Fw: Newsletter: Town Hall Meeting Issues

[Guest guest]

Untitled DocumentHi all:

I think this newsletter from Senator Garrett gives a nice summary of some of the

most current issues facing our state at present.

Ellen

Ellen Garber Bronfeld

egskb@...

Newsletter: Town Hall Meeting Issues

March 26, 2010

Dear Ellen ~

Thank you to all who participated in the recent Town Hall Meetings held in

Lake Bluff, Highland Park, Des Plaines, and Northbrook. There were many issues

that were brought to my attention at these meeting and that I would now like to

summarize and address those in turn.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balancing the Illinois Budget

Pension Reform

Illinois now faces a budget deficit of about $13 billion. One of the

largest factors contributing to the state's ongoing fiscal difficulties is

Illinois' unfunded pension liability.

The Illinois General Assembly responsible for funding 5 pension systems:

the General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), the State Employees' Retirement

System of Illinois (SERS), the State Universities Retirement System (SURS),

Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the Judges Retirement System (JRS).

Currently, repayment of the liability (often called the " Pension Ramp " )

backloads the costs and creates an escalating fiscal pressure over the long

term.

What is being done to reform Illinois' retirement systems?

For New Hires Only:

House Amendment 4 to Senate Bill 1946 overwhelmingly passed out of both

chambers on March 24, 2010. The proposal, would raise the retirement age to 67

in order to qualify for full benefits, restrict annual cost of living increases

for retirees, limit the salary that can be used to determine retirement benefits

(60% as opposed to 85% of average final salary) and restrict those who qualify

to earn enhanced benefits under the " alternative formula " set aside for high

risk jobs. When signed into law, the changes would affect future members of 13

pension systems controlled by the state, including all five state-funded pension

systems: GARS, JRS, SURS, SERS, and TRS. The combined savings to the state from

this proposal has a rough estimate of $500 million to $1 billion for the next

fiscal year and is said to save the state $119 billion over the next 35 years.

Pension reform legislation, would also require that individuals forgo

receipt of a pension if that individual returns to work for the state,

contributing to another pension (i.e. if a retired teacher were to become a

state representative thereby contributing to GARS and eligible to receive TRS

benefits).

These changes moved through both chambers of the General Assembly

relatively quickly before an upcoming bond sale to pay for public works

projects. The state was in danger of a possible " double downgrade " in its bond

ratings, and such a downgrade would've put Illinois at the same level as

California's dismal credit rating, costing the state even more money.

Ultimately, long-term pension stability is the goal.

Cuts in Spending

There is about $27 billion in the state's General Revenue Fund (GRF) and

we have a $13 billion deficit. The truth is that we cannot cut 40% of state

spending to close the budget gap. The GRF, funded primarily by state income

taxes, sales taxes, and state service fees, provides the funding for the state's

5 pension systems, and finances most of the activities associated with State

government such as education, prisons, and human services. Because of the

state's fixed obligations, we could cut out all of state government and still

not break even.

There is a movement in the State to push agencies to prioritize their

spending (which is not currently happening) rather than cutting a set percentage

across the board for all state agency programs. Illinois already has the lowest

headcount of state employees in the nation, so it would be difficult to make

further cuts in state government employees without sacrificing service. We need

to determine which programs work efficiently and effectively and which do not.

By forcing agency heads to evaluate their programs and determining which

programs are absolutely essential, we can cut spending on programs that are

truly ineffective.

Unfunded Mandates

State unfunded mandates are statutes or regulations that require a local

government body to perform certain actions yet provide no money for fulfilling

those requirements. Local governments, including school districts, complain that

unfunded mandates places an unfair burden on these lower units of government,

creating additional expenses and compounding any budgetary problems.

Senate Bill 3000, of which I am the chief sponsor, creates the

instructional mandates task force to explore and examine all existing

instructional mandates governing state public schools and make recommendations

as to the appropriateness of all existing mandates, the imposition of future

mandates, and waivers of instructional mandates. The bill would also create a

moratorium on all instructional mandates for public schools until the task force

has concluded its proceedings and submitted a final report to the Government and

the General Assembly.

Increasing Revenues

Combined polls of all the town hall meetings held (Lake Bluff, Highland

Park, Northbrook, Des Plaines) showed that a majority (approximately 2/3) would

support a tax increase of an additional 1-2% of a person's adjusted gross income

if significant pension reforms and sufficient budget cuts were made. An

increase in the income tax is just one of many proposals being considered to

increase the state's general revenue. Budget cuts themselves cannot completely

reduce the budget deficit. We as a state need to increase revenue, and we need

to explore every available option in order to do that.

Funding Education

A proposed Illinois budget for FY2011 would cut $1.3 billion from local

education. In order to reverse these proposed cuts, a 1% education income tax

surcharge is been considered. Funding education should be a top priority in

Illinois, as it gives the foundation for the next generation to achieve success.

