4 key errors in vaccine-autism JAMA study

[Guest guest]

Along with the fact the the first cases of autism that were noticed in the

mid '50's when the whooping cough vacccine was mandated in the UK. I would

like to suggest that the more the vaccines were used to suppress these

diseases, the more that autism was prevailant. The MMR was the build up to

the entire situation... There are very few incidence of autism amoung

children who were diagnosed with this disorder after the MMR who had NOT

been previously vaccinated for whooping cough, diphtheria and tetanus...

Too many vaccines is the culprit here... My son became autistic after the

second DPT at age 9 months... and then enhanced by the MMR which

immediately gave him Roseloa Fever within hours after the vaccine. This

lead to his learning disabilies that were, of course, not detected until he

was in Kindergarten.... His immediate reactions were fever, blotching skin

and hard areas that travels from his toes to the ball of his foot, through

his soles to his heel, up the back of his calves, then the thighs and then

the buttocks...Culminating with the breaking of the fever and body rash of

Rosela... Because I was giving him homeopathic remedis of the nosodes of

Rubella, Mumps (paroidiinum) and 9-day Mealses (Morbilinum) one right after

the other after the vaccine and then Hepar Sulphur during the bout of the

" crawling hard swelling " from the toes to the buttocks, is the only reason

why he did not have a fever so high that he had a seizure as he did after

the second (and only) DPT that he ever had....

.... Also this might have been why he did not slide back into the full blown

autistic attitudes that I had noticed after the second DPT

From: andysch <andysch@...>

> Newsgroups: misc.kids.health,bit.listserv.autism

> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 6:03 PM

> Subject: 4 key errors in vaccine-autism JAMA study

>

>

> > A careful review of the official published California autism study, and

a

> > comparison with the recent JAMA vaccine-autism article, reveals 3

> distorting

> > errors in the JAMA study.

> > http://www.dds.cahwnet.gov/Autism/main/incidencrptfinal.pdf (California

> > autism study)

> > http://jama.ama-assn.org/issues/current/toc.html (registration required;

> > media carried news as well)

> >

> > 1. The JAMA article implies that the increase in autism did not occur

> until

> > long after the introduction of the MMR vaccine. In fact, autism nearly

> > doubled from birth years 1972 to 1981, concurrent with introduction of

the

> > MMR vaccine. Previously, from birth years 1961 to 1972, there was

> virtually

> > no net change in autism.

> >

> > 2. The JAMA article relies on unpublished data (graphed in Figure 1),

to

> > show that there was little increase in autism in the early 1980s. In

> fact,

> > official published data show autism increasing by 33% between birth

years

> > 1980 and 1981, and again by another 33% between birth years 1981 and

1985.

> >

> > 3. The JAMA article cuts off its data at 1980 based on an unsupported

> claim

> > that the MMR composition has not changed since 1979. Even if that claim

> > were true, it provides no basis for omitting pre-1980 data -- especially

> > given the authors' thesis that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism.

> This

> > seems to me to be an excuse for omitting key data and distorting the

> > analysis.

> >

> > 4. The JAMA article omits any reference to the role publicity always

has

> in

> > proper diagnosis. In fact, higher numbers of correct diagnosis always

> > follow greater publicity, and that provides an explanation for the

recent

> > rise in autism cases regardless of the cause for the condition.

> >

> > Andy