Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 I think you are 100% right as far as the biopsy goes as far as with an experienced doc. My first one that I had done was without sedation and was HORRIBLE. It took a good month or better for me not to feel pain any more. The second one was with sedation and was great, felt no pain at all after. I just had another one a week ago and I hope to God that I never have to experience anything that painful again. I had some little Asian girl that probably weighed 80 pounds soaking wet ~ I'm thinking she was a student?? This was done at Mayo in MN (so was the 2nd one) I woke up twice during the procedure and I remeber her saying that I had really hard bone. Then when I was suppose to be awake I realized that something was very wrong. She had to have hit my syatic nerve, no doubt in my mind the pain was so intense that I felt nautious for about 4 hours after it was done. I have this huge brusie that's looking pretty ugly right now just to the left of the site. I would go through a million labors & deliveries than to have to experience that again! Sheila Tracey <traceyincanada@...> wrote: Hi, I've never heard of biopsy material containing too much blood to be analyzed. Usually it's the opposite, there isn't enough cells to be cultured. Normally when they refer to a " cytogenetics test " it's a test that's done on cells they culture from a bone marrow biopsy or a bone marrow aspiration. I suspect that the " cytogenetics blood test " you are referring to, is a PCR test which can be done on peripheral blood (blood taken from your vein). If you've never had a cytogenetic test done with a bone marrow biopsy/aspiration, I would think that it would be good to have at least an initial report done. It would give you a clear picture of what's going on in your marrow, that you just can't get from a PCR or any other test for that matter. A cytogenetic test done from marrow will tell you if you have other translocations besides the Philadelphia chromosome, it'll also tell you what state your marrow is in (hypercellular or normocellular) and it'll also give you an accurate blast count which will help determine what phase of CML you're in. A PCR test is important but will only tell you how many bcr/abl transcripts they found. This will be important to track over time because it will show you how you're responding to treatment and in time, will show you if you've achieved the 3 log reduction that we all aim for. Unfortunately, some people have had terrible pain with biopsies. It seems that the doctor's experience plays a vital role in the amount of pain the patient will feel. The one's I've had, have all been done with no sedation or pain killers and were not bad at all......I would have 10 of them before I'd have another baby If your doctor isn't very experienced in doing them, perhaps you could ask for another one that is more experienced? The other option would be to take some form of sedation (there's a myriad of choices out there, from laced lolly pops to IV drips to simple pills). Take care for now, Tracey dx Jan 2002 > > I just came from my oncologist. He informed me that an aspect of my > bone marrow biopsy contained too much blood for analysis. I have two > choices: another biopsy or a cytogenetics blood test. I know the blood > test is a simple blood draw and I certainly don't want to have another > bone biopsy. I was totally unprepared for the pain of it all (but now > I know) Is anyone familiar with thsi cytogenetice blood test? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 At 09:14 PM 4/9/06 -0700, you wrote: >Its sad that you feel that the Dr. Has to be a " Tall Man " for that says >little about the more than qualified women who perform this duty daily. >News Flash, it's not about leverage for I'm still young with young strong >bones it's a matter of selection of the proper location and not the >stature or gender of the person. It's sad but you may have experienced >some bad moments with shorter women but i assure you, that was an anomaly >and not the norm. Give all doctors a chance for if you're face with an >emergency (like I believe we have but forget sometimes) would it matter >who your doctor is or that he/she can assist you? Hmmm Take a good look at >yourself... I'm sorry....but I disagree with your comments. I have very tough bones (measured at 121% of normal density). When Dr. Druker, who is tall, does my bmb, he sweats.......but at least he has good leverage for the procedure. Dr. Mauro did my bmb once.....he is much shorten and he had a very tough time. I just recently heard from a patient of his that he now uses a stool.......to give himself better leverage!!!! This is simple physics..........if you are tall, you can keep a straight elbow and have more strength. If you are shorter and have to bend your elbow, you will not be as strong..... OH.........and it doesn't matter if the doc is a male or female, but it helps to be 'athletic'..... : ) C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Hi , Interesting--at MDACC they use short tables for the bone marrow biopsies. I've never thought of this before but I think you have a point. But I think the solution is to lower the tables, not find tall doctors. My first BMB done locally was done on the regular doctor's table which is quite a bit higher than the ones they use just for biopsies at mdacc and the first was the only one I've had that was a problem. Best wishes, Dorothy Cogan wrote: > At 09:14 PM 4/9/06 -0700, you wrote: > > >Its sad that you feel that the Dr. Has to be a " Tall Man " for that says > >little about the more than qualified women who perform this duty daily. > >News Flash, it's not about leverage for I'm still young with young > strong > >bones it's a matter of selection of the proper location and not the > >stature or gender of the person. It's sad but you may have experienced > >some bad moments with shorter women but i assure you, that was an > anomaly > >and not the norm. Give all doctors a chance for if you're face with an > >emergency (like I believe we have but forget sometimes) would it matter > >who your doctor is or that he/she can assist you? Hmmm Take a good > look at > >yourself... > > > I'm sorry....but I disagree with your comments. > I have very tough bones (measured at 121% of normal density). When Dr. > Druker, who is tall, does my bmb, he sweats.......but at least he has > good > leverage for the procedure. > Dr. Mauro did my bmb once.....he is much shorten and he had a very tough > time. I just recently heard from a patient of his that he now uses a > stool.......to give himself better leverage!!!! > This is simple physics..........if you are tall, you can keep a straight > elbow and have more strength. > If you are shorter and have to bend your elbow, you will not be as > strong..... > > OH.........and it doesn't matter if the doc is a male or female, but it > helps to be 'athletic'..... : ) > > C. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Hi all, The trick to doing a BMB is having a good technique. My local hematologist is excellent at it. His secret is to take a lot of time selecting the exact location and angle in which to insert the needle. I had a BMB by Dr. Mauro in 2001 and he was using a stool back then. He did a great job. I have also had a BMB done by a big strong doctor and he was awful. The best combination would be great technique, tall and strong, and dark and handsome for the ladies. Zavie Re: [ ] Re: cytogenetics blood test Hi , Interesting--at MDACC they use short tables for the bone marrow biopsies. I've never thought of this before but I think you have a point. But I think the solution is to lower the tables, not find tall doctors. My first BMB done locally was done on the regular doctor's table which is quite a bit higher than the ones they use just for biopsies at mdacc and the first was the only one I've had that was a problem. Best wishes, Dorothy Cogan wrote: > At 09:14 PM 4/9/06 -0700, you wrote: > > >Its sad that you feel that the Dr. Has to be a " Tall Man " for that says > >little about the more than qualified women who perform this duty daily. > >News Flash, it's not about leverage for I'm still young with young > strong > >bones it's a matter of selection of the proper location and not the > >stature or gender of the person. It's sad but you may have experienced > >some bad moments with shorter women but i assure you, that was an > anomaly > >and not the norm. Give all doctors a chance for if you're face with an > >emergency (like I believe we have but forget sometimes) would it matter > >who your doctor is or that he/she can assist you? Hmmm Take a good > look at > >yourself... > > > I'm sorry....but I disagree with your comments. > I have very tough bones (measured at 121% of normal density). When Dr. > Druker, who is tall, does my bmb, he sweats.......but at least he has > good > leverage for the procedure. > Dr. Mauro did my bmb once.....he is much shorten and he had a very tough > time. I just recently heard from a patient of his that he now uses a > stool.......to give himself better leverage!!!! > This is simple physics..........if you are tall, you can keep a straight > elbow and have more strength. > If you are shorter and have to bend your elbow, you will not be as > strong..... > > OH.........and it doesn't matter if the doc is a male or female, but it > helps to be 'athletic'..... : ) > > C. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 At 06:57 AM 4/10/06 -0400, you wrote: >Interesting--at MDACC they use short tables for the bone marrow >biopsies. I've never thought of this before but I think you have a >point. But I think the solution is to lower the tables, not find tall >doctors. My first BMB done locally was done on the regular doctor's >table which is quite a bit higher than the ones they use just for >biopsies at mdacc and the first was the only one I've had that was a >problem. > >Best wishes, >Dorothy Hi Dorothy, PTs (physical therapists) know all about using leverage!! that's how you work on the big people. At OHSU the table is the standard older exam table and it is not adjustable. Sitting on the edge, you are at about the doctor's chest level. Easy for the rest of an exam (ears, throat, etc)......but not the right height for a BMB. I did have a little chuckle when someone told me that Dr. Mauro now stands on a stool to do the BMB........without it he did not have much leverage. So.....you want a tall doctor........or an adjustable table........either should work well!! C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 At 09:04 AM 4/10/06 -0400, you wrote: >I have also had a BMB done by a big strong doctor and he was awful. The >best combination would be great technique, tall and strong, and dark and >handsome for the ladies. > >Zavie And someone sweet as sugar for Zavie!! The other mistake for someone with tough bones is to do a side-lying version of a bmb, like they do more often in Europe. OHSU had an onc from Ireland who did it that way....he had a horrible time with me. Without your pelvis stabilized by the table as it is when you are lying on your stomach, there is nothing to push against. Finally, he said to me that he needed to hold my pelvis from in front in order to do the procedure. Maui Nanc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 When I had my last bmb done (that was HORRIBLE) at Mayo in Minnesota they had me roll up on my side. Both times at Mayo that's they way they did it. The first one that I had done was at my local hospital was with me laying on my stomach and I was fully a wake and felt everything. You would think that Mayo would have the right technique! All three times they've done it on my right side and pretty much in the same spot. Is that normal that they go to the same spot everytime? Sheila Cogan <ncogan@...