Vaccines & Cancer - Testimony of Raphaele Moreau-Horwin & Horwin

[Guest guest]

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/horwin.html

Testimony of Raphaele Moreau-Horwin & Horwin

August 12th, 1999

Congressman Dan Burton

Chairman

Government Reform Committee

US House of Representatives

2157 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Burton,

This letter is in support of your Government Reform Committee on Vaccines;

Finding the Balance Between Public Safety

and Personal Choice. After speaking with your staff member, Mrs. Beth Clay,

I had to forward you the appalling story

regarding the death of our son, . I have also included some of the

facts that my husband and I have uncovered since

our son’s death that link vaccination with brain cancer.

On August 10th, 1998 our only child, , was diagnosed with the most

common pediatric brain cancer,

medulloblastoma. He was two years old. Our lives were shattered. The next

six months became a race against time to try to

understand the disease, find the appropriate treatment, and save .

After two brain operations recovered quickly. We wanted to give

our son the most effective cancer therapy

possible. After weeks of research, many conversations with parents who had

children with brain cancer, and conversations with

doctors from all over the world, we selected the Burzynski Clinic in

Houston, Texas. We arrived there and incredibly we were

turned away. Dr. Burzynski said he was not allowed to accept .

I’ll never forget it. We sat in an examining room.

was smiling at the doctor.

" Why can’t you take ? " I asked Burzynski.

" The FDA dictates who I can and can’t accept, " Burzynski said.

Burzynski explained to us that the FDA would only allow him to accept

children who had suffered through chemotherapy

and/or radiation and still had " measurable tumor " left in their brains.

hadn’t had either of these " world class

treatments " but already endured two brain operations (16 hours of surgery

in total) and was tumor free for the moment. He had

paid a dear price to be tumor free. His optic nerves had been injured so

that his big brown eyes were stuck pointing in opposite

directions, he lost the ability to cry and laugh and he temporarily lost

the ability to walk.

" Please accept my son. He’s only two years old. His whole life is in front

of him. I know your treatment works. I’ve spoken to

several parents whose children are here. They had malignant brain tumors

like but now they’re alive and well. You

have to treat my son, " I begged.

Dr. Burzynski said simply, " I am sorry but I can’t. " Burzynski was saddened

but he was powerless. The FDA had made him

turn away many children just like .

Chemotherapy was started soon after and died in my arms three

months later.

Because of the FDA, Dr. Burzynski has to turn away over 90% of the cancer

victims who come to him, many of them children.

Burzynski’s cancer therapy is non-poisonous to the body and light years

ahead of the crude poisonous treatments -

chemotherapy or radiation - offered by conventional medicine. If Burzynski

could accept and other children like him

his cure rate would increase. It’s a clever ploy on the part of the FDA to

only allow Dr. Burzynski to accept children who have

already had chemotherapy and/or radiation and whose cancer has returned.

Then nothing can save those children. When

’s cancer returned while he was on chemotherapy, he died within

two weeks.

Who is the FDA really protecting? Why would the FDA not want Dr. Burzynski

to have a high cure rate? Dr. Burzynski’s

therapy is a better product - it is not toxic to the body and it is much

more effective against cancer. But every year,

chemotherapy and radiation gross tens of billions of dollars for the drug

companies and the medical establishment. If Dr.

Burzynski’s treatment was allowed to be accessible, imagine the market

share it would take from chemo and radiation. Imagine

the money it would cost the drug companies and the cancer doctors. It could

literally cost them billions.

Lederle, the same company that produces vaccinations, manufacturers the

chemotherapy that killed ! was

originally diagnosed with medulloblastoma. The cancer that took his life

was called leptomeningeal sarcoma. How did one

cancer turn into another? By the carcinogenic (by definition the " DNA

changing " ) effects of chemotherapy. In fact, nearly all

chemotherapy drugs are listed as " Class I - Known Human Carcinogens " with

the FDA. Yet every day hundreds of children

are injected with these deadly chemicals.

’s immune system was completely destroyed by the chemo and he had

no strength to fight the new cancer.

Whether we are talking about childhood vaccinations, therapy for cancer,

treatments for cardiovascular diseases or any of the

other big money makers, the interests, motives and actions of the federal

government are completely inseparable with the

motives and goals of the drug producers and the AMA leadership. After all,

we are talking about the exact same people. The

same doctors who work for the major drug companies and own stock in those

corporations take a rotation through the FDA.

They will work at this governmental " regulatory " body for a few years, make

decisions that protect their investments and

careers, and then return to the drug companies for reportedly bigger

salaries and stock options. Over the last twenty years, the

most powerful people at the FDA have been employees, grant recipients,

board members or research " affiliates " of the major

pharmaceutical corporations.

Why Did Get Cancer?

