Guest guest Posted April 12, 2003 Report Share Posted April 12, 2003 In a message dated 4/12/03 12:42:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, pennyhoule@... writes: > automatic > pumps which determines the delivery rate through small plastic tubes > that connect them to your picc line. The whole thing fits in my > pocket. Not only do I feel better with a slower delivery, I'm not > tied to the i.v. pole at home when I need to be doing other things. > > The second link is one that my friend gave me. I think his pharmacy > uses those. > > http://www.opitsourcebook.com/baxter.html > > http://www.i-flowcorp.com/3_PRODUCTS/IV_DELIVERY_SYSTEMS/eclipse.html > > penny > Penny, such good news and thank you for sharing it with us. When you first told us you were going back on IV's I was a little worried because of the H*ll you went through when you were on them before. Now, I am glad because it seems you are not suffering so much because of these new " balls " . I am so happy. Now, are you on oral cipro still even though you started on IV doxy and I think even IV cipro..right? Man, you are getting the full treatment...in the nose, IV, and orally. When your dealing with staph I guess its the only way to go though...FULL FORCE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 Hi Penny, you sure have a lot of stuff you are doing to kill everything. You are bound to win the " battles of the staphs " this way. That is also good your daughter is getting treated, that way you won't be tossing the staph back and forth to each other. I am not sure if this is even possible but are the vitamin C infusions going into your PICC or do you have to get a separate injection for that? Did your friend who saw the doctor who had the same stuff going on happen to tell you what the doctor did to get better and what antibiotics she put into the IV to help get her better? Finding out that information would be really helpful. Especially since she's someone who has already been through it. I am hanging in there. I am hoping to start my IV in the next week to two weeks. I think I will look into the " balls " you mentioned. They seem much easier. In a message dated 4/12/03 6:25:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, pennyhoule@... writes: > Hi , > > It's too soon to tell yet if I'll be able to tolerate the doxy. But I > realize now that the other drugs, which are hard for many people > anyway, should have been administered over a much greater length of > time. Of course the i.v. home care people never said a thing. > > I'm currently on oral cipro, which I feel really good on, and the > nebulizer cipro (inhalation) which is harsh on the throat. I'm also > nebulizing the imipenim which seems to work well. And am now starting > the i.v. doxy. The pseudomonas is not stoppable with one drug alone, > and that's what I'm dealing with at the moment, plus I'm sure there's > still lots of staph hiding in less obvious places. My sinuses are > obviously infected now, so weird since I never had the symptoms > before. They're not strong symptoms, but I definitely feel pressure > in them, so the abx are activating things. I just hope I can clear > them without surgery. > > I'm also getting vitamin C infusions along with large amounts of > magnesium/calcium and b vitamins. These really seem to be helping. > > I'm also trying to support my immune system as much as possible, and > create a hostile environment for the bad bacteria. Am taking things > like EDTA to help the abx penetrate the bacteria cell wall. I'm also > taking this new MSP-12000 (a type of colloidal silver) along with the > saline solution in my nasal irrigator (hydropulse). So I'm attacking > on all fronts. At the moment I'm feeling quite a bit improved, but > this is one heck of a roller coaster, and I know I'm nowhere near > clear of this infection. Amazing, when you consider how many abx I'm > on. My friend saw a local doctor the other day, who had the same > stuff going on, and she was on I.V. abx for 3 years before she had > full remission. She absolutely believes that staph was her problem. > > Thanks for the good wishes. > > How are you doing? > > penny > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 Hi , It's too soon to tell yet if I'll be able to tolerate the doxy. But I realize now that the other drugs, which are hard for many people anyway, should have been administered over a much greater length of time. Of course the i.v. home care people never said a thing. I'm currently on oral cipro, which I feel really good on, and the nebulizer cipro (inhalation) which is harsh on the throat. I'm also nebulizing the imipenim which seems to work well. And am now starting the i.v. doxy. The pseudomonas is not stoppable with one drug alone, and that's what I'm dealing with at the moment, plus I'm sure there's still lots of staph hiding in less obvious places. My sinuses are obviously infected now, so weird since I never had the symptoms before. They're not strong symptoms, but I definitely feel pressure in them, so the abx are activating things. I just hope I can clear them without surgery. I'm also getting vitamin C infusions along with large amounts of magnesium/calcium