Guest guest Posted April 20, 1999 Report Share Posted April 20, 1999 Ok, The word I get today from what I consider of the highest reliability is that " It hit the fan at Dover Air Force Base, Yesterday " . Seems the flight surgeons have noticed a sharp rise in the number of those grounded due to sickness, and are thus beginning to seriously question the wisdom of this program. We need to get word to as many Congressmen and Senators as possible to verify for themselves what is going on at Dover AFB. An egg is harder to crack from the outside than it is to poke through from the inside. The cracks it would seem are beginning to be visable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 To all: Things just seem strange. My husband received his first anthrax shot on March 2, 99. He has had a total of 3 innoculations since then. He has had no side effects or adverse reactions. He told me that no one on his ship, that he know of, has had problems. And no refusers on the Inchon. Why are some military personel experiencing problems and others not? Is it because some lots are contaminated and others not? My husband received FAV038. As far as we know the only problem with this lot was low volume (not a real problem). Why would some lots have squalene in them and others not????????? When would one start seeing the effects of having squalene in the blood? I pray and hope that all involved in this program (our massive military) doesnt end up like many of the vets from the GW. What a horrible situation that would be. I am still working against this program - I am not for the anthrax vaccine. Thanks, Traci York bedlam3 wrote: > From: " bedlam3 " <bedlam3@...> > > Ok, > > The word I get today from what I consider of the highest reliability is that > " It hit the fan at Dover Air Force Base, Yesterday " . Seems the flight > surgeons have noticed a sharp rise in the number of those grounded due to > sickness, and are thus beginning to seriously question the wisdom of this > program. We need to get word to as many Congressmen and Senators as > possible to verify for themselves what is going on at Dover AFB. > > An egg is harder to crack from the outside than it is to poke through from > the inside. The cracks it would seem are beginning to be visable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 To all: Things just seem strange. My husband received his first anthrax shot on March 2, 99. He has had a total of 3 innoculations since then. He has had no side effects or adverse reactions. He told me that no one on his ship, that he know of, has had problems. And no refusers on the Inchon. Why are some military personel experiencing problems and others not? Is it because some lots are contaminated and others not? My husband received FAV038. As far as we know the only problem with this lot was low volume (not a real problem). Why would some lots have squalene in them and others not????????? When would one start seeing the effects of having squalene in the blood? I pray and hope that all involved in this program (our massive military) doesnt end up like many of the vets from the GW. What a horrible situation that would be. I am still working against this program - I am not for the anthrax vaccine. Thanks, Traci York bedlam3 wrote: > From: " bedlam3 " <bedlam3@...> > > Ok, > > The word I get today from what I consider of the highest reliability is that > " It hit the fan at Dover Air Force Base, Yesterday " . Seems the flight > surgeons have noticed a sharp rise in the number of those grounded due to > sickness, and are thus beginning to seriously question the wisdom of this > program. We need to get word to as many Congressmen and Senators as > possible to verify for themselves what is going on at Dover AFB. > > An egg is harder to crack from the outside than it is to poke through from > the inside. The cracks it would seem are beginning to be visable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 [This message contained attachments] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 ........Rumor has it that antibodies for squalene have been detected in some blood samples of some of those recently innoculated and symptomatic. Who is running the tests to detect squalene? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 I would say that this is EXTREMELY important information to add to our case!!! Traci... M. Lee wrote: > From: " M. Lee " <finchley@...> > > .......Rumor has it that > antibodies for squalene have been detected in some blood samples of some of > those > recently innoculated and symptomatic. > > Who is running the tests to detect squalene? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 Hello Angie, Yes, there has been and continues to be testing. One thing, of which we can be sure , that it's not being provided by the DOD:-) Hope.........rgs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ -------------- On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 06:08:51 -0500 " M. Lee " <finchley@...> writes: >From: " M. Lee " <finchley@...> > > .......Rumor has it that >antibodies for squalene have been detected in some blood samples of >some of those recently innoculated and symptomatic. > >Who is running the tests to detect squalene? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.