The Vaccine-Related Symptoms

Why did our strong two-year-old boy have a brain tumor? There is no cancer

on either side of our families going back three

generations. Both of our paternal grandmothers lived to almost 90! Two of

’s great-grandparents are still alive today.

My husband and I started to review everything we knew about ’s

health. never had been a good sleeper.

At four months old, when most babies start to sleep through the night,

actually got worse. He used to wake us up at

least four times a night and yell. We also recalled an evening when

was about seven months old. It was a couple of

weeks after he had received his latest round of vaccinations shots. He

started crying very loud and long and he suddenly had

convulsions that lasted about five minutes. I held him in my arms. He

calmed down but it had made him very tired. The next day

I called his pediatrician. I was told that little children sometimes get

excited and can have spasms. It was nothing I should worry

about. A couple months later, would have another episode of

" spasms. "

After the age of one, began to have eczema outbreaks that would

cover the back of his legs. I went to the

pediatrician. He said that lots of little children have food allergies and

he gave me cortisone cream. The cream didn’t help very

much. I used vitamin E and almond oil, which seemed to help a little.

But why would get cancer? He always had been a good eater. He was

very strong and tall for his age- in the top 95

percentile in weight and height compared to other children. We didn’t live

near a nuclear plant, I didn’t work near pesticides.

My husband worked in an office. Since 1992, we had lived in Marina del Rey,

a suburb by the beach in Los Angeles. Of

course, Los Angeles is not known for its fresh air, but none of his little

friends had cancer.

We started to do research on medulloblastoma - the brain tumor that

was originally diagnosed with. The tumor had

been identified in the 1920’s by two of the first neurosurgeons, Drs.

Percival and Harvey Cushing. They removed

medulloblastomas and other brain tumors at the Surgical Clinic of the

Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston. We read their

articles and books and studied their graphs on the survival rates of

children with medulloblastoma. We learned that after

" 100% " of the tumor had been surgically removed it would grow back within

six to twelve months (assuming no additional

therapy was attempted). This suggested to us that the original tumor took

approximately that same amount of time to grow.

had been very irritable and threw up a lot in November 1997. The

pediatrician told me it was a viral infection, a

stomach flu. often had ear infections around this time. Then in

March 1998, threw up again and told me

he had pain in his tummy. I thought he had swallowed a button or little

toy. That night, the pediatrician on call told us to go to

the emergency room. There, threw up more. The ER doctor told us

that had a viral infection. The next

day, his pediatrician told me the same thing. This was five months before

he would be diagnosed with a three-inch malignant

tumor growing in his brain.

We now understand that sometime between November 1997 and March 1998 the

tumor began to grow.

What had happened to at or before that time which could have led

to cancer? I opened ’s " medical file "

and suddenly saw all the vaccines he received within weeks or months of

these symptoms. My husband and I focused on the

DPT, the IPV and OPV and Hepatitis B vaccine. What were these vaccines all

about? What was in them? And more

importantly what were the side effects on an infant’s brain?

The Vaccine Cancer Connection

After extensively researching the medical literature, we have identified

six ways that vaccination may cause cancer, either

directly or indirectly. After reading this you may wonder why aren’t these

subjects being actively pursued? Childhood cancer is

on the rise, why aren’t the " authorities " conducting objective research to

determine the risks? The answer is simple - money.

Nearly all the medical research in this country is funded by drug companies

or the U.S. government (viz. taxpayer’s money).

Both parties have an inherent interest in, at a minimum, maintaining the

status quo. What would motivate a drug company to pay

for a study that demonstrates that their products cause cancer? Do they

want to commit fiscal suicide? Why would the federal

government pay for research that presents the dangers of a program that

they have ostensibly mandated?

Orthodox Medicine Has No Idea If Vaccines Are Carcinogenic

We will begin with a very basic question - are vaccines carcinogenic? And

the answer is that nobody knows because no

studies have ever been done. The inserts that the vaccine manufacturers

must place with each and every vial of vaccine state

this fact. Here’s a summary of what the vaccine manufacturers publish about

their products for the eyes of physicians. This

information is taken directly from their inserts as it is published in the

Physicians’ Desk Reference (PDR, 51st edition, Medical

Economics Co. Inc., 1997). The last column is of most interest.

