Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: What We're About

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

One last thought...we have an expert to discuss Managed Care, which is great.

We will need to find an expert on the Health Care Reform bill and its impact on

people with disabilities, at some point. A few of us debating the pros and cons

of the bill will not give us the facts, which is what IPADDU is all about.

I think the lines between Managed Care and the Health Care Reform bill will

become blurred, here in Illinois as both will be affecting us at the same time,

but the impact of each is independent of the other. So, we need to be aware of

how both will affect our loved ones.

Ellen

Ellen Garber Bronfeld

egskb@...

Re: What We're About

I have learned more about the new healthcare program by reading IPADD posts

than anywhere else. Everything that I have read I can find an article with

nearly the exact opposite perspective depending on which political party

initiated the info. I very much appreciate everyone's input, including the

differing opinions. : ) Can we get , , Ron and Pam together (Ellen can

moderate! : )) to hammer all of this out for us? I very much enjoy all of the

info they are providing and I would LOVE to be a fly on the wall as the four of

them discussed this mess!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I believe you are right and we need to have an Expert who is able to give us

facts on the impact on our loved ones.

I hope this happens as well and had planned to discuss this with Laurie later.

However, things are just shaking out......physicians do not know what is

happening and how it will impact them as well--rumors not withstanding.....I

know from personal experience they are often the next-to-last to know, right

before their patients!

I hope we will line up a Health Care Reform person later this spring/early

summer. I do have some connections through Chuck's hospital but will have to

see who the best person for that will be.

Marie

>

> One last thought...we have an expert to discuss Managed Care, which is great.

We will need to find an expert on the Health Care Reform bill and its impact on

people with disabilities, at some point. A few of us debating the pros and cons

of the bill will not give us the facts, which is what IPADDU is all about.

> I think the lines between Managed Care and the Health Care Reform bill will

become blurred, here in Illinois as both will be affecting us at the same time,

but the impact of each is independent of the other. So, we need to be aware of

how both will affect our loved ones.

> Ellen

> Ellen Garber Bronfeld

> egskb@...

> Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

> I have learned more about the new healthcare program by reading IPADD posts

than anywhere else. Everything that I have read I can find an article with

nearly the exact opposite perspective depending on which political party

initiated the info. I very much appreciate everyone's input, including the

differing opinions. : ) Can we get , , Ron and Pam together (Ellen can

moderate! : )) to hammer all of this out for us? I very much enjoy all of the

info they are providing and I would LOVE to be a fly on the wall as the four of

them discussed this mess!!!

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I believe you are right and we need to have an Expert who is able to give us

facts on the impact on our loved ones.

I hope this happens as well and had planned to discuss this with Laurie later.

However, things are just shaking out......physicians do not know what is

happening and how it will impact them as well--rumors not withstanding.....I

know from personal experience they are often the next-to-last to know, right

before their patients!

I hope we will line up a Health Care Reform person later this spring/early

summer. I do have some connections through Chuck's hospital but will have to

see who the best person for that will be.

Marie

>

> One last thought...we have an expert to discuss Managed Care, which is great.

We will need to find an expert on the Health Care Reform bill and its impact on

people with disabilities, at some point. A few of us debating the pros and cons

of the bill will not give us the facts, which is what IPADDU is all about.

> I think the lines between Managed Care and the Health Care Reform bill will

become blurred, here in Illinois as both will be affecting us at the same time,

but the impact of each is independent of the other. So, we need to be aware of

how both will affect our loved ones.

> Ellen

> Ellen Garber Bronfeld

> egskb@...

> Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

> I have learned more about the new healthcare program by reading IPADD posts

than anywhere else. Everything that I have read I can find an article with

nearly the exact opposite perspective depending on which political party

initiated the info. I very much appreciate everyone's input, including the

differing opinions. : ) Can we get , , Ron and Pam together (Ellen can

moderate! : )) to hammer all of this out for us? I very much enjoy all of the

info they are providing and I would LOVE to be a fly on the wall as the four of

them discussed this mess!!!