However, we learned from the Town Hall meetings that many people are weary of

raising the income tax without sufficient safeguards in place to ensure that the

revenue would go towards funding education. In the 1970s, the Lottery was sold

to the people of Illinois as a revenue generator for education. While there is

requirement that the Lottery revenue be kept in the Education Fund, the state

concurrently reduces its appropriations from the General Revenue Fund towards

public education. The idea is that, as Lottery money comes in, it frees up other

state tax money to spend elsewhere. Effectively, the Lottery provides

approximately $625 million to the General Revenue Fund. Without substantial

assurances that the income tax surcharge will exclusively be used to close the

budget gap in education, I do not think we can expect Illinois citizens to be

sold on the idea that the a 1% tax increase would be targeted specifically for

education.

Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the

income tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring

more equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school

districts, 70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the

City of Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore,

there is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

Redistricting Reform (Fair Map)

For decades legislators have been able to create their own districts by

literally drawing a name out of a hat, thereby increasing the chances that

Illinois legislature elections are won by the incumbent. A proposed amendment

would take the power to draw the district maps away from the legislature and

transfer it to a temporary redistricting advisory commission. The criteria for

drawing a district, in addition to requiring compact, contiguous and equally

populated districts, would require that the district be drawn by following

geographic features and municipal boundaries without discriminating against one

political party or group. The proposed amendment would also require

transparency in the process rather than allowing lines to be drawn behind closed

doors. We need to ensure fairness in the democratic process, and this is one

way to do that.

Red Light Cameras

Many constituents reached out to me regarding the practice of using red

light cameras at intersections by municipalities. Many felt that the use of red

light cameras was primarily used to generate revenue for local government as

opposed to driver safety. One of the main criticisms of red light cameras is

the limited opportunity for review of traffic tickets issued, and many argued

that they were not afforded the right to properly adjudicate the red light

traffic tickets. Earlier this year, Senator Duffy introduced legislation, which

would have repealed the use of red light cameras entirely. That bill did not

make it out of committee.

Senate Bill 935, which represents a compromise worked out by Senate

President Cullerton, passed out of the Senate on March 25, 2010 with a vote

of 45-10. This legislation calls for more protections for those under the video

scrutiny. Some of the requirements provided in the bill include: technical

violations like stopping just over the stop line would no longer be ticketed;

locations of red-light cameras would be publicized; violators would no longer

have to pay a fee to appeal their tickets; and police officers or trained

specialists would review tapes and issue tickets.

Free Rides for Seniors

The House voted 83-27 to modify the free rides for seniors on public

transit systems program put in place by ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich, in favor of

applying means testing to the program. Under House Bill 4654, any senior who

qualifies for the circuit breaker program (i.e. anyone 65 and older making less

than $27,610 a year or couples making less than a combined $36,635 a year) would

continue to ride for free on public transit. Seniors with higher incomes would

ride for half-price on the CTA, Metra, and Pace. The bill is now in the Senate

where it is expected to get the necessary support it needs to become law. I

have been in favor of means testing the free rides for seniors from the

beginning. Seniors would only receive free rides if they couldn't afford to

pay. This measure is expected to generate $37 million in new transit revenue.

Asian Carp

As you are probably aware, there has been a lot of recent discussion in

the media and among key stakeholders regarding the growing threat of Asian carp

in Illinois waterways and the affect this species could have on the fishing

industry. I held a hearing on this issue earlier this year to address this

growing concern. One of the topics that was discussed was creating a culinary

market for Asian carp. In fact, Illinois fisheries have been exporting Asian

carp to Israel and other countries for human consumption for years. I have been

speaking with local chefs and have been working with the Department of Natural

Resources trying to plan an " Asian Carp Cook-Off " for later this year. I think

we need to explore the possibility of promoting this species for human

consumption and taking advantage of a less than ideal situation. Who knows? This

could be a new market for Illinois businesses.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will continue to hold Town Hall Meetings, as they are an invaluable

resource to better understand your needs and concerns and to facilitate the

drafting of future bills and public policy. As always, I welcome any additional

comments or concerns.

Sincerely,

This message was sent from State Senator Garrett to

egskb@.... It was sent from: Illinois State Senate, 425 Sheridan Road,

Highwood, IL 60040. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below.

Email Marketing by

Manage your subscription

[Guest guest]

Untitled DocumentHi all:

I think this newsletter from Senator Garrett gives a nice summary of some of the

most current issues facing our state at present.

Ellen

Ellen Garber Bronfeld

egskb@...

Newsletter: Town Hall Meeting Issues

March 26, 2010

Dear Ellen ~

Thank you to all who participated in the recent Town Hall Meetings held in

Lake Bluff, Highland Park, Des Plaines, and Northbrook. There were many issues

that were brought to my attention at these meeting and that I would now like to

summarize and address those in turn.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Balancing the Illinois Budget

Pension Reform

Illinois now faces a budget deficit of about $13 billion. One of the

largest factors contributing to the state's ongoing fiscal difficulties is

Illinois' unfunded pension liability.

