Re: Many Cancers Hereditary

[Guest guest]

I find the environmental factors interesting. Second-hand smoking? Eating

habits?

Gerry Danen

---------------------------------------

* www.danen.org * main website *

* gdanen.blogspot.com * weblog *

---------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

I grew up eating organic vegertarian food, no smoking by me or

anyone around me. I got breast cancer at 36. Why? Because

five other women in my mom's side of the family had it. There

is no doubt about the importance of heredity! C

[Guest guest]

,

Some factors may play a bigger part than heredity.

For breast cancer, the most significant ones, in addition to

environmental toxins, are related to chosen and/or learned reproductive

behaviors.

Here're some of the risks:

1. Having no children or many children.

2. Having one's first child at the age of over 23.

3. Not having breastfed one's children, or having breastfed them for a

short time only.

4. Not having been breastfed as a baby, or having been breastfed for a

short time only.

5. Wearing a bra for extended periods of time every day.

6. Monogamy; few sexual partners; no sexual partners. (Nuns have the

highest rates of breast cancer of all professional groups.)

7. Oral contraceptives.

8. Underarm deodorants; regular underarm shaving.

9. Environmental toxins.

10.Depression.

If one or more of these apply to all of the women in the family who

got breast cancer, heredity as an explanation might be redundant.

Elena

[Guest guest]

If you want to read testimonies by others who have experienced healing,

e-mail me and I will share them with you.

God Bless, Diann

[Guest guest]

Please check out http://www.danen.org/h/diary/s.shtml for another

healing testimony.

Gerry

[Guest guest]

Elena, this is the information I want to know more about. If you have

study sources, please let me know.

Thanks, Gerry

Here're some of the risks:

1. Having no children or many children.

2. Having one's first child at the age of over 23.

3. Not having breastfed one's children, or having breastfed them for a

short time only.

[rest snipped]

[Guest guest]

cbmd3@... said she really didn't trust tumor marker tests,

that one came back " normal " for her and she had a 2-1/2 cent tumor.

What was the doctor's explanation?

[Guest guest]

I really don't trust tumor marker tests, one came back " normal " and I had a 2

1/2 cent tumor! C

[Guest guest]

About the AMAS blood test, please note that it is not a " tumor marker "

test, which is why it is so much better.

I agree with 's skepticism of tumor marker tests -- they

can reflect a condition other than cancer, such as

inflammation and/or infection. Unfortunately, many probably think

they do otherwise and they have expectations that simply cannot be met.

This is one of the more common myths, misconceptions, and

misunderstandings about cancer. Bob B.

[Guest guest]

The doctor said it's not a fully reliable test

C

szukidavis@... wrote: What was the doctor's explanation?

" Life is not holding a good hand; Life is playing a poor hand well. "

Danish proverb