Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: sweeteners; meat

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

In a message dated 7/28/04 9:38:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

leonardleonard1@... writes:

> However, I'd avoid all red meat (except POSSIBLY grass-fed organic) if

> I had or was recovering from cancer, except perhaps if I had leukemia,

> lymphoma, myeloma, or melanoma.

>

why for these particular diseases?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 7/28/04 9:38:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

leonardleonard1@... writes:

> what about agave and vegetable glycerine?

> Agave's certainly 1 of the safer sweeteners. It's low-glycemic, so I'm

> sure is fine in moderation.

>

It is also delicious...better than stevia. You have to be sure to check the

glycemic index which should be 10 or less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

From: <szukidavis@...>

> In a message dated 7/28/04 6:43:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

> mkathryn59@... writes:

> > NO SUGARS. Only Stevia

>

> what about agave and vegetable glycerine?

Agave's certainly 1 of the safer sweeteners. It's low-glycemic, so I'm

sure is fine in moderation.

> In a message dated 7/28/04 6:43:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

> mkathryn59@... writes:

>

>

> > The less meat and animal the better because all meat is fed with

> > growth hormones

Most conventional meat is.

> > and this causes cancer

Yes.

> what about naturally raised meat?

I think organic poultry's fine, possibly even lamb & game (and

particularly Alaskan salmon, sardines, herring, & rainbow trout).

However, I'd avoid all red meat (except POSSIBLY grass-fed organic) if

I had or was recovering from cancer, except perhaps if I had leukemia,

lymphoma, myeloma, or melanoma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> In a message dated 7/28/04 9:38:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

> leonardleonard1@e... writes:

>

>

> > However, I'd avoid all red meat (except POSSIBLY grass-fed

organic) if

> > I had or was recovering from cancer, except perhaps if I had

leukemia,

> > lymphoma, myeloma, or melanoma.

> >

>

> why for these particular diseases?

That's according to (among others) / findings -- they

believe people with these cancers need red meat for recovery, since

it is the " obligatory carnivores " among us who tend to get them.

Their reasoning and clinical experience supporting this view can be

found in their works. bases his dietary recommendations on

extensive bloodwork, and they are widely different for different

individuals. He asserts they offer not one or even four but almost

a hundred different diets based on individual needs; if it is true,

and if the decisive factors in favor of seeking particular foods and

avoiding other foods are realistic rather than ideological, and a

sound balance of the predictive scientific models and the actual

empirical observations (which tend to conform to the scientific

model by varying margins, and sometimes not at all), it should be a

perfectly correct approach.

Elena

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...