Why are apricot seeds banned in the U.S.A?

August 22, 2006

Best Answer - Chosen By Voters

The American Cancer Society and the FDA have a list of " Unproven

Methods " for cancer. As you might expect, the criteria for getting on

this list are predictable: - in a natural form

- non-toxic

- not produced by the Drug Industry

- easily available without a prescription

- non-patentable

Opus, like most people in the medical field you are in a major state

of denial. Ralph Moss left the Sloan-Kettering Institute when they

refused to publish their findings on Laetrile. It didn't work on all

cancers, but it had stopped metastases 100% of the time.

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/me...

How Cancer Politics Have Kept You in the Dark Regarding Successful

Alternatives

A powerful conglomerate of government agencies, international drug

companies, and major cancer treatment hospitals puts profits first.

They do not want the public to learn about and pursue effective

alternatives. The result is that chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery

are the law of the land as cancer treatments-for political, not

therapeutic, reasons. Most of what you have heard over your lifetime

about cancer treatments is not the truth. At the very least, you have

received an incomplete picture. If you believe the propaganda you

have been fed and you develop cancer; it can cost you your life. In

the United States, economic interests masquerade as therapeutic

regimens and scientific concern. Their goal is to own and completely

control a disease-cancer-as if it were a commodity, and to quash

competition (meaning alternative approaches), so as to maintain a

marketplace monopoly. Money leads politics by the nose. The financial

interests of drug companies, conventional cancer doctors, hospitals,

HMOs and others in what is known as the Cancer Establishment, have

eclipsed the integrity of the Hippocratic Oath; money and politics

have proclaimed conventional approaches as scientifically validated

and therefore mandated by law. The terrible flaw in this convenient

financial setup is that the profits that flow to the cancer

establishment are derived from human lives lost to cancer be cause

successful alternative approaches are outlawed or unreported. To the

cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual

clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the

cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the

law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the

politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will

continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality. Although

rising cancer rates are bad news for patients, they are great news

for the cancer treatment industry-Cancer, Inc., as some critics have

labeled it. In this environment, words that sound scientific and

doctorly often mask a different agenda. The phrase " treatment

success " can mean profitable, while " dangerous " or " questionable "

treatment can refer to therapies that threaten the profits of the

cancer industry. When you begin to ferret out the economic context

and motivations of cancer treatment, it helps you understand why

alternative cancer therapies are suppressed or barred from the

public's awareness. It helps you see why treatments as dangerous and

consistently unsuccessful as radiation and chemotherapy continue to

dominate the field of oncology. The reason alternative cancer

treatments are not mainstream has little to do with alleged

therapeutic ineffectiveness and far more to do with political control

over the therapy marketplace. The politics of cancer have an

overriding influence on the science of cancer and, ultimately, on

what the public thinks and believes about cancer and what it is able

to expect as treatment options. The doctors who perform cancer

treatments and the scientists who conduct research are not the ones

in control of the cancer field. It is the larger power structure of

the cancer establishment that effectively controls the shape and

direction of cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.' The field

of U.S. cancer care is organized around a medical monopoly that

ensures a continuous flow of money to the pharmaceutical companies,

medical technology firms, research institutes, and government

agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the

National Cancer Institute (NCI) and quasi-public organizations such

as the American Cancer Society (ACS). This is " the cancer industry, "

says Ralph Moss, Ph.D., extensions of which include the corporate

media, public relations experts, petrochemical and nuclear

industries, corporate scientists, and doctors who specialise

in " killing " cancer. Cancer research has been set up almost entirely

in favor of conventional approaches ever since the war on cancer,

formalized in 1971 as the National Cancer Act, was first scripted in

the 1960s. At that time, Senator Ralph Yarborough (D-Texas) organized

the National Panel of Consultants of the Conquest of Cancer. Of its

26 members, 10 came from the American Cancer Society and 4 were

affiliated with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital; ...

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/me...

Source(s):

As a Wellness Consultant, I have coached thousands of people back to

health with live food nutrition.

http://answers./question/?qid=20060705193658AAg5mbi

September 20, 2006

jason -

can you send me the link to reach your sister and get some apricot seeds? I

have a friend who has cancer of the liver,and bowel

thanks so much

Patti