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

Pam

Re: What We're About

I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my insurance

because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my provider

and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom line is we

save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year alone my

insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How would the

state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

Pam

Re: What We're About

I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my insurance

because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my provider

and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom line is we

save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year alone my

insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How would the

state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is so weird to me.  I have insurance through my company and my son is on

Medicare A B and D.  Medicare is his primary and My insurance is secondary and

Medicaid (HBDW) is third.  I was told he had to be on Medicaid to get

services.  I got him on Medicaid and he had such a high spend down I had to put

him on HBDW and he has to pay $81.00 a month and hardly uses it as he is (THANK

GOD) healthy.  I was told he had to have Medicaid or HBWD so if or when he

wants to move into a living facility he would qualify.  Now it looks like they

want to get him off of Medicaid?  Am I missing something?  I was being told he

would loose his Home Based Services if he didn't have Medicaid.  So am I making

him pay the $81.00 a month for nothing?  Man o Man just when I think I know

SOMETHING....... BAM!  LOL

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 7:53 PM

 

I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

Pam

Re: What We're About

I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my insurance

because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my provider

and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom line is we

save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year alone my

insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How would the

state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

This is so weird to me.  I have insurance through my company and my son is on

Medicare A B and D.  Medicare is his primary and My insurance is secondary and

Medicaid (HBDW) is third.  I was told he had to be on Medicaid to get

services.  I got him on Medicaid and he had such a high spend down I had to put

him on HBDW and he has to pay $81.00 a month and hardly uses it as he is (THANK

GOD) healthy.  I was told he had to have Medicaid or HBWD so if or when he

wants to move into a living facility he would qualify.  Now it looks like they

want to get him off of Medicaid?  Am I missing something?  I was being told he

would loose his Home Based Services if he didn't have Medicaid.  So am I making

him pay the $81.00 a month for nothing?  Man o Man just when I think I know

SOMETHING....... BAM!  LOL

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 7:53 PM

 

I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

Pam

Re: What We're About

I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my insurance

because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my provider

and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom line is we

save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year alone my

insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How would the

state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

So, wait a minute, are you telling me that I should move my 30 year old,

nonverbal, autistic son OFF OF MEDICAID? And since my husband is a HEALTH CARE

PROFESSIONAL in private practice (he does accept Medicaid BTW)with our own

insurance person on staff, this is not what we understand to be a good idea. It

is my understanding that the health care reform bill allows parent's insurance

to cover adult children until their 26th birthday, but no older.

Marie

>

> I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

>

>

> Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

>

> Pam

>

> Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

So, wait a minute, are you telling me that I should move my 30 year old,

nonverbal, autistic son OFF OF MEDICAID? And since my husband is a HEALTH CARE

PROFESSIONAL in private practice (he does accept Medicaid BTW)with our own

insurance person on staff, this is not what we understand to be a good idea. It

is my understanding that the health care reform bill allows parent's insurance

to cover adult children until their 26th birthday, but no older.

Marie

>

> I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid since

the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the new

healthcare reform bill

>

>

> Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan does

not include people with private insurance.

>

> Pam

>

> Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

DON'T do anything! Sit tight. We are not sure what will happen. See my

previous post.

Marie

>

> This is so weird to me.  I have insurance through my company and my son is on

Medicare A B and D.  Medicare is his primary and My insurance is secondary and

Medicaid (HBDW) is third.  I was told he had to be on Medicaid to get

services.  I got him on Medicaid and he had such a high spend down I had to put

him on HBDW and he has to pay $81.00 a month and hardly uses it as he is (THANK

GOD) healthy.  I was told he had to have Medicaid or HBWD so if or when he

wants to move into a living facility he would qualify.  Now it looks like they

want to get him off of Medicaid?  Am I missing something?  I was being told he

would loose his Home Based Services if he didn't have Medicaid.  So am I making

him pay the $81.00 a month for nothing?  Man o Man just when I think I know

SOMETHING....... BAM!  LOL

> Shirley

>

> -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

DON'T do anything! Sit tight. We are not sure what will happen. See my

previous post.

