Re: Hand-held scanner designed to detect cancer

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 6/12/03 1:27:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, poldiv17@...

writes:

> <A

HREF= " http://in.news./030611/137/251nr.html " >http://in.news./0\

30611/137/251nr.html</A>

>

>

I can't get this to open at all.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 6/12/03 1:27:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time, poldiv17@...

writes:

> <A

HREF= " http://in.news./030611/137/251nr.html " >http://in.news./0\

30611/137/251nr.html</A>

>

>

I can't get this to open at all.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 6/12/03 12:53:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

szukidavis@... writes:

>

> > <A

HREF= " http://in.news./030611/137/251nr.html " >http://in.news./0\

30611/137/251nr.html</A>

>

I tried several times and finally found my way to this site. It is pretty

amazing. It reminds me of Star Trek!

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 6/12/03 12:53:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

szukidavis@... writes:

>

> > <A

HREF= " http://in.news./030611/137/251nr.html " >http://in.news./0\

30611/137/251nr.html</A>

>

I tried several times and finally found my way to this site. It is pretty

amazing. It reminds me of Star Trek!

[Guest guest]

< It is pretty amazing.>

Yes, but who knows what all those microwave beams are going to do in terms of

making a tumor worse, or beginning mutatation where there was none. Microwaves

do alter foods at the cellular level.

[Guest guest]

< It is pretty amazing.>

Yes, but who knows what all those microwave beams are going to do in terms of

making a tumor worse, or beginning mutatation where there was none. Microwaves

do alter foods at the cellular level.

[Guest guest]

Exactly my worries as well! All those microwave beams!!

Cheryl

[Guest guest]

Exactly my worries as well! All those microwave beams!!

Cheryl

[Guest guest]

Just a few thoughts, ...

My guess would be that this device would use a very low output of

microwaves, much lower than what would be used for cooking, and for a much

shorter time. Foods are exposed long enough to generate a thermal (heat)

effect, of course. I doubt if this would " cook " anything, even if you wanted

to!

True, it could still affect things at the cellular level, but then one has

to consider the trade-off...the options that are out there. If this is the

lesser evil, then it may be " good " in that sense... Sure sounds like it is

less harmful than biopsies, for example. Or mammograms...

We're surrounded by risks on a daily basis...we just have to manage them the

best we can. I hope this device offers us a substantially reduced risk than

what we have at the present time; I think it offers that potential.

Bob B.

Re: Hand-held scanner designed to detect cancer

> < It is pretty amazing.>

>

> Yes, but who knows what all those microwave beams are going to do in terms

of making a tumor worse, or beginning mutatation where there was none.

Microwaves do alter foods at the cellular level.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Just a few thoughts, ...

My guess would be that this device would use a very low output of

microwaves, much lower than what would be used for cooking, and for a much

shorter time. Foods are exposed long enough to generate a thermal (heat)

effect, of course. I doubt if this would " cook " anything, even if you wanted

to!

True, it could still affect things at the cellular level, but then one has

to consider the trade-off...the options that are out there. If this is the

lesser evil, then it may be " good " in that sense... Sure sounds like it is

less harmful than biopsies, for example. Or mammograms...

We're surrounded by risks on a daily basis...we just have to manage them the

best we can. I hope this device offers us a substantially reduced risk than

what we have at the present time; I think it offers that potential.

Bob B.

Re: Hand-held scanner designed to detect cancer

> < It is pretty amazing.>

>

> Yes, but who knows what all those microwave beams are going to do in terms

of making a tumor worse, or beginning mutatation where there was none.

Microwaves do alter foods at the cellular level.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Bob,

<My guess would be that this device would use a very low output of

microwaves, much lower than what would be used for cooking, and for a much

shorter time.

I can't remember whether it was on this list or the " Getting Well " list that I

read something about there being more danger from low-level x-rays than high

level. Of course microwaves are of a different order, but it's possible they

might work, on the cellular level, in a way that is similar. We don't really

know how mutation gets started.

<We're surrounded by risks on a daily basis...we just have to manage them the

best we can. I hope this device offers us a substantially reduced risk than

what we have at the present time; I think it offers that potential.

I understand and appreciate this argument, especially for the person anxious to

test whether tumors might be present. My own position, however, is quite

different. I have had a brother die of colon cancer and my sister is now dying

from the disease. I no longer have the need I once had to learn through any

invasive or non-invasive testing procedure--even a scanner held to be

low-risk--whether such a growth has begun in me. Why? Because nothing I learn

from such testing would change the way I live now--which is to follow a

life-syle and a series of protocols that have the best chance of preventing or

curing cancer.

[Guest guest]

Hi Bob,

<My guess would be that this device would use a very low output of

microwaves, much lower than what would be used for cooking, and for a much

shorter time.

I can't remember whether it was on this list or the " Getting Well " list that I

read something about there being more danger from low-level x-rays than high

level. Of course microwaves are of a different order, but it's possible they

might work, on the cellular level, in a way that is similar. We don't really

know how mutation gets started.

<We're surrounded by risks on a daily basis...we just have to manage them the

best we can. I hope this device offers us a substantially reduced risk than

what we have at the present time; I think it offers that potential.

I understand and appreciate this argument, especially for the person anxious to

test whether tumors might be present. My own position, however, is quite

different. I have had a brother die of colon cancer and my sister is now dying

from the disease. I no longer have the need I once had to learn through any

invasive or non-invasive testing procedure--even a scanner held to be

low-risk--whether such a growth has begun in me. Why? Because nothing I learn

from such testing would change the way I live now--which is to follow a

life-syle and a series of protocols that have the best chance of preventing or

curing cancer.