GO TO THE WEBSITE TO SEE THIS CHART IN A BETTER FORMAT

Type of Vaccine

Manufacturer

Brand

Name

Ages

Prescribed

Prescribed

Studies on carcinogenic

Studies on carcinogenic

potential according to

potential according to

manufacturer

Chickenpox

(Varicella)

Merck

Varivax

12 months and

older

No

studies conducted

DTP

Lederle

Tetramune

2 months to 5

years

years

" Tetramune has not been

evaluated

for its carcinogenic or

mutagenic

potential. "

DTP

Lederle

Tri-Immunol

2 months to 7

years

No

studies conducted

DTP

Connaught

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

Tripedia

15 months to 7

years

" Tripedia

has not been evaluated

for its

carcinogenic or mutagenic

potential. "

DTP

Lederle

Acel-Immune

17 months to

7 years

7 years

" Acel-Immune has not been

evaluated

for its carcinogenic or

mutagenic

potential "

DTP

(whole cell pertussis)

Kline Beecham

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

DTP

6 weeks to 7

years

" Animal

and human studies

and human studies

concerning possible carcinogenic

or

teratogenic effects have not

been done. "

Hepatitis A

Kline Beecham

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

Havrix

Over two years

old

" Havrix

has not been evaluated

for its

carcinogenic or mutagenic

potential. "

Hepatitis B

Merck

Recombivax

" infants "

No

studies conducted

Influenzae type b

Haemophilus b

conjugate with

diphtheria protein

Lederle

HibTITER

2-71 months

" HibTITER

has not been

evaluated

for its carcinogenic or

mutagenic

potential. "

Influenzae type b

Haemphilus b

conjugate with tetatus

toxoid conjugate

Connaught

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

ActHIB

2 months to 5

years

No

studies conducted

Japanese

encephalitis virus

Connaught

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

JE-VAX

One year and

older

" No

studies have been performed

to

evaluate carcinogenicity or

mutagenic

potential. "

Measles live

Merck

Attenuvax

15 months and

older

No

studies conducted

Measles, Mumps,

Rubella live

Merck

M-M-R

15 months and

older

No

studies conducted

Measles, Rubella

(live)

Merck

M-R-Vax

15 months and

older

No

studies conducted

Mumps (live)

Merck

Mumpsvax

12 months and

older

No

studies conducted

Polio (live)

Lederle

Orimune

6 weeks to 18

years

No

studies conducted

Poliovirus

(inactivated)

Connaught

(subsidiary of Pasteur

Merieux)

IPOL

" infants,

children and

adolescents "

" Studies

in animals to evaluate

in animals to evaluate

carcinogenic potential have not

been

conducted. "

Rubella and mumps

(live)

Merck

Biavax II

12 months and

older

No

studies conducted

Rubella (live)

Merck

Meruvax

12 months to

puberty

No

studies conducted

None of the vaccines injected into children have ever been tested for their

carcinogenic (cancer causing), mutagenic (mutation

causing), or teratogenic (developmental malformation causing) potential.

Not a single one. Can these chemicals that are injected

into healthy children cause cancer? The people manufacturing the vaccines

(the drug companies) and the bureaucrats mandating

the drugs can’t say because no studies have ever been conducted.

In summary, federal and state governments are mandating that infants and

children swallow and be injected with substances that

have never been tested for their ability to cause cancer, mutations or

developmental malformations. In the meantime, the drug

companies are grossing billions of dollars on sales of these potentially

carcinogenic products.

How Vaccination Can Cause or Contribute to Cancer

Vaccines contain Known Carcinogens

If you call the American Association of Pediatrics and ask them what is the

safe dosage of mercury derivatives, aluminum and

formaldehyde to be injected into an infant, they may suspect child abuse.

After they have calmed down, they will explain that

there is no safe dosage because these are all potentially carcinogenic

substances. But mercury derivatives, aluminum and

formaldehyde are ingredients in most vaccines. How is it possible that

they’re safe? The answers depends on who is injecting

them. If you or I inject our child with mercury or formaldehyde we are

going to jail. But if a drug company and a doctor inject

the same chemicals then they are perfectly safe.

Viruses Can Be Carcinogenic

Vaccines are comprised of viruses and viruses can be carcinogenic.

According to mainstream science a number of viruses with

oncogenic (cancer causing) properties have been identified over the last

twenty years. The information below comes from the

chapter entitled " Etiology of Cancer: Viruses " from the 5th edition of the

book - Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology.

(One of the book’s editors is Dr. De Vita, Jr., former director of

the National Cancer Institute.) This chapter lists

various viruses and the cancers associated with them:

Virus And the Human Cancer associated with them:

Hepatitis B Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis C Hepatocellular carcinoma

Epstein-Barr Burkitt’s lymphoma

Epstein-Barr Hodgkins disease

Epstein-Barr Immunoblastic lymphoma

HPV-16, HPV-18, 33, 39 Anogenital cancers and some upper airway cancers

HPV 5,HPV-8,HPV-17 Skin cancer

BK,JC Brain tumours (possible),

Mesotheliomas (possible)

HTLV-1 Adult T-cell leukemia

HTLV-II Hairy cell leukemia

Murnane Poeschla E, Wong-Staal F. Etiology of Cancer: Viruses, p.169,

Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology; Fifth Edition, edited by V.

T. DeVita Jr., S. Hellman, S. A. Rosenberg. Lippincott-Raven Publishers,

Philadelphia, 1997.