The Illinois General Assembly responsible for funding 5 pension systems:

the General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), the State Employees' Retirement

System of Illinois (SERS), the State Universities Retirement System (SURS),

Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the Judges Retirement System (JRS).

Currently, repayment of the liability (often called the " Pension Ramp " )

backloads the costs and creates an escalating fiscal pressure over the long

term.

What is being done to reform Illinois' retirement systems?

For New Hires Only:

House Amendment 4 to Senate Bill 1946 overwhelmingly passed out of both

chambers on March 24, 2010. The proposal, would raise the retirement age to 67

in order to qualify for full benefits, restrict annual cost of living increases

for retirees, limit the salary that can be used to determine retirement benefits

(60% as opposed to 85% of average final salary) and restrict those who qualify

to earn enhanced benefits under the " alternative formula " set aside for high

risk jobs. When signed into law, the changes would affect future members of 13

pension systems controlled by the state, including all five state-funded pension

systems: GARS, JRS, SURS, SERS, and TRS. The combined savings to the state from

this proposal has a rough estimate of $500 million to $1 billion for the next

fiscal year and is said to save the state $119 billion over the next 35 years.

Pension reform legislation, would also require that individuals forgo

receipt of a pension if that individual returns to work for the state,

contributing to another pension (i.e. if a retired teacher were to become a

state representative thereby contributing to GARS and eligible to receive TRS

benefits).

These changes moved through both chambers of the General Assembly

relatively quickly before an upcoming bond sale to pay for public works

projects. The state was in danger of a possible " double downgrade " in its bond

ratings, and such a downgrade would've put Illinois at the same level as

California's dismal credit rating, costing the state even more money.

Ultimately, long-term pension stability is the goal.

Cuts in Spending

There is about $27 billion in the state's General Revenue Fund (GRF) and

we have a $13 billion deficit. The truth is that we cannot cut 40% of state

spending to close the budget gap. The GRF, funded primarily by state income

taxes, sales taxes, and state service fees, provides the funding for the state's

5 pension systems, and finances most of the activities associated with State

government such as education, prisons, and human services. Because of the

state's fixed obligations, we could cut out all of state government and still

not break even.

There is a movement in the State to push agencies to prioritize their

spending (which is not currently happening) rather than cutting a set percentage

across the board for all state agency programs. Illinois already has the lowest

headcount of state employees in the nation, so it would be difficult to make

further cuts in state government employees without sacrificing service. We need

to determine which programs work efficiently and effectively and which do not.

By forcing agency heads to evaluate their programs and determining which

programs are absolutely essential, we can cut spending on programs that are

truly ineffective.

Unfunded Mandates

State unfunded mandates are statutes or regulations that require a local

government body to perform certain actions yet provide no money for fulfilling

those requirements. Local governments, including school districts, complain that

unfunded mandates places an unfair burden on these lower units of government,

creating additional expenses and compounding any budgetary problems.

Senate Bill 3000, of which I am the chief sponsor, creates the

instructional mandates task force to explore and examine all existing

instructional mandates governing state public schools and make recommendations

as to the appropriateness of all existing mandates, the imposition of future

mandates, and waivers of instructional mandates. The bill would also create a

moratorium on all instructional mandates for public schools until the task force

has concluded its proceedings and submitted a final report to the Government and

the General Assembly.

Increasing Revenues

Combined polls of all the town hall meetings held (Lake Bluff, Highland

Park, Northbrook, Des Plaines) showed that a majority (approximately 2/3) would

support a tax increase of an additional 1-2% of a person's adjusted gross income

if significant pension reforms and sufficient budget cuts were made. An

increase in the income tax is just one of many proposals being considered to

increase the state's general revenue. Budget cuts themselves cannot completely

reduce the budget deficit. We as a state need to increase revenue, and we need

to explore every available option in order to do that.

Funding Education

A proposed Illinois budget for FY2011 would cut $1.3 billion from local

education. In order to reverse these proposed cuts, a 1% education income tax

surcharge is been considered. Funding education should be a top priority in

Illinois, as it gives the foundation for the next generation to achieve success.

However, we learned from the Town Hall meetings that many people are weary of

raising the income tax without sufficient safeguards in place to ensure that the

revenue would go towards funding education. In the 1970s, the Lottery was sold

to the people of Illinois as a revenue generator for education. While there is

requirement that the Lottery revenue be kept in the Education Fund, the state

concurrently reduces its appropriations from the General Revenue Fund towards

public education. The idea is that, as Lottery money comes in, it frees up other

state tax money to spend elsewhere. Effectively, the Lottery provides

approximately $625 million to the General Revenue Fund. Without substantial

assurances that the income tax surcharge will exclusively be used to close the

budget gap in education, I do not think we can expect Illinois citizens to be

sold on the idea that the a 1% tax increase would be targeted specifically for

education.

Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the

income tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring

more equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school

districts, 70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the

City of Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore,

there is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

Redistricting Reform (Fair Map)

For decades legislators have been able to create their own districts by

literally drawing a name out of a hat, thereby increasing the chances that

Illinois legislature elections are won by the incumbent. A proposed amendment

would take the power to draw the district maps away from the legislature and

transfer it to a temporary redistricting advisory commission. The criteria for

drawing a district, in addition to requiring compact, contiguous and equally

populated districts, would require that the district be drawn by following

geographic features and municipal boundaries without discriminating against one

political party or group. The proposed amendment would also require

transparency in the process rather than allowing lines to be drawn behind closed

doors. We need to ensure fairness in the democratic process, and this is one

way to do that.

Red Light Cameras

Many constituents reached out to me regarding the practice of using red

light cameras at intersections by municipalities. Many felt that the use of red

light cameras was primarily used to generate revenue for local government as

opposed to driver safety. One of the main criticisms of red light cameras is

the limited opportunity for review of traffic tickets issued, and many argued

that they were not afforded the right to properly adjudicate the red light

traffic tickets. Earlier this year, Senator Duffy introduced legislation, which

would have repealed the use of red light cameras entirely. That bill did not

make it out of committee.

Senate Bill 935, which represents a compromise worked out by Senate

President Cullerton, passed out of the Senate on March 25, 2010 with a vote

of 45-10. This legislation calls for more protections for those under the video

scrutiny. Some of the requirements provided in the bill include: technical

violations like stopping just over the stop line would no longer be ticketed;

locations of red-light cameras would be publicized; violators would no longer

have to pay a fee to appeal their tickets; and police officers or trained

specialists would review tapes and issue tickets.

Free Rides for Seniors

The House voted 83-27 to modify the free rides for seniors on public

transit systems program put in place by ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich, in favor of

applying means testing to the program. Under House Bill 4654, any senior who

qualifies for the circuit breaker program (i.e. anyone 65 and older making less

than $27,610 a year or couples making less than a combined $36,635 a year) would

continue to ride for free on public transit. Seniors with higher incomes would

ride for half-price on the CTA, Metra, and Pace. The bill is now in the Senate

where it is expected to get the necessary support it needs to become law. I

have been in favor of means testing the free rides for seniors from the

beginning. Seniors would only receive free rides if they couldn't afford to

pay. This measure is expected to generate $37 million in new transit revenue.

Asian Carp

As you are probably aware, there has been a lot of recent discussion in

the media and among key stakeholders regarding the growing threat of Asian carp

in Illinois waterways and the affect this species could have on the fishing

industry. I held a hearing on this issue earlier this year to address this

growing concern. One of the topics that was discussed was creating a culinary

market for Asian carp. In fact, Illinois fisheries have been exporting Asian

carp to Israel and other countries for human consumption for years. I have been

speaking with local chefs and have been working with the Department of Natural

Resources trying to plan an " Asian Carp Cook-Off " for later this year. I think

we need to explore the possibility of promoting this species for human

consumption and taking advantage of a less than ideal situation. Who knows? This

could be a new market for Illinois businesses.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I will continue to hold Town Hall Meetings, as they are an invaluable

resource to better understand your needs and concerns and to facilitate the

drafting of future bills and public policy. As always, I welcome any additional

comments or concerns.

Sincerely,

This message was sent from State Senator Garrett to

egskb@.... It was sent from: Illinois State Senate, 425 Sheridan Road,

Highwood, IL 60040. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below.

Email Marketing by

Manage your subscription

[Guest guest]

Thanks for sharing Ellen. This excerpt intrigued me:

Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the income

tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring more

equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school districts,

70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the City of

Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore, there

is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

One thing that always perturbed me were the cry for more funding to the schools

in the areas because those of use in the suburbs paying 70-80 percent have

better facilities for our children. As a tax preparer, I have personally

noticed how much more in property tax I pay for a little single family attached

house (looks like a town house) with no yard as opposed to those in Chicago and

many Cook County suburbs.

I am also glad to see that the ridiculous Free Ride For Seniors is going to be

changed.

>

> Untitled DocumentHi all:

> I think this newsletter from Senator Garrett gives a nice summary of some of

the most current issues facing our state at present.

> Ellen

> Ellen Garber Bronfeld

> egskb@...

> Newsletter: Town Hall Meeting Issues

>

>

>

> March 26, 2010

>

> Dear Ellen ~

>

>

> Thank you to all who participated in the recent Town Hall Meetings held

in Lake Bluff, Highland Park, Des Plaines, and Northbrook. There were many

issues that were brought to my attention at these meeting and that I would now

like to summarize and address those in turn.

