Guest guest Posted January 25, 2001 Report Share Posted January 25, 2001 " Vegetables were included in the diet of controls more frequently than in that of cases (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06-0.46). Mothers of cases complained of asthma more frequently than mothers of controls, but the number of asthmatic mothers was small (4.2 versus 0.5%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for severe RSV infection identified in this study are not amenable to public health interventions. Prevention of severe infection is likely to require the development of an effective vaccine. " : Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus infection leading to hospital admission in children in the Western Region of The Gambia. AU: Weber-MW; Milligan-P; Hilton-S; Lahai-G; Whittle-H; Mulholland-EK; Greenwood-BM SO: Int-J-Epidemiol. 1999 Feb; 28(1): 157-62. JN: International-journal-of-epidemiology; ISSN: 0300-5771 Am I missing something? Can someone explain to me why public health interventions, like more vegetables, couldn't be tried before vaccination? Don't they read their own conclusions? Of course we all know the answer. But how do they get away with ignoring their own results? To me it goes to show how they think we are not paying attention. So we must prove them wrong. Sandy ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.