHPs inoculated with BbN40 became infected and showed carditis at necropsy. The predominant cells were T cells, plasma cells, and macrophages. There was increased IgG and IgM in the heart independent of immunosuppression. The B-cell chemokine BLC was significantly increased in IS-NHPs. There was increased deposition of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC) in TISP and IS-NHPs. The spirochetal load was very high in all BbN40-inoculated IS-NHPs but minimal if any in IC or TISP NHPs. Double-immunostaining revealed that many spirochetes in the heart of BbN40-IS NHPs had MAC on their membranes. We conclude that carditis in NHPs infected with B. burgdorferi is frequent and can persist for years but is mild unless they are immunosupressed. Cardiol Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):185-7. Lyme carditis: restitutio ad integrum documented by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Karadag B, Spieker LE, Schwitter J, Ruschitzka F, Luscher TF, Noll G, Corti R. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. Lyme disease is a tickborne illness that could cause, weeks to months later, complications involving the joints, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system. We report a case of cardiac manifestation with transitory higher degree atrioventricular block and dysfunction of the left ventricle. Complete resolution without signs of myocardial scar is demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Copyright 2004 Lippincott and Wilkins Publication Types: * Case Reports Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 Hi Kurt, The " heart problem " that people are speculating on, found in the Peckerman study, and Dr. Cheney's patients, is Diastolic Heart Failure which in turn is causing a cascade of other problems. It would probably help if everyone read the study (tho I have trouble getting through it so far!). Dr. Cheney has alot of interesting things to say about it in transcripts on the DFW website, also. As usual, he'll continue to learn more every week, and from every patient. I think his June lecture will be fascinating. Katrina > Don't know if this is the type of heart involvement in Cheney's theory, > but here are two studies showing heart involvement from Borrelia > infection. > > The first, an animal test, shows that ALL of the animals inoculated with > Borrelia developed a heart problem, carditis. > > The second discusses a specific Borrelia Burgdorferi case reports a > heart problem that was resolved, presumably by treatment (the abstract > is not clear on this point, but I believe that is what is inferred). > > --Kurt > > > > > Lab Invest. 2004 Nov;84(11):1439-50. > > > Cardiac involvement in non-human primates infected with the Lyme disease > spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. > > Cadavid D, Bai Y, Hodzic E, Narayan K, Barthold SW, Pachner AR. > > Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical > School, Newark, NJ, USA. Cadavidi@u... > > To investigate cardiac involvement in the non-human primate (NHP) model > of Lyme disease, we inoculated 39 adult Macaca mulatta with Borrelia > burgdorferi sensu stricto strains N40 (BbN40) by needle (N=22, 14 > immunocompetent (IC), seven permanently immunosuppressed (IS), and four > transiently immunosuppressed (TISP)) or by tick-bite (N=4, all TISP) or > strain 297 (Bb297) by needle (N=2 IS), or with B. garinii strains Pbi > (N=4, 2 TISP and 2 IS), 793 (N=2, TISP) or Pli (N=2, TISP). Five > uninfected NHPs were used as controls. Infection and inflammation was > studied in the hearts and the aorta removed at necropsy 2-32 months > after inoculation by (1) H & E and trichrome-staining; (2) > immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis; (3) Western blot > densitometry; and (4) TaqMan RT-PCR. All NHPs inoculated with BbN40 > became infected and showed carditis at necropsy. The predominant cells > were T cells, plasma cells, and macrophages. There was increased IgG and > IgM in the heart independent of immunosuppression. The B-cell chemokine > BLC was significantly increased in IS-NHPs. There was increased > deposition of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC) in TISP and > IS-NHPs. The spirochetal load was very high in all BbN40-inoculated > IS-NHPs but minimal if any in IC or TISP NHPs. Double-immunostaining > revealed that many spirochetes in the heart of BbN40-IS NHPs had MAC on > their membranes. We conclude that carditis in NHPs infected with B. > burgdorferi is frequent and can persist for years but is mild unless > they are immunosupressed. > > > Cardiol Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):185-7. > > > Lyme carditis: restitutio ad integrum documented by cardiac magnetic > resonance imaging. > > Karadag B, Spieker LE, Schwitter J, Ruschitzka F, Luscher TF, Noll G, > Corti R. > > Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. > > Lyme