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> Balancing the Illinois Budget

> Pension Reform

>

> Illinois now faces a budget deficit of about $13 billion. One of the

largest factors contributing to the state's ongoing fiscal difficulties is

Illinois' unfunded pension liability.

>

> The Illinois General Assembly responsible for funding 5 pension

systems: the General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), the State Employees'

Retirement System of Illinois (SERS), the State Universities Retirement System

(SURS), Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the Judges Retirement System

(JRS). Currently, repayment of the liability (often called the " Pension Ramp " )

backloads the costs and creates an escalating fiscal pressure over the long

term.

>

> What is being done to reform Illinois' retirement systems?

>

>

> For New Hires Only:

>

> House Amendment 4 to Senate Bill 1946 overwhelmingly passed out of

both chambers on March 24, 2010. The proposal, would raise the retirement age

to 67 in order to qualify for full benefits, restrict annual cost of living

increases for retirees, limit the salary that can be used to determine

retirement benefits (60% as opposed to 85% of average final salary) and restrict

those who qualify to earn enhanced benefits under the " alternative formula " set

aside for high risk jobs. When signed into law, the changes would affect future

members of 13 pension systems controlled by the state, including all five

state-funded pension systems: GARS, JRS, SURS, SERS, and TRS. The combined

savings to the state from this proposal has a rough estimate of $500 million to

$1 billion for the next fiscal year and is said to save the state $119 billion

over the next 35 years.

> Pension reform legislation, would also require that individuals forgo

receipt of a pension if that individual returns to work for the state,

contributing to another pension (i.e. if a retired teacher were to become a

state representative thereby contributing to GARS and eligible to receive TRS

benefits).

>

> These changes moved through both chambers of the General Assembly

relatively quickly before an upcoming bond sale to pay for public works

projects. The state was in danger of a possible " double downgrade " in its bond

ratings, and such a downgrade would've put Illinois at the same level as

California's dismal credit rating, costing the state even more money.

>

> Ultimately, long-term pension stability is the goal.

>

> Cuts in Spending

>

> There is about $27 billion in the state's General Revenue Fund (GRF)

and we have a $13 billion deficit. The truth is that we cannot cut 40% of state

spending to close the budget gap. The GRF, funded primarily by state income

taxes, sales taxes, and state service fees, provides the funding for the state's

5 pension systems, and finances most of the activities associated with State

government such as education, prisons, and human services. Because of the

state's fixed obligations, we could cut out all of state government and still

not break even.

>

> There is a movement in the State to push agencies to prioritize their

spending (which is not currently happening) rather than cutting a set percentage

across the board for all state agency programs. Illinois already has the lowest

headcount of state employees in the nation, so it would be difficult to make

further cuts in state government employees without sacrificing service. We need

to determine which programs work efficiently and effectively and which do not.

By forcing agency heads to evaluate their programs and determining which

programs are absolutely essential, we can cut spending on programs that are

truly ineffective.

>

> Unfunded Mandates

>

> State unfunded mandates are statutes or regulations that require a

local government body to perform certain actions yet provide no money for

fulfilling those requirements. Local governments, including school districts,

complain that unfunded mandates places an unfair burden on these lower units of

government, creating additional expenses and compounding any budgetary problems.

>

> Senate Bill 3000, of which I am the chief sponsor, creates the

instructional mandates task force to explore and examine all existing

instructional mandates governing state public schools and make recommendations

as to the appropriateness of all existing mandates, the imposition of future

mandates, and waivers of instructional mandates. The bill would also create a

moratorium on all instructional mandates for public schools until the task force

has concluded its proceedings and submitted a final report to the Government and

the General Assembly.

>

> Increasing Revenues

>

> Combined polls of all the town hall meetings held (Lake Bluff,

Highland Park, Northbrook, Des Plaines) showed that a majority (approximately

2/3) would support a tax increase of an additional 1-2% of a person's adjusted

gross income if significant pension reforms and sufficient budget cuts were

made. An increase in the income tax is just one of many proposals being

considered to increase the state's general revenue. Budget cuts themselves

cannot completely reduce the budget deficit. We as a state need to increase

revenue, and we need to explore every available option in order to do that.

>

> Funding Education

>

> A proposed Illinois budget for FY2011 would cut $1.3 billion from local

education. In order to reverse these proposed cuts, a 1% education income tax

surcharge is been considered. Funding education should be a top priority in

Illinois, as it gives the foundation for the next generation to achieve success.

