Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

3 decades later, suit is filed over vaccination

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

3 decades later, suit is filed over vaccination

Monday, March 25, 2002

By PAULO LIMA

Staff Writer

<A HREF= " http://www.bergen.com/page.php?level_3_id=7 & page=2732300 " >

NorthJersey.com - North Jersey News</A>

Mark Moreno is 35 but has the intellect of a toddler. He needs help feeding

himself and crawls around the floor of the Brick Township home he shares with

his mother, who has been his caretaker all his life.

Moreno also has had to wear a helmet to protect his brain since surgeons

removed parts of his skull to excise a tumor.

In January, Moreno's lawyers filed a lawsuit against two pharmaceutical

giants, alleging that his tumor was caused by a monkey virus that Moreno

contracted from polio vaccinations he received more than 30 years ago.

The suit is the second filed in Bergen County and one of just four nationwide

that accuse major drug companies of doling out millions of doses of polio

vaccines tainted with the simian virus known as SV40. The virus is the

subject of debate in the medical community, where many believe it is at least

partially responsible for certain rare forms of cancer and tumors.

The Moreno suit names Pfizer, American Home Products, and American Cyanamid,

which is now a subsidiary of American Home Products. Last week, AHP changed

its name to Wyeth, which had been the name of its pharmaceutical division.

The companies were the only ones manufacturing the oral polio vaccine at the

time Moreno was inoculated, between May 1968 and October 1970. The suit

contends the companies did not adequately test their stocks for SV40 - even

after government regulations required them to do so - and thus distributed

the tainted vaccines to millions of Americans.

Market leader

According to the lawsuit, American Cyanamid dominated the market, selling

about 84 percent of all oral polio vaccine distributed in the United States

during the period when Moreno was vaccinated.

" They refuse to admit that they haven't tested or that their neutralization

[of the virus] does not work,'' said Philadelphia attorney Stanley P. Kops,

who specializes in vaccine-related litigation and is involved in all four of

the SV40 lawsuits. " Let American Cyanamid come out and tell the truth. Did

they test for SV40 and can they assure you that it's safe?''

Doug Petkus, a spokesman for Madison-based Wyeth, said the company wouldn't

discuss any aspect of the case.

" We're talking about litigation here, so I can't comment,'' Petkus said.

Pfizer spokeswoman McGowan also declined to respond to the suit's

allegations.

" We did receive the papers and we are reviewing it with counsel right now,''

McGowan said. " We can't specifically comment on any of the allegations

because we're still in the information-gathering stage.''

Moreno's mother, Eileen, is her son's round-the-clock caretaker. She tries to

make life as normal as possible for what essentially is a 200-pound infant.

Sometimes, she said, she paints rocks gold and stashes them around the yard

because her son likes to search for " treasure.''

" I love him very much,'' she said. " I'd cut my heart out with a spoon for

him. But it's made life very difficult.

" The way I see it, I'm just as crippled as he is. I have to do everything he

does. Whatever Mark can't do, we can't do.''

Moreno was 2½ years old when he walked into a cabinet. Realizing he was

partially blind, Eileen Moreno took him to doctors who discovered a brain

tumor and promptly removed it. Brain swelling from the operation left Moreno

in a coma for two months and forced another surgery, this one to remove half

of his brain, his mother said.

Eileen Moreno can't help but think about what her son has missed as a result.

" It makes me feel very betrayed for one thing,'' she said. " It's destroyed

his life. It's destroyed my life. I could have had grandchildren from him. He

could have friends. He could have a girlfriend.''

Making the vaccine

Producing the polio vaccine begins with growing the polio virus on monkey

kidney tissue. In the version given by injection, known as IPV, the treated

dead polio virus is injected into the recipient. The oral vaccine, known as

OPV, involves giving the recipient a dose of the weakened live polio virus.

In either case, a series of doses produces immunity to polio.

In 1960, five years after the vaccine was developed, researchers discovered

SV40 in much of the vaccine seed stocks.

By 1963, an estimated 10 million to 30 million Americans had received tainted

oral vaccines, according to research.

After SV40 was shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals, the government

required producers in 1961 to screen their stocks and eliminate the virus.

They did this by treating vaccine seed stocks with an antiserum and by

growing the virus on kidney tissue from a different kind of monkey. But some

researchers now question whether the measures were entirely successful,

particularly in the case of the oral vaccine.

By the time Moreno received his oral doses as a baby in Manhattan, all

vaccines were long thought to have been SV40-free.

Kops and Hackensack lawyer Caminiti, who are working together on the

two Bergen County cases, insist the vaccine is the only possible source of

the monkey virus their client contracted.

" I don't think he was bitten by a monkey,'' Kops said.

Laboratory tests last Aprilfound SV40 present in Moreno's tumor, Caminiti

said. To be successful, however, the attorneys must prove that it caused the

brain tumor.

The National Cancer Institute's position on SV40 and cancers is mixed. On the

one hand, the institute cites several studies as having " failed to detect an

increased cancer risk in those likely to have been exposed to the virus.''

However, it also says: " There is some evidence to suggest that SV40,

unrelated to polio vaccine, may be associated with human cancer.''

Some studies have suggested that SV40 may act in tandem with asbestos to

cause mesothelioma, a rare cancer. SV40 has been found in many mesothelioma

tissue samples.

A natural question arises: If so many people received the SV40-tainted

vaccines, then why haven't more developed cancers and tumors attributed to it?

Kops believes SV40 is lingering latent within millions of Americans and could

begin affecting select carriers in coming years.

" There's a 30- to 45-year latency period; it's a slow-growing cancer,'' Kops

said. " A person who was immunized in 1962 probably will not show the first

symptoms for another five or six years [from now].''

So far, researchers at the National Cancer Institute say there is no evidence

to support Kops' theory.

The NCI statement cites long-term studies in Sweden, Germany, and the United

States that have " failed to detect an increased cancer risk in those likely

to have been exposed to the virus.''

700,000 kids in study

The Swedish study examined 700,000 children who received the SV40-infected

vaccines in 1957. Researchers followed up 36 years later and found no

significant increase in cancer rates when compared with people who had not

received the tainted vaccines.

The German study followed 886,000 subjects for 22 years, also failing to turn

up a discernible link.

Current conventional wisdom is that the vaccine is SV40-free. The oral

vaccine is quickly falling out of favor, and the federal Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention now recommends that all infants receive four doses of

the injectable version. That's because the oral vaccine is much more likely

to cause cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio, the CDC says.

In those rare cases - about eight to 10 are documented in the United States

each year - children infected with the live-virus vaccine actually contract

the disease to which they were supposed to develop immunity.

It was while litigating those types of cases that Kops said he became aware

of the SV40 controversy. In an article published in a cancer research journal

two years ago, he urged vaccine manufacturers to allow independent

researchers to test the stocks from which the doses were produced.

The lawyers say the drug companies so far have not been very forthcoming with

records surrounding their own testing of the vaccine stocks. Americian

Cyanamid, which is now owned by Wyeth, has asserted it lost those records,

Kops said.

" When you're involved in product liability litigation, their attitude is

always to batten down the hatches, even when there's a compelling argument

that they cooperate,'' Caminiti said.

Staff Writer o Lima's e-mail address is lima@...

2732300

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...