The association between some viruses and some cancers is a well-accepted

medical fact. Are there other viruses that may

cause or lead to other cancers? Of course. There are literally tens of

thousands of viruses, but only a small percentage has been

tested for their ability to cause cancer. In fact, some viruses use a " team

approach. " One virus by itself may be relatively benign

but when it is combined with other viruses it " helps " the first one cause

cancer. These viruses are literally called " helper viruses. "

How many various combinations of different viruses can lead to cancer, no

one knows. But when you consider that:

Children are injected with bacteria (that contain viruses)

Children are injected with viruses themselves as per the vaccine

The bacteria and virus vaccines are grown on animal tissue (i.e.

monkeys, eggs, etc.) that also contain their own

population of viruses

There is no way of knowing what viral combinations have formed and what is

in the final " soup " that will be injected into a

healthy infant. The toxicity test that vaccine manufacturers use is as

crude as can be imagined. They inject mice with the

vaccines and if a given percentage still eat and put on weight than the

vaccine is pronounced safe for children. Unbelievable!

Vaccines, Brain Injury and Brain cancer

Oncologists and neurosurgeons at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, St. Jude

Children’s Research Hospital and UCLA Medical

Center told us that pediatric brain cancer is on the rise? Why? Why are

more and more children getting cancer in their brains?

Could it be due to the various types of brain injuries caused by vaccines?

The fact that vaccines can cause temporary or permanent brain damage is an

established fact. Even the manufacturers admit it.

For example, the manufacturer of one of the DTP vaccines (Lederle), warns

pediatricians on their insert that their vaccine can

cause " neurological complications such as convulsions, encephalopathy, and

various mono and polyneuropathies including

Guillian-Barre Syndrome…Permanent neurological disability and death have

been reported… "

- Physicians’ Desk Reference, 51st edition, Medical Economics Co. Inc., 1997

There is an abundance of medical literature going back one hundred years

that suggests a connection between cancer and

chronic injury caused by viruses or bacteria. It appears that cancers have

a tendency to form in organs that are injured or

irritated by viral or bacterial infections. For example, it is well known

that people who have various forms of hepatitis (viruses

that infect the liver) are at a much higher risk for liver cancer. This

fact was presented in a recent article published in the

European Journal of Cancer Prevention. The authors wrote, " Chronic disease

conditions…are well established as risk

factors for cancer development. These may be due to viruses (for example,

in the case of hepatitis and liver cancer),

bacterial infections, parasite infestation or physical trauma. "

- , MA, Tsuda H, Chronically elevated proliferation as a risk factor

for neoplasia. European Journal of cancer Prevention 1988 October;

7(5): 353-385.

The same line of reasoning suggests that a viral infection of the brain

(which vaccines are known to cause) can lead to cancer of

the brain. It’s a rational conclusion and a reasonable question to ask, but

no one from the drug companies or the federal

government is asking it.

Simian Virus 40

In the 1950’s and 1960’s the polio vaccine injected into millions of

children contained an unexpected guest - another virus that

was growing on the same monkey kidney cells in which the vaccine was being

grown. This virus was named Simian Virus 40

(SV40) because it was the 40th simian or monkey virus found. Unfortunately,

this virus was also found to cause cancer. The

vaccine manufacturers changed their monkeys (African green monkeys) but

this wasn’t enough. Today SV40 is found in many

human cancers including many pediatric brain cancers. Coincidence? I don’t

think so. It turns out that SV40 can be passed

horizontally (i.e. between father and mother) and vertically (i.e. between

mother and child). In fact, SV40 is often associated

with medulloblastoma, the most prevalent pediatric brain tumor. When

scientists injected young hamsters with Simian Virus 40

over 80% developed brain cancers - all of which were medulloblastomas. Here

are a few of the studies that have looked at

SV40 and human cancers:

In 1979, Drs. Jaqueline Farwell, Dohrmann, Lorraine Marrett and

J. Wister Meigs wrote a paper entitled:

Effect of SV40 Virus-Contaminated Polio Vaccine on the Incidence and

Type of CNS Neoplasms in Children:

A Population-Based Study, in which they found a substantial increase

in childhood brain tumors, especially

medulloblastoma, when the mothers had been inoculated with vaccines

containing SV40. They wrote:

" In the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, an increase occurred in the

number of central nervous system tumors

diagnosed in children as recorded in the Connecticut Tumor Registry.

