Guest guest Posted September 22, 2004 Report Share Posted September 22, 2004 I am sorry I don't follow this email list as often as I used to. I am so involved with the Marshall Protocol and just can't keep up with everything. Since I wrote the article on Zadaxin and tried it for 6 months I now believe it is not appropriate for cfs, fms or Lyme disease. It is probably very good for AIDS and hepatitis. The problem is that in cfs I no longer think we are Th 2 shifted. We have elevated cytokines, in particular IFN gamma and TNF alpha which is Th 1 overactivation. It took me awhile to accept this, especially since I had researched Zadaxin and paid out of pocket to buy it. One simple reason I now think Zadaxin is more suitable for viral infections is that when you measure the D levels 25 D and 1,25 D in AIDS and hepatitis patients their 1,25 D level is almost nonexistent. Our 1,25 D level is usually high indicating inflammation caused by intracellular bacterial infection. The bacteria actually produce excess 1,25 D to enable them to enter and exist cells. You can read more on this at http://www.marshallprotocol.com. So far after 4 plus months I am gradually improving. I am certainly far better than I was on Zadaxin and mega antibiotics for Lyme disease. Thanks for reading, and I will try to check back here soon. a Carnes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.