Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 Just my $.02... I've been a part of this list for a month or so now. In that short time, I've read too many posts about certain products (no names mentioned), some of which I inquired about, but privately. There has been a lot of bickering back and forth, and generally opinions that may or may not be well received. We're all very different people with very different thoughts and feelings. It can be expected to be a little " uneven " at times; however, I never bargained for opening up my digest version and finding 80% of the posts related to the same topic, day after day. At first, I thought of unsubscribing, but I've found some valuable info on this list along with some real heartfelt words and feelings and have decided to stay. My only suggestion and pleading is to delete the previous posts when replying as it takes up so much room and really keeps me from wanting to sort through all of it just to read a certain part of the post. And as others have said in today's digest, keep some of this private. Not all of us need to hear some of this stuff. That's all for now. Thanks for listening to my rant, and for sharing your feelings, info and knowledge. There are many kind people on this list who are willing to help all. I only hope I can return this at some time. Best, as always, Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 Let's all ignore them, by hitting the delete key. Maybe they will all go away. They seem to thrive when we respond to them. Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 I've stopped posting and been lurking for the past few days, observing the interchange of ideas and, sometimes, barbs at each other. Interesting that I find it all very interesting, but agree that the purpose of this interchange may be obscured; also the time it takes to even scan the subject lines is pretty overwhelming on some days. For those new to the site (myself included), I find it all helpful and would really like to know which things have not worked. Literature, advertising, p.r., word of mouth, labels -- all of these things tell us which might, should, or could work. What I really wanted to know when I signed up hereon (but have come to know more, thanks to all of you): risks of alternative/adjuctive/complementary treatments and what is NOT working, not to focus the site on the negative, but to try to sort out at what stage people went into these choices and at what stage some bell went off and someone said, hey, this treatment is not for me. or if I have thus-and-so treatment, I shouldn't have this other thing, whatever. This thought could apply to chemo, radiation, as well as the other treatments being discussed. What do you say? Joyce (H.) P.S. This is a trivial detail, but it would be incredibly helpful if we kept our subject lines consistent so scanning would be easier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 Dear Cancergroups, Sorry we couldn't compact years of research into something smaller than a few days of ranting and raving. Let's just say, in your searches for cures for cancers we've exposed years of rabbit trails you don't have to go down now. Or if you so incline at least you see some trails are marked, a little. And if you think you have a few extra years of time for research go ahead and delete us, sort all the info out out on your own, publish the threemillionfourhundredthousand threehundredsixtyfourth book, and we'll all read it and get well effortlessly. Godspeed' drpeppe@... Misc. ramblings... > Just my $.02... > > I've been a part of this list for a month or so now. In that short time, > I've read too many posts about certain products (no names mentioned), some of > which I inquired about, but privately. There has been a lot of bickering > back and forth, and generally opinions that may or may not be well received. > > We're all very different people with very different thoughts and feelings. > It can be expected to be a little " uneven " at times; however, I never > bargained for opening up my digest version and finding 80% of the posts > related to the same topic, day after day. > > At first, I thought of unsubscribing, but I've found some valuable info on > this list along with some real heartfelt words and feelings and have decided > to stay. My only suggestion and pleading is to delete the previous posts > when replying as it takes up so much room and really keeps me from wanting to > sort through all of it just to read a certain part of the post. And as > others have said in today's digest, keep some of this private. Not all of us > need to hear some of this stuff. > > That's all for now. Thanks for listening to my rant, and for sharing your > feelings, info and knowledge. There are many kind people on this list who > are willing to help all. I only hope I can return this at some time. > > Best, as always, > Judi > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wow the crowds with your FREE Shimmer Ring! The coolest > accessory of the year is FREE shipping too! > http://clickhere./click/1820 > > -- Check out your group's private Chat room > -- ChatPage?listName=cures for cancer & m=1 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 Joyce (H) and To Whom This May Concern, Only when somebody feeds all the cancer books, all the trials, observations, all the successes and failures and reasons proven, disproven and suspected etc., into a computer data warehouse and presses the statistical analysis button will you get an organized email of what you are asking. As a current graduate student in Computer Information Systems I presented this $50 Million (two fellows that had such a system taught one of my classes) solution to Cancer Treatment Centers of America in Tulsa. After several followup visits they told me, " don't call us, we'll call you " . Maybe you call down there and tell them you want that simplified listing of all the answers with no discussions allowed. Godspeed, Joe Peppe X Re: Misc. ramblings... > I've stopped posting and been lurking for the past few