Guest guest Posted December 29, 2002 Report Share Posted December 29, 2002 In a message dated 12/29/02 10:22:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, writes: > BOB, we can theorize till the cows come home and that's exactly what > those who havent taken the risks that and others on this list > have done. I dont know about you, but, I'm not worried 10 > yrs. > down the road. I have severe CFS and I dont expect to be around > > if these neuro-cognitive symptoms attack with such ferocity. If > anybody on this list expects any researchers or clinicians to put > them > in remission= please contact me at once. I have a bridge to sell them in > > Brooklyn; where i was raised. it was JASON who told me that very > > few on this list have achieved anywhere near full functionality AND > CERTAINLY NOT REMISSION!!!! P.s. I agree with you, that ABX > treatment and its causation should be looked at more closely.... > P.P.S. > Got anything for my Hypothamic hormones which are blunted and > sending wrong messages to the rest of my BODY & BRAIN? Or does > Cheney? MY igf-1 is normal in my blood....Perhaps I should dive into > > an Oxygen chamber or take Growth factors= have nothing to lose, but > > my wallet....Take care, > , your posts are indirectly funny some times. I myself have not taken too many risky endevors I don't think. I certainly am not looking into GH or bovine growth factors at this point. I don't consider bee venom therapy to be too risky either. Then again I remember many folks who think DMPS is very risk b/c of some who had no business doing it in the first place (or DMSA for that matter) and you can read about these botch jobs on dmpsbackfires.com I think it is. I followed Dr. Klinghardt's protocol and did consoltation with his office though prior to undergoing it and Dr. Klinghardt seems very conservative to me and much more than say Cheney and yet Cheney has his patients doing very risky endevors such as the bgf's and not DMPS so go figure. Risk is like beauty and is in the eye of the beholder. I am 29 and have goals of getting better long term and so I am careful in what I do with or put into my body. I think it was Bob that laments that like you, he has had this for so long that he is not as concerned about long term risk as he has already thought about suicide in the past and what keeps him from considering suicide now days is hope that he may live out this disease and see it being cured if such a thing is to happen. So I can see why someone in their 50's who wishes they weren't alive would do bgf's or long term AB treatment to just feel better for once in a very long time. My take on AB is I will do it in the future if I feel I need to but only after doing everything else I can to make sure my body is already functioning better than at any time before I came down with CFS. In other words, if I am better 8 months after beginning DMPS I would want to continue doing DMPS and get my mercury down even further and then and only then think about AB treatment. I figure I have enough to worry about just with seeing if I can get the EBV lowered and see if I have babesia or not for sure (hopefully when my MDL test results come back this week). Maybe if we can get our bodies to get certain things under control then at that point out bodies will be stronger to be able to take advantage of AB treatment and go after the bacterial infections after it is not bogged down with viral attacks like EBV. Just my theory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.