However, we learned from the Town Hall meetings that many people are weary of

raising the income tax without sufficient safeguards in place to ensure that the

revenue would go towards funding education. In the 1970s, the Lottery was sold

to the people of Illinois as a revenue generator for education. While there is

requirement that the Lottery revenue be kept in the Education Fund, the state

concurrently reduces its appropriations from the General Revenue Fund towards

public education. The idea is that, as Lottery money comes in, it frees up other

state tax money to spend elsewhere. Effectively, the Lottery provides

approximately $625 million to the General Revenue Fund. Without substantial

assurances that the income tax surcharge will exclusively be used to close the

budget gap in education, I do not think we can expect Illinois citizens to be

sold on the idea that the a 1% tax increase would be targeted specifically for

education.

> Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the

income tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring

more equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school

districts, 70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the

City of Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore,

there is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

>

> Redistricting Reform (Fair Map)

>

> For decades legislators have been able to create their own districts by

literally drawing a name out of a hat, thereby increasing the chances that

Illinois legislature elections are won by the incumbent. A proposed amendment

would take the power to draw the district maps away from the legislature and

transfer it to a temporary redistricting advisory commission. The criteria for

drawing a district, in addition to requiring compact, contiguous and equally

populated districts, would require that the district be drawn by following

geographic features and municipal boundaries without discriminating against one

political party or group. The proposed amendment would also require

transparency in the process rather than allowing lines to be drawn behind closed

doors. We need to ensure fairness in the democratic process, and this is one

way to do that.

>

>

> Red Light Cameras

>

> Many constituents reached out to me regarding the practice of using red

light cameras at intersections by municipalities. Many felt that the use of red

light cameras was primarily used to generate revenue for local government as

opposed to driver safety. One of the main criticisms of red light cameras is

the limited opportunity for review of traffic tickets issued, and many argued

that they were not afforded the right to properly adjudicate the red light

traffic tickets. Earlier this year, Senator Duffy introduced legislation, which

would have repealed the use of red light cameras entirely. That bill did not

make it out of committee.

>

> Senate Bill 935, which represents a compromise worked out by Senate

President Cullerton, passed out of the Senate on March 25, 2010 with a vote

of 45-10. This legislation calls for more protections for those under the video

scrutiny. Some of the requirements provided in the bill include: technical

violations like stopping just over the stop line would no longer be ticketed;

locations of red-light cameras would be publicized; violators would no longer

have to pay a fee to appeal their tickets; and police officers or trained

specialists would review tapes and issue tickets.

>

> Free Rides for Seniors

>

> The House voted 83-27 to modify the free rides for seniors on public

transit systems program put in place by ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich, in favor of

applying means testing to the program. Under House Bill 4654, any senior who

qualifies for the circuit breaker program (i.e. anyone 65 and older making less

than $27,610 a year or couples making less than a combined $36,635 a year) would

continue to ride for free on public transit. Seniors with higher incomes would

ride for half-price on the CTA, Metra, and Pace. The bill is now in the Senate

where it is expected to get the necessary support it needs to become law. I

have been in favor of means testing the free rides for seniors from the

beginning. Seniors would only receive free rides if they couldn't afford to

pay. This measure is expected to generate $37 million in new transit revenue.

>

> Asian Carp

>

>

> As you are probably aware, there has been a lot of recent discussion in

the media and among key stakeholders regarding the growing threat of Asian carp

in Illinois waterways and the affect this species could have on the fishing

industry. I held a hearing on this issue earlier this year to address this

growing concern. One of the topics that was discussed was creating a culinary

market for Asian carp. In fact, Illinois fisheries have been exporting Asian

carp to Israel and other countries for human consumption for years. I have been

speaking with local chefs and have been working with the Department of Natural

Resources trying to plan an " Asian Carp Cook-Off " for later this year. I think

we need to explore the possibility of promoting this species for human

consumption and taking advantage of a less than ideal situation. Who knows? This

could be a new market for Illinois businesses.

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> I will continue to hold Town Hall Meetings, as they are an invaluable

resource to better understand your needs and concerns and to facilitate the

drafting of future bills and public policy. As always, I welcome any additional

comments or concerns.

>

> Sincerely,

>

>

>

>

>

> This message was sent from State Senator Garrett to

egskb@... It was sent from: Illinois State Senate, 425 Sheridan Road, Highwood,

IL 60040. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Email

Marketing by

>

>

>

>

> Manage your subscription

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks for sharing Ellen. This excerpt intrigued me:

Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the income

tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring more

equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school districts,

70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the City of

Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore, there

is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

One thing that always perturbed me were the cry for more funding to the schools

in the areas because those of use in the suburbs paying 70-80 percent have

better facilities for our children. As a tax preparer, I have personally

noticed how much more in property tax I pay for a little single family attached

house (looks like a town house) with no yard as opposed to those in Chicago and

many Cook County suburbs.

I am also glad to see that the ridiculous Free Ride For Seniors is going to be

changed.

>

> Untitled DocumentHi all:

> I think this newsletter from Senator Garrett gives a nice summary of some of

the most current issues facing our state at present.

> Ellen

> Ellen Garber Bronfeld

> egskb@...

