Association-induction hypothesis, by Gilbert N. Ling

[Guest guest]

Hi Anne,

> In regards to lipids I strongly recommend reading Dr. Peat articles at

> http://www.efn.org/~raypeat/index.html Scroll down to bottom of his webpage

> and click " nutrition " .

I haven't read Dr. Peat's articles yet, but there was a link on his website

to a fascinating discussion of basic cell physiology by Gilbert Ling, PhD.:

http://www.gilbertling.org/

Here's what Dr. Peat says about Dr. Ling:

Gilbert Ling's work has created a scientific basis for cell physiology. When

I began reading his work in 1968, I found that he had already resolved many

of the basic issues that appeared to confuse most of those in the scientific

establishment who were studying " membrane physiology. "

" Anyone who reads his work will find that cells do not do the things

described in the standard medical literature. His indictment of scientific

fraud--on a scale " unknown in scientific history " --and of anti-scientific

stupidity, must eventually be accepted by anyone who would understand the

present scientific-political establishment. "

Dr. Ling, a biochemist, says this about his own work:

" The association-induction hypothesis deals with all major aspects of cell

functions in a coherent manner; nothing like this has existed before (or

since). Among these cell functions is how, in general terms, drugs produce

their physiological effects.... "

Dr. Ling says that his work was the basis for the invention of the MRI.

He says that there cannot be progress in treating cancer or chronic diseases

until scientists understand basic cell physiology. He says that the

membrane-pump theory has been disproved over and over again.

He has published three or four books. If anyone with a background in physics

and chemistry has read them, I'd love to know what you think.

Sue B.,

Upstate New York