and b vitamins. These really seem to be helping. I'm also trying to support my immune system as much as possible, and create a hostile environment for the bad bacteria. Am taking things like EDTA to help the abx penetrate the bacteria cell wall. I'm also taking this new MSP-12000 (a type of colloidal silver) along with the saline solution in my nasal irrigator (hydropulse). So I'm attacking on all fronts. At the moment I'm feeling quite a bit improved, but this is one heck of a roller coaster, and I know I'm nowhere near clear of this infection. Amazing, when you consider how many abx I'm on. My friend saw a local doctor the other day, who had the same stuff going on, and she was on I.V. abx for 3 years before she had full remission. She absolutely believes that staph was her problem. Thanks for the good wishes. How are you doing? penny > In a message dated 4/12/03 12:42:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > pennyhoule@y... writes: > > > > automatic > > pumps which determines the delivery rate through small plastic tubes > > that connect them to your picc line. The whole thing fits in my > > pocket. Not only do I feel better with a slower delivery, I'm not > > tied to the i.v. pole at home when I need to be doing other things. > > > > The second link is one that my friend gave me. I think his pharmacy > > uses those. > > > > http://www.opitsourcebook.com/baxter.html > > > > http://www.i- flowcorp.com/3_PRODUCTS/IV_DELIVERY_SYSTEMS/eclipse.html > > > > penny > > > > > Penny, such good news and thank you for sharing it with us. When you first > told us you were going back on IV's I was a little worried because of the > H*ll you went through when you were on them before. Now, I am glad because > it seems you are not suffering so much because of these new " balls " . I am so > happy. Now, are you on oral cipro still even though you started on IV doxy > and I think even IV cipro..right? Man, you are getting the full > treatment...in the nose, IV, and orally. When your dealing with staph I > guess its the only way to go though...FULL FORCE. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2003 Report Share Posted April 13, 2003 , The doctor had some infected teeth removed by an oral surgeon, but still has a mouthful of root canals. Then an I.D. doctor just kept testing her for the organisms, and changed abx as needed. I'm probably going to talk to her this week, for more details. But each person is so different. I find it encouraging, though, that she did not have to radically debride her jaw to get better. This abx routine is not an easy ride. Depending on how late you get started treating it, it can take a long time. I do believe that as we get stronger, we can start relying on natural means more, to get our body's more in balance and resistant to the bad bugs. The C infusion does go into my picc line. It's great, goes in about 3 or 4 times as fast as a regular infusion. penny > Hi Penny, you sure have a lot of stuff you are doing to kill everything. > You are bound to win the " battles of the staphs " this way. That is also good > your daughter is getting treated, that way you won't be tossing the staph > back and forth to each other. > > I am not sure if this is even possible but are the vitamin C infusions going > into your PICC or do you have to get a separate injection for that? > > Did your friend who saw the doctor who had the same stuff going on happen to > tell you what the doctor did to get better and what antibiotics she put into > the IV to help get her better? Finding out that information would be really > helpful. Especially since she's someone who has already been through it. > > I am hanging in there. I am hoping to start my IV in the next week to two > weeks. I think I will look into the " balls " you mentioned. They seem much > easier. > > > In a message dated 4/12/03 6:25:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > pennyhoule@y... writes: > > > > Hi , > > > > It's too soon to tell yet if I'll be able to tolerate the doxy. But I > > realize now that the other drugs, which are hard for many people > > anyway, should have been administered over a much greater length of > > time. Of course the i.v. home care people never said a thing. > > > > I'm currently on oral cipro, which I feel really good on, and the > > nebulizer cipro (inhalation) which is harsh on the throat. I'm also > > nebulizing the imipenim which seems to work well. And am now starting > > the i.v. doxy. The pseudomonas is not stoppable with one drug alone, > > and that's what I'm dealing with at the moment, plus I'm sure there's > > still lots of staph hiding in less obvious places. My sinuses are > > obviously infected now, so weird since I never had the symptoms > > before. They're not strong symptoms, but I definitely feel pressure > > in them, so the abx are activating things. I just hope I can clear > > them without surgery. > > > > I'm also getting vitamin C infusions along with large amounts of > > magnesium/calcium and b vitamins. These really seem to be helping. > > > > I'm also trying to support my immune system as much as possible, and > > create a hostile environment for the bad bacteria. Am taking