> Newsletter: Town Hall Meeting Issues

>

>

>

> March 26, 2010

>

> Dear Ellen ~

>

>

> Thank you to all who participated in the recent Town Hall Meetings held

in Lake Bluff, Highland Park, Des Plaines, and Northbrook. There were many

issues that were brought to my attention at these meeting and that I would now

like to summarize and address those in turn.

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> Balancing the Illinois Budget

> Pension Reform

>

> Illinois now faces a budget deficit of about $13 billion. One of the

largest factors contributing to the state's ongoing fiscal difficulties is

Illinois' unfunded pension liability.

>

> The Illinois General Assembly responsible for funding 5 pension

systems: the General Assembly Retirement System (GARS), the State Employees'

Retirement System of Illinois (SERS), the State Universities Retirement System

(SURS), Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), and the Judges Retirement System

(JRS). Currently, repayment of the liability (often called the " Pension Ramp " )

backloads the costs and creates an escalating fiscal pressure over the long

term.

>

> What is being done to reform Illinois' retirement systems?

>

>

> For New Hires Only:

>

> House Amendment 4 to Senate Bill 1946 overwhelmingly passed out of

both chambers on March 24, 2010. The proposal, would raise the retirement age

to 67 in order to qualify for full benefits, restrict annual cost of living

increases for retirees, limit the salary that can be used to determine

retirement benefits (60% as opposed to 85% of average final salary) and restrict

those who qualify to earn enhanced benefits under the " alternative formula " set

aside for high risk jobs. When signed into law, the changes would affect future

members of 13 pension systems controlled by the state, including all five

state-funded pension systems: GARS, JRS, SURS, SERS, and TRS. The combined

savings to the state from this proposal has a rough estimate of $500 million to

$1 billion for the next fiscal year and is said to save the state $119 billion

over the next 35 years.

> Pension reform legislation, would also require that individuals forgo

receipt of a pension if that individual returns to work for the state,

contributing to another pension (i.e. if a retired teacher were to become a

state representative thereby contributing to GARS and eligible to receive TRS

benefits).

>

> These changes moved through both chambers of the General Assembly

relatively quickly before an upcoming bond sale to pay for public works

projects. The state was in danger of a possible " double downgrade " in its bond

ratings, and such a downgrade would've put Illinois at the same level as

California's dismal credit rating, costing the state even more money.

>

> Ultimately, long-term pension stability is the goal.

>

> Cuts in Spending

>

> There is about $27 billion in the state's General Revenue Fund (GRF)

and we have a $13 billion deficit. The truth is that we cannot cut 40% of state

spending to close the budget gap. The GRF, funded primarily by state income

taxes, sales taxes, and state service fees, provides the funding for the state's

5 pension systems, and finances most of the activities associated with State

government such as education, prisons, and human services. Because of the

state's fixed obligations, we could cut out all of state government and still

not break even.

>

> There is a movement in the State to push agencies to prioritize their

spending (which is not currently happening) rather than cutting a set percentage

across the board for all state agency programs. Illinois already has the lowest

headcount of state employees in the nation, so it would be difficult to make

further cuts in state government employees without sacrificing service. We need

to determine which programs work efficiently and effectively and which do not.

By forcing agency heads to evaluate their programs and determining which

programs are absolutely essential, we can cut spending on programs that are

truly ineffective.

>

> Unfunded Mandates

>

> State unfunded mandates are statutes or regulations that require a

local government body to perform certain actions yet provide no money for

fulfilling those requirements. Local governments, including school districts,

complain that unfunded mandates places an unfair burden on these lower units of

government, creating additional expenses and compounding any budgetary problems.

>

> Senate Bill 3000, of which I am the chief sponsor, creates the

instructional mandates task force to explore and examine all existing

instructional mandates governing state public schools and make recommendations

as to the appropriateness of all existing mandates, the imposition of future

mandates, and waivers of instructional mandates. The bill would also create a

moratorium on all instructional mandates for public schools until the task force

has concluded its proceedings and submitted a final report to the Government and

the General Assembly.

>

> Increasing Revenues

>

> Combined polls of all the town hall meetings held (Lake Bluff,

Highland Park, Northbrook, Des Plaines) showed that a majority (approximately

2/3) would support a tax increase of an additional 1-2% of a person's adjusted

gross income if significant pension reforms and sufficient budget cuts were

made. An increase in the income tax is just one of many proposals being

considered to increase the state's general revenue. Budget cuts themselves

cannot completely reduce the budget deficit. We as a state need to increase

revenue, and we need to explore every available option in order to do that.

>

> Funding Education

>

> A proposed Illinois budget for FY2011 would cut $1.3 billion from local

education. In order to reverse these proposed cuts, a 1% education income tax

surcharge is been considered. Funding education should be a top priority in

Illinois, as it gives the foundation for the next generation to achieve success.

