Guest guest Posted July 12, 2000 Report Share Posted July 12, 2000 Note: This information was just posted to DISINISSUES, I felt it was so important, as in for precedent purposes, for many in their battles with insurance companies and employers - that I am reposting it here - [Disinissues Website: http://www.cfids-me.org/disinissues/] http://www.lawnewsnetwork.com/stories/A19017-2000Mar17.html Fibro What? A Jury Is Won Over Lawyers score record verdict for disputed fibromyalgia ailment By Margaret Cronin Fisk The National Law Journal March 20, 2000 A former ferry worker afflicted with a recently recognized and oft-disputed chronic pain syndrome called fibromyalgia has won a $2.37 million jury verdict -- the largest award ever to a plaintiff claiming to suffer from the condition. The plaintiff, Greenwood, contended that he was left in constant pain after having an accident while carrying a load of sand up a ladder on the M/V Quinault ferry, owned by the state of Washington. The state conceded that Greenwood was in pain but disputed liability and the extent of his physical disability. But on March 1, a Seattle jury found that the plaintiff was permanently disabled and that the state was responsible. Greenwood v. State of Washington, No. 98-2-22537-8SEA (Super. Ct., King Co., Wash.). The verdict was unusually large for a fibromyalgia case. Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome that was not accepted as an actual physical disorder until 1990, when it was recognized by the American College of Rheumatology. However, the condition is frequently dismissed by doctors, insurance carriers and government agencies, said Lynne Matallana, executive director of the National Fibromyalgia Awareness Campaign. This lack of acceptance and the nature of the injuries mean that these cases can be difficult to win, said Greenwood's counsel, Seattle solo practitioner P. Krafchick. " You can't see pain, " he said, and the defendants often claim either that the plaintiffs do not have the condition or that the pain is psychological. On April 28, 1996, Greenwood was climbing a ladder while carrying a bag of sand when his foot slipped. His supervisor grabbed him to keep him from falling, but Greenwood hurt his neck, back and shoulders, said Krafchick. Greenwood continued to work for the next 21 months, despite chronic pain, but in January 1998, Krafchick said, " he came down with a bleeding ulcer. A rheumatologist diagnosed him in February 1998 with fibromyalgia. " He has since been unable to return to work. Greenwood sued the state, charging that it was negligent in permitting him to climb a ladder while carrying the sand " in violation of Washington labor code, " which states that a worker can't ascend or descend a ladder " without having both hands free, " Krafchick said. The state had four basic contentions, said Nicefaro Jr., assistant attorney general of Washington. First, Greenwood himself was responsible for the accident. Second, the slip was a minor event that resulted in a shoulder strain. It would have resolved itself with appropriate physical therapy. Third, whatever pain Greenwood had was not connected to this slip on the ferry. " He worked 22 months after the incident, " Nicefaro said. And fourth, the pain was psychological in origin. To win, the plaintiff used extensive documentation, including medical literature about fibromyalgia and how Greenwood's condition closely reflected the standard diagnoses for the syndrome. The plaintiff's team also relied heavily on experts in rheumatology and pain, including a specialist in addiction and chronic pain, and a psychiatrist. To connect the pain to the incident, Krafchick said, the plaintiff " called people who knew -- his supervisor, his girlfriend ... to establish that the pain started before January 1998. " A turning point in the trial, he noted, was the cross-examination of the defense pain expert, a rheumatologist from the University of Washington, who wound up conceding the similarities between Greenwood's symptoms and fibromyalgia diagnostic standards: " We used him as a vehicle to get our points out again. " The state is filing post-trial motions to set aside or reduce the verdict. Copyright © 2000 ALM IP, LLC -- American Lawyer Media. All rights reserved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.