Guest guest Posted July 4, 2007 Report Share Posted July 4, 2007 Hey Guys Visited the aidstruth website link ? Theres some fantastic info in there > Like how the Zambian Aids cure was derived from pesticide. Dont get me wrong. I hate the FDA. Also my relatives side effects and dependence on the mainstream Pharmas + the lack of gov investigation into tetrasil / ozone therapy's et al but the site really does have some good info. At the same time E.ds conviction about the AIDS trance remains extremely potent for me. But the devil is in the details as always. Correct mental attitude does have the ability to overpower any physical invader far as I have seen so far. DM mercury2502 <pierpaolorizzo@...> wrote: This is a great web site. Finally, there is a focal point on the web which answers the AIDS denialists. http://aidstruth.org/ Duesberg was one of my professors at Berkeley. is an organic chemist who made his name conducting research on retroviruses...but not the HIV virus. He is very intelligent and a good bench scientist. can be very funny and engaging at times, but overall he is a second rate person. This comment has nothing to do with his denial of the HIV virus and AIDS. He seemed to delight in humiliating people, including visiting scientists who gave lectures at Berkeley. When the lights dimmed and the projector was turned on, always moved close to the projector light beam so he could make hand puppets that projected on the screen. The students laughed, but the lecturers and most faculty members hated him. I don't know if is a homophobe, but one of my friends, an opnely gay man in s lab, was treated like shit by him. When my friend finished his research, refused to pay the " page charges " that scientists have to pay to get their studies published in scientific journals. This money would normally come out of 's research grant. My friend had to pay the $500 out of his own pocket. It was pure meaness on 's part. is a mean spirited person with tunnel vision, and nothing is going to change him. once said that science was not a popularity contest. He is absolutely right. And he has the right to disagree to accepted dogma. But after 20 years, and tens of thousands of research papers, you'd think he would get the message that the HIV virus does indeed cause AIDS. Dream on. --------------------------------- Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on TV. --------------------------------- Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2007 Report Share Posted July 4, 2007 Hey Guys Visited the aidstruth website link ? Theres some fantastic info in there > Like how the Zambian Aids cure was derived from pesticide. Dont get me wrong. I hate the FDA. Also my relatives side effects and dependence on the mainstream Pharmas + the lack of gov investigation into tetrasil / ozone therapy's et al but the site really does have some good info. At the same time E.ds conviction about the AIDS trance remains extremely potent for me. But the devil is in the details as always. Correct mental attitude does have the ability to overpower any physical invader far as I have seen so far. DM mercury2502 <pierpaolorizzo@...> wrote: This is a great web site. Finally, there is a focal point on the web which answers the AIDS denialists. http://aidstruth.org/ Duesberg was one of my professors at Berkeley. is an organic chemist who made his name conducting research on retroviruses...but not the HIV virus. He is very intelligent and a good bench scientist. can be very funny and engaging at times, but overall he is a second rate person. This comment has nothing to do with his denial of the HIV virus and AIDS. He seemed to delight in humiliating people, including visiting scientists who gave lectures at Berkeley. When the lights dimmed and the projector was turned on, always moved close to the projector light beam so he could make hand puppets that projected on the screen. The students laughed, but the lecturers and most faculty members hated him. I don't know if is a homophobe, but one of my friends, an opnely gay man in s lab, was treated like shit by him. When my friend finished his research, refused to pay the " page charges " that scientists have to pay to get their studies published in scientific journals. This money would normally come out of 's research grant. My friend had to pay the $500 out of his own pocket. It was pure meaness on 's part. is a mean spirited person with tunnel vision, and nothing is going to change him. once said that science was not a popularity contest. He is absolutely right. And he has the right to disagree to accepted dogma. But after 20 years, and tens of thousands of research papers, you'd think he would get the message that the HIV virus does indeed cause AIDS. Dream on. --------------------------------- Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on TV. --------------------------------- Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.