Guest guest Posted December 24, 2011 Report Share Posted December 24, 2011 " My doctor told me he has seen the hiv virus under a microscope and has pictures " Oh, just the same old electron microscope stuff which is not how the existence or presence of a virus is proven. There still has not been any isolation of HIV virus. You can google those electron microscope pictures. Nothing new said in these HIV drug advertising posts coming in together. We heard the same supposed replication and attack modus twenty years ago. That unproven theory was always part of the scare tactic. What the PCR test inventor says about HIV PCR testing is that the sample is too watered down and no reason is given for conspicuously and unscientifically and suspiciously unscientifically, with vested interest, diluting the sample so that the test becomes invalid as far as proving HIV is present or that HIV exists. Then when real tests are given they prove that the dna fragments belong to fifty pathogens and/or recent pregnancy. Needless to say, HIV PCR testing does not exclude dozens of more likely causes of a positive result, much less prove HIV exists. We have been over this ground many times, and to do so again and again is not the purpose of this group. We are hear to begin with agreement that HIV does not exist or if there is a retrovirus it does no harm, and then to discuss the real problems, including healing damage from HIV drugs, and how people are addressing the lifestyle illnesses and opportunistic infections, whether those are lifestyle or HIV drug caused infections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.