Guest guest Posted August 12, 2001 Report Share Posted August 12, 2001 <I also breastfed my son and he has apraxia. I wonder if it has anything to do with the mother not getting enough EFA to pass through to the child.> YES!! This is exactly what happened to us! In researching my son's condition, I learned that 60% of Americans eat diets deficient in EFAs. Vegetarians are particularly at risk. So are mothers, because a mother's stores of EFAs will go to building her baby's brain during pregnancy and breastfeeding. With our deficient diets, our EFA levels do not recover after pregnancy and nursing, so we go into subsequent pregnancies with " less to give " , so to speak. I believe this is what happened to us--my first child is precociously verbal, my second is apraxic. There is scientific support for this idea--in one study, breastfeeding mothers were supplemented with DHA and their babies showed cognitive gains. I don't blame the folks who urged me to breastfeed. If my son had been artificially fed he'd have gotten no EFAs at all. I blame obstetricians and pediatricians who assured me that as long as I ate a " healthy diet " and took my pre- natal vitamins, everything would be fine. I'm a poster child for the FDA food pyramid, and still my son has what I'm convinced is a deficiency disease. in southern California Keenan, 26 mo, oral-verbal apraxia and sensory integration disorder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2001 Report Share Posted August 13, 2001 , What follows is almost correct. Except that what pregnant women are deficient in are the omega-3s and not EFAs in general. We already know that EFA is a term for both the omega-6 (n-6) and the omega-3 (n- 3) fatty acids. There is usually sufficient omega-6 fatty acid (FA) intake from vegetable oil such as corn, safflower and soybean oils (linoleic acid, LA, 18 carbon atom chain and 2 double bonds)) and red meats (arachidonic acid, AA, 20 carbon atom chain and 4 double bonds). The problem is usually with the n-3 family which is more difficult to find and consume. People eat far less fish than they should. For example the American Heart Association recommends that every person eat fish (preferably fatty fish) twice a week. A pregnant women should eat even more, at least one extra meal of fish. Why? Because during the third semester of pregnancy the developing embryo's brain requires a daily 80 milligrams of DHA (the most unsaturated n-3 FA with six double bonds and a 22 carbon atom chain). This need persists during the post-partum growth period of the newborn when the DHA is required for brain and vision development and AA (arachidonic acid) is required for growth. Since DHA is not provided through formula feeding (because new formulas that will supplement both DHA and AA are not yet available in the US market it has to be provided through breast milk. How does one deal with the dangers of methyl mercury in fish? By consuming salmon, pacific herring, anchovy, mackerel (not king mackerel), sardines, sablefish, lake whitefish and bluefish. Even 100 grams of shrimp can contain as much as 400 mg of omega-3FAs. If fish is not available, one can take supplements. During pregnancy and after birth the mother can take two to three 1.0 gram capsules/day of high quality fish oil capsules each with a total EPA +DHA content of about 600-900 mgs with more DHA than EPA. Such an intake will suffice for both the mother and the fetus or newborn during pregnancy and breast feeding. I think it is important to realize that the relatively new scientific findings regarding the physiological roles of essential fatty acids for brain and eye development take time to get recognized and accepted. Therefore, I don't think that we can throw around blame for past oversight by medical professionals. However, from now on, with the FDA approving formula supplementation with DHA and AA, the time is ripe to undertake wide scale, continuing medical education courses in this area. Once it validates the therapeutic role of omega-3 FAs in verbal apraxia through a clinical trial, the CHERAB Foundation can pioneer in undertaking this educational task. Katz, Ph.D. EFA Director of Research CHERAB Foundation Managing Director, Consortium for Brain Fatty Acids (CFBFA) Omega-3 Research Institute, Inc. Bethesda, land http://www.omega3ri.org > > <I also breastfed my son and he has > apraxia. I wonder if it has anything to do with the > mother not getting enough EFA to pass through to the > child.> > > > YES!! This is exactly what happened to us! > > In researching my son's condition, I learned that 60% > of Americans eat diets deficient in EFAs. Vegetarians > are particularly at risk. So are mothers, because a > mother's stores of EFAs will go to building her baby's > brain during pregnancy and breastfeeding. With our > deficient diets, our EFA levels do not recover after > pregnancy and nursing, so we go into subsequent > pregnancies with " less to give " , so to speak. I > believe this is what happened to us--my first > child is precociously verbal, my second is apraxic. > > There is scientific support for this idea--in one study, > breastfeeding mothers were supplemented with DHA and their > babies showed cognitive gains. > > I don't blame the folks who urged me to breastfeed. If my > son had been artificially fed he'd have gotten no EFAs at > all. I blame obstetricians and pediatricians who assured > me that as long as I ate a " healthy diet " and took my pre- > natal vitamins, everything would be fine. I'm a poster child > for the FDA food pyramid, and still my son has what I'm > convinced is a deficiency disease. > > in southern California > Keenan, 26 mo, oral-verbal apraxia and sensory integration disorder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.