Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Waiver comments/questions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Ellen,

Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

L.

ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications now

include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community Agencies. And

apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the reimbursement rates.

Interesting and very positive if this creates more options for participants.

P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting. Supported

employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work settings in a

business or industry that primarily employs people without disabilities.

Supported employment does not include sheltered work or other similar types of

vocational services furnished in specialized facilities.

My question is this -- if supported employment does not include 'sheltered work'

or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still has so many community-based

agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think of at least 3 locally with 100 or

more individuals. I assumed they were paying for their workshop via Waiver

services; but is there another source of funding for these? How are tax

dollars/waiver dollars going toward payment to sheltered workshops if they are

not covered under the Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is this a new

exclusion? I support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special Recreation

Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support workers? Not sure

exactly what this means, but again, if it increases participant choices/options,

then I’m all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To Laurie's question (If supported employment does not include 'sheltered work'

or

'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still has so many

community-based agencies operating 'workshops'?)--perhaps this is a proposed

change to what's been going on.

Illinois can promote " Employment First " all it wants, but if there are economic

advantages for companies to move out of state, how will Employment First

initiatives work?  Does the state think that the disability community and its

relatives have the power to keep business in IL?

-Gail

________________________________

From: Jerue Family <jeruefamily@...>

IPADDUnite

Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:24 PM

Subject: Waiver comments/questions

 

Ellen,

Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

L.

ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications now

include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community Agencies. And

apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the reimbursement rates.

Interesting and very positive if this creates more options for participants.

P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting. Supported

employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work settings in a

business or industry that primarily employs people without disabilities.

Supported employment does not include sheltered work or other similar types of

vocational services furnished in specialized facilities.

My question is this -- if supported employment does not include 'sheltered work'

or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still has so many community-based

agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think of at least 3 locally with 100 or

more individuals. I assumed they were paying for their workshop via Waiver

services; but is there another source of funding for these? How are tax

dollars/waiver dollars going toward payment to sheltered workshops if they are

not covered under the Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is this a new

exclusion? I support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special Recreation

Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support workers? Not sure

exactly what this means, but again, if it increases participant choices/options,

then I’m all for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laurie:

I believe this piece that you reference means that Supported Employment is the

only other option for how CILA day program funds can be used...that is...the

$11,000 or so can be used for Supported Employment OR Day Training, PERIOD.

The problem with this is that the funding cannot be used for any other creative

options...

I am checking this out with Ed McManus to make sure I am interpreting this

correctly.

Ellen

P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting. Supported

employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work settings in a

business or industry that primarily employs people without disabilities.

Supported employment does not include sheltered work or other similar types of

vocational services furnished in specialized facilities.

Ellen Garber Bronfeld

egskb@...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do the initials HCBS actually stand for?

Diane

>

> Ellen,

> Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

> L.

>

> ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

>

> P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications now

include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community Agencies. And

apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the reimbursement rates.

Interesting and very positive if this creates more options for participants.

>

> P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting. Supported

employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work settings in a

business or industry that primarily employs people without disabilities.

Supported employment does not include sheltered work or other similar types of

vocational services furnished in specialized facilities.

>

> My question is this -- if supported employment does not include 'sheltered

work' or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still has so many

community-based agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think of at least 3

locally with 100 or more individuals. I assumed they were paying for their

workshop via Waiver services; but is there another source of funding for these?

How are tax dollars/waiver dollars going toward payment to sheltered workshops

if they are not covered under the Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is

this a new exclusion? I support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

>

> P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special Recreation

Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support workers? Not sure

exactly what this means, but again, if it increases participant choices/options,

then I’m all for it.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home and Community Based Supports

From: Diane S.

Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 7:23 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Waiver comments/questions

What do the initials HCBS actually stand for?

Diane

>

> Ellen,

> Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

> L.

>

> ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

>

> P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications now

include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community Agencies. And

apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the reimbursement rates.

Interesting and very positive if this creates more options for participants.

>

> P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting. Supported

employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work settings in a

business or industry that primarily employs people without disabilities.

Supported employment does not include sheltered work or other similar types of

vocational services furnished in specialized facilities.

>

> My question is this -- if supported employment does not include 'sheltered

work' or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still has so many

community-based agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think of at least 3

locally with 100 or more individuals. I assumed they were paying for their

workshop via Waiver services; but is there another source of funding for these?

How are tax dollars/waiver dollars going toward payment to sheltered workshops

if they are not covered under the Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is this

a new exclusion? I support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

>

> P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special Recreation

Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support workers? Not sure

exactly what this means, but again, if it increases participant choices/options,

then I’m all for it.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our Special Rec does not accept the waiver. I spoke with the Director

many times and he says that they cannot afford to put their employees

and volunteers thru the training required. It is maddening to me

because the funding that I do not use could be put to good use.

needs the social support more than anything else, and it is

the one thing I cannot do for her. She does get a weekly social outing

through our agency but she would love to participate more in the SRA.