days, observing the > interchange of ideas and, sometimes, barbs at each other. Interesting that I > find it all very interesting, but agree that the purpose of this interchange > may be obscured; also the time it takes to even scan the subject lines is > pretty overwhelming on some days. For those new to the site (myself > included), I find it all helpful and would really like to know which things > have not worked. Literature, advertising, p.r., word of mouth, labels -- all > of these things tell us which might, should, or could work. > > What I really wanted to know when I signed up hereon (but have come to know > more, thanks to all of you): risks of alternative/adjuctive/complementary > treatments and what is NOT working, not to focus the site on the negative, > but to try to sort out at what stage people went into these choices and at > what stage some bell went off and someone said, hey, this treatment is not > for me. or if I have thus-and-so treatment, I shouldn't have this other > thing, whatever. This thought could apply to chemo, radiation, as well as > the other treatments being discussed. What do you say? > > Joyce (H.) > > P.S. This is a trivial detail, but it would be incredibly helpful if we kept > our subject lines consistent so scanning would be easier. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to tablesaws. > http://clickhere./click/1701 > > > > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar! > -- cal?listname=cures for cancer & m=1 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 Hi Joyce, Indeed, we have two Joyce's and with opposing views. I say NO!!! to fishing out the worms that would have the FDA and world government take over our health and healthy Design Foods. Rather, I think time would be better spent in discussing the DANGERS of the toxins Dr. Hulda talks about which causes cancer, so we can eliminate them from our bodies and reduce our cancer rates. People are ignorant about them; the drug stores are full of them; and as a result our bodies are filled with them. Designer Foods are SAFE and promote cancer cures. So, I would propose that we TALK about the " medical drugs that are causing 100,000 to 300,000 deaths. Or, let us talk about the CARCINOGENS in our FOODS, LOTIONS, TOOTH FILLINGS, etc. that Dr. speaks about which are known cancer promoters. The very treatments that are prescribed for cancer (radiation, chemotherapy) will increase cancer rates by their damage to genes, if not in this generation, then in the next generation of children. Statistics speak very loudly. Joyce On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 ACEBRIAN@... wrote: > I've stopped posting and been lurking for the past few days, observing the > interchange of ideas and, sometimes, barbs at each other. Interesting that I > find it all very interesting, but agree that the purpose of this interchange > may be obscured; also the time it takes to even scan the subject lines is > pretty overwhelming on some days. For those new to the site (myself > included), I find it all helpful and would really like to know which things > have not worked. Literature, advertising, p.r., word of mouth, labels -- all > of these things tell us which might, should, or could work. > > What I really wanted to know when I signed up hereon (but have come to know > more, thanks to all of you): risks of alternative/adjuctive/complementary > treatments and what is NOT working, not to focus the site on the negative, > but to try to sort out at what stage people went into these choices and at > what stage some bell went off and someone said, hey, this treatment is not > for me. or if I have thus-and-so treatment, I shouldn't have this other > thing, whatever. This thought could apply to chemo, radiation, as well as > the other treatments being discussed. What do you say? > > Joyce (H.) > > P.S. This is a trivial detail, but it would be incredibly helpful if we kept > our subject lines consistent so scanning would be easier. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Accurate impartial advice on everything from laptops to tablesaws. > http://clickhere./click/1701 > > > > -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar! > -- cal?listname=cures for cancer & m=1 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 1999 Report Share Posted December 8, 1999 I was gonna say that myself. Love LloydAt 09:21 AM 12/8/99 EST, you wrote: >Just my $.02... > >I've been a part of this list for a month or so now. In that short time, >I've read too many posts about certain products (no names mentioned), some of >which I inquired about, but privately. There has been a lot of bickering >back and forth, and generally opinions that may or may not be well received. > >We're all very different people with very different thoughts and feelings. >It can be expected to be a little " uneven " at times; however, I never >bargained for opening up my digest version and finding 80% of the posts >related to the same topic, day after day. > >At first, I thought of unsubscribing, but I've found some valuable info on >this list along with some real heartfelt words and feelings and have decided >to stay. My only suggestion and pleading is to delete the previous posts >when replying as it takes up so much room and really keeps me from wanting to >sort through all of it just to read a certain part of the post. And as >others have said in today's digest, keep some of this private. Not all of us >need to hear some of this stuff. > >That's all for now. Thanks for listening to my rant, and for sharing your >feelings, info and knowledge. There are many kind people on this list who >are willing to help all. I only hope I can return this at some time. > >Best, as always, >Judi > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Wow the crowds with your FREE Shimmer Ring! The coolest >accessory of the year is FREE shipping too! >http://clickhere./click/1820 > >-- Check out your group's private Chat room >-- ChatPage?listName=cures for cancer & m=1 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.