Ut oh - Tetanus, but oh so much more! OMG-Down Syndrome!

[Guest guest]

Hi Everyone, a tetanus link was provided by Sheri on April 24th and I'm just

now getting around to checking it out. The first thing that caught my eye

was the following quote. It really helped me for perspective - just knowing

that if it BLEEDS I don't even have to worry. And since worrying is what we

moms do best, one less thing to worry about is a good thing.

" Wounds that bleed will never result in tetanus because the tetanus bacillus

is anaerobic. It is absolutely silly to vaccinate boys who cut their knees.

The only reason behind that is money. " - Dr. Buchwald, MD

PLEASE READ - ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING REVELATIONS!!!

Okay everyone, y'all say you are trying to become more educated - here's your

chance! All you hemhawers out there, this is a must-read.

Dr. Buchwald testimony before the Quebec College of Physicians Medical Board:

<Dr. Gerhard Buchwald takes the stand>

A physician from Germany, Dr. Buchwald testifies through an interpreter. Dr.

Lanctot tables his credentials as well as a copy of his book entitled

" Vaccination: Business Based on Fear " . He is recognized as an expert on

vaccination by the Committee.

Dr. Buchwald testifies that his experience includes being a medical counselor

to an association of parents whose children have been injured or killed by

vaccinations. He adds that he is aware of a thousand vaccination related

injury cases and has had personal contact with 350 cases. In 150 of these

cases, he wrote the medical opinion and acted as an advisor during the legal

proceedings.

> Dr Lanctot (L).: If you take this stand in your country, have you been

> reprimanded by the medical authorities?

> .: I wrote a paper entitled, " Vaccinations: A Crime Against our Children " .

> I received written reprimands from the College of Physicians... In Germany,

> we have a law called " Kronegesetz " in the Civil Code, which stipulates that

> everyone has the right to freely voice his or her opinion. When I was fed

> up with this nonsense with the College, I drew their attention to the fact

> that their responses were actually a breach of those sections of the law.

> German judges, who deal with these issues, are very touchy on this issue...

> It is impossible to suppress the free speech of a physician in a free

> country which is why the College knew that it would lose. They also knew

> that the press would really have a field day. Since then I’ve heard nothing

> more...

>

L.: You mentioned earlier that the first criterion in medicine is to do no

harm... And

> you referred to these ethics in

>

He continues with a brief history of his experiences in general and describes

how he got interested in the whole question of immunization. He recalls that

after graduating from medical school, he was a supporter of vaccination

policies, as was everyone else he knew. Then he relates to the Committee the

story of the eldest of his three children, born in 1957, who at eighteen

months received a smallpox vaccination and who, eight days later was no

longer able to stand up in his crib. Until then, his son’s development had

been absolutely normal: " He fell sick with a post-vaccination encephalitis,

and ever since, I have a completely destroyed human being at home. " It was at

that time that someone approached him to become a member of a protective

association in Germany. It was through this group that he got to know other

vaccination damage cases. " Back then, I was working in one of the oldest lung

illness treatment centers in Germany, and just by chance, I looked at the

files of those people who had fallen ill during the first German epidemic of

smallpox, in 1947. Up to 1974, starting after the WW II, we had eleven

smallpox epidemic events in Germany. We had always been told that the

smallpox vaccination would protect against smallpox. And now, I could verify,

thanks to the files and papers, that all of those who had fallen ill had been

vaccinated. This was very upsetting for me... " Dr. Buchwald draws the

Committee’s attention to a series of about 50 graphs in his book which show

that vaccinations have no effect on the decline of infectious diseases.

L.: If vaccines didn’t have any effect on the decline of infectious diseases,

what then

> caused this decline?

B.: A British professor of social medicine, McKeown, showed that the

> decline in infectious diseases in developed countries had nothing to do with

> vaccinations, but with the decline in poverty and hunger....

L.: Why do you refer to vaccination as a business?

> against smallpox costs about 600 DM, and the

> proclaimed target or goal is to vaccinate three billion people in this

> world. So if this is not business... The vaccination against hepatitis

> costs 250 DM and you need three of them... Vaccination is a huge business

>

>

> >

L: If you take this stand in your country, have you been reprimanded by

> the medical authorities?

B.: I wrote a paper entitled, " Vaccinations: A Crime Against our

> Children " . I received written reprimands from the College of Physicians...

> In Germany, we have a law called " Kronegesetz " in the Civil Code, which

> stipulates that everyone has the right to freely voice his or her opinion.