Thus far this year we haven't been able to do anything because we are

behind in payments and you can't sign up until the previous year is

paid. It would sure be nice if they could change the rules somehow so

that the smaller SRA's could participate. Or perhaps he is giving me a

line of BS about the training. I don't know. Anyone out there know

what the training requirements are to qualify. My workers and I didn't

have to go thru any special training other than what I do personally.

Gloria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Special Recreation Associations have been included as a potential

provider for some time now under DT and Personal Support; however, the

problem has been the training requirements. They would need to adhere to

the same requirements as a community agency which is DSP (Direct Support

Personnel) training and pass competancy-based training assessments (40

hours of classroom and 80 hours of on-the-job training). The SRA's just

don't have the staff or funding to be able to offer this to their staff.

It is my understanding that these staff do participate in training;

however, it is not nearly as much as what is required of a direct

support personnel who typically works in a DT program.

Training for personal support has been a hot topic for awhile now as

there is great disparity between those workers in a community agency

versus those is the self-directed model. I had thought that might be

addressed during the waiver renewal process but did not see any mention

of it.

As for the transportation piece, the cost of this has always been

included in the rate for programming. There are some agencies who have

not been able to provide the actual tansportation and have found other

ways to support the individual's need to get to/from the day program.

>

> Ellen,

> Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

> L.

>

> ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

>

> P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications

now include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community

Agencies. And apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the

reimbursement rates. Interesting and very positive if this creates more

options for participants.

>

> P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting.

Supported employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work

settings in a business or industry that primarily employs people without

disabilities. Supported employment does not include sheltered work or

other similar types of vocational services furnished in specialized

facilities.

>

> My question is this -- if supported employment does not include

'sheltered work' or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still

has so many community-based agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think

of at least 3 locally with 100 or more individuals. I assumed they were

paying for their workshop via Waiver services; but is there another

source of funding for these? How are tax dollars/waiver dollars going

toward payment to sheltered workshops if they are not covered under the

Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is this a new exclusion? I

support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

>

> P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special

Recreation Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support

workers? Not sure exactly what this means, but again, if it increases

participant choices/options, then I’m all for it.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, , thanks so much for the thoughtful analysis. I’m sure the

training piece is somewhat controversial, although the value of on-the-job,

individualized training that goes on between a consumer/consumer’s family and

the DSP hired privately, I don’t believe can be undervalued. The people my

daughter has hired through self-directed model are infinitely more aware of her

specific needs, strengths and challenges than the DSPs in the day program model.

And that’s not a swipe against the hard-working people in the community

agencies!! It’s more the luxury of only having to learn about ONE person, in

depth, versus the needs of many on a more diverse and less intimate level.

Thanks again .

From: lisalewclearbrook18

Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 9:18 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Waiver comments/questions

Special Recreation Associations have been included as a potential

provider for some time now under DT and Personal Support; however, the

problem has been the training requirements. They would need to adhere to

the same requirements as a community agency which is DSP (Direct Support

Personnel) training and pass competancy-based training assessments (40

hours of classroom and 80 hours of on-the-job training). The SRA's just

don't have the staff or funding to be able to offer this to their staff.

It is my understanding that these staff do participate in training;

however, it is not nearly as much as what is required of a direct

support personnel who typically works in a DT program.

Training for personal support has been a hot topic for awhile now as

there is great disparity between those workers in a community agency

versus those is the self-directed model. I had thought that might be

addressed during the waiver renewal process but did not see any mention

of it.

As for the transportation piece, the cost of this has always been

included in the rate for programming. There are some agencies who have

not been able to provide the actual tansportation and have found other

ways to support the individual's need to get to/from the day program.

>

> Ellen,

> Read through the Waiver & here are some comments/questions.

> L.

>

> ADULT HCBS WAIVER REVIEW & COMMENTS

>

> P. 57 -- Under Developmental Training section, provider specifications

now include Special Recreation Associations in addition to Community

Agencies. And apparently door-to-door transportation is included in the

reimbursement rates. Interesting and very positive if this creates more

options for participants.

>

> P.58 -- Under Supported Employment section, this was interesting.

Supported employment may be provided in integrated and competitive work

settings in a business or industry that primarily employs people without

disabilities. Supported employment does not include sheltered work or

other similar types of vocational services furnished in specialized

facilities.

>

> My question is this -- if supported employment does not include

'sheltered work' or 'workshops' -- then how is it that Illinois still

has so many community-based agencies operating 'workshops'? I can think

of at least 3 locally with 100 or more individuals. I assumed they were

paying for their workshop via Waiver services; but is there another

source of funding for these? How are tax dollars/waiver dollars going

toward payment to sheltered workshops if they are not covered under the

Waiver? Perhaps I'm missing something? Is this a new exclusion? I

support exclusion of sheltered workshops, by the way.

>

> P. 60 Under Personal Support section, again a mention of Special

Recreation Associations being eligible to provide Personal Support

workers? Not sure exactly what this means, but again, if it increases

participant choices/options, then I’m all for it.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...