Guest guest Posted December 15, 2001 Report Share Posted December 15, 2001 thanks sandy...i've passed it on... you know, hilary butler says that the 2 years old thing with the japanese was a myth - it never happened....i spoke to her in an email once about it - here's what she said Also, you have me really curious......are you saying that one specific person started that rumor, or a group of people?? I believe the instigator of that theory was Dr Vierra Scheibnerova from Australia. Are you sure this was maybe never even tested out at some point, maybe that's where it came from? (But then, why would they go back to the old schedule if it was true that sids was reduced).....Maybe it was one specific shot that was held back until 2?..... It's just hard to believe that this has circulated for so long and isn't true one iota ;-) The Japanese don't say that SIDS was reduced. they say that deaths from the vaccine was eliminated. > Have you tried my website? Also, please note that there are no statistics > on SIDS going back before DPT was introduced - in fact the farthest back > that I have been able to get anything was around 1980, although I have heard > you can get them a bit farther back than that. In other words, the > incidence of SIDS was inconsequential enough, apparently, that records were > not kept until sometime after infant vaccination was introduced. > > I have heard, but have not yet been able to confirm that the SIDS rate > plummeted when Japan stopped giving DPT to infants, waiting until they were > 2 years old. > > And please read the VAERS data I have so far compiled - you will see how > many SIDS deaths occur within hours or days of receiving vaccination. > Although it is not proof, the high percent that occur so soon after > vaccination should give anyone pause. > > You will not find proof, however, because no one but the vaccine > manufacturers has an incentive to pay for any studies. But remember, the > absence of proof is not proof of the absence of a relationship. > > Sandy > > http://www.vaccinationnews.com > > ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE > IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS > REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE > CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION > WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE > MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. > > > > > need good links > > > a ? from another list i'm on..... > > Care, have you got some good links for more info? I have been wading > through stuff but am getting annoyed by the unfounded, out of date > scare mongering by BOTH sides of the debate. The only sids links I > am finding are annecdotal and emotionally charged - not useful for > dh's analytical mind and not convincing to me. > > I have tried a few of the discussion boards but have found that if > they detect you are already not converted to the anti-vax thinking > things get defensive. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.