> When I was fed up with this nonsense with the College, I drew their

> attention to the fact that their responses were actually a breach of those

> sections of the law. German judges, who deal with these issues, are very

> touchy on this issue... It is impossible to suppress the free speech of a

> physician in a free country, which is why the College knew that it would

> lose. They also knew that the press would really have a field day. Since

> then I’ve heard nothing more...

>

L: You mentioned earlier that the first criterion in medicine is to do no

> harm... And you referred to these ethics in your book: do no harm, your

> book: do no harm, be helpful, the well-being of the patient is the supreme

> rule, the will of the patient is the supreme rule... Does vaccination

> respond to those rules?

B. No, and I cannot understand it. Those rules are always being

> stressed by our physicians and by the medical community except when it comes

> to vaccination...

L.: Are vaccination campaigns waged out of fear? Are they made to

> scare people?

B.: I have lectured all over the world... I have always had a special

> interest in newspapers. All of them have one thing in common, there is

> always some reference made to some epidemic in some part of the world. For

> instance, two years ago, one paper referred to a polio epidemic in Holland.

> For the past three years, our newspapers have commented on the diphtheria

> epidemic in Russia. By these means, the population is constantly threatened

> with epidemics, they have been made to fear them, and the reports always

> conclude: " Go and get vaccinated " .

L.: That’s the sales pitch.

B.: Yes.

After yet another round of objections, Dr. Lanctot asks Dr. Buchwald about

his position on hepatitis B vaccine?

> B.: First there was a simple hepatitis infection, then we were able to

> distinguish between hepatitis A, B, non-A, non-B, and today, we call still

> another hepatitis C. In 1981, we saw the introduction of vaccinations for

> all medical personnel. All the other forms of hepatitis we didn’t vaccinate

> against were in decline. But hepatitis B stayed at the same level, even

> after the introduction of the vaccine. It was then believed in Germany that

> we made a mistake, it’s not being passed through the blood but by sexual

> contact. We expected the response to be to vaccinate everyone where the

> event of sexual intercourse would be a factor... However, the response was

> to vaccinate everyone. And this is where you can see that it all revolves

> around money.

L.: What is your position regarding measles vaccination?

> graph... As of 1962... there was a decline in cases

> of measles and deaths due to measles, there were virtually no deaths... In

> 1976. vaccinations began... there were about ten deaths related to measles.

> It stayed like that for years, until it finally declined even further. Now,

> you can count the number of deaths on one hand... Vaccinating against

> measles is not just useless, but harmful. In the past, infants would not

> get measles. They would get the protection through their mothers, who used

> to have measles themselves. Mothers who were vaccinated against measles

> cannot pass on the protection to their infants, so infants now get measles.

L.: Because mothers have been vaccinated against measles as children they now

> cannot pass on the protection, but if they have not been vaccinated they can?

>

B.: Exactly... Our grandparents knew exactly how important it was for kids to

go

> through measles. My grandmother, for instance, would have said: " This boy is

> six years old. He is going to be in school pretty soon and he has not had

> the measles yet. " He would be sent to visit a child with measles in order

> to catch it. I got measles...

L.: Does the protection conferred by the disease protect for life?

> and I think so too.

L.: Why do we have to repeat measles vaccination then?

> opportunity to make money.

L.: What’s your position about MMR (mumps, measles, and rubella), the three

> vaccines given together?

B.: Maybe I could give you one example from Switzerland... There is a large

group of

> physicians, pediatricians, and experts on children’s diseases. They are

> opposed to the vaccination campaign against measles, which according to the

> World Health Organization (WHO), was to include all Swiss children... It

> has not been decided to go ahead, yet... But this is not what lies at the

> heart of the whole issue.., it’s a question of money.

L.: How can you say it is for money?

> their funds? What are the links

> from the WHO to all the huge pharmaceutical companies? Just look at that.

> We physicians are the modern slaves of the pharmaceutical industry... We

>

Dr. Lanctot again has to respond to a series of objections arguing that what

Dr. Buchwald was saying was identical to what appeared in her book, and for

which she was brought up before this Disciplinary Committee: " We are at least

two people in the world saying the same thing. There may be others. It’s the

WHO which makes the decisions to vaccinate in our countries. Your child may

be vaccinated tomorrow, and it won’t be your decision, nor your doctor’s,

nor your government’s, but that of the WHO. That’s what he’s saying. " But

the

exchange doesn’t end there. She notes that Dr. Buchwald’s testimony is

pertinent given the fact she had referred to the medical establishment and

WHO in her book:see the dangers because they’re obvious. We heard this

morning that Merck organized a scientific meeting which they financed, but

they didn’t invite Dr. Hyde because he says there are problems. However,

others were invited and then the government puts out a bulletin stating that

everything is all right... What more will it take before we begin to ask

ourselves how such things happen? " As the arguing drags on, a frustrated Dr.

