The Connecticut Law Tribune...

[Guest guest]

Monday, December 18, 2006

Class Action Suit Targets Anthrax Vaccine

By THOMAS D. WILLIAMS

http://www.ctlawtribune.com/getarticle.aspx?ID=24652

Two years after an earlier lawsuit temporarily halted mandatory anthrax

vaccinations for all 2.4 million U.S. military service members and some military

contractors, another group of military service members and Pentagon civilian

contractors are going to federal court to block the vaccine's forced use.

Six complainants, remaining unidentified to protect them from retaliatory

military discipline, filed suit against federal military and health officials

Dec. 13 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. They're asking a

judge once again to declare the controversial vaccine an unapproved drug and

unlawful for use without informed consent.

Connecticut's U.S. Rep. Shays, R-Stamford, state Attorney General

Blumenthal and two well-known Connecticut U.S. Air Force officers,

Rempfer and Russ Dingle, were leading opponents of the inoculation

program when it began in 1997. For seven years, in vain, they pressured

Congress, two presidents and high-ranking Pentagon officials to halt the

program. Lt. Col. Dingle, of East Hartford, died in September 2005.

A federal court order in late 2004 halted mandatory vaccinations based on a

finding that the Food and Drug Administration failed to follow licensing

regulations. But soon after the FDA issued a final order approving the vaccine's

safety and effectiveness in December 2005, the Department of Defense announced

it was reinstituting the mandatory inoculation program for those serving in

Korea and the Middle East.

Critics charge the FDA failed to provide evidence the vaccine was effective

against inhalation (weaponized) anthrax, and failed to address reports of

adverse health consequences from the vaccine.

Reached last week, Blumenthal said he hasn't yet reviewed the class action.

But he seemed to place little confidence in the FDA final rule. " My belief has

been consistently that the vaccine should be voluntary unless and until a new

vaccine is developed that is safe and effective, " he said.

Shays agreed. Military personnel " volunteer to put on the uniform to defend

us. They should not be required to put untested vaccines into their bodies, " he

said.

Each of the plaintiffs faces either termination from employment or criminal

prosecution if they refuse inoculation.

Adverse Reactions

The U.S. Government Accountability Office reported that the vaccine's systemic

adverse reaction rate was 100 times higher than the 0.2 percent rate reported on

the product's label. Adverse vaccine reactions were said by users to include

immune disorders, muscle and joint pains, headaches, rashes, fatigue, nausea,

diarrhea, chills and fever. At least half a dozen deaths and a number of birth

defects have been attributed to use of the vaccine, but they have not been

definitively proven as linked.

Chicago attorney J. Michels Jr., co-counsel in the litigation with D.C.

attorney Mark S. Zaid, charged, " FDA's certification of the vaccine … is based

on slipshod statistical analysis, and an improper use of testing data. [That],

as well as the defense department's alteration of the vaccine dosing schedule,

renders [it] a drug unapproved for its applied use under current federal law. "

Defense department and FDA spokespersons declined to comment on the pending

litigation, but maintained the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine. " We

believe, in issuing its final order last December, the FDA affirmed once and for

all the safety and efficacy of our vaccine, " said Kim Brennen Root, a

spokeswoman for BioPort Corp., the vaccine's manufacturer.

Nearly 500 active-duty service members have refused the vaccine, and more than

100 have been court-martialed. Additionally, approximately 500 to 1,000 pilots

and flight crew members have quit, resigned or transferred from the Air National

Guard or Reserves rather than take the vaccine. The vaccine is voluntary in the

Australian, British and Canadian militaries, as well as for U.S. Department of

State employees, even though they serve in the same geographical region as that

of U.S. military service members.

Randi J. Airola, © 517-819-5926

http://military-biodefensevaccines.org

To receive MBVP E-news: http://military-biodefensevaccines.org click on MBVP

Chat List and join. The Chat List provides biodefense information and allows

subscribers to interact with one another. This is a public domain. Opinions

expressed by individuals are the responsibility of the individual.

The MBVP Chat list is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center

(NVIC), which is a non-profit (501C3) educational organization. Donations are

tax deductible as provided under law. NVIC does not receive Government

subsidies. To support the MBVP of NVIC, go to

http://www.nvic.org/makingcashdonations.htm and become a member of NVIC.

NVIC publishes a free E-News newsletter with daily analysis and commentary by

Co-Founder/President Barbara Loe Fisher on infectious diseases and vaccine

research, regulation, policymaking, legislation, and informed consent issues. To

receive NVIC E-news: http://www.nvic.org and sign up.