Guest guest Posted April 4, 2005 Report Share Posted April 4, 2005 A test of good intentions in a Kenyan village By Marc Lacey The New York Times Tuesday, April 5, 2005 SAURI, Kenya Awino Odera had her handmade hoe cocked over her head the other day, her face scrunched up into a scowl, sweat pouring from her brow, her labors the very image of futility. Then hope descended onto her cornfield. " No, no, no, no! " cried Herine Okoth, an agricultural expert, as she marched over the freshly tilled land. " Stop! " Odera, a frail-looking 54-year-old woman who had never had a day of schooling in her life, had thrown fertilizer in with her corn seeds and spaced her holes too closely, both of which would reduce the harvest she and her children would get. " We agreed that you'd put the fertilizer in first, separate from the maize, " Okoth said. " It's not so difficult. It's like this. " Fertilizer first. Then cover it with some dirt. Then thrown in the seeds. Then cover those. It's not hard at all. " This settlement in western Kenya where Odera lives has become a giant test tube for a UN development project, and Okoth's instruction is part of that experiment. Eventually, there will be 10 such test villages across Africa, the world's poorest continent. Led by Sachs, director of the Earth Institute of Columbia University, the project aims to fight poverty in all its aspects - from health and education to agriculture and energy - to prove that conditions for millions of people like Odera and her neighbors can be improved in just five years. It is an important and uncertain gambit. If it fails, initiatives like the one pushed recently by Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain to increase foreign aid to Africa greatly may seem foolhardy. If a single village cannot be turned around with focused attention, how can whole communities and even countries be revitalized? The project led by Sachs grew out of the Millennium Development Goals, benchmarks created by the United Nations in 2000 to prod the world to reduce hunger and sickness by half, increase school enrollment, and generally improve the lives of the poorest of the poor. But setting the millennium goals - and a deadline of 2015 for seeing them through - has so far not meant much to people like Odera. The projections for reaching the goals keep slipping further and further into the future. It is now estimated that many of the goals will be reached decades late. By then, Odera will be long gone. Her children may be dead, too. Many of her grandchildren, some of whom have already lost their parents to disease, will be well along in poverty-stricken lives of their own. That looming failure is what spurred Sachs and his colleagues to select a particular village with dismal social indicators - this one - where they would apply a more focused antipoverty strategy to prove that, with enough attention, the goals could be reached more quickly than people thought. Okoth, who interrupted Odera's planting, is one of the dozens of experts working to make sure that this Millennium Village Project does not become another pie-in-the-sky effort. The researchers behind the program are keeping track of every penny they spend, trying to demonstrate that for a modest amount, somewhere around $110 per person, a village can be tugged out of poverty. " Projects come and go in this part of the world, " said Mutuo, a Kenyan soil scientist who is the project director. " Some people participate in order to get a free lunch. They see the immediate benefits and not necessarily the long-term benefits. This project is not about free this and free that. The attitude of the people will ultimately determine whether it succeeds. People need to get involved and stay involved long after the experts go home. " Most of the aid, in fact, will come in the form of shared knowledge from some of the foremost experts in the world in subjects as varied as health, agriculture, energy and economics. Residents, project officials say, will lift themselves out of poverty. Pedro , a top soil scientist at Columbia University, is advising the people of Sauri on how to revive their badly damaged fields and how to plant trees as a way to fertilize the soil for free. Officials estimate that the villagers' dismal crop yields could double or triple as a result. Not all the new food the farmers produce will remain theirs. This project is devised to create a community spirit and so, in exchange for their free fertilizer and seeds, farmers had to agree to give 10 percent of their yields to local schools. The schools will then start a feeding program for children at noontime and, thus, lure more of them, especially underrepresented girls, into class. The project also plans to bring electricity to Sauri by extending the power grid that came close to the villagers as part an old World Bank project, but never actually reached them. Researchers are also working to rehabilitate water pipes that were set up years ago in yet another development project that went awry. It is too early to say whether this effort will go the way of other failed ventures. Although the project is just getting off the ground, organizers are already learning how much more complicated poverty reduction is, the closer one gets to those mired in it. It is easy, for instance, to talk of the importance of bed nets to keep malaria-carrying mosquitoes away. But how does one ensure that villagers use them and do not sell them in the market instead? Already, village leaders have had to persuade one farmer not to sell his free fertilizer, as he had planned. See more of the world that matters - click here for home delivery of the International Herald Tribune. http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/04/04/news/kenya.html --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.