Re: ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

[Guest guest]

Has anyone checked for those under 18 who may be receiving the AVIP. I know

some enlist before 18.

Dave

ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

From: " Bourgeois " <bourgeoisb@...>

ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

1. Who should not take the anthrax vaccine?

Those with a true hypersensitivity reaction (serious allergic reaction) to a

previous dose of the anthrax vaccine, people infected with HIV, people who

have other kinds of immune suppression, pregnant women, and people under 18

and over 65 years of age..... "

[Guest guest]

Wasn't it reported that Crowe has taken the vaccine? Will search the

archives. BTW, he is in his 70's.

bedlam3 wrote:

>

> From: " bedlam3 " <bedlam3@...>

>

> Has anyone checked for those under 18 who may be receiving the AVIP. I know

> some enlist before 18.

>

> Dave

>

> ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

>

> From: " Bourgeois " <bourgeoisb@...>

>

> ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

> 1. Who should not take the anthrax vaccine?

> Those with a true hypersensitivity reaction (serious allergic reaction) to a

> previous dose of the anthrax vaccine, people infected with HIV, people who

> have other kinds of immune suppression, pregnant women, and people under 18

> and over 65 years of age..... "

>

[Guest guest]

http://www.house.gov/reform/hearings/healthcare/99.10.12/crowe.htm

Here is Crowe's house testimony in which he says " Incidentally, I have had 4

of the 6 shots myself and I will complete the course next year. "

> From: Colley <wecbac@...>

>

> Wasn't it reported that Crowe has taken the vaccine? Will search the

> archives. BTW, he is in his 70's.

>

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 11/23/99 6:45:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,

beller@... writes:

<< Wasn't it reported that Crowe has taken the vaccine? Will search the >

archives. BTW, he is in his 70's. >>

Sorry, he is over the age limit. Too old.

[Guest guest]

OOPS! ANOTHER deviation from the guidelines!! How about this statement

that he made:

(> Moreover, my understanding is that a military recipient who has a

reaction that requires medical attention is taken off the program. There

have, of course, been some reactions to the shots. >

RECKON HE MIGHT PASS ON HIS " UNDERSTANDING " TO SOME OF THE MILITARY

CLINICS?

The Bellers wrote:

>

> From: " The Bellers " <beller@...>

>

> http://www.house.gov/reform/hearings/healthcare/99.10.12/crowe.htm

>

> Here is Crowe's house testimony in which he says " Incidentally, I have had 4

> of the 6 shots myself and I will complete the course next year. "

>

> > From: Colley <wecbac@...>

> >

> > Wasn't it reported that Crowe has taken the vaccine? Will search the

> > archives. BTW, he is in his 70's.

[Guest guest]

Not really a deviation here because only the military can determine if you

had a reaction. So in only the most severe and publicized cases they simply

state there is not a clear cause and effect to the vaccine. " Yes your sick

but our shots didn't cause it. " (Ha Ha)

Dave

Re: ANTHRAX VACCINE -- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

From: Colley <wecbac@...>

OOPS! ANOTHER deviation from the guidelines!! How about this statement

that he made:

(> Moreover, my understanding is that a military recipient who has a

reaction that requires medical attention is taken off the program. There

have, of course, been some reactions to the shots. >

RECKON HE MIGHT PASS ON HIS " UNDERSTANDING " TO SOME OF THE MILITARY CLINICS?

[Guest guest]

LIES... LIES... LIES.... and O' yes... LIES!!!! I can tell you first hand,

that even if one " requires medical attention " , it does NOT.... repeat, does

NOT disqualify one from taking the shots.......

<< (> Moreover, my understanding is that a military recipient who has a

reaction that requires medical attention is taken off the program. >>