disease is a tickborne illness that could cause, weeks to months > later, complications involving the joints, central nervous system, and > cardiovascular system. We report a case of cardiac manifestation with > transitory higher degree atrioventricular block and dysfunction of the > left ventricle. Complete resolution without signs of myocardial scar is > demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Copyright 2004 > Lippincott and Wilkins > > Publication Types: > * Case Reports > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 There seems to be some confusion about some of the info below. Here's my take on the Key Points from part one (section 1A) of Dr. Cheney's comments as reported by Carol - Cheney is commenting on the study headed by Arnold Peckerman. My summary of key points: 1) Q (cardiac output)correlated with level of disablility in CFIDS 2) ALL DISABLED CFIDS patients have post exertional fatique & low Q. (Only 60% non-disabled & no FM patients have low Q/post-exertional fatigue. FM patients can exercise and feel better.) 3) Dr. Cheney recommends using the Impedance Cardiography test to measure Q - (NOT ANY OTHER TEST- see his comments) 4) The test needs to be done standing (and if possible in 4 positions) 5) University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as a valid measurement of Q. This algorithm must be used for the test in order to be valid. 6) This is the ONLY TEST EVER that can measure level of disability in a PWC. This is significant & was the point of the study - to find a way to measure CFIDS disability. Funded by Nat'l Institutes of Health. 7) Dr. Cheney's last sentence in this section is significant: " More importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " BELOW IS THE LINK FOR PART 1A OF DR. CHENEY'S COMMENTS IN CAROL'S REPORT: http://www.virtualhometown.com/dfwcfids/medical/cheney/heart04.part1a. htm HERE ARE EXCEPT FROM THE 1ST SECTION [1A] A " Q " Problem " Q " stands for cardiac output in liters per minute. " Q " in CFIDS patients correlated—with great precision —with the level of disability as judged by validated clinical questionnaires that asked about activities of daily living. The Test: Impedance Cardiograph " Then they measured Q, using impedance cardiography. This technology allows one to accurately measure the cardiac output using the idea that the resistance a current has, passed through your chest, is a function of the blood flow through it. The University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as a valid measurement of Q. The point is that Medicare pays for this. It's been clinically validated by a government agency and is not considered experimental or research—as long as you use this algorithm. That's important, because whenever this test result filters back to a cardiologist, the first thing many say is, well, but, you know, that's not accurate. And indeed, it may not be accurate, depending on the machine and the algorithm it uses. " By the way, there's one other important detail. Unlike all other measures of cardiac output, this is the only one that can be done in the upright position. Which, as you'll find out in a second, was a critical step. Absolutely critical. All other cardiac output measurements are done in the supine position—laying down. " [To detect the heart problem in CFS patients, it has to be done both lying down and standing up. If you can manage the whole test, it's preferred to take readings in four positions on a tilt table.] When [disabled CFIDS patients] stand up, [they're] on the edge of organ failure due to low cardiac output. " When they looked at the test result statistics, disability correlated with Q! P Value: " Q " Correlates with Degree of Disability ....those that were disabled was exactly proportional to the severity of their " Q " defect—without exception, and with scientific precision by virtue of their most disabling symptom, post-exertional fatigue. WOW. WOW! " Dr. Cheney continued, " And I'll tell you, it's profound because no other paper that I know of has been published in 20 years that can give a number which so precisely correlates with the level of disability. There's nothing out there. Believe me—nothing exists. Not RNase L, not immune-activation levels, not SED rates. NOTHING has this sort of correlation with disability that I know of. " Post-Exertional Fatigue Indicates a " Q " Problem Next, the NJ team looked to see if there were any symptoms that were 100% observable in the group of disabled cases, but not in the others. They found that there was only one symptom (among the loooong list of CFIDS symptoms) that was seen in 100% of the patients with the Q problem. Only one. Post-exertional fatigue. That is, when you push yourself physically, you get worse. What distinguishes CFIDS from FM? Post-exertional fatigue. Patients who have FM, but not CFIDS, can