Marie

>

> This is so weird to me.  I have insurance through my company and my son is on

Medicare A B and D.  Medicare is his primary and My insurance is secondary and

Medicaid (HBDW) is third.  I was told he had to be on Medicaid to get

services.  I got him on Medicaid and he had such a high spend down I had to put

him on HBDW and he has to pay $81.00 a month and hardly uses it as he is (THANK

GOD) healthy.  I was told he had to have Medicaid or HBWD so if or when he

wants to move into a living facility he would qualify.  Now it looks like they

want to get him off of Medicaid?  Am I missing something?  I was being told he

would loose his Home Based Services if he didn't have Medicaid.  So am I making

him pay the $81.00 a month for nothing?  Man o Man just when I think I know

SOMETHING....... BAM!  LOL

> Shirley

>

> -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21/us/health-care-reform.html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21/us/health-care-reform.html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a secondary

insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).  As far as I am

concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD which costs him $81.00

a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify for any other services or

housing that he needs in the future.  I will not do anything until I am forced

to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

 

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform. html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a secondary

insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).  As far as I am

concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD which costs him $81.00

a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify for any other services or

housing that he needs in the future.  I will not do anything until I am forced

to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

 

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform. html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The change to 26 is for typical children that were required to be

students to continue under their parent's coverage. Under the new law

they will not have to be students, giving them time after they graduate

to get their own coverage without a lapse. The bill does not change the

qualification for diabled adult children at this point.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Shirley Linden

<slpanda2@...> writes:

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a

secondary insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).

As far as I am concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD

which costs him $81.00 a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify

for any other services or housing that he needs in the future. I will

not do anything until I am forced to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's

shifting into Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also

receives coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid

until the exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard

anyone address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him

ineligible for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP

because IL faces a budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to

either have him dropped from our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or

will they tell us 2014, he is ineligible for Medicaid until he is past

age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform.

html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I

called my provider and they said they were unaware of this being a

problem. The bottom line is we save the state plenty by paying for this

ourselves. This last year alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their

negotiated rates) for her. How would the state benefit by forcing us to

use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The change to 26 is for typical children that were required to be

students to continue under their parent's coverage. Under the new law

they will not have to be students, giving them time after they graduate

to get their own coverage without a lapse. The bill does not change the

qualification for diabled adult children at this point.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Shirley Linden

<slpanda2@...> writes:

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a

secondary insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).

As far as I am concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD

which costs him $81.00 a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify

for any other services or housing that he needs in the future. I will

not do anything until I am forced to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@... <pam_harris@...>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's

shifting into Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also

receives coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid

until the exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard

anyone address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him

ineligible for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP

because IL faces a budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to

either have him dropped from our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or

will they tell us 2014, he is ineligible for Medicaid until he is past

age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform.

html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I

called my provider and they said they were unaware of this being a

problem. The bottom line is we save the state plenty by paying for this

ourselves. This last year alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their

negotiated rates) for her. How would the state benefit by forcing us to

use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Illinois already had its own " 26 " statute, for, I think now 2 years.

_____________________________________________________

Rubin

Special Needs Future Planning

The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

Office: 847.279.7999

Toll Free: 866-To-Rubin

Fax: 847-279-0090

Email: brian@...<mailto:brian@...>

Web Site: www.brianrubin.com<http://www.brianrubin.com/>

Mail: Buffalo Grove Business Park

1110 West Lake Cook Road

Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-1997

[cid:image001.gif@...]

® Rubin has received the dale Hubbell<http://www.martindale.com/>

Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent, the highest rating available.

Click here for more information on AV Peer Review

Rating<http://www.martindale.com/-N-Rubin/903577-lawyer.htm?view=cr>.

® Rubin is a member of The Special Needs

Alliance<http://www.specialneedsalliance.org/> is a national, not for profit,

association of experienced special needs planning attorneys. Membership is by

invitation. Rubin serves on the Board of Directors of The Special Needs

Alliance.

® Rubin is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law

Attorneys<http://www.naela.org/> and serves on the Special Needs Law Section

Steering Committee.

Notices:

1. This message does not create an attorney-client relationship, and is not

legal advice absent such a relationship with the recipient. This message may

contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client and/or work

product privilege. The information is only for the use of the intended

recipient. If you are not such recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or

reliance upon this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

transmission in error, please notify The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

by e-mail and destroy the original message and all copies.

2. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS MESSAGE OR ANY ATTACHMENT

CONCERNS TAX MATTERS, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AND CANNOT BE USED BY A

TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY LAW.

