Guest guest Posted September 7, 2001 Report Share Posted September 7, 2001 Dear Dr. Gilada, I am sorry not to agree with you on some points while I do agree on other points. I disagreement is for your condemnation for government's policy to mendatory testing of truck drivers. I know that you are an NGO and NGO's world over have somehow made a mind to oppose every act of gvernment. Your opposition is based on that why from bottom?. I did not expect such a non-scientific opposition from a medically qualified doctor. I am sure that If I ask from you the data that in India how many politians have been found HIV positive vis-a-vis truck drivers, what will be your answer?. Tell me honestly. So why you are making news without any substance. The truck drivers (and according to our study even the jailmates) are high risk populations. Their testing and counselling is not important only for themselves but also for the society. They are spreading infection from one corner of the country to another through innocent and illeterate passive parteners/preys. Sorry once again for my support to the ministry's order. Yours, Dr. Sarman Singh Additional Professor and Head, Clinical Microbiolgy and Chief AIDS Counsellor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi E-mail: <ssingh56@...> _________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2001 Report Share Posted September 8, 2001 Dear Forum mebers, Prof. Singh wrote, ... " The truck drivers (and according to our study even the jailmates) are highrisk populations. Their testing and counselling is not important only for themselves but also for the society. They are spreading infection from one corner of the country to another through innocent and illeterate passive parteners/preys. Sorry once again for my support to the ministry's order. I think that everyone knows that truck drivers represent one high risk population for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. " ... However, AIDS clearly does not discriminate! Now, I believe Dr. Singh points to a possible middle path solution. The MANDATORY testing is the part with which I think most people find economically ill-advised and deeply discriminatory. However, I think everyone here would agree that a targeted government program to provide truckers with safer sex education, condoms and the OPPORTUNITY for testing and counselling is a much more sensible way to approach what is a serious problem. The debate then becomes one of how best to allocate scarce resources for the best ends of prevention efforts to slow the spread of HIV disease. This will assure more money is available for the other piece of the public policy approach toward AIDS: caring for infected individuals, assuring access to appropriate diagnostic techniques and antiretroviral or opportunistic infection drug therapy as indicated. M. E-maiL <gmc0@...> _____________________________________________- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.