exercise—it helps them. FM patients do not have a Q problem. MCS patients do not have a Q problem. [unless they also have CFIDS.] They do have other issues that overlap with CFIDS. Pall's conceptual framework allows us to lump these people all together (FM, MCS, GWS, CFIDS). However, Q is what separates them. CFIDS patients have a big Q problem, and post- exertional fatigue is the one symptom that correlates with Q. Post-exertional fatigue is the number one symptom reported by people with ICM (Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy). Though some symptoms were certainly more common among the disabled patients, the symptoms varied—with the exception of post-exertional fatigue. They all had that. ....ALL DISABLED PATIENTS HAVE THAT, and 60% of non-disabled have that. " " More importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 nailed it. It is the " loading " of the heart, by standing, that reveals the low output. Other output tests (if I am not mistaken) can only sample Q when the patient is lying down. Lying down CFS patients, with a Q deficit, will have less of a load on their hearts and will therefore typically be able to function in the low normal range of Q. So the Q deficit is typically overlooked. The impedance cardiograph/Minnesota algorhythim has been a step forward in understanding this aspect of some cases of CFS. I would say it helps us parce out a new subset of " CFS " , from a broader group. [Or it may be that many, even most, CFS cases are progressing towards this eventuality, just that some are more resistant than others.] Too, the feedback loop to Pall's work is in play to obscure seeing this, i.e. CFS patients aren't dying like they should, given that they have cardiomyopathy. Thus, the typically used testing technology (echo?); and the fact that most CFS patients with heart failure do not progess along the normal course of heart failure (to death or transplant); has combined to obscure this aspect of CFS until now. Zippy - Life: the world's foremost sexually transmitted disease, and it's fatal. =================================================== > There seems to be some confusion about some of the info below. Here's > my take on the Key Points from part one (section 1A) of Dr. Cheney's > comments as reported by Carol - Cheney is commenting on the study > headed by Arnold Peckerman. > > My summary of key points: > 1) Q (cardiac output)correlated with level of disablility in CFIDS > 2) ALL DISABLED CFIDS patients have post exertional fatique & low Q. > (Only 60% non-disabled & no FM patients have low Q/post-exertional > fatigue. FM patients can exercise and feel better.) > 3) Dr. Cheney recommends using the Impedance Cardiography test to > measure Q - (NOT ANY OTHER TEST- see his comments) > 4) The test needs to be done standing (and if possible in 4 positions) > 5) University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as > a valid measurement of Q. This algorithm must be used for the test in > order to be valid. > 6) This is the ONLY TEST EVER that can measure level of disability in > a PWC. This is significant & was the point of the study - to find a > way to measure CFIDS disability. Funded by Nat'l Institutes of Health. > 7) Dr. Cheney's last sentence in this section is significant: " More > importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- > exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " > > BELOW IS THE LINK FOR PART 1A OF DR. CHENEY'S COMMENTS IN CAROL'S > REPORT: > http://www.virtualhometown.com/dfwcfids/medical/cheney/heart04.part1a. > htm > > HERE ARE EXCEPT FROM THE 1ST SECTION [1A] > > A " Q " Problem > > " Q " stands for cardiac output in liters per minute. " Q " in CFIDS > patients correlated—with great precision —with the level of > disability as judged by validated clinical questionnaires that asked > about activities of daily living. > > The Test: Impedance Cardiograph > > " Then they measured Q, using impedance cardiography. This technology > allows one to accurately measure the cardiac output using the idea > that the resistance a current has, passed through your chest, is a > function of the blood flow through it. > > The University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as > a valid measurement of Q. The point is that Medicare pays for this. > It's been clinically validated by a government agency and is not > considered experimental or research—as long as you use this > algorithm. That's important, because whenever this test result > filters back to a cardiologist, the first thing many say is, well, > but, you know, that's not accurate. And indeed, it may not be > accurate, depending on the machine and the algorithm it uses. > > " By the way, there's one other important detail. Unlike all other > measures of cardiac output, this is the only one that can be done in > the upright position. Which, as you'll find