Re: Selenium is one of basic nutrients for iodine protocol but here is another piece of puzzle on why it works

[Guest guest]

I'm sorry to have to say, but this is all well and good about selenium, if

indeed it is

true, but the idea that this means we don't need to worry about mercury (as this

article claims) in the environment is simply false. More and more industrial

processes emit mercury which enters the food chain. Japan had a horrible

mercury poisoning epidemic a few decades ago because of toxic waste being

dumped in a bay where people fished.

The article starts off:

The best science indicates that trace amounts of mercury in the fish

Americans eat simply aren't high enough to pose a health risk.

This isn't true from the get go-- pregnant women and children have been advised

to limit the amount of fish they eat, and if anyone thinks that guideline was

easy to

get by the corporate pollution deniers, they aren't paying attention-- we had to

struggle to get this truth out there. Because the article starts off with a

false

premise I seriously question the content of this article. I don't think the

content of

our list is enhanced by such false assurances about mercury.

--

moderators

On 20 Sep 2011 at 11:36, Pamela Valley wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> Selenium

> The best science indicates that trace amounts of mercury in the fish

> Americans eat simply aren't high enough to pose a health risk. But

> measuring only mercury further exaggerates this hypothetical risk.

> There's another scientific wrinkle that few environmental groups are

> talking about -- largely because it doesn't help to promote their

> scare campaigns. An accurate picture of the health consequences of

> eating fish must include other substances that affect the way mercury

> interacts with the human body.Selenium is plentiful in fish, but the

> public hasn't heard much about its role in the mercury puzzle. As

> biochemists, pharmacologists, and neurologists study this nutrient,

> we're gaining a better understanding of its importance.In scientific

> jargon, selenium has an unusually high " binding affinity " for mercury.

> In layman's terms, this means that when the two elements are found

> together, they tend to connect, forming a new substance. This makes it

> difficult for the human body to absorb the mercury separately. So when

> mercury " binds " to selenium, it's no longer free to " bind " to anything

> else -- like brain tissue. The research world is still developing

> explanations for exactly how selenium cancels out mercury's

> potentially toxic effects, but most scientists accept one of two

> competing theories. The conventional idea describes selenium as a sort

> of " mercury magnet. " Under this theory, once selenium is digested it

> can locate and neutralize mercury molecules. In one study, Japanese

> researchers found that adding selenium to the diets of birds " gave

> complete protection " from large amounts of mercury. Research carried

> out by scientists in Scotland and the Philippines has concluded that

> the relationship between mercury and selenium is one of " toxicological

> antagonism. " And in the United States, the Environmental Protection

> Agency describes selenium as an element that is " antagonistic to the

> toxic effects of mercury. " The more recent selenium hypothesis holds

> that mercury takes a more active role in the relationship. Under this

> theory, when mercury enters the body it seeks out selenium and takes

> it out of circulation, preventing the body from creating enzymes that

> depend on selenium to perform their functions. Enzymes are special

> proteins that control the various steps in chemical reactions that

> make life possible. Without enough selenium-based enzymes, the

> functions of the brain and other organs can be affected. While this

> might sound scary, problems can only occur if we don't get enough

> selenium to counteract the trace amounts of mercury in the fish we

> eat. And fish are so rich in selenium that this is not likely to

> happen. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has measured selenium

> levels in more than 1,000 commonly consumed foods, and 16 of the 25

> best sources of dietary selenium are ocean fish. University of North

> Dakota environmental scientist Dr. Ralston is an expert on

> the relationship between selenium and mercury. Here's how he describes

> it: Think of dietary selenium as if it were your income and dietary

> mercury as if it were a bill that you need to pay. Just as we all need

> a certain amount of money to cover living expenses such as food and

> rent, we all need a certain amount of selenium ... Only one major

> study has shown negative effects from exposure to mercury from

> seafood, and that seafood was pilot whale meat. Pilot whale meat is

> unusual in that it contains more mercury than selenium. When you eat

> pilot whale meat, it's like getting a bill for $400 and a check for

> less than $100. If that happens too much, you go bankrupt. On the

> other hand, if you eat ocean fish, it's like getting a check in the

> mail for $500 and getting a bill for $25. The more that happens, the

> happier you are. Dr. Ralston is right. Researchers at the National

> Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that most of the fish we

> eat contains significantly more selenium than mercury. Seafood that

> contains more mercury (Hg) than selenium (Se) includes pilot whale,

> tarpon, marlin, and some shark. Fish we most commonly consume,

> including all forms of tuna and salmon, are rich in selenium. On the

> other end of the scale, pilot whale is by far the worst offender. This

> may help explain why researchers in the Faroe Islands insist that

> dietary mercury is harmful to island residents. (Unlike the vast

> majority of people, the Faroese eat lots of pilot whale meat.) By

> contrast, a similar study in the Seychelles Islands -- where people

> eat lots of selenium-rich fish but no whale meat -- found no negative

> health effects from the tiny amounts of mercury in fish. Selected

> Sources: L.Cuvin-Aralar and R. Furness. " Mercury and Selenium

> Interaction: A Review. " Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 1990

> Oct 10;21:348-364. L. and N. Ralston. " Mercury: Selenium

> interactions and health implications. " SMDJ Seychelles Medical and

> Dental Journal. 2004 Nov.; Special Issue, Vol 7, No 1. P. Beyrouty and

> H. Chan. " Co-consumption of selenium and vitamin E altered the

> reproductive and developmental toxicity of methylmercury in rats. "

> Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 2006 Jan;28:49-58. K. Beijer and A.

> Jernelov. " Ecological Aspects of Mercury- Selenium Interaction in the

> Marine Environment. " Environmental Health Perspectives. 1978

> Aug;25:43-5. G. Ohi et al. " The Protective Potency of Marine Animal

> Meat Against the Neurotoxicity of Methylmercury: Its Relationship with

> the Organ Distribution of Mercury and Selenium in the Rat. " Food and

> Cosmetics Toxicology. 1980 Apr;18:139-145. Y Sugiura et al. " Selenium

> Protection Against Mercury Toxicity: High Binding Affinity of

> Methylmercury by Selenium Containing Ligands in Comparison with Sulfur

> Containing Ligands. " Bioinorganic Chemistry. 1978 Aug; 9(2):167-180.

>

> List Origin Statement: You are receiving this email because you have

> opted-in as an RSS via Email Subscriber of 'greenpastures Blog RSS'.

> Blog posts are published as they are created. You may remove your

> email address from this mailing list at any time by using the

> unsubscribe link below.

>

>

> by Green Pasture, located at 416 East Freemont P.O. Box 443 - O'Neill,

> NE 68763 - United States of America. *