Guest guest Posted March 17, 2011 Report Share Posted March 17, 2011 How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold?: Scientific American The Print Edition a.. View Latest Issue » b.. Give Scientific American » c.. Give Scientific American Mind » a.. Energy & Sustainability a.. Environment b.. Alternative Energy Technology c.. Clean Air Policy d.. Climate e.. Ecology f.. Green Living g.. Energy Technology h.. All topics in Energy & Sustainability a.. Evolution a.. Archaeology & Paleontology b.. Dinosaurs c.. Evolutionary Biology d.. Language & Linguistics e.. All topics in Evolution a.. Health a.. Biotechnology b.. Ethics c.. Infectious Diseases d.. Medical Technology e.. Pharmaceuticals f.. All topics in Health a.. Mind & Brain a.. Language & Linguistics b.. Addiction & Recovery c.. Neurological Disorders d.. Neuroscience e.. Psychiatry f.. Psychology g.. Thought & Cognition h.. All topics in Mind & Brain a.. Space a.. Astrophysics b.. Extraterrestrial Life c.. Galaxies d.. Space Exploration e.. Cosmology f.. All topics in Space a.. Technology a.. Alternative Energy Technology b.. Biotechnology c.. Automotive Technology d.. Communications e.. Computing f.. Consumer Electronics g.. Energy Technology h.. All topics in Technology a.. More Science a.. Biology b.. Chemistry c.. History of Science d.. Math e.. Physics f.. Society & Policy g.. Everyday Science h.. Science Education i.. All topics in More Science a.. Blog & Columns a.. Blogs b.. Scientific American Observations c.. Bering in Mind d.. Cross-check e.. Extinction Countdown f.. Solar at Home g.. Expeditions h.. Guest Blog i.. Anecdotes from the Archive a.. Scientific American Magazine b.. 50, 100, 150 Years Ago c.. Antigravity d.. Forum e.. The Science Agenda f.. The Science of Health g.. Skeptic h.. TechnoFiles a.. Scientific American MIND b.. Ask the Brains c.. Consciousness Redux d.. Facts & Fictions in Mental Health e.. Illusions f.. Mind in Pictures g.. MIND Perspectives h.. We're Only Human a.. Web Exclusives b.. Ask the Experts c.. Edit This d.. Extreme Tech e.. Fact or Fiction f.. Features g.. In-Depth Reports h.. Mind Matters i.. News a.. Multimedia a.. Podcasts b.. Video c.. Slide Shows d.. Science Images e.. Interactive Features a.. Magazines Give A Gift Browse Archive Scientific American Inside this Issue a.. Subscribe b.. Features c.. Advances d.. 50, 100, 150 Years Ago e.. Antigravity f.. Forum g.. Graphic Science h.. The Science Agenda i.. The Science of Health j.. Skeptic k.. TechnoFiles l.. Archive m.. Special Editions Give A Gift Browse Archive Scientific American MIND Inside this Issue a.. Subscribe b.. Features c.. Head lines d.. Ask the Brains e.. Consciousness Redux f.. Facts & Fictions in Mental Health g.. Illusions h.. Mind in Pictures i.. MIND Perspectives j.. We're Only Human k.. Archive l.. Special Reports Search Log In or Register Log In to SA Digital Home » News » News | Energy & Sustainability How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold? As Japan attempts to cool overheating nuclear fuel with seawater, experts worry that the damaged spent-fuel pools pose the greatest threat By Harmon | March 17, 2011 | 0 a.. Share b.. Email c.. Print The Japan Earthquake and Tsunami On March 11, a powerful, magnitude 9.0 quake hit northeastern Japan, triggering a tsunami with 10-meter-high waves that reached the U.S. west coast. Here's the science behind the disaster » March 11, 2011 INTACT REACTORS: Several of the reactors (pictured here before the March 11 earthquake) at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have sustained damage, making it difficult for crews to get close enough to stem the spread of radioactive material. Image: Wikimedia Commons/Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Supplemental Material a.. Overview In-Depth Report: The Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Helicopters and fire trucks proved unsuccessful at replenishing damaged nuclear fuel pools at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi plant on Thursday. The spent-fuel pools contain a large amount of radioactive material that is not contained as well as that in the reactor cores. And although information has been spotty, nuclear experts worry that this fuel—which should be submerged in circulating water to keep it from overheating—has been at least partly exposed in the pools belonging to reactor Nos. 3 and 4. In an early attempt to refill the vital pools with water Thursday, the Japan Self Defense Forces (JSDF) dispatched a cargo helicopter—specially outfitted with lead plates to help shield crewmembers from direct radiation—to drop seawater on the plant's reactor No. 3. The unit houses MOX (mixed oxide) fuel, which can melt at lower temperatures and could release some of its plutonium, which has a half-life of 24,000 years. Later that day, the country's National Police Agency attempted to use fire trucks to pump water into No. 3's spent-fuel pools, but owing to high radiation levels, operators were not able to get close enough. Five, more robust pump trucks, sent later by the JSDF were able to move in close enough for 24 minutes to inject some 30 tons of water into the low pools. As of 9:30 P.M. local time, the " effect of this operation [was] still under evaluation, " the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) reported. As of 10 P.M. local time on Thursday, the JAIF listed the following status of the six Fukushima Daiichi reactors: • Buildings around reactor Nos. 1, 3 and 4 were " severely damaged " ; the building housing reactor No. 2 was " slightly damaged " ; • Cooling was not working for reactor Nos. 1, or 3; • Water levels were covering more than half of the fuel in reactor No. 2; reactor Nos. 1 and 3 water levels were covering only about half of the fuel. • Structural integrity of the