things > > like EDTA to help the abx penetrate the bacteria cell wall. I'm also > > taking this new MSP-12000 (a type of colloidal silver) along with the > > saline solution in my nasal irrigator (hydropulse). So I'm attacking > > on all fronts. At the moment I'm feeling quite a bit improved, but > > this is one heck of a roller coaster, and I know I'm nowhere near > > clear of this infection. Amazing, when you consider how many abx I'm > > on. My friend saw a local doctor the other day, who had the same > > stuff going on, and she was on I.V. abx for 3 years before she had > > full remission. She absolutely believes that staph was her problem. > > > > Thanks for the good wishes. > > > > How are you doing? > > > > penny > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 I wouldn't get your hopes up so much. Yes, many of us have sinus problems/infections but that doesn't mean our main problem is the sinus infections. The symptoms can come from intracellular bacteria for example, such as chlamydia pneumonia which is the most suspect, and also mycoplasmas. In other words, if you are looking for something to treat that might make you feel better, and the sinuses are bothering you, then that makes sense. But I personally don't see the value in being identified as " chronic sinusitis " because the treatment is unlike to solve the underlying cause. Unless of course a person doesn't actually have CFS and their problems are all caused by a sinus infection. That certainly wouldn't be someone like me who has had numerous viral and bacterial infections identified, problems with blood flow in my brain, abnormal brain waves, cognitive problems, immune problems, orthostatic hypotension, thyroid problems, etc. This all in addition to the sinus problems. Thanks, Doris ----- Original Message ----- I know a few PWC's ( excluding Penny, 3 out of 3 in fact) who have CT scans done which show an inflammation of the sinus lining but no osteomyelitis, implying infection in the lining. This is an interesting line of action because we then no longer have the wastebin diagnosis of CFS/ME, but can then MAYBE be defined with a diagnosis of chronic sinusitis or rhinosinusitis, both of which have known treatment paths... Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Hi Doris, The sinuses and the mouth are probably the biggest repository's of bacteria in the body, and if you're colonized, that's a good starting place for infection to settle. Other people may have it settled in the teeth or jaw. Even the organs (thyroid) near the mouth and sinuses. Personally, I feel mine has moved from my sinuses, jaw, thyroid into my neck and shoulders. I'm currently having my neck and shoulders worked on by a chiropractic orthopedist, because they're causing me extreme pain. The reason? Extremely tight muscles. Why would muscles be this tight? One possible reason: The release of toxins, which are known to affect the muscles. Fortunately, he's loosening the area up and I'm improving quite a bit. Can actually use my left arm again. Anyway, back to sinus infections. My doctor friend's infection went through the sinus wall (osteomyelitis) and into his brain, where it caused seizures, and the seizures caused his premature death. Treat the organisms creating this problem, very possibly will help with the other organisms you mention as well. Since Coagulase Negative STaph and Staph Aureus are so difficult to treat, treating them is a good starting point. It's really frustrating that people are looking for mysteriours bacteria when we've got a huge problem with Staph right in front of our faces. Any good infectious disease doc will tell you that any organism, if it becomes colonized and haemolytic, can make you really sick. The australian researchers, and now Shoemaker are saying that this colonization, the biofilm around the bacteria, and the toxins being released are the real problem. Simple nasal swabs can give us the evidence we need to try treatments and see if we respond, the way I respond to Cipro. It's interesting that they don't have these staph problems in Russia. You know why? Because they don't use antibiotics, and they haven't created these abx resistant monsters. They use phage therapy. I just wish they'd find a phage for staph, but of course, they don't need to because staph's not a problem for them! If I get well, I may have to move to Russia! penny > I wouldn't get your hopes up so much. Yes, many of us have sinus problems/infections but that doesn't mean our main problem is the sinus infections. The symptoms can come from intracellular bacteria for example, such as chlamydia pneumonia which is the most suspect, and also mycoplasmas. In other words, if you are looking for something to treat that might make you feel better, and the sinuses are bothering you, then that makes sense. But I personally don't see the value in being identified as " chronic sinusitis " because the treatment is unlike to solve the underlying cause. Unless of course a person doesn't actually have CFS and their problems are all caused by a sinus infection. That certainly wouldn't be someone like me who has had numerous viral and bacterial infections identified, problems with