From 1955 to 1961, polio vaccine was

used in Connecticut, which subsequently was found to contain the virus

SV40. In animal models SV40 has

produced central nervous system tumors… particularly striking rises in

gliomas (astrocytoma,

spongiblastoma, and glioblastoma multiforme) and medulloblastomas were

noted in children born during

1956-1962…Among medulloblastoma patients, 10 of 15 were exposed to

SV40. This rate of exposure is high

and significantly greater than among controls (children without brain

tumors)…SV40 may selectively induce

malignant tumors…In summary we demonstrate a strong association

between exposure to SV40 and the

development of medulloblastoma…(and) the occurrence of gliomas. "

In 1987, Drs. Roush, Theodore Holford, Schymura and Colin

White of the Yale University School

of Medicine published a book on cancer risks. In it they wrote:

" Infectious agents have been strongly associated with childhood brain

tumors. An excess of central nervous

system malignancies occurred in a cohort (a group) of offspring

(children) whose mothers were

inadvertently exposed to polio vaccine contaminated by Simian Virus 40

(SV40). Medulloblastomas bore the

strongest relationship to the contaminated vaccine. "

- Roush G, Holford TR, Schymura MJ, White C, Cancer Risk and Incidence

Trends: The Connecticut Perspective, Brain,

Cerebral Meninges, and Cranial Nerves, Ages 0-19, Department of

Epidemiology and Public Health Yale University School of

Medicine; The Hemisphere Publishing Company, 1987.

In this 1995 study published in the Journal of the National Cancer

Institute, SV40 was again found in various

human brain tumors but not in any healthy brain tissue. The

researchers wrote:

" …we found SV40 DNA sequences in five of six choroid plexus

papillomas, eight of eleven ependymomas,

three of seven astrocytomas…None of the 13 normal brain tissues were

positive for SV40 DNA. "

- i F, et. al., Human Brain Tumors and Simian Virus 40, Journal

of the National Cancer Institute, September 6, Volume

87, 1995

In 1997, when researchers looked for SV40 in other human cancers such

as mesotheliomas (a kind of lung

cancer), and osteosarcomas (a kind of bone cancer that kills children

and adults), they found them. The doctors

wrote:

" We decided to test human mesotheliomas and osteosarcomas for SV40

based on…the enormous increase in

the incidence of mesotheliomas in the second half of this century

which coincided with the inadvertent

inoculation of millions of people with SV40 contaminated polio

vaccines… SV40 or closely related DNA

sequences are present in specific types of human tumors. "

- Rozzo P, et. al, Evidence for and implications of SV40-like

sequences in human mesotheliomas and

osteosarcomas; Conference: SV40 a Possible Human Polyomavirus National

Institute of Health January 27

and 28, 1997

This paper, like the previous one, was presented at an SV40 seminar at

the National Institute of Health in 1997.

In it the authors state that SV40 is found in most brain cancers and

that it can spread from one generation to the

next. They also mention that more people who are vaccinated have brain

tumors versus those who have not been

vaccinated. They wrote:

" SV40 amplification products were detected at high prevalence in

primary human brain tumors: 83% of

choroid plexus papillomas, 75% ependymomas, 47% astrocytomas, and 37%

glioblastomas…35%

osteosarcomas, and Ewing’s tumors…These results indicate that SV40 is

associated with human brain and

bone neoplasms (cancers)…SV40 infection (may be spread) by blood

transfusion and sexual transmission in

the human population.

" …a viral co-factor should be taken into consideration as a possible

cause of… human brain and bone

tumors…a higher incidence of brain neoplasms (brain cancers) was noted

in cohorts (groups) of vaccinated

persons. In this as well as in other studies, a high prevalence of

SV40 was detected in brain and bone tumors

that affect early childhood. "

- i F, et. al, Simian Virus footprints in normal human tissues,

brain and bone tumors of different histotypes; Conference:

SV40 a Possible Human Polyomavirus - National Institute of Health

January 27 and 28, 1997

And in this most recent study published in January of this year,

researchers found SV40 in all the brain tumors

they examined. They wrote:

" We found SV40…sequences in all brain tumor types investigated. High

frequencies were found in

low-grade astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas and secondary

glioblastomas (59%)…Presence of viral

DNA was also found in pediatric brain tumors… "

- Huang H, et al, Identification in human brain tumors of DNA

sequences specific for SV40 large T antigen, Brain Pathology,

January 9, 1999

So here’s the obvious question - Is the SV40 from the 1950’s and 1960’s

back to haunt us? Are parents passing cancer on to

their children?

Vaccines & Immune Deficiency

This is a very broad subject so we will only present the highlights:

Cancer is often associated with immune deficiency. Scientists believe that

the reason one person gets cancer and another

doesn’t is because the second individual has a " stronger " or " more

competent " immune system. But vaccines can cause a child

to become immune deficient. It is known that vaccines can cause immune

deficiency through various mechanisms including:

Vaccines cause commitment of T-lymphocytes to a specific antigen and

T-lymphocytes posses one of the major

defenses against cancer. In other words, vaccines cause important

cells in our immune system (T-cells) to commit

themselves and once an immune cell becomes committed to a specific

antigen, it becomes inert and incapable of

responding to other challenges.

