2nd Bidder?

[Guest guest]

Wouldn't going with the second production facility

and contract have solved a majority of the problems

associated with MBPI, and the current vaccine? If

they were to go this route....

1. A new facility, fully inspected, and fully

compliant, would be used, not just an old place fixed

up " just enough to pass " .

2. They would not have bought into, and supported the

variety of problems associated with MBPI's quality

control, nor their conflict of interest problems, nor

their insider bidding issues (you know, all the stuff

that technically would make the contract between DOD

and MBPI/BioPort illegal in the first place).

3. A brand new vaccine would be developed, and fully

tested according to current FDA standards of safety

and efficacy.

It seems to me for what they have already spent, and

plan on spending, they could have started over with

all new, instead of putting a " band-aid " on the old.

It's like having all these cars that are pre-1974, (I

like old cars, by the way) many of them are currently

not required to have certain types of inspections,

because AT THE TIME THEY WERE MADE, they were not

required to be inspected. But now, they are

considered bad for the environment because of the lack

of EPA equipment, and are considered unsafe, because

of the lack of ABS, Airbags, etc. YET THEY ARE STILL

LEGAL.

Since MBPI appears to be going defunct anyway, why not

just let it go (poor Adm. Crowe), and contract with

the second facility who put in the bid?

_________________________________________________________