3. Disclaimer Regarding Electronic Signature. If this communication concerns

negotiation of a contract or agreement, electronic signature rules do not apply

to this communication: contract formation in this matter shall occur only with

manually-affixed original signatures on original documents. The Signature given

hereon is not an electronic signature and is provided only for the purposes of

providing information as to the identity of the sender and for no other

purpose(s) whatsoever.

________________________________

From: IPADDUnite [mailto:IPADDUnite ] On Behalf

Of grzywa

Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:12 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

The change to 26 is for typical children that were required to be

students to continue under their parent's coverage. Under the new law

they will not have to be students, giving them time after they graduate

to get their own coverage without a lapse. The bill does not change the

qualification for diabled adult children at this point.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Shirley Linden

<slpanda2@...<mailto:slpanda2%40sbcglobal.net>> writes:

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a

secondary insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).

As far as I am concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD

which costs him $81.00 a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify

for any other services or housing that he needs in the future. I will

not do anything until I am forced to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@...<mailto:pam_harris%40comcast.net>

<pam_harris@...<mailto:pam_harris%40comcast.net>>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite <mailto:IPADDUnite%40>

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's

shifting into Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also

receives coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid

until the exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard

anyone address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him

ineligible for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP

because IL faces a budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to

either have him dropped from our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or

will they tell us 2014, he is ineligible for Medicaid until he is past

age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform.

html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I

called my provider and they said they were unaware of this being a

problem. The bottom line is we save the state plenty by paying for this

ourselves. This last year alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their

negotiated rates) for her. How would the state benefit by forcing us to

use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Illinois already had its own " 26 " statute, for, I think now 2 years.

_____________________________________________________

Rubin

Special Needs Future Planning

The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

Office: 847.279.7999

Toll Free: 866-To-Rubin

Fax: 847-279-0090

Email: brian@...<mailto:brian@...>

Web Site: www.brianrubin.com<http://www.brianrubin.com/>

Mail: Buffalo Grove Business Park

1110 West Lake Cook Road

Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-1997

[cid:image001.gif@...]

® Rubin has received the dale Hubbell<http://www.martindale.com/>

Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent, the highest rating available.

Click here for more information on AV Peer Review

Rating<http://www.martindale.com/-N-Rubin/903577-lawyer.htm?view=cr>.

® Rubin is a member of The Special Needs

Alliance<http://www.specialneedsalliance.org/> is a national, not for profit,

association of experienced special needs planning attorneys. Membership is by

invitation. Rubin serves on the Board of Directors of The Special Needs

Alliance.

® Rubin is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law

Attorneys<http://www.naela.org/> and serves on the Special Needs Law Section

Steering Committee.

Notices:

1. This message does not create an attorney-client relationship, and is not

legal advice absent such a relationship with the recipient. This message may

contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client and/or work

product privilege. The information is only for the use of the intended

recipient. If you are not such recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or

reliance upon this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

transmission in error, please notify The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

by e-mail and destroy the original message and all copies.

2. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS MESSAGE OR ANY ATTACHMENT

CONCERNS TAX MATTERS, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AND CANNOT BE USED BY A

TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY LAW.

3. Disclaimer Regarding Electronic Signature. If this communication concerns

negotiation of a contract or agreement, electronic signature rules do not apply

to this communication: contract formation in this matter shall occur only with

manually-affixed original signatures on original documents. The Signature given

hereon is not an electronic signature and is provided only for the purposes of

providing information as to the identity of the sender and for no other

purpose(s) whatsoever.

________________________________

From: IPADDUnite [mailto:IPADDUnite ] On Behalf

Of grzywa

Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:12 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

The change to 26 is for typical children that were required to be

students to continue under their parent's coverage. Under the new law

they will not have to be students, giving them time after they graduate

to get their own coverage without a lapse. The bill does not change the

qualification for diabled adult children at this point.

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Shirley Linden

<slpanda2@...<mailto:slpanda2%40sbcglobal.net>> writes:

My insurance will cover him for life because he is disabled but as a

secondary insurance (for now they could change that at any time I guess).

As far as I am concerned, in our case I would be happy to drop the HBWD

which costs him $81.00 a month if he can still get the HBS and qualify

for any other services or housing that he needs in the future. I will

not do anything until I am forced to but, wow things are a changing.