Vaccinations can cause the T-cell count to temporarily and

significantly decrease to the levels found in AIDS

patients.

Vaccines cause depression of lymphocyte function.

This means that vaccines can actually cause your immune system to be weaker

in its response to other viruses and bacteria.

Scientists are beginning to understand that the inoculation of billions of

organisms into the human body viz. vaccination is an

abnormal event and causes the body to react in an abnormal way. This

reaction, even if is only the formation of antigens,

requires the energy and the attention of the immune system. If the immune

system is reacting to the sudden and strange invasion

of billions of vaccine organisms, it may not be able to pay the same level

of attention to protecting the body against other threats

such as cancer as it did before the invasion/vaccination.

In addition, according to a report by the Medical Advisory Committee of the

Immune Deficiency Foundation published in 1992

(made possible by a grant from the American Red Cross) " most immune

deficiencies cannot be diagnosed until a child is one

year old. " And one of the most important contraindications for childhood

vaccines (a reason not to be vaccinated as stated by

the vaccine manufacturers) is to not administer a vaccine to " a child with

impaired immune response. " Wait a second here.

We have a contradiction. By the time a child is one year old they have

already received a number of vaccines. Yet, we are told

by the vaccine manufacturers, that we should not vaccinate an immune

deficient child. But diagnosing an immune deficient child

cannot be done until the child is one year old. I don’t know if this is

circular logic, a paradox, or a " Catch-22. " What is clear is

that it is irresponsible and a potentially dangerous practice.

How often are children immune deficient? According to the Immune Deficiency

Foundation:

" The primary immonodeficiency diseases were originally thought to be quite

rare. In fact, however, some of the primary

immunodeficiency diseases are relatively common… because there are so many

primary immunodeficiency diseases when

taken together as a group of disorders, they become a significant health

problem, occurring with a frequency

comparable to leukemia and lymphoma in children and four times as

frequently as cystic fibrosis. "

- The Clinical Presentation of the Primary ImmunodeficiencyDiseases, A

Primer for Physicians, Produced by the Medical Advisory Committee

of the Immune Deficiency Foundation, Towson, land, 1992.

So what’s the answer to this " paradox " ? The answer is that every

vaccination is a game of roulette with your child’s life.

Viruses From Vaccines Can Change DNA

Scientists are learning that DNA is not a blueprint that is " carved in

stone " and locked away and untouchable. It turns out that

DNA can be cut, torn and spliced and pieces can be inserted, deleted,

truncated, fused, mutated and amplified. What kind of

organism can change our DNA? Viruses. It turns out that viruses and viral

sequences (pieces of DNA from a virus) can actually

be inserted into our cells and into our own DNA. Researchers like

M.D., Ph.D. of the Center for Complex

Infectious Diseases in Rosemead, California, and Urnovitz Ph.D. of

the Chronic Illness Research Foundation in

Berkeley, California are discovering that viruses especially viruses in

various combinations can invade our cells, change our

DNA and even hide from our immune system. Some of these changes include

turning on oncogenes (growth genes that can

cause cancer). Remember that all vaccines contain millions of viruses from

the bacterium or virus itself, the tissue it was grown

in, or contaminants. These viruses may exchange sequences, pick-up animal

DNA or combine in other unknown ways. Once in

the body the range of damage they may reap is only now being recognized.

Conclusions on Vaccines & Cancer

I am not suggesting that vaccination always leads to cancer. What I am

suggesting is that in the same way vaccination can lead

to encephalitis (damage of brain tissue) it can also, in some cases, lead

to cancer. Why does one child become autistic from the

vaccine and another gets Crohn’s disease? Why does one child get

Guillian-Barre Syndrome from a vaccination and another

die of SIDS? Why does one child get reoccurring seizures and the other

cancer? How many other viruses is that child carrying?

What other latent or hidden infections do they have? How strong is their

immune system? How many vaccines can an infant

handle before some invisible threshold has been crossed and the body

becomes sick? got 16 vaccinations from the

age of 2 months to 17 months old. My grandparents got one childhood vaccine

and they are both alive today. My parents, both

born in 1937, got a total of two vaccines up to 17 months old. According to

my vaccination booklet (my parents kept

wonderful records) I was vaccinated only seven times before I reached 17

months. In fact, my first vaccine came at the age of

5 months, not two months like .

Every new childhood vaccine that is introduced means more profits for the

drug companies so there is a tremendous incentive

to keep adding more and more. got vaccinated against chicken-pox,

a " disease " that kept our generation at home

from school for one week. Do we really need a vaccine against chicken-pox?