out in a second, was a > critical step. Absolutely critical. All other cardiac output > measurements are done in the supine position—laying down. " [To detect > the heart problem in CFS patients, it has to be done both lying down > and standing up. If you can manage the whole test, it's preferred to > take readings in four positions on a tilt table.] > > When [disabled CFIDS patients] stand up, [they're] on the edge of > organ failure due to low cardiac output. " > > When they looked at the test result statistics, disability correlated > with Q! > > P Value: " Q " Correlates with Degree of Disability > > ...those that were disabled was exactly proportional to the severity > of their " Q " defect—without exception, and with scientific precision > by virtue of their most disabling symptom, post-exertional fatigue. > WOW. WOW! " > > Dr. Cheney continued, " And I'll tell you, it's profound because no > other paper that I know of has been published in 20 years that can > give a number which so precisely correlates with the level of > disability. There's nothing out there. Believe me—nothing exists. Not > RNase L, not immune-activation levels, not SED rates. NOTHING has > this sort of correlation with disability that I know of. " > > Post-Exertional Fatigue Indicates a " Q " Problem > > Next, the NJ team looked to see if there were any symptoms that were > 100% observable in the group of disabled cases, but not in the > others. They found that there was only one symptom (among the loooong > list of CFIDS symptoms) that was seen in 100% of the patients with > the Q problem. Only one. Post-exertional fatigue. That is, when you > push yourself physically, you get worse. > > What distinguishes CFIDS from FM? Post-exertional fatigue. Patients > who have FM, but not CFIDS, can exercise—it helps them. FM patients > do not have a Q problem. MCS patients do not have a Q problem. > [unless they also have CFIDS.] They do have other issues that overlap > with CFIDS. Pall's conceptual framework allows us to lump > these people all together (FM, MCS, GWS, CFIDS). However, Q is what > separates them. CFIDS patients have a big Q problem, and post- > exertional fatigue is the one symptom that correlates with Q. > > Post-exertional fatigue is the number one symptom reported by people > with ICM (Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy). Though some symptoms were > certainly more common among the disabled patients, the symptoms > varied—with the exception of post-exertional fatigue. They all had > that. > > ...ALL DISABLED PATIENTS HAVE THAT, and 60% of non-disabled have > that. " > > " More importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- > exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 Jim, thank you for this info, I look forward to reading your article, do you think the low blood volume found in CFS patients could be at the heart of this problem and the channelopahty problems? BW, Sheila Saturday, May 14, 2005, 4:52:57 PM, you wrote: >> Reviewing Cheney's heart info. t> Testing?? Question >> >> >> Finally able to settle into the Cheney materials we received t> recently from Carol; he is saying there is a clearcut correlation t> between the Q value and the degree of disability for people who get t> sicker from exertion. Period.(I am one of those people. I am t> seriously thinking of moving to a lower altitude.) >> >> So close a correlation that if you have the post-exertional t> malaise, you have a heart problem was his statement. Therefore, why t> would we need to get tested??? >> Unless Cheney is not entirely confident in the study and wants t> more data to accumulate? >> >> To " prove " it to some doc we are seeing? >> t> You may have a " Q " problem but that is not a clear indicator that t> the heart is the problem. There are a number of factors that t> influence cardiac output, blood flow or " Q " . I'm writing an article t> that I hope will give people a better understanding of " Q " . When t> you see some of the influencing factors that affect " Q " you will t> better understand why " Q " is low. It may not neccessarily be a t> problem with the heart. (although for some people heart problem is a t> possibility, however, I suspect that the majority of people with t> CFS-FMS do not have heart problems, but they do have " Q " problems.) t> All the best, t> Jim t> This list is intended for patients to share personal t> experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you t> are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your t> doctor. t> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 This is interesting, as that is a left ventricle problem, which is exactly what shows up in the abstract about the Lyme case (Below). Also, I believe that salt/c would be one therapy for this problem because it will support the BP. Maybe salt/c is a diauretic, which is also recommended for