Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 So how do vegetarians keep a low carb hi protien diet for CFS? I eat alot of almonds but worry about counteracting lysine, and Amy;s frozen rice and bean burritos, veggie burgers, goat yoghurt and Ezekiel bread which is supposed to be high protein for bread. Is it bad for Candida? I am eating more eggs since hearing about the high protein needs, and some salmon burgers. Not a true vegetarian but if I prepare fish or any meat quickly become nauseated by it all. Also almost a scoop of Immunepro. Does anyone have suggestions? Thank you, kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 There was discussion sometime around a year ago about people who felt ill (nauseated) by eating meat. You might be able to find some info in the archives. Doris Not a true vegetarian but if I prepare fish or any meat quickly become nauseated by it all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 I was a vegetarian for 25 years, and found it almost impossible to be low carb on a vegetarian diet, even though I had become very knowledgeable about nutrition over the years, and even helped to teach nutrition classes for vegetarians. Protein foods like beans and nuts are high carbohydrate. So are almonds, by the way. Things like soy milk are terribly high carbohydrate because of the added sweeteners. And so many vegetarian dishes substitute carbohydrate rich foods for some of the protein of meat dishes. For example, instead of meat loaf, there are vegetarian loaves that use a lot of grain or cereal in them, seeds and nuts that have a lot of carbohydrates, and then something to bind it together that sometimes includes flour, or other high carbohydrate binders. It was easier to focus on low glycemic index foods on a vegetarian diet, rather than low carbohydrate. Because at least there are some low glycemic index foods that are still high carbohydrate. Aside from eggs and eating allot of cheese, it gets really tough to be low carbohydrate. I found it to be almost impossible to eat an anti-candida diet as a vegetarian, because so many of the high protein foods are also high carb and high sugar content. And eating lots of eggs and cheese as the primary proteins can end up causing food allergies to them. The foods you mentioned, although they are supposed to be high protein, they are also high carbohydrate. I finally gave up and started eating meat. You might consider that you aren't producing enough hydrochloric acid, or have sufficient digestive enzymes, both of which can be taken as supplements to solve the nausea problem. (Actually, I found that Deglycerizinated Licorice Extract helped me deal with nausea, which was being caused by increased stomach acid to digest the harder to digest proteins of meat) But nausea can also be caused by food allergies. And if you have leaky gut problems, it makes sense that the high protein foods would be most likely to trigger an allergic response, since the cause of allergies is undigested proteins being able to get into the blood stream. (there can also be intolerances, but with leaky gut, allergies are a major problem) In my case, I've used BioSET to help correct the food allergies so I wouldn't have to be so obsessive about avoiding specific foods. Many people do avoidance diets. But it's really hard to do when you're already limiting food choices by being a vegetarian. The more you limit food choices, the harder it gets to prevent new food allergies from forming, because you end up eating the same foods more frequently. The more a food is eaten, the more likely you are to develop an allergy to it. There are only a few grams of protein in a scoop of ImmunePro, so I don't consider it to be a good source of protein if you are doing a high protein/low carb diet. I did find a muscle building whey formula that is really packed with protein made by Healthy N' Fit International, called 100% Whey Pro-Amino, that has 45 grams of protein per scoop, and is sweetened with stevia, so it is low carb. It isn't a substitute for ImmunePro, but it is a very high protein/low carbohydrate food that a vegetarian could eat to help meet protein needs. lindaj@... Re: Low Carb Diet for Vegetarians > So how do vegetarians keep a low carb hi protien diet for CFS? I eat alot of > almonds but worry about counteracting lysine, and Amy;s frozen rice and bean > burritos, veggie burgers, goat yoghurt and Ezekiel bread which is supposed > to be high protein for bread. Is it bad for Candida? I am eating more eggs > since hearing about the high protein needs, and some salmon burgers. Not a > true vegetarian but if I prepare fish or any meat quickly become nauseated by > it all. Also almost a scoop of Immunepro. Does anyone have suggestions? > Thank you, kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 In a message dated 2/1/2004 12:59:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, lindaj@... writes: > And from what I've now read, neurological problems in vegetarian > and vegan children occur at a higher percentage than among meat eaters Would you please cite these if they are scientific articles. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I was a vegetarian for 15 years. I started eating meat a few years ago when I kept seeing a common thread on this list and elsewhere in the CFIDS community -- that a disproportionately high number of us were vegetarians when we got sick. I find this disturbing, and I think Rich's explanation does the best job of capturing why it might be true. However, I still really don't crave meat. Even though I take Betaine HCL to aid in the digestion, I find that I do better with eggs and other alternate sources of protein. I do eat meat though, and I agree that red meat -- used somewhat sparingly, because more doesn't seem to be better -- always gives energy. I eat chicken pretty regularly now, with less frequent doses of beef. I was completely grossed out when I started eating meat, so I understand anyone's hesitation. Because vegetarianism was a conscience issue for me, I still feel a lot more comfortable eating free range chickens and humanely raised beef. When it grossed me out, I simply thought of it as taking medicine and forced it down. Peggy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 Hi, rhoodwhite and the group. On the question of eating meat in CFS vs. eating a vegetarian diet plus eggs and milk-based products, yes, you would be getting the same amino acids as if you ate meat. However, I think it's important to note that the total quantity of protein one eats is also important. Meat is a very concentrated source of protein, so having meat in the diet tends to raise the total protein intake on the average. It also seems to be beneficial to many PWCs to minimize their carbohydrate intake, especially sugars and starches, which are found in many plant-based foods. I can't speak for Mike C., but perhaps he was addressing those who eat only plant-based food. In that case, it is more difficult to achieve a high protein, low carbohydrate diet, because of the composition of plant foods. In addition, some essential nutrients are particularly likely to be low in a diet that is entirely plant- based. Vitamin B-12 is probably the one that shows up to be deficient first on such a diet, but there are others that are difficult to get in sufficient amounts from plants as well. Cysteine is an amino acid that is not found in high amounts in plant- based protein, and it is usually the rate-limiting amino acid for making glutathione in the body. I believe that glutathione depletion is one of the central issues in the pathogenesis of CFS for many or most PWCs. Many PWCs do not metabolize carbohydrates well, but most are able to use protein well. I think this is a result of partial blockades in the Krebs cycles of the red, " slow-twitch, type I skeletal muscle cells, and perhaps other types of cells as well, resulting from glutathione depletion and the rise of peroxynitrite. Carbohydrates must enter the Krebs cycle upstream of the first blockade. On the other hand, protein supplies amino acids, which can be interconverted to some extent with the help of vitamin B-6, magnesium, and other cofactors. Some of the resulting amino acids can enter the Krebs cycle downstream of the blockades. I think this the reason protein can be utilized better by PWCs. Carbohydrates, on the other hand, get trapped cycling between lactic acid or pyruvate and glucose. If more glucose is added by consuming carbohydrates, the pancreas is forced to raise insulin to the point that the excess glucose is converted to stored fat, producing weight gain. The high insulin surges can then be followed by hypoglycemia. This is called reactive hypoglycemia. Until a way is found to get rid of the partial blockades by raising the glutathione back up (which is difficult because of vicious circles that develop over the course of time the PWC is ill), it's best to emphasize a high protein, low carbohydrate diet, and eating meat will help to achieve this. Rich > In a message dated 1/31/2004 9:18:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, > yakcamp22@a... writes: > > > For all you 'vegies', get off your high horse and try some " flesh " , > > you may really like it *and* your body may need it. > > > > Could you please explain to me how the amino acids found in " flesh " are > different from the amino acids which you can obtain in eating complementary > proteins (plant based + eggs + milk-based products)? Also, please explain to me why > you *believe* that vegetarians are on a " high horse " ????? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I think because they are much closer to our own tissues. Probably having the different amino's in the correct proportions makes a difference. But we are very pragmatic here; the most important thing we get here are the collective results of experiments we do on ourselves. (It's a rough kind of science we are doing.) And the consensus says flesh works better. Inquiring minds often like to know why, but it isn't always necessary, nor possible. Maybe Rich or someone more biochemically hip than me will have a technical answer for you. In my case, I tried doing fowl and a little fish only. I did poorly. I didn't know what was wrong, but one day I gave into the craving for a burger and wowie; like being shot from guns. My experiments turned in the direction of burgers (so to speak). I found I needed some about every 10 days, but that if I ate beef too often I got heavy and sluggish.I have no idea why it needed to be red meat: who cares, I do what works. Nowadays I have been eating buffalo meat (VERY lean) and I discover I can eat it even more often than I was eating beef before (w.out getting sluggish-and w.out the fat), and my energy/endurance is going up! As for high horses, I apologize on behalf of my colleague. Please, let's get well together. Adrienne Re: Re: Low Carb Diet for Vegetarians In a message dated 1/31/2004 9:18:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, yakcamp22@... writes: > For all you 'vegies', get off your high horse and try some " flesh " , > you may really like it *and* your body may need it. > Could you please explain to me how the amino acids found in " flesh " are different from the amino acids which you can obtain in eating complementary proteins (plant based + eggs + milk-based products)? Also, please explain to me why you *believe* that vegetarians are on a " high horse " ????