work of Dr. Mathias Rath/Where is the lie???

[Guest guest]

Dear list,

In einer eMail vom 10.06.03 09:31:27 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt

redactie@..., as an answer to michael marty:

> the approach from Dr. Rath is interesting but to say that he cured

> the only patinent with braintumors is a big lie or better a big fomr of

> arrogancy

------copy, taken from the posting of michaelmarty787@... (michael

marty)

:

" ...that day, and that I was the

first patient in the history of medicine whose brain tumour had

vanished completely through treatment with Cellular Medicine. ... "

My comment:

I did not see anything of arrogancy. He did not say " the only patient " , he

said " the first patient " , and he also restricted his maintenance to the METHOD

of cellular medicine. So, where is the lie? Am I wrong?

Best regards,

Katharina

[Guest guest]

Dear list,

In einer eMail vom 10.06.03 09:31:27 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt

redactie@..., as an answer to michael marty:

> the approach from Dr. Rath is interesting but to say that he cured

> the only patinent with braintumors is a big lie or better a big fomr of

> arrogancy

------copy, taken from the posting of michaelmarty787@... (michael

marty)

:

" ...that day, and that I was the

first patient in the history of medicine whose brain tumour had

vanished completely through treatment with Cellular Medicine. ... "

My comment:

I did not see anything of arrogancy. He did not say " the only patient " , he

said " the first patient " , and he also restricted his maintenance to the METHOD

of cellular medicine. So, where is the lie? Am I wrong?

Best regards,

Katharina