Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

A 'Silent Pandemic' Of Brain Disorders

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

A 'Silent Pandemic' Of Brain Disorders

Nov 7, 2006(WebMD) Exposure to industrial chemicals may be responsible for a

" silent pandemic " of brain development disorders affecting millions of

children worldwide, and not enough is being done to identify the risks.

That is the contention of two researchers who have studied the effects of

chemical exposures on brain development for many decades.

In an essay published online in the journal The Lancet, the researchers

identified 202 potentially harmful industrial chemicals that may be

contributing to dramatic increases in autism, attention deficit

hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and other brain disorders among children.

Roughly half of the chemicals are in common use, but very few have been

tested to determine their impact on brain development.

" The bottom line is you only get one chance to develop a brain, " Philippe

Grandjean, M.D., of the Harvard School of Public Health, tells WebMD. " We

have to protect children against chemical pollution because damage to a

developing brain is irreversible. "

Tip of the Iceberg

Grandjean and co-author Philip Landrigan, M.D., of New York's Mount Sinai

School of Medicine, noted that of the industrial chemicals known to be toxic

to the human brain, only five - lead, mercury, arsenic, PCBs, and toluene -

have been proven to cause damage to the developing brain.

These chemicals have been identified not because they are necessarily more

dangerous than the others, but because they have been studied the most,

Grandjean and Landrigan contend.

" The few substances proven to be toxic to human neurodevelopment should be

viewed as the tip of a very large iceberg, " they wrote.

Grandjean spent decades documenting the toxic effects of mercury exposure on

the developing brain, and Landrigan spent decades studying the effects of

lead exposure in children.

Lead and mercury are among the few chemicals that are now strictly regulated

to protect children. But regulation came long after the dangers were first

recognized.

Lead-based paint was first linked to sickness in children more than a

century ago, but lead was not removed from paint and gasoline in the U.S.

until the late 1970s and early 1980s.

" Despite those early pediatric warnings, the largely unchecked use of lead

in petrol, paints, ceramic glazes, and many other products through much of

the twentieth century caused continued risk of lead poisoning, " the

researchers write.

A Generation Exposed

Almost all children born in industrialized countries between 1960 and 1980

were exposed to substantial amounts of lead from gasoline. The researchers

write that lead exposure in this population could be responsible for a

substantial reduction in average IQ scores.

" A generation of American children was exposed to this very dangerous

neurotoxin while we were doing traditional risk assessment, " Grandjean tells

WebMD. " We can't afford to make the same mistake again. "

Annette Kirshner, Ph.D., of the National Institute of Environmental Health

Sciences (NIEHS) agrees that more expeditious ways of identifying chemical

exposures that put children at risk are needed.

The prevailing thinking among researchers studying autism and ADHD is that

both genetic and environmental factors play a role in the childhood brain

disorders.

" There is still no good evidence linking any single environmental exposure

to autism and ADHD, " Kirshner tells WebMD. " It will probably require a

global effort to understand the combination of factors that lead to these

disorders. "

But Grandjean and Landrigan argue that exposure to industrial chemicals

appear to have created a " silent pandemic in modern society. "

" Although these chemicals might have caused impaired brain development in

millions of children worldwide, the profound effects of such a pandemic are

not apparent from available health statistics, " they wrote.

SOURCES: Grandjean, P. and Landrigan, P.J. The Lancet, Nov. 8, 2006; Vol.

368: online edition. Philippe Grandjean, M.D., department of environmental

health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Annette Kirshner, Ph.D.,

health science administrator, National Institute of Environmental Health

Sciences.

By Salynn Boyles

Reviewed by Louise Chang

Copyright 2006, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...