diastolic problems. hmm. Maybe yet another benefit being seen from salt/c. --Kurt Re: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question Hi Kurt, The " heart problem " that people are speculating on, found in the Peckerman study, and Dr. Cheney's patients, is Diastolic Heart Failure which in turn is causing a cascade of other problems. It would probably help if everyone read the study (tho I have trouble getting through it so far!). Dr. Cheney has alot of interesting things to say about it in transcripts on the DFW website, also. As usual, he'll continue to learn more every week, and from every patient. I think his June lecture will be fascinating. Katrina > Don't know if this is the type of heart involvement in Cheney's theory, > but here are two studies showing heart involvement from Borrelia > infection. > > The first, an animal test, shows that ALL of the animals inoculated with > Borrelia developed a heart problem, carditis. > > The second discusses a specific Borrelia Burgdorferi case reports a > heart problem that was resolved, presumably by treatment (the abstract > is not clear on this point, but I believe that is what is inferred). > > --Kurt > > > > > Lab Invest. 2004 Nov;84(11):1439-50. > > > Cardiac involvement in non-human primates infected with the Lyme disease > spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. > > Cadavid D, Bai Y, Hodzic E, Narayan K, Barthold SW, Pachner AR. > > Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical > School, Newark, NJ, USA. Cadavidi@u... > > To investigate cardiac involvement in the non-human primate (NHP) model > of Lyme disease, we inoculated 39 adult Macaca mulatta with Borrelia > burgdorferi sensu stricto strains N40 (BbN40) by needle (N=22, 14 > immunocompetent (IC), seven permanently immunosuppressed (IS), and four > transiently immunosuppressed (TISP)) or by tick-bite (N=4, all TISP) or > strain 297 (Bb297) by needle (N=2 IS), or with B. garinii strains Pbi > (N=4, 2 TISP and 2 IS), 793 (N=2, TISP) or Pli (N=2, TISP). Five > uninfected NHPs were used as controls. Infection and inflammation was > studied in the hearts and the aorta removed at necropsy 2-32 months > after inoculation by (1) H & E and trichrome-staining; (2) > immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis; (3) Western blot > densitometry; and (4) TaqMan RT-PCR. All NHPs inoculated with BbN40 > became infected and showed carditis at necropsy. The predominant cells > were T cells, plasma cells, and macrophages. There was increased IgG and > IgM in the heart independent of immunosuppression. The B-cell chemokine > BLC was significantly increased in IS-NHPs. There was increased > deposition of the complement membrane attack complex (MAC) in TISP and > IS-NHPs. The spirochetal load was very high in all BbN40-inoculated > IS-NHPs but minimal if any in IC or TISP NHPs. Double-immunostaining > revealed that many spirochetes in the heart of BbN40-IS NHPs had MAC on > their membranes. We conclude that carditis in NHPs infected with B. > burgdorferi is frequent and can persist for years but is mild unless > they are immunosupressed. > > > Cardiol Rev. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(4):185-7. > > > Lyme carditis: restitutio ad integrum documented by cardiac magnetic > resonance imaging. > > Karadag B, Spieker LE, Schwitter J, Ruschitzka F, Luscher TF, Noll G, > Corti R. > > Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. > > Lyme disease is a tickborne illness that could cause, weeks to months > later, complications involving the joints, central nervous system, and > cardiovascular system. We report a case of cardiac manifestation with > transitory higher degree atrioventricular block and dysfunction of the > left ventricle. Complete resolution without signs of myocardial scar is > demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Copyright 2004 > Lippincott and Wilkins > > Publication Types: > * Case Reports > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 I'm not sure why he said that. In his interview with Immune Support Peckerman stated CFS patients relative to controls showed even greater reductions in cardiac output when lying down. This is why he discounts reduced blood volume as a cause. Adrienne <duckblossm@...> wrote:Cheney in his discussion (via Carol) said it is the only test that can be performed sitting upright and that is when the problem manifests, not while lying down. THAT'S what's new!!! Adrienne Re: Reviewing Cheney's heart info. Testing?? Question I wonder if I should go hear Cheney speak and ask why the 'Q' test is better than the echocardiogram or stress echo test?? Of course if anyone on this list knows, it could save me from asking a stupid question. I live in Dallas. Mike C. -- In , " helen9jora " <helen9jora@y...