Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

2 ladies not allowed to nurse at Wal-Mart

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://www.geocities.com/heartland/8529/BF/cartoon.html

This is from the Monday Dayton Daily News. By DL , the humor

columnist.

I've never nursed anything but an occasional grudge, so maybe I have no

right to an opinion. But this whole breastfeeding flap has me puzzled

(about the 2 Ohio women who were asked to not BF at Walmart and who have

filed a court case).

As you may have read, two area women are suing Wal-Mart Stores Inc. because

they say there were not allowed to breastfeed their babies in the stores.

They're asking for apologies and a change in the stores' policies.

This is hardly a new issue. It's been an ongoing skirmish ever since

breastfeeding was invented by baby boomers in 1971.

But I still don't understand it.

Not only don't I understand why this is a controversy, I can't even figure

out who made it one. What percentage of the public actually objects to

women nursing their babies in public? Who are the people who strongly

against breastfeeding that Wal-Mart is willing to risk being known as

anti-motherhood in order to pacify them.

Is it men?

As with anything else that negatively affects women - including unequal pay,

splits ends and varicose veins-the whole thing could be our fault, I

supposed. And I'm sure there are men who are offended by the sight of a

woman's bare breast, although I don't personally know any. But I don't

think most men care if a woman nurses her baby in Wal-Mart. Most men don't

want to be in Wal-Mart in the first place.

If it's not men who are upset, my next guess is that it must be women.

That doesn't make sense to me either, though. Any woman offended by the

sight of breasts probably would have a tough time getting dressed in the

morning.

Whoever they are, I'm sure the people who object to breastfeeding in public

have good reasons for the way they feel. Such as, they have been personally

appointed by God to make sure the entire world eventually is afflicted with

as many sexual hangups as possible.

But the biggest question I have about all this is: Who decided which body

parts are supposed to be covered and which aren't?

Who made the rule that it's offensive for women to bare their breasts but

it's a lovely sight when they appear in a pair of shorts that exposes

several acres of gelatinous flesh?

How did it become illegal for women to reveal a nipple in public, but okay

for men to show both of theirs? Not to mention enormous Budweiser-filled

gust, hairy backs and really appetizing armpits?

Anyway, if we're going to cover up body parts, I vote for anything that

jiggles.

And feet.

Feet don't start out looking too bad. But by the time a person reaches

adulthood a lot of them are covered with corns and calluses and hair and

chipped toenail polish and all sorts of nasty things you hardly ever see on

breasts. And yet people think nothing of walking around in public barefoot.

Or wearing shower clogs or those big clunky sandals that make them look like

Roman centurions.

So, for what it's worth, my opinion is that people who have a problem with

her breastfeeding in public need to grow up. I think a woman should have

the right to nurse her baby anywhere she pleases.

As long as she's wearing socks when she's doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks for that good laugh! Heeheehee

In a message dated 8/7/2001 9:46:39 PM Central Daylight Time,

meharv84@... writes:

> Who made the rule that it's offensive for women to bare their breasts but

> it's a lovely sight when they appear in a pair of shorts that exposes

> several acres of gelatinous flesh?

>

> How did it become illegal for women to reveal a nipple in public, but okay

> for men to show both of theirs? Not to mention enormous Budweiser-filled

> gust, hairy backs and really appetizing armpits?

>

> Anyway, if we're going to cover up body parts, I vote for anything that

> jiggles.

>

> And feet.

>

> Feet don't start out looking too bad. But by the time a person reaches

> adulthood a lot of them are covered with corns and calluses and hair and

> chipped toenail polish and all sorts of nasty things you hardly ever see on

> breasts. And yet people think nothing of walking around in public barefoot.

> Or wearing shower clogs or those big clunky sandals that make them look like

> Roman centurions.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks! This was too funny!

Laurie<ohio

I've never nursed anything but an occasional grudge, so maybe I have no

right to an opinion. But this whole breastfeeding flap has me puzzled

(about the 2 Ohio women who were asked to not BF at Walmart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...