Shirley

From: pam_harris@...<mailto:pam_harris%40comcast.net>

<pam_harris@...<mailto:pam_harris%40comcast.net>>

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

IPADDUnite <mailto:IPADDUnite%40>

Date: Sunday, March 28, 2010, 8:26 PM

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's

shifting into Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also

receives coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid

until the exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard

anyone address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him

ineligible for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP

because IL faces a budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to

either have him dropped from our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or

will they tell us 2014, he is ineligible for Medicaid until he is past

age 26?

http://www.nytimes. com/interactive/ 2010/03/21/ us/health- care-reform.

html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I

called my provider and they said they were unaware of this being a

problem. The bottom line is we save the state plenty by paying for this

ourselves. This last year alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their

negotiated rates) for her. How would the state benefit by forcing us to

use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Don't forget that we need Medicaid not just for " medical " but for programs, like

residential... and one by one due to conversion, day programs.

_____________________________________________________

Rubin

Special Needs Future Planning

The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

Office: 847.279.7999

Toll Free: 866-To-Rubin

Fax: 847-279-0090

Email: brian@...<mailto:brian@...>

Web Site: www.brianrubin.com<http://www.brianrubin.com/>

Mail: Buffalo Grove Business Park

1110 West Lake Cook Road

Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-1997

[cid:image001.gif@...]

® Rubin has received the dale Hubbell<http://www.martindale.com/>

Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent, the highest rating available.

Click here for more information on AV Peer Review

Rating<http://www.martindale.com/-N-Rubin/903577-lawyer.htm?view=cr>.

® Rubin is a member of The Special Needs

Alliance<http://www.specialneedsalliance.org/> is a national, not for profit,

association of experienced special needs planning attorneys. Membership is by

invitation. Rubin serves on the Board of Directors of The Special Needs

Alliance.

® Rubin is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law

Attorneys<http://www.naela.org/> and serves on the Special Needs Law Section

Steering Committee.

Notices:

1. This message does not create an attorney-client relationship, and is not

legal advice absent such a relationship with the recipient. This message may

contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client and/or work

product privilege. The information is only for the use of the intended

recipient. If you are not such recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or

reliance upon this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

transmission in error, please notify The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

by e-mail and destroy the original message and all copies.

2. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS MESSAGE OR ANY ATTACHMENT

CONCERNS TAX MATTERS, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AND CANNOT BE USED BY A

TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY LAW.

3. Disclaimer Regarding Electronic Signature. If this communication concerns

negotiation of a contract or agreement, electronic signature rules do not apply

to this communication: contract formation in this matter shall occur only with

manually-affixed original signatures on original documents. The Signature given

hereon is not an electronic signature and is provided only for the purposes of

providing information as to the identity of the sender and for no other

purpose(s) whatsoever.

________________________________

From: IPADDUnite [mailto:IPADDUnite ] On Behalf

Of pam_harris@...

Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:26 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21/us/health-care-reform.html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Don't forget that we need Medicaid not just for " medical " but for programs, like

residential... and one by one due to conversion, day programs.

_____________________________________________________

Rubin

Special Needs Future Planning

The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

Office: 847.279.7999

Toll Free: 866-To-Rubin

Fax: 847-279-0090

Email: brian@...<mailto:brian@...>

Web Site: www.brianrubin.com<http://www.brianrubin.com/>

Mail: Buffalo Grove Business Park

1110 West Lake Cook Road

Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-1997

[cid:image001.gif@...]

® Rubin has received the dale Hubbell<http://www.martindale.com/>

Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent, the highest rating available.

Click here for more information on AV Peer Review

Rating<http://www.martindale.com/-N-Rubin/903577-lawyer.htm?view=cr>.

® Rubin is a member of The Special Needs

Alliance<http://www.specialneedsalliance.org/> is a national, not for profit,

association of experienced special needs planning attorneys. Membership is by

invitation. Rubin serves on the Board of Directors of The Special Needs

Alliance.

® Rubin is a member of the National Academy of Elder Law

Attorneys<http://www.naela.org/> and serves on the Special Needs Law Section

Steering Committee.