> wrote: > Hi Adrienne: > > Yes, it's useful for disability, I believe a lot of his practice is > helping people get disability. > > I decided to go there after reading the material Carol posted, and of > course I haven't spoken to Cheney yet. > > He is giving a talk on June 18th in Dallas that will be on this > subject and I think you can buy a video or whatever from Carol's > website if you want to know more. have been removed] This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 Thats actually not true. If you look at the Peckerman 2003 paper both charts for cardiac output and symptom expression and cardiac output while supine and standing are measured in liters/minute. The supine/standing chart actually says 'Q' while the symptom one does not. The 1999 study also measured cardiac output in liters per minute. I think stroke volume and Q are the same. Both studies only used impedance cardiography. Another note on the 2003 study; yes exercise intolerance and fever/chills were correlated with Q but look at all the things that have been associated with CFS that were not; memory/concentration, swollen lymph nodes, 'weakness', joint pain, unrefreshing sleep and sore throat. In fact the more severe CFS patients had significantly better memory/concentration than the less severe CFS patients! Very strange. It makes one wonder a bit about the whole symptom thing. Cort and Adrienne, I think y'all might be confusing the 2 Peckerman papers. Q is NOT stroke volume (SV), it is a rate of flow measured in liters per minute. The second Peckerman paper is what measured Q and found very high correlation with symptom severity, (flu-like symptoms more than P-EM). Cheney is more exited about the second paper than the first. Tim Y'all wrote, " You might reflect on the fact that about half the CFS patients in that study did not have any abnormaliies in stroke volume (Q). " ---------------------------------------------- But that's because they " had " CFS/ME by case definition, whereby post-exertional malaise (P-EM) is only a minor and not a major criterion for that diagnosis. That is, you can get the diagnosis without having the exertion problem. The demonstration is only of correlation between P-EM and Q value. " This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 15, 2005 Report Share Posted May 15, 2005 She didnt nail it because she only listened to Cheney. If you read the interview with Peckerman, the author of the study, that Carol listed in her paper, you'll see that amount of cardiac output in CFS patients relative to the controls was LOWER when they were lying down. This is why Peckerman suggests low blood volume is not the cause of the reduced stroke volume. It also indicates the heart has a problem dealing with more blood. Peckerman says both values are at the low end of NORMAL. bhp355 <zippy890@...> wrote: nailed it. It is the " loading " of the heart, by standing, that reveals the low output. Other output tests (if I am not mistaken) can only sample Q when the patient is lying down. Lying down CFS patients, with a Q deficit, will have less of a load on their hearts and will therefore typically be able to function in the low normal range of Q. So the Q deficit is typically overlooked. The impedance cardiograph/Minnesota algorhythim has been a step forward in understanding this aspect of some cases of CFS. I would say it helps us parce out a new subset of " CFS " , from a broader group. [Or it may be that many, even most, CFS cases are progressing towards this eventuality, just that some are more resistant than others.] Too, the feedback loop to Pall's work is in play to obscure seeing this, i.e. CFS patients aren't dying like they should, given that they have cardiomyopathy. Thus, the typically used testing technology (echo?); and the fact that most CFS patients with heart failure do not progess along the normal course of heart failure (to death or transplant); has combined to obscure this aspect of CFS until now. Zippy - Life: the world's foremost sexually transmitted disease, and it's fatal. =================================================== > There seems to be some confusion about some of the info below. Here's > my take on the Key Points from part one (section 1A) of Dr. Cheney's > comments as reported by Carol - Cheney is commenting on the study > headed by Arnold Peckerman. > > My summary of key points: > 1) Q (cardiac output)correlated with level of disablility in CFIDS > 2) ALL DISABLED CFIDS patients have post exertional fatique & low Q. > (Only 60% non-disabled & no FM patients have low Q/post-exertional > fatigue. FM patients can exercise and feel better.) > 3) Dr. Cheney recommends using the Impedance Cardiography test to > measure Q - (NOT ANY OTHER TEST- see his comments) > 4) The test needs to be done standing (and if possible in 4 positions) > 5) University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as > a valid measurement of Q. This algorithm must be used for the test in > order to