However, we learned from the Town Hall meetings that many people are weary of

raising the income tax without sufficient safeguards in place to ensure that the

revenue would go towards funding education. In the 1970s, the Lottery was sold

to the people of Illinois as a revenue generator for education. While there is

requirement that the Lottery revenue be kept in the Education Fund, the state

concurrently reduces its appropriations from the General Revenue Fund towards

public education. The idea is that, as Lottery money comes in, it frees up other

state tax money to spend elsewhere. Effectively, the Lottery provides

approximately $625 million to the General Revenue Fund. Without substantial

assurances that the income tax surcharge will exclusively be used to close the

budget gap in education, I do not think we can expect Illinois citizens to be

sold on the idea that the a 1% tax increase would be targeted specifically for

education.

> Other proposals that have been on the table for years is to increase the

income tax by 1½?2% and decreasing property taxes (with tax credits) to bring

more equity in the funding of public education. In the suburban school

districts, 70-80% of property taxes go towards public school education. In the

City of Chicago and downstate, that proportion is significantly less. Therefore,

there is great disparity among Illinois school districts in per pupil spending.

Several cost-saving measures, such as consolidating school districts are also

being considered.

>

> Redistricting Reform (Fair Map)

>

> For decades legislators have been able to create their own districts by

literally drawing a name out of a hat, thereby increasing the chances that

Illinois legislature elections are won by the incumbent. A proposed amendment

would take the power to draw the district maps away from the legislature and

transfer it to a temporary redistricting advisory commission. The criteria for

drawing a district, in addition to requiring compact, contiguous and equally

populated districts, would require that the district be drawn by following

geographic features and municipal boundaries without discriminating against one

political party or group. The proposed amendment would also require

transparency in the process rather than allowing lines to be drawn behind closed

doors. We need to ensure fairness in the democratic process, and this is one

way to do that.

>

>

> Red Light Cameras

>

> Many constituents reached out to me regarding the practice of using red

light cameras at intersections by municipalities. Many felt that the use of red

light cameras was primarily used to generate revenue for local government as

opposed to driver safety. One of the main criticisms of red light cameras is

the limited opportunity for review of traffic tickets issued, and many argued

that they were not afforded the right to properly adjudicate the red light

traffic tickets. Earlier this year, Senator Duffy introduced legislation, which

would have repealed the use of red light cameras entirely. That bill did not

make it out of committee.

>

> Senate Bill 935, which represents a compromise worked out by Senate

President Cullerton, passed out of the Senate on March 25, 2010 with a vote

of 45-10. This legislation calls for more protections for those under the video

scrutiny. Some of the requirements provided in the bill include: technical

violations like stopping just over the stop line would no longer be ticketed;

locations of red-light cameras would be publicized; violators would no longer

have to pay a fee to appeal their tickets; and police officers or trained

specialists would review tapes and issue tickets.

>

> Free Rides for Seniors

>

> The House voted 83-27 to modify the free rides for seniors on public

transit systems program put in place by ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich, in favor of

applying means testing to the program. Under House Bill 4654, any senior who

qualifies for the circuit breaker program (i.e. anyone 65 and older making less

than $27,610 a year or couples making less than a combined $36,635 a year) would

continue to ride for free on public transit. Seniors with higher incomes would

ride for half-price on the CTA, Metra, and Pace. The bill is now in the Senate

where it is expected to get the necessary support it needs to become law. I

have been in favor of means testing the free rides for seniors from the

beginning. Seniors would only receive free rides if they couldn't afford to

pay. This measure is expected to generate $37 million in new transit revenue.

>

> Asian Carp

>

>

> As you are probably aware, there has been a lot of recent discussion in

the media and among key stakeholders regarding the growing threat of Asian carp

in Illinois waterways and the affect this species could have on the fishing

industry. I held a hearing on this issue earlier this year to address this

growing concern. One of the topics that was discussed was creating a culinary

market for Asian carp. In fact, Illinois fisheries have been exporting Asian

carp to Israel and other countries for human consumption for years. I have been

speaking with local chefs and have been working with the Department of Natural

Resources trying to plan an " Asian Carp Cook-Off " for later this year. I think

we need to explore the possibility of promoting this species for human

consumption and taking advantage of a less than ideal situation. Who knows? This

could be a new market for Illinois businesses.

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> I will continue to hold Town Hall Meetings, as they are an invaluable

resource to better understand your needs and concerns and to facilitate the

drafting of future bills and public policy. As always, I welcome any additional

comments or concerns.

>

> Sincerely,

>

>

>

>

>

> This message was sent from State Senator Garrett to

egskb@... It was sent from: Illinois State Senate, 425 Sheridan Road, Highwood,

IL 60040. You can modify/update your subscription via the link below. Email

Marketing by

>

>

>

>

> Manage your subscription

>

>

>