The drug companies will answer " yes. "

So I will ask the question again - How many vaccines can an infant handle

before some invisible threshold has been crossed

and the body becomes sick? This is not an easy question to answer but it

should be asked! Sadly for all the children who are

about to be maimed and killed by the vaccines they will soon receive, the

answer to this question is only being pursued by a

handful of independent scientists (researchers who are not being financed

by the drug companies or the government). These

scientists operate outside medical orthodoxy on " shoe-string " budgets.

Mainstream science, the " science " of the drug companies

and the government is not interested in the truth. They have no interest in

knowing the real answer. Why ask a question when

the answer can only hurt you?

Dr. B. Urnovitz possesses a degree in Microbiology and Immunology

and is the Scientific Director of the Chronic

Illness Research Foundation. He testified to the following in front of the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.

The human body retains a genetic memory of the foreign substances to

which it has been exposed, including viral

and bacterial vaccines;

Each individual responds to foreign substances differently, based on

his or her own unique genetic background;

There appears to be a limit on how much foreign material to which the

human body can be exposed before some

level of genetic damage occurs and a chronic disease initiates.

Each generation gets more vaccinations. Each generation has more immune

related diseases. Where are all the new

" auto-immune " diseases coming from? (Such as Crohn’s disease,

Guillian-Barre syndrome, asthma, encephalomyelitis, multiple

sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, chronic neuropathy, stiff-man syndrome,

retinopathy, primary biliary sclerosis, pernicious anemia,

systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, etc. etc.) And

regardless of the self-serving pronouncements by the

American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute, cancer rates

continue to climb.

By giving each generation more and more vaccinations are we not creating

populations of genetically damaged mutants?

There are a lot of unknowns in respect to childhood vaccination. But as

parents, nobody ever waved them in front of us.

Nobody ever said that there’s over 50 years of evidence that vaccines can

cause brain damage. Nobody ever said that we

don’t know if vaccines cause cancer because we never tested it. Nobody told

us that if was immune deficient he

shouldn’t get the vaccines. Nobody ever told us that ’s symptoms

(before he was diagnosed with cancer) of

vomiting, " spasms " and eczema were signs that this child could not endure

the vaccinations. Nobody ever told us that monkey

viruses that have been found in vaccines are known to cause brain cancer.

What would happen if parents were provided with full disclosure or

" informed consent " as is legally required with any medical

procedure? Some parents might say " no thanks " to the vaccines. But then

this could take a bite from the billions of dollars

earned by the vaccine manufacturers.

Between the greed of the drug companies and the impotence of our

government, parents and children have been forced into

making a dangerous trade. Assuming for a moment that vaccines actually work

(after careful research we believe they do not

work but that would take another letter), assuming they do, we have traded

mumps for autism, polio for SIDS and whooping

cough for cancer. We are not suggesting that there exists a one to one

relationship, but we are suggesting that our government

has traded one group of diseases (relatively benign childhood diseases) for

another group of diseases (complex, permanent,

disabling and deadly). That trade continues to be made without our

permission and without good science. For example, for

years, pediatricians and pediatric neurologists were finding that the

pertussis vaccine can cause neurological side effects - some

temporary, others permanent. However as late as the 1980’s some physicians

were fighting fifty years of clinical observations.

They claimed that there was no link between the pertussis vaccine and

permanent and disabling brain damage. As it turns out

these doctors were employees of the drug companies that manufactured the

vaccines.

According to the book A Shot in the Dark: Why the P in DPT vaccination may

be hazardous to your childs health, by H.L.

Coulter and B.L. Fisher, one of these doctors, D. Cherry received

money (nearly a half a million dollars) from Lederle.

Lederle manufacturers vaccines including various brands of DTP, Hib,

influenza, and poliovirus. It also manufacturers

chemotherapy, and countless other drugs. Lederle is a division of American

Cyanamid the manufacturer of pesticides,

herbicides, fungicides and all the other " wonderful chemicals " poisoning

the earth, our food, water and air, the animals, the

plants and our bodies.

Writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in March

1990, Cherry stated that it was a " myth " that

pertussis caused encephalitis. Such a statement is an insult to 50 years of

dead or disabled children and 50 years of grieving

parents. But if you investigate who Cherry is, his position makes sense. He

is a recipient of funds from one of the largest

manufacturer of vaccines. What’s the money for? Is it just a coincidence

that he has also testified in over 125 lawsuits on behalf

of vaccine manufacturers who were being sued by parents of vaccine damaged

children. But here’s the problem - as a doctor

he is considered " independent " and " credible. " His research, analysis and

conclusions are considered " objective. " He is a peer

reviewer for JAMA which means that he has influence as to what gets

published and what doesn’t get published - what gets

communicated and what doesn’t get communicated to children’s doctors. His

articles in JAMA and other prominent medical

journals are read by thousands of doctors. When Dr. Cherry says

encephalopathy from vaccines is a " myth " those words are

believed. Children are vaccinated. After received his DTP

vaccinations he had convulsions. We called his

pediatrician and the doctor told us that it was nothing to worry about

because " sometimes little children get excited. " The

pediatrician didn’t consider encephalopathy. Our pediatrician was probably

aware that there was a controversy regarding the

pertussis vaccine but that no scientific consensus had been reached. But

the controversy is artificial. On one hand there was 50

years of maimed and dead children and pediatricians and pediatric

neurologists who knew encephalopathy when they saw it.