be valid. > 6) This is the ONLY TEST EVER that can measure level of disability in > a PWC. This is significant & was the point of the study - to find a > way to measure CFIDS disability. Funded by Nat'l Institutes of Health. > 7) Dr. Cheney's last sentence in this section is significant: " More > importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- > exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " > > BELOW IS THE LINK FOR PART 1A OF DR. CHENEY'S COMMENTS IN CAROL'S > REPORT: > http://www.virtualhometown.com/dfwcfids/medical/cheney/heart04.part1a. > htm > > HERE ARE EXCEPT FROM THE 1ST SECTION [1A] > > A " Q " Problem > > " Q " stands for cardiac output in liters per minute. " Q " in CFIDS > patients correlated—with great precision —with the level of > disability as judged by validated clinical questionnaires that asked > about activities of daily living. > > The Test: Impedance Cardiograph > > " Then they measured Q, using impedance cardiography. This technology > allows one to accurately measure the cardiac output using the idea > that the resistance a current has, passed through your chest, is a > function of the blood flow through it. > > The University of Minnesota algorithm has been approved by the FDA as > a valid measurement of Q. The point is that Medicare pays for this. > It's been clinically validated by a government agency and is not > considered experimental or research—as long as you use this > algorithm. That's important, because whenever this test result > filters back to a cardiologist, the first thing many say is, well, > but, you know, that's not accurate. And indeed, it may not be > accurate, depending on the machine and the algorithm it uses. > > " By the way, there's one other important detail. Unlike all other > measures of cardiac output, this is the only one that can be done in > the upright position. Which, as you'll find out in a second, was a > critical step. Absolutely critical. All other cardiac output > measurements are done in the supine position—laying down. " [To detect > the heart problem in CFS patients, it has to be done both lying down > and standing up. If you can manage the whole test, it's preferred to > take readings in four positions on a tilt table.] > > When [disabled CFIDS patients] stand up, [they're] on the edge of > organ failure due to low cardiac output. " > > When they looked at the test result statistics, disability correlated > with Q! > > P Value: " Q " Correlates with Degree of Disability > > ...those that were disabled was exactly proportional to the severity > of their " Q " defect—without exception, and with scientific precision > by virtue of their most disabling symptom, post-exertional fatigue. > WOW. WOW! " > > Dr. Cheney continued, " And I'll tell you, it's profound because no > other paper that I know of has been published in 20 years that can > give a number which so precisely correlates with the level of > disability. There's nothing out there. Believe me—nothing exists. Not > RNase L, not immune-activation levels, not SED rates. NOTHING has > this sort of correlation with disability that I know of. " > > Post-Exertional Fatigue Indicates a " Q " Problem > > Next, the NJ team looked to see if there were any symptoms that were > 100% observable in the group of disabled cases, but not in the > others. They found that there was only one symptom (among the loooong > list of CFIDS symptoms) that was seen in 100% of the patients with > the Q problem. Only one. Post-exertional fatigue. That is, when you > push yourself physically, you get worse. > > What distinguishes CFIDS from FM? Post-exertional fatigue. Patients > who have FM, but not CFIDS, can exercise—it helps them. FM patients > do not have a Q problem. MCS patients do not have a Q problem. > [unless they also have CFIDS.] They do have other issues that overlap > with CFIDS. Pall's conceptual framework allows us to lump > these people all together (FM, MCS, GWS, CFIDS). However, Q is what > separates them. CFIDS patients have a big Q problem, and post- > exertional fatigue is the one symptom that correlates with Q. > > Post-exertional fatigue is the number one symptom reported by people > with ICM (Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy). Though some symptoms were > certainly more common among the disabled patients, the symptoms > varied—with the exception of post-exertional fatigue. They all had > that. > > ...ALL DISABLED PATIENTS HAVE THAT, and 60% of non-disabled have > that. " > > " More importantly, all disabled CFIDS patients, all of whom have post- > exertional fatigue, have low " Q " and are in heart failure. " This list is intended for patients to share personal experiences with each other, not to give medical advice. If you are interested in any treatment discussed here, please consult your doctor. --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.