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 Because of the metabolic problems, I think that there are other amino acids besides cysteine that might be low. Taurine is an example of an amino acid that is not essential for most people, but for me seems to be essential, and I have to supplement. There can also be problems metabolizing things like Omega 3 oils from plant sources, or synthesizing Vitamin A from beta carotene. Another thing that might be in short supply might be steric acid, which is a primary source of energy for the heart, found in beef. I've always had abnormally low cholesterol, and I seem to benefit from eating a high cholesterol diet, especially in light of using things to help detox that also deplete cholesterol. Since the neurotoxins get bound with cholesterol and excreted with bile, it seems that having abnormally low cholesterol levels might restrict the ability to get rid of the neurotoxins. And a vegan diet tends to lower cholesterol levels even more. lindaj@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 Since you asked for it, you got it: Unfortunately, the amino acids found in plants don't include some amino acids that the body might otherwise synthesize, but in PWC's, those amino acids may not be readily synthesized because of metabolic problems, poor digestion, anaerobic metabolism, etc. Taurine is a prime example. It is not found in plant sources, and is often deficient in PWC's. Many other non-essential amino acids may also be in short supply in PWC's. So eating a plant based diet, which might be sufficient for a normal, healthy person, may not be sufficient for a PWC, and may actually be downright harmful. This may explain the research on the Halaleujia diet that found that it benefited about 1/3 of people with FM, (which they tend to focus on, and use as a reason to promote it's use for everyone with FM) didn't do anything beneficial or harmful to about 1/3, and made approximately 1/3 worse. It clearly was not meeting the nutritional needs of the 1/3 that were harmed by it, even though it is claimed to be a complete and balanced diet. And many of the people who were on the diet, claimed they struggled with food cravings, which might indicate they were not getting as much nutrition as their body would have liked, even if it was sufficient for basic needs. Not to mention that when the study was over, none of the subjects remained on the diet, including the ones that were helped by it. But what they don't generally publicize, is that many of the test subjects didn't fit the diagnosis of FM at the time of the study. In all likelihood, they were the ones who benefited from the diet, or weren't harmed by it, because they in fact didn't actually have FM. (Kind of reminds me of how Wessley skews research by including subjects that don't actually have CFS)Doesn't say much for the Halaleujia diet. Since FM and CFS have a lot of overlap, I think there is also a lot of overlap of PWC's who also don't benefit from a vegan diet, and are actually harmed by it. But it's really hard to tell without having unbiased research done. And then there are the people who genetically lack the ability to metabolize plant based Omega 3 oils, such as coastal Native Americans, Japanese, Norwegians, etc. Over the centuries, they lost the ability to metabolize Omega 3s from plant sources because their fish-based diets were so high in Omega 3s that they didn't need to metabolize it from plant sources. Up to 5% of the population lacks the genetics to metabolize Omega 3 fats from plant sources. So consuming a plant based diet may be detrimental to their health in the long run. And having been a vegetarian for 25 years, I have to agree that most vegetarians are on a high horse, believing that their diet is somehow superior to meat eaters, and assuming that everyone should be vegetarian. There is a vegetarian propaganda war going on. Many vegetarians treat meat eaters like they have no will power, and that they just have bad character, or like it is something criminal to eat meat. They treat meat eaters as though eating meat causes an increase in aggression. (There is actually evidence to suggest that the opposite is true, and aggression in vegans increases with each passing generation, and neurological disorders increase in each passing generation, according to one research abstract that I read) There are religious agendas, a lot of misinformation being circulated as fact, and a general blindness to research that contradicts their beliefs that everyone should be vegetarian. The propaganda is so pervasive that it is often hard to weed out propaganda from facts. And all too often, they present propaganda as fact, and use bad research to support their views. I know, because I've been a part of the vegetarian high horse crowd. And having been indoctrinated in it for so many years, and then discovering the truth, that a vegetarian diet is not always beneficial, I've had to come down off my high horse. It's interesting that the shortest lived people on the planet are vegans (in southern India), and the longest lived people on the planet include meat in their diet. (Okinawa and Hunza) And it's interesting that most of the time, when one reads research that supposedly supports a vegetarian diet, instead of comparing it to say, an Okinawa diet, it compares it to a Traditional Western Diet, that is notoriously bad. Even meat eaters know that a traditional Western Diet is bad, and most people try to eat more healthy. But a traditional Western diet is far more than just eating meat. If a vegetarian diet can't stand up to the best diets, than it hardly