Re: Table of USEFUL alternative medicines for cancer

[Guest guest]

This is only one person's opinion. Is this your research??

[Guest guest]

OK.......................I will NOT force my belief on YOU again! This is

supposed to be a site where we share OPINIONS and that is what I am doing.

NOT AGAIN though! SO........keep taking your laetrile WITH the knowledge that

research is totally against it. I really don't care.

I find it hard to understand that IF I WERE FOR laetrile you would not ever

be so critical of my opinion as I would be AGREEING with you! How sad this

world would be if everyone agreed with everything YOU believe in!

SO........chomp away on your pits.

[Guest guest]

SURE WILL! SORRY................to offend anyone. The point that I was

trying to make is that CANCER is a terrible disease that KILLS many people (as

you know). That is why I was abrupt and rude (as some have indicated) because

it is serious and it is a serious subject.

[Guest guest]

Would you please stop trying to force your beliefs (or lack thereof) on us? we

all know that latrile works, so just give it up ok? Are you being paid by the

AMA for this?

B

Puffer48@... wrote:

This is the table that I have found and it indicates that Laetrile is

NOT as

effective as PAW PAW cell reg for cancer.

_http://alternativecancer.us/table.htm_

(http://alternativecancer.us/table.htm)

This is based on research and it is what I USE to make my judgement on

products. ALONG with other articles. It makes sense to do YOUR own research

before you BELIEVE in any alternative medicine.

[Guest guest]

Yes . Now you have said something I totally agree with. Cancer is serious

BUISINESS.

Puffer48@... wrote:

SURE WILL! SORRY................to offend anyone. The point that I was

trying to make is that CANCER is a terrible disease that KILLS many people (as

you know). That is why I was abrupt and rude (as some have indicated) because

it is serious and it is a serious subject.

[Guest guest]

Dear ,

You said:

<<This is the table that I have found and it indicates that Laetrile is

NOT as

effective as PAW PAW cell reg for cancer.

_http://alternativecancer.us/table.htm_

(http://alternativecancer.us/table.htm)

This is based on research and it is what I USE to make my judgement on

products. ALONG with other articles. It makes sense to do YOUR own research

before you BELIEVE in any alternative medicine.>>

** After seeing this I have less of an understanding why you hold the

opinion you do. This chart clearly indicates that studies (the quality of

which I don't know without being able to read each study) have shown B17 to

be effective with an assigned rating of 7 for effectiveness.

Given the small number of studies for all the substances

here, these statistics cannot be relied upon to be accurate. I would be

surprised if any studies for any of these substances had enough participants

in them to reach truly accurate conclusions. The study designs play a

major role, too. Another question that comes to mind is how was the

effectivenesss number determined? determined? Was it determined by # of

people who showed improvement? # of people who fully recovered?

Realistically, there are many more questions but I won't take up the

space here to write them all.

But, to get back to the original point -- you stated B14 " doesn't work "

and then provided evidence in the form of a chart that clearly shows B17 as

having moderate efficacy. Perhaps you could see that the same treatment

that fails for one, can save another's life. It seems to me that this is

more of a personal issue with B17 and this is why there's a certain amount

of logic missing at this point.

Regards,

Do not follow where the path may lead;

go instead where there is no path and

leave a trail.

[Guest guest]

This is research based on FACTS on numerous patients outcome from the

products use.

[Guest guest]

Prove it genius.......