Notices:

1. This message does not create an attorney-client relationship, and is not

legal advice absent such a relationship with the recipient. This message may

contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client and/or work

product privilege. The information is only for the use of the intended

recipient. If you are not such recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or

reliance upon this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

transmission in error, please notify The Law Offices of Rubin & Associates

by e-mail and destroy the original message and all copies.

2. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS MESSAGE OR ANY ATTACHMENT

CONCERNS TAX MATTERS, IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AND CANNOT BE USED BY A

TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED BY LAW.

3. Disclaimer Regarding Electronic Signature. If this communication concerns

negotiation of a contract or agreement, electronic signature rules do not apply

to this communication: contract formation in this matter shall occur only with

manually-affixed original signatures on original documents. The Signature given

hereon is not an electronic signature and is provided only for the purposes of

providing information as to the identity of the sender and for no other

purpose(s) whatsoever.

________________________________

From: IPADDUnite [mailto:IPADDUnite ] On Behalf

Of pam_harris@...

Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:26 PM

IPADDUnite

Subject: Re: Re: What We're About

Excellent point, Marie.

The new healthcare reform bill (FEDERAL - nothing to do with IL's shifting into

Medicaid managed care) - says

i f your son or daughter is covered under your insurance AND also receives

coverage from Medicaid, the State cannot cut them from Medicaid until the

exchanges start operating in 20104

UNLESS the State faces a budget shortfall.

It also says that a son or daughter is covered until they are 26.

This, too, has the potential to change a great deal but I haven't heard anyone

address it.

Josh is 21. And covered on our private insurance. Will IL deem him ineligible

for Medicaid which would make him ineligible for the HBSSP because IL faces a

budget shortfall? Or in 2014, will IL tell us to either have him dropped from

our family insurance or lose eligibility? Or will they tell us 2014, he is

ineligible for Medicaid until he is past age 26?

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21/us/health-care-reform.html

Pam

Re: What We're About

>

>

>

>

>

>

> I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I would agree, 100% with you, . It is important to sit tight for the

moment, until we all know what is IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR OWN CHILDREN.

My husband, who is a surgical sub-specialist and the only ENT who accepts

Medicaid in the south suburbs, doesn't know what will concern him as yet. We

are in the middle of converting to electronic records for his practice and it's

a mess.

Marie

> >

> > I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid

since the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the

new healthcare reform bill

> >

> >

> > Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan

does not include people with private insurance.

> >

> > Pam

> >

> > Re: What We're About

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I would agree, 100% with you, . It is important to sit tight for the

moment, until we all know what is IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR OWN CHILDREN.

My husband, who is a surgical sub-specialist and the only ENT who accepts

Medicaid in the south suburbs, doesn't know what will concern him as yet. We

are in the middle of converting to electronic records for his practice and it's

a mess.

Marie

> >

> > I think the point is to move your adult son or daughter OFF of Medicaid

since the parents are making private insurance available. This is a piece of the

new healthcare reform bill

> >

> >

> > Regarding Illinois, I understand that the new Medicaid managed care plan

does not include people with private insurance.

> >

> > Pam

> >

> > Re: What We're About

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > I am with Diane on this. I pay substantially to keep my daughter on my

insurance because the Medicaid providers in this area were USELESS. I called my

provider and they said they were unaware of this being a problem. The bottom

line is we save the state plenty by paying for this ourselves. This last year

alone my insurance paid over $5,000 (at their negotiated rates) for her. How

would the state benefit by forcing us to use Medicaid? Gloria

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes Ellen, I share your concerns. Let's face it, I have workde in healthcare

for 23 years and worked in many area. I work very closely with many different

kinds of doctors, of whom many have become my personal friends. They share a lot

with me about medicine, healthcare, and their insecurities, and am aware of

their weaknesses. Those weaknesses are different for different individual

physicians.

Let's face it folks, not all doctors have the same skill and educational level,

or ablities to practice the medicine that they are trained to know, and the

trainings have not all been the same, and not all received in this country for

that matter. I mean nothing about the in this country statement, you take it how

each one of you feel you should. if you think it makes no difference, then it

doesn't. If you think it does, then it does, etc. A doctor is not a doctor.(

just as a nurse is not a nurse, a lawyer is not a lawyer, and not all teachers

are the same. We all know that).

