Re: Humic and Fulvic Acid??

June 23, 2010

I orginally posted the Humic/Fulvic acid link ....if dig back about a year I

posted a link (which I cant find right now in my bokmarks) and it showed lab

results of an individual who reverted back to HIV neg ...of course the

antibodies were still there but the viral load was 0.

Then some-one posted on here that they tried it for a few weeks and dint feel

any better. Are you serious!!!!! We need viral load reports ...not " I didnt feel

any better " remarks. It takes months for this stuff to do its trick.

Google Humic acid HIV. Here's one example:

http://vfihumicacid.com/

HIV

" â€¦the ability

to inhibit the replication of wild-type strains (of

HIV-1) is

an obvious (and, arguably, the most important)

prerequisite in

order that any HIV-1 drug be considered useful. The

results obtained

to date have shown that (natural) Humic Acid as well as

synthetic

humic acid(s) do, in fact, inhibit the replication of

HIV-1 wild-type

strains, in addition to assaulting in a unique way the

intracellular

replicative events of the virus. " " It was found in this

work that both synthetic as well as naturally-occurring

humic

substances extracted from soil are in fact capable of

inhibiting

HIV-1 replication. " Research team at USC School of

Medicine,

January, 1998.

" The Humates

are

potent inhibitors of acute HIV infection in antiviral

evaluation

models. The present studies point to an antiviral target

occurring

before proviral integration, possibly involving virus

attachment

and entry. " " We were able to confirm antiviral activity

for the humates and define their potential antiviral

target to

the pre-integration phase of HIV replication, providing

preliminary

data that a portion of the antiviral activity is due to

inhibition

of virus attachment. "

Jim A.

Turpin Ph.D.,

Manager Retrovirus Research Laboratory

Loftus, Supervisor Retrovirus Research Laboratory

Southern Research Institute, September, 2000

" [VFI humic

acid]

inhibited HIV-1 infection of MT-2 cells with an IC(50)

of 12.5

microg/ml. Treatment of free and cell-attached HIV with

(Humic

Acid) irreversibly reduced infectivity, while the

susceptibility

of target cells to the virus was not impaired by

treatment prior

to infection. The infectivity of the HIV particles was

inhibited

by interference with CD4 binding and the V3

loop-mediated step

of virus entry. No viral resistance to (Humic Acid)

developed

over a 12-week period in vitro. (Humic Acid) therefore

holds promise

for the treatment of HIV-infected patients. "

van

Rensburg CE,

Department of Pharmacology, University of Pretoria,

Pretoria,

South Africa; Dekker J, Enerkom (Pty) Ltd, Pretoria,

South Africa;

Weis R, TL, Janse van Rensburg E, Schneider J.

" Humic acids

are

natural constituents of soil and ground water and mainly

consist

of mixtures of polycyclic phenolic compounds. [VFI humic

acid]

inhibited HIV-1 infection of MT-2 cells with an IC50 of

50-300

ng/ml. Inhibition of HIV-induced syncytium formation was

observed

at 10-50 micrograms/ml. Treatment of free and

cell-attached HIV

with [VFI humic acid] irreversibly reduced its

infectivity. [VFI

humic acid] interfered with the CD4-induced proteolytic

cleavage

of the V3 loop of virion gp120SU. Furthermore, binding

of V3 loop-specific

antibodies was irreversibly inhibited, whereas binding

of soluble

CD4 to gp120SU on virus and infected cells was not

affected. In

conclusion, our data suggest, that the [VFI humic acid]

inhibits

the infectivity of HIV particles by interference with a

V3 loop-mediated

step of virus entry. "

Schneider

J, Weis

R, Manner C, Kary B, Werner A, Seubert BJ, Riede UN.

Abteilung Virologie, Institut fur Medizinische

Mikrobiologie und

Hygiene der Universitat, Freiburg, Germany.

From: Donnell <hu_06_11@...>

Subject: Humic and Fulvic Acid??

cures for AIDS

Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 3:12 AM

Hi,

I was recently diagnosed as HIV positive Nov 2nd 2010. My neck glands where

obviously swollen VL100,000Â CD 250.Â I started taking Atripla March15th. My

glands reduced, current labs VL 650 and CD 350. I've been searching for a

alternative natural treatments for this virus and foundÂ ( MMS, Ozone,

Cellfood, Dr. Sebi, Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide etc.) I recently came across

Humic and Fulvic acid. I'm thinking about stopping the Atripla and using Humic

and Fulvic Acid instead. Has anyone had success with these products after

discontinuing antiviral medicine? I have google them and found no bad reviews.Â

I'm scared about stopping the medcine do to the fact my doctor thinks I may

build up a resistance or glands will re-enlarge. I don't smoke or drink and

exercise often.Â If someone has used these products or any other natural

treatments with success olease let me know.

Thanks,

Donnell

June 23, 2010

I tried a gallon eachÂ of humic and fulvic acids over about a three month

period, but sorry I don't have any bloodwork from them.Â The website did

mention that I should expect a herxheimer reaction from them, but I did not get

it.Â I have had the reaction from other things...Â

Â

I ended up pouring the last bit down the drain after reading this from a book

called " Cancer Confidential " by Prof. -Mumby, MD, MB, ChB, PhD...

Â

I know we were talking about humic acid, but humic acid is made up of fulvic

acid...

Â

#48. Fulvic Acid. - Even Worse!

This is presently being promoted as a cure for tumors, as part of a " colloidal

mineral " regimen.

This is an obvious fraud and differs from most of the others because fulvic acid

is not just a harmless placebo.

As of October 2001, there is exactly nothing published in the mainstream medical

literature on fulvic acid having any therapeutic effects.

What I do know is that fulvic acid is a fungal poison and free-radical generator

that is considered, by people who actually study this sort of thing, as the

first or second most important cause of the epidemic of mutilating arthritis in

central Asia (Cell & Tiss. Res. 297: 141, 1999; Int. Orthop. 25: 175, 2001;

Virch. Arch. A. 423: 483, 1993; and many others).

Scientific articles published on fulvic acid are limited to descriptions of how

much of this pollutant are present in various water systems, and how much should

be considered safe. It is amazing that thanks to slick advertizing, people are

now paying money to ingest what the poor nations consider a dangerous pollutant.

Many MDs seem to have been fooled by the pseudo-science too.

I wouldnâ€™t even take the stuff for any reason, never mind rely on it to help

with cancer.