Edgar Cayce Iodine in India today

[Guest guest]

Hi Everyone just wanted you to know about a Blog article (Iodine related) that

the ARE- Edgar Cayce organization has posted on their blog. It has to do with

an iodine-malaria-chikungunya project in India. If all iodine were alike then

Lugol's would have been the answer to malaria 130 years ago.

http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog.aspx?id=5204 & blogid=445

http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog

[Guest guest]

This article does not prove that Magnascent Iodine is any better than Lugol's.

In fact they

would probably have even better results if they were treating at milligram doses

instead of

the tiny doses in that product.

While it is good to see that iodine is being used in clinical environments, it's

not the type of

iodine that is responsible, it is the iodine itself. Larger amounts would do

even more good.

--

On 3 Sep 2011 at 16:08, john wrote:

> Hi Everyone just wanted you to know about a Blog article (Iodine

> related) that the ARE- Edgar Cayce organization has posted on their

> blog. It has to do with an iodine-malaria-chikungunya project in

> India. If all iodine were alike then Lugol's would have been the

> answer to malaria 130 years ago.

>

> http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog.aspx?id=5204 & blogid=445

>

> http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog

[Guest guest]

Once again, you would think that someone in 130 years has tried Lugol's for some

infectious disease. Maybe you could find someone to contact in India, Southern

Asia, or Africa and offer to supply them with your favorite iodine. I think

there really is a difference with iodine in the nascent state and the old forms

of iodine that have been round so long. This might be the indication that Dr.

Brownstein has been waiting for.

>

> > Hi Everyone just wanted you to know about a Blog article (Iodine

> > related) that the ARE- Edgar Cayce organization has posted on their

> > blog. It has to do with an iodine-malaria-chikungunya project in

> > India. If all iodine were alike then Lugol's would have been the

> > answer to malaria 130 years ago.

> >

> > http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog.aspx?id=5204 & blogid=445

> >

> > http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog

>

[Guest guest]

Well we disagree about iodine in the " nascent state " ... iodine is not toxic, and

we need it in

milligram doses. Nascent iodine is weak and therefore expensive to get to

milligram doses.

You're welcome to continue to believe in nascent iodine, but we will continue to

speak the

truth of the matter and to what is required for the iodine protocol.

--

moderator

> Once again, you would think that someone in 130 years has tried

> Lugol's for some infectious disease. Maybe you could find someone to

> contact in India, Southern Asia, or Africa and offer to supply them

> with your favorite iodine. I think there really is a difference with

> iodine in the nascent state and the old forms of iodine that have been

> round so long. This might be the indication that Dr. Brownstein has

> been waiting for.

>

>

> > > > Hi Everyone just wanted you to know about a Blog article (Iodine

> > > related) that the ARE- Edgar Cayce organization has posted on

> their > > blog. It has to do with an iodine-malaria-chikungunya

> project in > > India. If all iodine were alike then Lugol's would have

> been the > > answer to malaria 130 years ago. > > > >

> http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog.aspx?id=5204 & blogid=445 > > > >

> http://www.edgarcayce.org/are/blog >