Guest guest Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 In case you think this piece of legislation is a good idea...read my comments to Senator Steans, a few other Senators, Tony auski and Phil Milsk... This is a piece of legislation that has ASFCME written all over it... Ellen Ellen Garber Bronfeld egskb@... Leaders in The Arc: State Operated Group Homes Dear Senator Steans: While I commend you for some creative thinking in helping individuals with disabilities achieve community living in an affordable, sustainable way, I have some concerns about SB 1614. My main concern is that in creating a " new " 6-bed community living arrangement, we will lock in a model that doesn't work. While 6-bed homes are a vast improvement over 100 or more bed institutions, what we really need is a new Medicaid Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waiver that promotes and supports individuals in living arrangements and meaningful days/employment that work best for them with friends of their choice. What we need is a waiver and/or legislation that reflects both individual choice, individual need, individual plans and individual resources and that creates a way to measure valued outcomes consistent with the four goals of the ADA: Equality of opportunity; Independent living; Economic self sufficiency; and Full participation. According to the latest data from the Institute and the University of Minnesota, the normative living arrangement is three or fewer individuals with intellectual disabilities. The 6-bed model is a 1990's model. It will also end up with the State purchasing and/or building expensive property to defend forever; a problem we already have with many providers who see real estate as their essence for being rather than services and supports. We know that currently, we do not have quality in housing and programming for people with intellectual disabilities in Illinois. We fail in almost every area on most national data sets. We need to be budgeting for outcomes, in which case, the question becomes, what should the state be buying on behalf of individuals with disabilities and how can it measure what it buys in order to ensure effectiveness and efficiency? If the legislature can focus on Olmstead, with the outcome of living arrangements in the most integrated setting, along with the adoption of the tenets of the ADA, that would be a starting point for systemic change in Illinois. It seems to me that creating 6-bed group homes that will be run by the State, provides a quick fix for the elected officials, in order to mollify the unions, without much thought for the valued outcomes desired for individuals with intellectual disabilities. It will also be difficult for long term institutional staff to make a dramatic shift in their philosophy to see individuals as citizens rather than patients or residents. I know some folks will be grateful for some baby steps toward closing the large state institutions, and close them, we should. But, I think it would be worthwhile to step back and think about the ramifications of creating a new model, especially an outdated one, before we fix the system that is already failing the individuals it was designed to serve. Thanks for all that you do, to help citizens with intellectual disabilities in Illinois. Ellen Ellen Garber Bronfeld egskb@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.