merits the support that it garners from the crowds of vegetarians who are indoctrinated by it. Eating meat doesn't mean that you have to eat deep fat fried foods fried in hydrogenated fats, and high in processed sugar and deplete of nutrients. But the vegetarian propaganda makes it sound like that's what they assume of meat eaters. Ironically, many of the foods that are often substituted for protein in a vegetarian diet, can cause imbalances in Lysine, or have other problems. Soy, for example, is probably not a good food for men or growing boys to eat because of the estrogen-like chemicals it contains, not to mention that it contains chemicals that can cause neurodegeneration over time. (The higher the soy consumption, especially of non-fermented sources of soy, the earlier the development of neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's) And that's not even getting into the problems with GMO's, hydrolyzed plant proteins that often develop MSG in the process, but aren't labeled as having MSG, etc. Since the farming industry has begun latching onto the promotion of soy, a lot of the problems with it have sort of been pushed into the shadows. It's now become a matter of economy and money, and we no longer get the truth. Soy is big business. Vegetarians often cite the use of antibiotics and pollutants in meat products, but they often overlook organic meat, and ignore the high levels of pollutants on plant crops. I remember when they used to claim that a vegetarian diet was less expensive than a meat based diet. It's not. I remember reading an article that was done back in the 50's, that was promoting soy in the diet, and tried to convince the reader that Eskimo's, which ate a high meat diet, were somehow inferior to people, with inferior intellect, inferior moral values, lazy, etc. I was appalled at how skewed it was. It was downright racist, and didn't fit what I've learned about the Eskimo's at all. The vegetarian propaganda tactics may have changed over the years, but I don't think they have gotten any better. They still cover things up, twist things, promote only what supports their views. It's impossible to have a self-sustaining farm that avoids the use of chemical fertilizers without using animal based products. Animal based products in organic farming are common. So eating organic produce doesn't prevent you from being outside of the ring of animal production farming. So vegetarian diets don't benefit the ecosystem the way they are claimed to. It's all a bunch of propaganda, and it's being driven by people whose religious beliefs don't allow them to eat meat, or animal rights activists who will do or say anything to try to stop animal husbandry. I know that in my family, the vegetarians for years have been condescending to the meat eaters. The denomination that I attended for years was rather condescending to meat eaters, and attempted to make them feel that eating meat would make them loose out on heaven. (Never a mention of the fact that Jesus ate meat) There was a lot of denial that they were doing this to the general public, but you couldn't help be aware of it, every potluck after church, if someone brought a meat dish, it was like a gossip excuse to ostracize that person. And it was like that in every single church that I attended, over the years, so it wasn't just an isolated thing. And people quickly learned that if they wanted to be accepted, they had to conform to the vegetarian agenda. Having said all that, like I said, I was a vegetarian for many years. I raised my children as vegetarians. When my son was 2 1/2, he began to have seizures. We went through all kinds of tests, and all kinds of medications, trying to figure out what the cause of his seizures was, and trying to get control of the seizures. The medications that we tried caused terrible side effects. One made him so doped up that all he could do was sleep or lay, listless, unfocused, and hardly aware of what was going on around him. One made him literally bounce off the walls, squawking like a chicken for 24 hours. We tried a dozen different medications, each one worse than the one before, and none of them completely effective at controlling his seizures. The one that worked the best for him, and had the least side effects, caused him to have oppositional defiance behavior and hyperactivity. And it was hard to have him go from a very sweet and well behaved little boy to an angry aggressive little monster. It was a horrendous experience for him to get his blood drawn every week to test medication levels in his blood and liver enzymes, and having to put him through having blood drawn every week was a nightmare. He would have nightmares every night and wake screaming, and I'd have to console him, and he'd tell me that he was dreaming that they were stabbing him with needles. That's not the kind of thing that a toddler should have to deal with. Ultimately, it was discovered that he didn't synthesize taurine very well. And because taurine is not present in sufficient amounts in dairy and eggs, even though we were including those in his diet in more than sufficient amounts to provide for his other protein needs, it wasn't enough to make up for his taurine deficiency. I feel that he might not have developed epilepsy if it hadn't been for the fact that we were eating a vegetarian diet. And it's not like I was somehow just really bad at balancing a vegetarian diet. It's something that I spent a considerable amount of time studying, and I was a perfectionist about doing and very actively studied. I even helped to teach classes on vegetarianism. But a vegetarian diet wasn't meeting his needs for high quality protein. I started him on taurine