Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

vaccine ... against anthrax has never been a best-seller

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

<A

HREF= " http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42952-2001Sep28.html " >http:\

//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42952-2001Sep28.html</A>

Demand Growing for Anthrax Vaccine

Fear of Bioterrorism Attack Spurs Requests for Controversial Shot

By Rick Weiss

Washington Post Staff Writer

Saturday, September 29, 2001; Page A16

      The nation's only vaccine approved against anthrax has never been a

best-seller. The only civilians who ever needed it were ranchers, hide

handlers, veterinarians and the few scientists who worked with the deadly

soil bacterium.

      Sept. 11 changed all that. Doctors' offices and travel clinics around

the country have been swamped with requests for the vaccine amid concern that

the tragedies in New York and Washington might foreshadow a bioterrorist

attack. More than 1,000 people in the past two weeks have tried to get shots

directly from the vaccine's maker, BioPort of Lansing, Mich. Callers there

are being shunted to a recorded message that reflects what doctors everywhere

are saying:

      " All the stockpile that currently exists is owned by the Department of

Defense. At this time there is no opportunity for any commercial sales. "

      That reality has infuriated some. " After all, we are all now soldiers

in the war trenches of our offices, hospitals and backyards, " said

Gray, an Atlanta area health care worker. He noted that Iraq, the Soviet

Union and perhaps other nations have made weapons loaded with the deadly

spores.

      Yet BioPort's vaccine was until two weeks ago perhaps the most shunned

and controversial shot ever produced. For years it has been at the center of

a political, medical and legal struggle, with more than 400 members of the

military opting to quit or be court-martialed rather than roll up their

sleeves.

      Indeed, the history of the vaccine suggests that the nation faces some

difficult decisions as it tries to prepare for what is widely believed to be

the No. 1 biowarfare threat today.

      The Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly cited BioPort for

violations at its manufacturing plant, including contamination problems and

suspicious changes made to quality assurance records. So severe have those

problems been that the agency has blocked the release of all batches for

several years, contributing to a severe shortage that was causing problems

for the military long before the public wanted a share of the doses.

      BioPort may eventually overcome its manufacturing problems – the

company says it will apply for FDA licensure of an upgraded plant in

mid-October. But questions remain as to whether the FDA itself is in

violation of the law by allowing the military to use the vaccine against

inhaled anthrax when the shot's usefulness has been proven only for a

different version of the disease.

      In May, two Air Force officers filed a federal class action suit,

contending that the vaccine should be classified as " investigational " for

inhaled anthrax and should be offered only to volunteers who sign

informed-consent documents clearly stating they are subjects in an experiment.

      Pentagon leaders also are apparently engaged in a heated battle among

themselves over the vaccine. Undersecretaries of Defense Pete Aldridge and

Chu, who were reviewing the anthrax vaccine situation for Defense

Secretary H. Rumsfeld, sent a memo to Rumsfeld on Aug. 10 saying they

would make their final recommendations about BioPort by Sept. 1.

      Language in the memo supports long-standing rumors that they may

recommend canceling the contract with BioPort and developing a new facility

for the military's vaccine needs.

      Their final Sept. 1 recommendation has not been made public. But on

Aug. 30 Gen. Henry H. Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sent

his own preemptory memo to Rumsfeld.

      That memo, which was obtained by The Washington Post, urges Rumsfeld to

keep the BioPort vaccine " as the centerpiece of our defense " against anthrax.

Sources inside and outside the military, speaking on the condition of

anonymity, said the memo appears to be an effort to derail the

undersecretaries' review. They say it reflects the joint chiefs' position

that the vaccine will give them political, if not medical, cover if U.S.

troops are attacked with anthrax.

      One of BioPort's four board members is former Joint Chiefs of Staff

member Adm. J. Crowe Jr.

      Inhaled anthrax is fatal in 80 percent of unvaccinated people.

Antibiotics for the disease, such as ciprofloxacin (brand name Cipro), which

have been selling in record quantities in the past two weeks, are largely

useless by the time symptoms arise.

      The vaccine was approved in 1970, based on a study that showed it

protected against " cutaneous " anthrax, a form of the disease that occurs when

spores infect the skin. The vaccine was never tested against inhaled anthrax

in people (and could not be today for ethical reasons). Nonetheless, about

half a million members of the military were ordered to take the shots to

protect against inhaled anthrax during the Gulf War.

      In 1996, BioPort applied to the FDA for a change in the vaccine's

approval to deem it officially protective against inhaled anthrax. That

application is still pending, but in 1997 the military embarked on a massive

program to vaccinate all 2.4 million active and reserve military personnel.

      Those plans have shrunk over the years, largely as a result of

dwindling supplies caused by BioPort's ongoing failure to pass FDA

requirements. About 520,000 members of the service have been inoculated to

date.

      Critics of the vaccine say no one should be forced to get the shot

because, in their view, its safety and efficacy against inhalation anthrax

are still in question. The U.S. General Accounting Office has agreed – among

other problems, it concluded, the current vaccine does not have the same

chemical formulation as that approved in 1970. A scathing report by the House

Government Reform Committee also agreed.

      The FDA has been highly critical of BioPort's performance, telling

Congress on numerous occasions that the agency continues to find " significant

deviations " from its standards. The most recent inspection records available,

obtained by The Post through the Freedom of Information Act, contain 17 pages

of violations from October 2000, including sterility failures, mysteriously

post-dated quality control forms and the use of improper calculations that

effectively made abnormal test results appear to be normal.

      Nonetheless, the FDA and the federal Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention have repeatedly asserted that they believe the vaccine being

circulated to the military is safe, and that it is not illegal to prescribe

it for inhalation anthrax. Side effects appear to be no more frequent than

for other vaccines, BioPort and the Defense Department have said.

      It remains to be seen whether the military will use the heightened

threat of terrorism to justify a new push for mass vaccination of troops.

Alternatively, soldiers could be given the choice of opting out of what they

see as an unfair experiment, or the president could invoke a 1998 law that

allows him to compel soldiers to submit to experimental shots.

      Neither of those options is politically attractive, observers said. And

given the current climate of fear, it may be that – in a twist no one had

predicted – the real challenge will be making enough of the vaccine to

satisfy public demand.

      © 2001 The Washington Post Company

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...