blood flow in my brain, abnormal brain waves, cognitive problems, immune problems, orthostatic hypotension, thyroid problems, etc. This all in addition to the sinus problems. > Thanks, > Doris > ----- Original Message ----- > I know a few PWC's ( excluding Penny, 3 out of 3 in > fact) who have CT scans done which show an inflammation of the sinus > lining but no osteomyelitis, implying infection in the lining. This is > an interesting line of action because we then no longer have the > wastebin diagnosis of CFS/ME, but can then MAYBE be defined with a > diagnosis of chronic sinusitis or rhinosinusitis, both of which have > known treatment paths... Dave > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 I wasn't trying to make any point to you. In fact, you make my point. You are not being treated for " chronic sinusitis " , you are treating staph as the underlying cause. Which was the point I was trying to make. But as far as staph, I am watching your results closely. So far it is simple, why staph and not something else? We have talked about this before I think. There are at least 20 viable theories and I can't try them all. I improved on doxycycline and not on some other antibiotics so that is what I continue to take. Thanks, Doris ----- Original Message ----- From: penny Anyway, back to sinus infections. My doctor friend's infection went through the sinus wall (osteomyelitis) and into his brain, where it caused seizures, and the seizures caused his premature death. Treat the organisms creating this problem, very possibly will help with the other organisms you mention as well. Since Coagulase Negative STaph and Staph Aureus are so difficult to treat, treating them is a good starting point. It's really frustrating that people are looking for mysteriours bacteria when we've got a huge problem with Staph right in front of our faces. Any good infectious disease doc will tell you that any organism, if it becomes colonized and haemolytic, can make you really sick. The australian researchers, and now Shoemaker are saying that this colonization, the biofilm around the bacteria, and the toxins being released are the real problem. Simple nasal swabs can give us the evidence we need to try treatments and see if we respond, the way I respond to Cipro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Actually, once I knocked the staph way down, a pseudomonas was uncovered (or appeared) in my sinuses. It's sensitive to Cipro and imipenim, and I think it may explain why I've always felt good on Cipro, as I am now, once again. Those nasty drugs did really wipe out a lot of staph, although I don't for a minute think I'm completely free of them. I think we can have a lot of co-infections, but hitting them where they live (exact location) is our best shot. In the petri dish, they often respond to abx when there's direct contact, but won't respond if they're being given systemically. It's a lot to expect a drug to make it through the gut and manage to end up in the right places. Of course, I'm sure the organisms are in the blood too, so clearing the blood's important, but it's those big colonies which really need to be hit. penny > I wasn't trying to make any point to you. In fact, you make my point. You are not being treated for " chronic sinusitis " , you are treating staph as the underlying cause. Which was the point I was trying to make. > > But as far as staph, I am watching your results closely. So far it is simple, why staph and not something else? We have talked about this before I think. There are at least 20 viable theories and I can't try them all. I improved on doxycycline and not on some other antibiotics so that is what I continue to take. > Thanks, > Doris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: penny > Anyway, back to sinus infections. My doctor friend's infection went > through the sinus wall (osteomyelitis) and into his brain, where it > caused seizures, and the seizures caused his premature death. Treat > the organisms creating this problem, very possibly will help with the > other organisms you mention as well. Since Coagulase Negative STaph > and Staph Aureus are so difficult to treat, treating them is a good > starting point. It's really frustrating that people are looking for > mysteriours bacteria when we've got a huge problem with Staph right > in front of our faces. Any good infectious disease doc will tell you > that any organism, if it becomes colonized and haemolytic, can make > you really sick. The australian researchers, and now Shoemaker are > saying that this colonization, the biofilm around the bacteria, and > the toxins being released are the real problem. Simple nasal swabs > can give us the evidence we need to try treatments and see if we > respond, the way I respond to Cipro. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Penny, > It's interesting that they don't have these staph problems in Russia. > You know why? Because they don't use antibiotics, and they haven't > created these abx resistant monsters. They use phage therapy. I just > wish they'd find a phage for staph, but of course, they don't need to > because staph's not a problem for them! If I get well, I may have to > move to Russia! > What on earth makes you make such a sweeping statement that " in Russia they don't use abx " !!!!! That is just ridiculous. of course they use abx! Here is just one article: : Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2002 Mar-Apr;(2):119-20 [Etiology of purulent septic diseases and the antibiotic resistance of the isolated causative agents] [Article in Russian] Mefod'ev VV, Khokhliavina RM, Kozlov LB. Institute of the Problems of North Development, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Regional Clinical Hospital, State Medical Academy, Tyumen, Russia. Among the causative agents of purulent septic diseases in the surgical hospital, 25 microbial species were isolated; of these, the prevailing species were Staphylococcus aureus (19.86 +/- 1.07%), Escherichia coli (16.5 +/- 0.99%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.06 +/- 0.8%). From environmental objects in the hospital 14 microbial species were isolated, among them bacteria of the genus Enterobacter (27 +/- 1.7%), E. coli (19.07 +/- 1.48%), S. aureus (14.7 +/- 1.31%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.73 +/- 1.31%), P. aeruginosa (7.33 +/- 0.98%). During 3 years of observation the isolation rate of K. pneumoniae from different environmental objects was found to increase threefold to 24.7 +/- 2.7%. The results of the study of the microbial picture in surgical hospitals, as well as the antibiotic resistance of circulating causative agents, should be borne in mind while taking epidemic control measures. PMID: 12043144 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] As for Phage therapy, it was developed in Russia from what I have read it is used mainly for external wounds. But it is not used as routinely as what you seem to think. Nelly > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Plus , they have plenty of staph phages http://www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/names_host.htm Subject: Re: Re: I.V. antibiotic balls. Big improvement! > Penny, > > It's interesting that they don't have these staph problems in Russia. > > You know why? Because they don't use antibiotics, and they haven't > > created these abx resistant monsters. They use phage therapy. I just > > wish they'd find a phage for staph, but of course, they don't need to > > because staph's not a problem for them! If I get well, I may have to > > move to Russia! > > > What on earth makes you make such a sweeping statement that " in Russia they > don't use abx " !!!!! That is just ridiculous. of course they use abx! > > Here is just one article: > > : Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2002 Mar-Apr;(2):119-20 > > > [Etiology of purulent septic diseases and the antibiotic resistance of the > isolated causative agents] > > [Article in Russian] > > Mefod'ev VV, Khokhliavina RM, Kozlov LB. > > Institute of the Problems of North Development, Siberian Branch, Russian > Academy of Sciences, Regional Clinical Hospital, State Medical Academy, > Tyumen, Russia. > > Among the causative agents of purulent septic diseases in the surgical > hospital, 25 microbial species were isolated; of these, the prevailing > species were Staphylococcus aureus (19.86 +/- 1.07%), Escherichia coli (16.5 > +/- 0.99%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.06 +/- 0.8%). From environmental > objects in the hospital 14 microbial species were isolated, among them > bacteria of the genus Enterobacter (27 +/- 1.7%), E. coli (19.07 +/- 1.48%), > S. aureus (14.7 +/- 1.31%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.73 +/- 1.31%), P. > aeruginosa (7.33 +/- 0.98%). During 3 years of observation the isolation > rate of K. pneumoniae from different environmental objects was found to > increase threefold to 24.7 +/- 2.7%. The results of the study of the > microbial picture in surgical hospitals, as well as the antibiotic > resistance of circulating causative agents, should be borne in mind while > taking epidemic control measures. > > PMID: 12043144 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > > As for Phage therapy, it was developed in Russia from what I have read it is > used mainly for external wounds. But it is not used as routinely as what you > seem to think. > > Nelly > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 Sorry to make such a generalization, Nellie. I meant the Russians don't abuse abx the way we do, since they tend to culture organisms before treating, and they don't seem to have people colonized with Coagulase Negative STaph, because it hasn't developed the resistance, that ours have. I'm sure it's just a matter of time, now that the borders have opened up. What I was saying about the phages was based on statements made by a young woman who helps her scientist mother with phage research. This researcher actually sent a bunch of phages to my friend for testing. I'm sorry, can't recall her name, but I can get it if you need it. penny > Penny, > > It's interesting that they don't have these staph problems in Russia. > > You know why? Because they don't use antibiotics, and they haven't > > created these abx resistant monsters. They use phage therapy. I just > > wish they'd