supplements, and immediately it began controlling his seizures, and we were able to drop the seizure medication, and he returned to his very mellow personality. He hasn't had another seizure since. But he likely wouldn't have developed epilepsy at all if he hadn't been a vegetarian. And from what I've now read, neurological problems in vegetarian and vegan children occur at a higher percentage than among meat eaters. I wish I had known what I know now back then. But unfortunately, it's a propaganda war, and that would make a vegetarian diet look bad. So it's not something you normally hear from people who promote vegetarian diets. At least CFS doesn't have religious fanatics behind it. It may seem so at times, because the fanatics that promote psychologizing of CFS are just that; fanatics. But believe me, religious fanatics are worse. You can't reason with them at all. Anything that you use that is truth is heresy, as far as they're concerned, no matter how well it might be supported by scientific research. Even science is not believed by some of them. How's that for high horse stuff? lindaj@... Re: Re: Low Carb Diet for Vegetarians > Could you please explain to me how the amino acids found in " flesh " are > different from the amino acids which you can obtain in eating complementary > proteins (plant based + eggs + milk-based products)? Also, please explain to me why > you *believe* that vegetarians are on a " high horse " ????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 I can't even begin to dig them up. I read them a few years back in doing Internet searches. I didn't book mark them. I don't have the energy to go digging around and searching for them. They're long gone, and who knows where to begin to look for it. I remember reading about it in a study that involved people who had been using the Hallelujia diet for multiple generations, and that might be a place to start. But I'm not in a condition right not to take my valuable energy and time to put into digging it up. I do have a couple sites that I bookmarked, and here they are. I don't remember whether or not the research on increased neurological problems in successive generations of vegans is among them. But there is a fair amount of information about the myths of vegetarianism on these sites, and they do include references to actual research studies: http://www.chetday.com/b12.html http://www.powerhealth.net/selected_articles.htm What I don't understand, is that when someone else makes claims about something, I don't expect them to post the exact sources that they got their information from. I go out and dig around myself, and try to see if what they say is true, or if there is contradicting evidence. But inevitably, when I say something that I've read, people assume that I bookmark everything, and keep an exact record of everything I've learned over the years. That would literally be impossible, because I've read tens of thousands of research abstracts. I've read thousands of books, many of which I no longer own, because I wouldn't have room in my house for all of them. And many of the web sites that I've used in the past for information are no longer there. Web searches don't turn up the same sources every time. Some web sites have moved, others have disappeared. And so to try to research where I learned something, would probably take me hours to do, and I just don't have the ability to do that right now. And yet people expect me to do their work for them, and go look up things that are going to take me countless hours, and use up what little energy I have to satisfy their smugness that they don't believe what I've said. You don't have to believe anything I've said, if you don't want to. But if you don't learn to research things for yourself, and expect other people to do it for you, you will always get a one sided view of things. And in the process of trying to search out the information for yourself, you'll learn a lot in the process. I'm having a really negative response to phosphatidyl choline. My naturopath wanted me to try it, and I've been taking small doses of it this past week. I was hoping that because it is a part of the Kane detoxification protocol, it would do me some good. Instead it is making me extremely irritable, stirring up panic attack problems again, and making all my symptoms flare up worse than ever. So I'm in the middle of a big time crash. I've stopped taking it, but the symptoms haven't calmed down yet. So please forgive me if I sound rude, or angry. I'm really not myself right now. And I probably shouldn't even be posting at all. I've noticed that one of the signs that I'm crashing is that I'm more likely to post, and my posts end up being long and rambling. Normally I try to keep my mouth shut, because inevitably it stirs up someone who wants to attack what I say, and I really don't need that kind of stress. And when I crash, I don't think through things as well, and am more likely to respond without thinking. And every time it opens up a can of worms that starts some sort of war, and I get backchanneled with personal and very rude attacks. I think that I'm not the only PWC who responds without thinking about what kind of response we'll get back. But right now I'm too foggy minded to think about it. lindaj@... Re: Re: Low Carb Diet for Vegetarians > In a message dated 2/1/2004 12:59:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, > lindaj@... writes: > > > And from what I've now read, neurological problems in vegetarian > > and vegan children occur at a higher percentage than among meat eaters > > Would you please cite these if they are scientific articles. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.