Guest guest Posted July 9, 2004 Report Share Posted July 9, 2004 I am happy to HEAR that mia facilitated generous donations to programs in Africa, and would be interested to hear more details from others about that, as I know nothing about it. But doesn't her rhetoric strike an odd note? I believe that in an international forum such as this, all are entitled to ask questions of one another. If we, who live in extremely different circumstances and cultures, do not ask questions, how would we ever learn about each other? When questions were addressed to her, she became extremely defensive. She consistently refuses to supply any details. She now says she is NOT a spokesperson for GIA/SFL, but consistently has said that she has passed our messages along to Bonnie Marshall, who founded and is allegedly the major financial donor for GIA/SFL. The GIA/SFL web site shows photos of Ms. Marshall with the King of Swaziland. The GIA/SFL site describes an orphan village initiative in Swaziland. So I inquired about that. Is it really happening? Or do certain organization people go to photo opportunity social events with government figures so that all can LOOK like they're doing something? Read the story below about the King of Swaziland. The rhetoric he ends with matches Mia's style! I trust that any Kenyan program financially aided by GIA/SFL has direct communication access to GIA/SFL and I cannot imagine that you would be deprived of funds just because Mia has had a fit of verbal pique on the list and decided to unsubscribe. Wouldn't it be sad if that organization actually punished Africans for daring to participate in an international email forum as equals in conversation? Wouldn't it be great if government leaders would lead......or follow.....or at least get out of the way? ****************************************************************************** 28 January - Schoolchildren in Swaziland are finally let to attend school after the absolute monarch, King Mswati III, had deferred the reopening of schools by a week. The Swazi children first had to finish weeding in the royal fields. Meanwhile, the King is meeting growing critiques on his increasingly controversial politics. Swazi school were supposed to reopen on Monday, 19 January, after seasonal vacations. This was however promptly denied by King Mswati, who first postponed the reopening by one week to enable schoolboys " to complete royal duties assigned to them by the King. " These " royal duties " in practical terms were the weeding of the royal fields. Following yet another postponement, Swazi schools finally reopened their doors yesterday as the children had weeded all the King's fields. Weeding the royal fields marks the end of the annual sacred Swazi Incwala ceremony, which begins with the eating of the first fruit. More than 30,000 students and their parents were affected, as they had already prepared to send their children to school last Tuesday, only to be told that the buildings would remain closed for a further week. - I have no problem with culture, but it should be dynamic and must not supersede daily routines that makes the country tick, commented Masuku, the leader of Swaziland's opposition and a parent, according to the UK-based Local Government International Bureau (LGIB). " Such behaviour deserves to be condemned at all costs. This is a clear sign of absolute dictatorship, " added Mr Masuku. Palace functionaries however maintained the decision to open the schools late was taken by the Ministry of Education, but opposition groups dismissed that claim. - Government agencies work at the behest of the palace, an opposition member told UN agencies in Mbabane. " If King Mswati knew about the disruption of the school year and, if he were at all concerned, he could have ordered the schools open, " he added. The Swazi opposition further took note that King Mswati's children attend private schools, which were not affected by the delay in the reopening of public schools. Three of the King's children, attend private schools in London. The Swazi government however further puts the blame for the poor situation of the country's pupils and students on others than itself. The Minister of Education, Constance Simelane, recently publicly ordered schools to admit orphans and the poor without paying, in a bid to demonstrate her vigour. This was however rejected as impossible by the Head Teachers' Association of Swaziland, which noted that no extra funding had been provided. The association told the 'Times of Swaziland' that following the Ministry's promise of free education last year, most schools were promised money. This had however never arrived. The dispositions of King Mswati have been increasingly noted internationally during the last few years as the Kingdom is experiencing a crisis provoked by years of drought, high HIV infection rates and spreading poverty. Swaziland is increasingly dependent on foreign aid and donations, a fact that has not prevented the King from boosting his private spending. King Mswati made headlines in 2002, as he was to spend government funds, exceeding the national health budget, on a luxury jet aircraft for personal representation use. The decision caused protests among donors, funding agencies and within the government of Swaziland. During the last month, the Swazi King again made headlines by ordering the construction of eleven palaces, one for each of his royal wives. This was known as it became clear that yet another harvest would fail due to drought in the Kingdom, thus making the Swazi population dependent on food aid yet another year. The lack of democracy and labour rights also has given the Swazi palace much unwanted international attention during the last years. Trade unions and opposition parties have been illegalised as they have protested the King's absolute powers. International support to these protests has contributed to the ongoing legal reforms, which foresee a Swazi constitution. King Mswati reacted to these developments this weekend while delivering his annual speech on the state of the Kingdom. He commented that Swazis who aired the nation's problems, meaning the opposition and the media, " might seem like heroes in their own eyes, but they are mocking themselves. " The King added that these " cowardly messengers " that were " tarnishing " the Kingdom's international image would " live shortened lives " because they had incurred the wrath of God and the ancestral spirits, UN agencies in Mbabane report. He made no reference to the AIDS crisis, the ongoing drought and spreading poverty in his state of the Kingdom speech. By staff writer © afrol News ******************************************************************************* >From: " " <xhayes@...> >Reply-AIDS treatments >AIDS treatments >Subject: Re: Re: GIA/SFL >Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 02:05:25 -0400 > >This web site language sounds wonderful. July of what year? Has a village >been built? What location in Swaziland? Is there a contact or authority in >Swaziland that can be consulted for details and verification? > > >Boston, Massachusetts, USA > >****************************************************************************** > >http://www.globalinitiativeonaids.org/response.htm > >In July, the Global Initiative on AIDS in Africa announced its plan to >build >the first in a series of " Whole Life Children's Villages " for the continent >of Africa, in the Kingdom of Swaziland. > >The village will be self contained and will consist of every service and >opportunity a child will need to grow and develop into a successful, >productive, respectable, responsible and caring adult. The villages will be >a place where children will receive superior academic, physical and moral >education. There will be technology, agricultural and horticultural >training >centers, a trade school for learning: computer repair, electronics, >electrical contracting, building and carpentry and others. > >The center will house a performing arts center and complete sports training >complex and physical fitness facility. Movie theater, playgrounds, Olympic >training pool and soccer fields are planned for all of the primary centers. >There will be apartments for families who are facing their final days, to >come and visit the centers with their children. This will enable them to >experience the center and meet the people who will be caring for their >children. Friends and family who live far away may also book accommodations >in the village to visit the children. > >The GIAA recognizes that we cannot address all of the problems that exist >with the HIV/AIDS pandemic in Africa. But, we are committed to helping as >many parents die with as much dignity and peace as possible. Knowing that >their children will not be left to the streets is one small, human, >compassionate effort that we can take to ease the pain of this pandemic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.