> wrote: At 09:04 AM 4/10/06 -0400, you wrote: >I have also had a BMB done by a big strong doctor and he was awful. The >best combination would be great technique, tall and strong, and dark and >handsome for the ladies. > >Zavie And someone sweet as sugar for Zavie!! The other mistake for someone with tough bones is to do a side-lying version of a bmb, like they do more often in Europe. OHSU had an onc from Ireland who did it that way....he had a horrible time with me. Without your pelvis stabilized by the table as it is when you are lying on your stomach, there is nothing to push against. Finally, he said to me that he needed to hold my pelvis from in front in order to do the procedure. Maui Nanc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 At 08:33 PM 4/10/06 -0700, you wrote: >When I had my last bmb done (that was HORRIBLE) at Mayo in Minnesota they >had me roll up on my side. Both times at Mayo that's they way they did >it. The first one that I had done was at my local hospital was with me >laying on my stomach and I was fully a wake and felt everything. You >would think that Mayo would have the right technique! All three times >they've done it on my right side and pretty much in the same spot. Is >that normal that they go to the same spot everytime? > > Sheila Hi Sheila, I have had at least 20 bmbs as I have been in trials and had them every 3 months. At first I had them mostly done on the right side.......but then I started alternating. When they auger the hole in the pelvis, it heals like a fracture and lays down more bone....so it makes it a 'tougher' spot. But yes, there is a small area that they are trying to find.......if you feel in the back and feel a small pit or dimple, it is right above that on the bone. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Shelia, Going to the same location is often the preferred site. Your bones will heel however, going to the same site does two things: 1) Introduces the needle to an already 'met' location thus making the entry easier (old/reused site). 2) The chances of extracting a " good " sample is fairly high. Having said that, if it's too painful, perhaps another site my be beneficial. (there is no garuantee). Good Luck... sheila hoffman <sheilamonster13@...> wrote: When I had my last bmb done (that was HORRIBLE) at Mayo in Minnesota they had me roll up on my side. Both times at Mayo that's they way they did it. The first one that I had done was at my local hospital was with me laying on my stomach and I was fully a wake and felt everything. You would think that Mayo would have the right technique! All three times they've done it on my right side and pretty much in the same spot. Is that normal that they go to the same spot everytime? Sheila Cogan <ncogan@...> wrote: At 09:04 AM 4/10/06 -0400, you wrote: >I have also had a BMB done by a big strong doctor and he was awful. The >best combination would be great technique, tall and strong, and dark and >handsome for the ladies. > >Zavie And someone sweet as sugar for Zavie!! The other mistake for someone with tough bones is to do a side-lying version of a bmb, like they do more often in Europe. OHSU had an onc from Ireland who did it that way....he had a horrible time with me. Without your pelvis stabilized by the table as it is when you are lying on your stomach, there is nothing to push against. Finally, he said to me that he needed to hold my pelvis from in front in order to do the procedure. Maui Nanc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 At 11:31 AM 4/12/06 -0700, you wrote: > Going to the same location is often the preferred site. Your bones will > heel however, going to the same site does two things: > 1) Introduces the needle to an already 'met' location thus making the > entry easier (old/reused site). > 2) The chances of extracting a " good " sample is fairly high. What happens with a bone marrow biopsy, it that a small hole is augered through the bone (pelvis).....the body heals this just like a fracture (takes about 6 weeks)....this means that more bone is laid down the bone actually gets thicker!!! so not easier to enter. (when a broken bone heals it is actually stronger than the bone was before it was broken). yes, there is a 'best' spot to get a sample.....and you only have 2 of them....one on each side of the body. It is called your PSIS (poserior superior iliac spine).........I am a retired PT (physical therapist). If you place your hand on the pelvis at your side.....the rim........this is the iliac crest......then follow it back and it drops down to the dimple area...........that's it! the bony area is a little larger here and more honeycomb like.......so they can get a better sample with an aspiration. But over time (many bmbs) it can be hard to get a sample, and sometimes they start getting dry taps.......'my' theory is that with all the bone healing and laying down of more bone, this is the reason why.........so, a good reason for switching side to side for this procedure. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2006 Report Share Posted April 20, 2006 I have my BMP next week at H.L.Moffit Center. This is my 4th one and I start to be scared so I asked my doctor for sedation. Is it better to be under Anastasia and not to feel the pain. Please advise. T dxd 1/2003 CCR 7/03-400 MG Gleevec PCRU pending Re: [ ] Re: cytogenetics blood test At 09:14 PM 4/9/06 -0700, you wrote: >Its sad that you feel that the Dr. Has to be a " Tall Man " for that says >little about the more than qualified women who perform this duty daily. >News Flash, it's not about leverage for I'm still young with young strong >bones it's a matter of selection of the proper location and not the >stature or gender of the person. It's sad but you may have experienced >some bad moments with shorter women but i assure you, that was an anomaly >and not the norm. Give all doctors a chance for if you're face with an >emergency (like I believe we have but forget sometimes) would it matter >who your doctor is or that he/she can assist you? Hmmm Take a good look at >yourself... I'm sorry....but I disagree with your comments. I have very tough bones (measured at 121% of normal density). When Dr. Druker, who is tall, does my bmb, he sweats.......but at least he has good leverage for the procedure. Dr. Mauro did my bmb once.....he is much shorten and he had a very tough time. I just recently heard from a patient of his that he now uses a stool.......to give himself better leverage!!!! This is simple physics..........if you are tall, you can keep a straight elbow and have more strength. If you are shorter and have to bend your elbow, you will not be as strong..... OH.........and it doesn't matter if the doc is a male or female, but it helps to be 'athletic'..... : ) C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.