Sometimes the difference in care can even mean life and death. I personally

will always need to be in control of my own as well as that of my disabled son's

healthcare, that is as long as I am still breathing. IF..... IFFFFFFF, that is

any part of health care reform- then we are all in danger. Disabled or not. I am

not saying it is, I'm saying I would like someone to answer that question for

me, cause I currently do not know the answer to that question. Scarey.

Diane S.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi -

> > >

> > > Will you please then set some parameters or describe how discussions

about lobbying local, state and national law makers can occur without a

discussion of the issue ALL while remaining apolitical?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > How about this for apolitical discussion:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Several months ago, I was shaken to learn that because my son Josh

participates in IL Home Based Support Services Program, the State and Federal

government have increased access to his privacy - that is, what is beyond the

protections provided to a citizen not participating in a Medicaid waiver

program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The State of Illinois gave my name and home address to union organizers.

And the reason they were able to do so was because I receive a check that comes

from the IL HBSSP program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > This intrusion on my privacy motivated me to stand up and loudly protest

what I felt was the state of IL forcing me to join a union and pay money to a

union via dues or fair share. In turn, the union could use the money to exercise

their political muscle on policies that I may agree or disagree with.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Again, I am shaken to learn that the State of Illinois can force us to

drop Josh from our private health insurance if he is to continue participating

in the IL HBSSP. I don’t know when or if this happen but this is a part

of the new healthcare reform law.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I can’t help but to ask:

> > >

> > > Is it worth it? Is the small monetary support worth all of the heavy,

inflexible strings that it comes with? Is it worth giving up our privacy?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I am tired of the quarterly visits and the review of our records. I am

wondering why Josh has to have an individualized service plan that identifies

life goals and documents his progress towards these goals. I don’t have

an individualized service plan. I don’t have to report monthly on my

progress made towards my life goals. People don't have to sit down at least once

a year and examine all aspects of my life - medical, social, familial and

discuss it.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Some days, I am shaken to realize what we give up because Josh

participates in a Medicaid waiver program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Thoughts?

> > > Pam

> > >

> > > What We're About

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I would echo what Laurie and Ellen have posted about recent posts and

add my own comments.

> > >

> > > We are Illinois Parents of Adults with Developmental Disabilities Unite!

and our focus is sharing information, strategies, and commiserating about our

state and it's woeful stance and services for those with disabilities. We hope

we're a place to vent when our loved one is having problems. We hope we can be a

place to come together (remember the " Unite! " part of our name?)to lobby our

local, state and national law makers when items come up that affect our loved

ones. We want you share news in your part of the state, news of your children

and news of your lives--this is not an easy life and we all do the best we can

and it's great we can come together to share the ride.

> > >

> > > We try to be as apolitical as we can be......in Illinois, that can be a

hard thing to do! But we must, or we will turn into something other that what

Laurie intended IPADDUnite! to be. Partisan politics have no place here--no

matter what side you're on.

> > >

> > > The ONE THING we all agree on is---Illinois SUCKS when it comes to

services/programs etc. etc. for those with special needs. I bring up the

" Unite! " part of our name again--we are united in our belief we can make it

better and be a force in Illinois if WE ARE UNITED IN OUR GOAL TO MAKE IT BETTER

FOR OUR CHILDREN. We don't have to agree how to, but we have to trust each other

that we all want just about the same thing.

> > >

> > > I have many, many friends who do not share my political beliefs and I

try to avoid talking politics with them. I have always been political, since my

days at Illini Girls State when I ran for office and in my time " off list " , I am

very political. But politics can be polarizing and being polarized from each

other is exactly what we can't afford to be if we want to change this state.

> > >

> > > So, be nice. I'll get off my soapbox and leave you and have another cup

of coffee. We can all agree that coffee and chocolate can fix anything.

> > >

> > > Marie

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes Ellen, I share your concerns. Let's face it, I have workde in healthcare

for 23 years and worked in many area. I work very closely with many different

kinds of doctors, of whom many have become my personal friends. They share a lot

with me about medicine, healthcare, and their insecurities, and am aware of

their weaknesses. Those weaknesses are different for different individual

physicians.