Lanctot makes the following proposal: " I will make a deal with you. Tell me

that medicine is dogmatic, that it is a sect, with no room for thinking,

which has to be blindly obeyed, and I’ll tender my resignation - here and

now. Tell me and it’s all over! " But no one does. And so the bickering

continues between the now infamous three protagonists. When the dust again

settles, Dr. Lanctot resumes her questioning.

L.: You mentioned that a group of Swiss physicians have banded together to

oppose the WHO-imposed mandatory vaccination plan. Can you tell us what their

arguments are?

B.:They are afraid that the dangers far outweigh the benefits... The Swiss

physicians are concerned about what has occurred in the United States. There

is a report that deaths have risen ten-fold (since the introduction of

mandatory vaccinations) and that this situation has mystified American

physicians.

> B.: The cause of tetanus is a bacillus and the vaccine against it is one of

> the few vaccines that contains neither virus nor bacilli... What has been

> hidden away is the fact that it is possible to treat tetanus...

L.: It’s not necessary, but is it harmful?

> tetanus is one of the worst

> side-effects known. You may be paralyzed, beginning from the neck down, and

> this can last a whole year. We know that a muscle that is not used

> atrophies. What is lost of this muscle over that year is lost forever. In

> Germany, the head of vaccination services issued a number of opinions, but

> did not publish these in medical journals in order not to discredit

> vaccination as a whole. Physicians who vaccinate withhold certain medical

> information, proven medical knowledge, to the detriment of patients and the

> population at large. Wounds that bleed will never result in tetanus because

> the tetanus bacillus is anaerobic. It is absolutely silly to vaccinate boys

> who cut their knees. The only reason behind that is money.

L.: I would like to know your position on DPT shots.

> on diphtheria. It shows that vaccinations

> have no influence. That (on the graph) was where the vaccination was

> introduced, but despite that, there was an increase... In 1925 there was a

> vaccination campaign. We then had about 20,000 cases. During WW II, the

> number rose to 250,000 cases and then dropped significantly, even though

> during the War and during the post-War period, shortly thereafter, no

>

" The same situation for tuberculosis, " Dr. Buchwald continues, " Every year,

there was a decline in cases of tuberculosis in Germany. To such an extent,

that there were less and less dangers from this disease. After the War, we

had 160,000 cases and 40,000 deaths, meaning that one out of four people with

the illness died. In 1994, we had 13,000 cases with 1,000 deaths. This means

1 out of 13 died. You can see how this illness has come to be less and less

dangerous over time. One hundred years ago, being diagnosed with tuberculosis

was a death sentence. You can see (on his graph) that vaccinations had no

influence at all.The reason behind this decline is as I showed you earlier.

Never before have both Germans and Canadians, for instance, enjoyed such a

good life. The victory that has been won over epidemics is not due to

physicians, but to farmers and social legislation... Better dwellings, better

bathrooms, and more soap... Everything that we may refer to as general social

ameliorations... As a small boy, three of us kids shared the same bed... Our

general living conditions are responsible for our good health. This isn’t due

to vaccinations at all, that’s just for the money.

" DAY 9— MARCH 26, 1996 Dr. Buchwald’s testimony continues...The day begins

innocently enough, but will end with a bang when Dr. Lanctot takes issue with

the President’s constant barrage of objections regarding the relevance of her

questions and evidence. As during the previous days of hearings, most

objections originate from the President, Mr. Prevost having from all

appearances abdicated from this role. The President’s insistence this day

will finally bring about a cry of foul from Dr. Lanctot when he holds up the

testimony of another one of her witnesses, Dr. , a recognized expert in

the field of vaccines. But first, Dr. Lanctot resumes her questioning of Dr.

Buchwald on the subject of polio vaccinations. Dr. Buchwald responds that

prior to the introduction of polio vaccinations in Germany, anyone was

counted as having polio, even if they only had the virus in their feces. It

is known, he goes on, that there are people who are healthy but who evacuate

polio viruses when they go to the bathroom. Based on this criteria, the

number of cases was approximately 4,000 per year. After the introduction of

the vaccine, statistics included only those polio cases of people who were

paralyzed for at least six weeks.

L.: If I understand you correctly, before, everyone was counted, those with

polio in

> their feces as well as those sick with polio, and that totaled 4,000. When

> they started the polio vaccination, they only counted those people who had

> been paralyzed for at least