spent fuel pools was unknown for reactor Nos. 1 and 2; • Reactor Nos. 3 and 4 had low water levels; pool temperature was continuing to rise for reactor Nos. 5 and 6. The spent fuel pools are of significant concern, Marvin Resnikoff, a radioactive waste management consultant, said in a Wednesday press briefing organized by the nonprofit organization Physicians for Social Responsibility. Resnikoff noted that the pools at each reactor are thought to have contained the following amounts of spent fuel, according to The Mainichi Daily News: • Reactor No. 1 fuel pool: 50 tons of nuclear fuel • Reactor No. 2 fuel pool: 81 tons • Reactor No. 3 fuel pool: 88 tons • Reactor No. 4 fuel pool: 135 tons • Reactor No. 5 fuel pool: 142 tons • Reactor No. 6 fuel pool: 151 tons • Also, a separate ground-level fuel pool contains 1,097 tons of fuel; and some 70 tons of nuclear materials are kept on the grounds in dry storage. The reactor cores themselves contain less than 100 tons of fuel, Resnikoff noted. The fuel had been moved from reactor No. 4's core to its spent-fuel pool recently, so " that fuel is relatively fresh and hotter, thermally, " Resnikoff explained. " So it's not surprising that when the water [was] no longer circulating that the water was actually boiled off in a zirconium exothermic reaction, that the zirconium burned " (occurring at about 1,800 degrees Celsius). Scientists are not confident that they will be able to assess just how much radioactive material will have been released as this event unfolds, , an epidemiologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's School of Public Health, said in the press briefing. It might not be until people can safely take stock of all of the fuel that is left, and then only " by that we can make a reckoning of what was lost, " he said. Post a Comment | Read Comments (0) 1 2 Next > Reprints and Permissions » Share Articles You Might Also Like a.. How to Cool a Nuclear Reactor a.. How Does an Earthquake Trigger Tsunamis Thousands of Kilometers Away? a.. Fast Facts about Radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Reactors a.. What Happens During a Nuclear Meltdown? a.. Partial Meltdowns Led to Hydrogen Explosions at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant a.. Radiation's Complications: Pinning Health Problems on a Nuclear Disaster Isn't So Easy Comments Add Comment Leave this field empty Add a Comment You must log in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment. Advertisement Follow Scientific American a.. Email b.. RSS c.. Facebook d.. Twitter e.. YouTube f.. iTunes Scientific American Newsletter Get weekly coverage delivered to your inbox. Latest Headlines a.. Gene Therapy Offers Hope for Parkinson's Disease Nature 1 hour ago 0 a.. Map Reveals Status of Japan's 54 Nuclear Reactors Image Gallery 3 hours ago 0 a.. How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold? News 3 hours ago 0 Most Read a.. Nuclear Experts Explain Worst-Case Scenario at Fukushima Power Plant News Mar 12, 2011 107 a.. What Happens During a Nuclear Meltdown? Features Mar 15, 2011 17 a.. Fast Facts about the Japan Earthquake and Tsunami News Mar 14, 2011 2 Most Commented a.. Nuclear Experts Explain Worst-Case Scenario at Fukushima Power Plant News Mar 12, 2011 107 a.. Signs, signs, everywhere signs: Seeing God in tsunamis and everyday events Bering in Mind Mar 13, 2011 88 a.. Beware the fear of nuclear....FEAR! Guest Blog Mar 12, 2011 45 YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription. Email Address Name Address 1 Address 2 City AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WI WV WY State Zip Science Jobs of the Week a.. Pharmaceutical Primary Care Sales Rep Neuroscience Rochester South NY - Fixed Duration Employee Lilly USA, LLC Rochester, NY b.. Scientific Computing, Methods Development Dart Neuroscience, LLC 7473 Blvd, San Diego, CA 92121, USA c.. Bioinformatician Virginia Bioinformatics Institute at Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA d.. Developer Nature Publishing Group London, UK e.. Post-doctoral Fellow Neuroscience University of Arizona - College of Medicine, Phoenix Phoenix, Arizona, USA f.. More jobs from Naturejobs.com » Advertisement Scientific American is a trademark of Scientific American, Inc., used with permission © 2011 Scientific American, a Division of Nature America, Inc. . a.. About Scientific American a.. Advertise a.. Subscribe a.. Special Ad Sections a.. Site Map a.. Renew Your Subscription a.. Customer Service a.. Products & Services a.. Terms of Use a.. Buy Back Issues a.. Partner Network a.. Privacy Policy a.. Press Room a.. Science Jobs a.. Contact Us Email this Article How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold? Your Email Address Recipient's Email Address (separate multiple addresses with a comma) Comment (optional) X Please Log In Username Password Forgot: Password X Report Abuse Are you sure? X Whereas many people may celebrate March 14th by eating the math holiday's homophonic equivalent (pies), Scientific American suggests exercising your mathematical prowess with 4 puzzles from Gardner's article, A Quarter-Century of Recreational Mathematics. Not only are we paying tribute to the most famous irrational number around, but we also want to draw attention to a truly rational concept -- the scientific pursuit for a cleaner earth. Learn about New Solutions for Clean Energy , our latest In-Depth Report. As companion reading, we suggest Scientific American's A Plan for a Sustainable Future. All PDFs are complimentary downloads, normally only available with a SciAmDigital.com subscription. X Close Share this Article a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. RT @SciAm How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold? X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.