find a phage for staph, but of course, they don't need to > > because staph's not a problem for them! If I get well, I may have to > > move to Russia! > > > What on earth makes you make such a sweeping statement that " in Russia they > don't use abx " !!!!! That is just ridiculous. of course they use abx! > > Here is just one article: > > : Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2002 Mar-Apr;(2):119-20 > > > [Etiology of purulent septic diseases and the antibiotic resistance of the > isolated causative agents] > > [Article in Russian] > > Mefod'ev VV, Khokhliavina RM, Kozlov LB. > > Institute of the Problems of North Development, Siberian Branch, Russian > Academy of Sciences, Regional Clinical Hospital, State Medical Academy, > Tyumen, Russia. > > Among the causative agents of purulent septic diseases in the surgical > hospital, 25 microbial species were isolated; of these, the prevailing > species were Staphylococcus aureus (19.86 +/- 1.07%), Escherichia coli (16.5 > +/- 0.99%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.06 +/- 0.8%). From environmental > objects in the hospital 14 microbial species were isolated, among them > bacteria of the genus Enterobacter (27 +/- 1.7%), E. coli (19.07 +/- 1.48%), > S. aureus (14.7 +/- 1.31%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.73 +/- 1.31%), P. > aeruginosa (7.33 +/- 0.98%). During 3 years of observation the isolation > rate of K. pneumoniae from different environmental objects was found to > increase threefold to 24.7 +/- 2.7%. The results of the study of the > microbial picture in surgical hospitals, as well as the antibiotic > resistance of circulating causative agents, should be borne in mind while > taking epidemic control measures. > > PMID: 12043144 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > > As for Phage therapy, it was developed in Russia from what I have read it is > used mainly for external wounds. But it is not used as routinely as what you > seem to think. > > Nelly > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2003 Report Share Posted April 15, 2003 I'll have to look into that. They didn't have a CNS phage when the researcher sent the phages to my friend. If they have them, I'd like to know about it, because it could potentially help a lot with all of the abx resistance problems. The phage is the naturally occuring counterpart of the particular bacteria. If they've been able to isolate it, I can't understand why it's not being used more. Maybe has something to do with not being able to patent a naturally occuring organsism? penny -- In , " Bob Joy " <BobJoy@s...> wrote: > Plus , they have plenty of staph phages > > http://www.mansfield.ohio-state.edu/~sabedon/names_host.htm > > > Subject: Re: Re: I.V. antibiotic balls. Big improvement! > > > > Penny, > > > It's interesting that they don't have these staph problems in Russia. > > > You know why? Because they don't use antibiotics, and they haven't > > > created these abx resistant monsters. They use phage therapy. I just > > > wish they'd find a phage for staph, but of course, they don't need to > > > because staph's not a problem for them! If I get well, I may have to > > > move to Russia! > > > > > What on earth makes you make such a sweeping statement that " in Russia > they > > don't use abx " !!!!! That is just ridiculous. of course they use abx! > > > > Here is just one article: > > > > : Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 2002 Mar-Apr;(2):119-20 > > > > > > [Etiology of purulent septic diseases and the antibiotic resistance of the > > isolated causative agents] > > > > [Article in Russian] > > > > Mefod'ev VV, Khokhliavina RM, Kozlov LB. > > > > Institute of the Problems of North Development, Siberian Branch, Russian > > Academy of Sciences, Regional Clinical Hospital, State Medical Academy, > > Tyumen, Russia. > > > > Among the causative agents of purulent septic diseases in the surgical > > hospital, 25 microbial species were isolated; of these, the prevailing > > species were Staphylococcus aureus (19.86 +/- 1.07%), Escherichia coli > (16.5 > > +/- 0.99%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.06 +/- 0.8%). From environmental > > objects in the hospital 14 microbial species were isolated, among them > > bacteria of the genus Enterobacter (27 +/- 1.7%), E. coli (19.07 +/- > 1.48%), > > S. aureus (14.7 +/- 1.31%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.73 +/- 1.31%), P. > > aeruginosa (7.33 +/- 0.98%). During 3 years of observation the isolation > > rate of K. pneumoniae from different environmental objects was found to > > increase threefold to 24.7 +/- 2.7%. The results of the study of the > > microbial picture in surgical hospitals, as well as the antibiotic > > resistance of circulating causative agents, should be borne in mind while > > taking epidemic control measures. > > > > PMID: 12043144 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > > > > > > As for Phage therapy, it was developed in Russia from what I have read it > is > > used mainly for external wounds. But it is not used as routinely as what > you > > seem to think. > > > > Nelly > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.