On the other hand you had prominent doctors like Cherry. The two sides

seemed to have an equally objective point of view.

Doctors on either side of an important question, rationally debating a

medical issue where lives are at stake. But this

" controversy " is a fiction.

On one hand you have experience, observation and clinical skills. On the

other hand you have a drug company protecting its

immense profits. People like Cherry are not doctors if you define doctors

as truly objective and rational professionals who are

seeking truth. People like Cherry are MD’s for hire. Their positions and

arguments are a direct result of who is paying them.

Sadly, there are many many Ph.D’s and MD’s like Cherry. People need to be

paid and some people want to be paid more

than others. As mentioned above, today there are two major employers of

science - the drug companies and the U.S.

Government. Since he who pays the piper calls the tune, the prevalent point

of view throughout the medical literature is the

position of the drug companies and the government. In respect to vaccines,

where one of these entities stops and the other

starts is hard to discern. The government mandates the vaccines and

corporations like Lederle produces them. Where is the

incentive for either of these two parties to admit that vaccination can

harm? To admit this would subject the government to

severe criticism and cause the drug companies to loose millions of dollars.

Another corruption of the scientific process is that " scientists " like

Cherry can help determine the frequency of adverse events

that are reported. How often does autism, SIDS, encephalitis, permanent

neurological damage and cancer result from

vaccination? The vaccine manufacturers through their pay-rolled scientists

decide. Is an infant’s sudden death that takes place

twelve days after vaccination counted as vaccine related or does it have to

take place within seven days or three days or 24

hours? Who chooses the number? If you scrutinize the data on the frequency

of adverse reactions you will find that the very

corporations manufacturing the vaccine financed most of those studies. In

other words, the vaccine makers have chosen the

number for their own ends. They have chosen a number that will ensure that

most vaccine related deaths and injuries will not be

counted as such. Your child died seven days after the vaccinations? Sorry,

she had to die within 24 hours for it to be linked to

the vaccines. Therefore, cause of death is unknown.

The most powerful doctors in American are those affiliated with drug

companies. The influence of the drug companies is so

complete and profound that the agenda of the drug manufacturers has become

the agenda of mainstream medicine and the U.S.

government.

Our son, was our life. At two years old was bilingual

in English and French. He was full of joy and

laughter. He loved life. He loved looking at the little ants in the earth.

He would say, " Look Daddy they go vite, vite, vite " (fast,

fast, fast). He loved going to the beach, in particular the tide pools

looking for " gaga crabs " and " little tiny animals. " When I

asked my son, " you want to go rollerblading? He used to give me a

big smile and say: " Yeah, rollerblading with

Mommy " and run to the closet to get the rollerblades. We used to go fast on

the bike path along the beach. was in

his special purple stroller holding his apple juice bottle and Mommy would

push. But Mommy will never push the stroller again

with her beautiful son who loved life.

I’m only left with his handsome pictures, his special smell in his little

clothes, his bag of special cars, memories of laughter and

pain, a little brown sandwich bag with his curly brown locks, his smiling

face on the videos and his beautiful innocent little voice

which always said: " Mommy, I’m happy, happy, happy. "

used to say: " Mommy, Daddy and , the Team! " Yes, my love

we will always be the team, but a family we

are no more.

Yours Sincerely,

Raphaele Moreau-Horwin Horwin

’s Mommy ’s Daddy

MHBiomed@... http://www.ouralexander.org/

Vaccinations Received from age 2 months to 17 months. Within 15

months my son received

16 vaccinations. But how many viruses? This was the same time his brain

cancer began to grow.

Date Date Date Date

DTP 8/12/96 10/10/96 12/14/96 11/7/97

IPV 8/12/96 10/10/96

OPV 11/7/97

MMR 7/7/97

HbPV 8/12/96 10/10/96 12/14/96 7/7/97

Tuberculin (Only checking for the antigen) 7/7/97

HEP B 12/14/96 1/2/97 3/7/97

VARIVAX 7/7/97 (chickenpox)

[burton] [Vaccination]

Horwin's website

http://www.ouralexander.org/

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & UK

530-478-1242 Voicemail

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

" All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men ( &

women) do nothing " ...Edmund Burke

ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE

DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

Well Within's Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin

International Tours, Homestudy Courses, ANTHRAX & OTHER Vaccine Dangers

Education, Homeopathic Education

CEU's for nurses, Books & Multi-Pure Water Filters