Let's face it folks, not all doctors have the same skill and educational level,

or ablities to practice the medicine that they are trained to know, and the

trainings have not all been the same, and not all received in this country for

that matter. I mean nothing about the in this country statement, you take it how

each one of you feel you should. if you think it makes no difference, then it

doesn't. If you think it does, then it does, etc. A doctor is not a doctor.(

just as a nurse is not a nurse, a lawyer is not a lawyer, and not all teachers

are the same. We all know that).

Sometimes the difference in care can even mean life and death. I personally

will always need to be in control of my own as well as that of my disabled son's

healthcare, that is as long as I am still breathing. IF..... IFFFFFFF, that is

any part of health care reform- then we are all in danger. Disabled or not. I am

not saying it is, I'm saying I would like someone to answer that question for

me, cause I currently do not know the answer to that question. Scarey.

Diane S.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi -

> > >

> > > Will you please then set some parameters or describe how discussions

about lobbying local, state and national law makers can occur without a

discussion of the issue ALL while remaining apolitical?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > How about this for apolitical discussion:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Several months ago, I was shaken to learn that because my son Josh

participates in IL Home Based Support Services Program, the State and Federal

government have increased access to his privacy - that is, what is beyond the

protections provided to a citizen not participating in a Medicaid waiver

program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The State of Illinois gave my name and home address to union organizers.

And the reason they were able to do so was because I receive a check that comes

from the IL HBSSP program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > This intrusion on my privacy motivated me to stand up and loudly protest

what I felt was the state of IL forcing me to join a union and pay money to a

union via dues or fair share. In turn, the union could use the money to exercise

their political muscle on policies that I may agree or disagree with.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Again, I am shaken to learn that the State of Illinois can force us to

drop Josh from our private health insurance if he is to continue participating

in the IL HBSSP. I don’t know when or if this happen but this is a part

of the new healthcare reform law.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I can’t help but to ask:

> > >

> > > Is it worth it? Is the small monetary support worth all of the heavy,

inflexible strings that it comes with? Is it worth giving up our privacy?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I am tired of the quarterly visits and the review of our records. I am

wondering why Josh has to have an individualized service plan that identifies

life goals and documents his progress towards these goals. I don’t have

an individualized service plan. I don’t have to report monthly on my

progress made towards my life goals. People don't have to sit down at least once

a year and examine all aspects of my life - medical, social, familial and

discuss it.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Some days, I am shaken to realize what we give up because Josh

participates in a Medicaid waiver program.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Thoughts?

> > > Pam

> > >

> > > What We're About

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I would echo what Laurie and Ellen have posted about recent posts and

add my own comments.

> > >

> > > We are Illinois Parents of Adults with Developmental Disabilities Unite!

and our focus is sharing information, strategies, and commiserating about our

state and it's woeful stance and services for those with disabilities. We hope

we're a place to vent when our loved one is having problems. We hope we can be a

place to come together (remember the " Unite! " part of our name?)to lobby our

local, state and national law makers when items come up that affect our loved

ones. We want you share news in your part of the state, news of your children

and news of your lives--this is not an easy life and we all do the best we can

and it's great we can come together to share the ride.

> > >

> > > We try to be as apolitical as we can be......in Illinois, that can be a

hard thing to do! But we must, or we will turn into something other that what

Laurie intended IPADDUnite! to be. Partisan politics have no place here--no

matter what side you're on.

> > >

> > > The ONE THING we all agree on is---Illinois SUCKS when it comes to

services/programs etc. etc. for those with special needs. I bring up the

" Unite! " part of our name again--we are united in our belief we can make it

better and be a force in Illinois if WE ARE UNITED IN OUR GOAL TO MAKE IT BETTER

FOR OUR CHILDREN. We don't have to agree how to, but we have to trust each other

that we all want just about the same thing.

> > >

> > > I have many, many friends who do not share my political beliefs and I

try to avoid talking politics with them. I have always been political, since my

days at Illini Girls State when I ran for office and in my time " off list " , I am

very political. But politics can be polarizing and being polarized from each

other is exactly what we can't afford to be if we want to change this state.

> > >

> > > So, be nice. I'll get off my soapbox and leave you and have another cup

of coffee. We can all agree that coffee and chocolate can fix anything.

> > >

> > > Marie

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...