Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 Hi Marjorie, My platelet count was 43,000 for months. My GP told me I was still in the safe region, for everyday life. I could not get a biopsy, because they were afraid of bleeding, but I was not going to hemorage (sp) or anything like that. My last platelet count was 90,000. Good Luck, Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 Hi Marjorie, My platelet count was 43,000 for months. My GP told me I was still in the safe region, for everyday life. I could not get a biopsy, because they were afraid of bleeding, but I was not going to hemorage (sp) or anything like that. My last platelet count was 90,000. Good Luck, Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 Hi Marjorie, My platelet count was 43,000 for months. My GP told me I was still in the safe region, for everyday life. I could not get a biopsy, because they were afraid of bleeding, but I was not going to hemorage (sp) or anything like that. My last platelet count was 90,000. Good Luck, Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2000 Report Share Posted July 17, 2000 Hi Marjorie, My platelet count was 43,000 for months. My GP told me I was still in the safe region, for everyday life. I could not get a biopsy, because they were afraid of bleeding, but I was not going to hemorage (sp) or anything like that. My last platelet count was 90,000. Good Luck, Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2001 Report Share Posted November 30, 2001 In a message dated 11/25/2001 4:27:34 PM Eastern Standard Time, bsgttx@... writes: Hello Everyone, I'd be interested to know if anyone's platelet count has dropped dramatically and they were able to reverse it. If so, would you please share this information? Someone close to me has this problem. Thanks, bg A low platelet count is known as Thrombocytopenia and if it is chronic, than the person is usually diagnosed with ITP - Immune (or Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura. This is an autoimmune condition - surprise! - and the treatments for it would sound more than familiar to the folks on this group - prednisone being the most popular. Like other autoimmune conditions, it can go through periods of flares and remissions. Because a drastically low platelet count can create an extreme risk of bleeding (including internal bleeding), doctors sometimes want to treat it with equally drastic measures, including splenectomy. From what I have read and the people I have talked to, that is one option I will NEVER personally take. I've done well on IVIG treatments, but different things work better for different people. A very good website to look at would be ITPpeople.com Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 sheila hoffman <sheilamonster13@...> wrote: Hello! I've got a question that I'm hoping someone can help me with. I was diagnosed in August 2005 with CML to make a long story short after about 3 weeks my white count and anc crashed and I was taken off the drug for a few weeks then back on and off and so forth. By December I ws so freaked out that I wasn't on the med that my local doc had me taking 400 mgs every other day instead of every day. Well, my counts started to go up but so did my platelets so he was concerned and wanted Mayo clinic to do another bmb on me. I was scheduled to go to Mayo at the end of March. So at the beginning of March I spoke with my Mayo doc over the phone to find out that when I was first diagnosed that my cells were 98% leukemic and at the end of September when they re did the FISH they were at 3.4%. So I had the FISH re drawn and it showed that 28% of my cells were now leukemic. They figured that is was because I wasn't on the proper dose and that I wasn not to go off the gleevec for any reason if my anc & white count crashed that they would give me a booster shot. Well, yesterday I had to get the shot. My anc was 504 and my wc was 1.8 but my platelets went from 549 to 739 (they were over a million when I was at Mayo). Mayo told me to watch fro the platelets to come down that was a good sign that the med was working. So my question is do you think that the med isn't working? I posted on another site and got some feed back but I am just so freaked out and upset again over this. Also I was told that CML people have fibrosis in the marrow is this true? Becasue on my lab results it says Reticulin Fibers are increased, grade 3+. How bad is this?? Sheila --------------------------------- Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Earth Day --------------------------------- goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Hi Sheila, It takes some time for the platelets to come down. They aren't as fast as the white cells so try to be patient. There are other drugs available to control platelets if they continue to be a problem (Agrylin). I know of at least one patient who had ET (essential thrombocytosis) along with CML which made his platelet count always high and had nothing to do with the CML being controlled or not so this may be something for them to look into if things persist. I don't know who told you that people with CML have fibrosis in the marrow because the vast majority of us do not. In the old days of Interferon, marrow fibrosis was common and not a good thing but that's no longer the case with Gleevec. I believe that your riticulin fibers are increased simply because your platelets are increased. I really don't think that's anything significant at this point so try not to worry about it. This isn't the same as marrow fibrosis. Take care, Tracey Hello! I've got a question that I'm hoping someone can help me with. I was diagnosed in August 2005 with CML to make a long story short after about 3 weeks my white count and anc crashed and I was taken off the drug for a few weeks then back on and off and so forth. By December I ws so freaked out that I wasn't on the med that my local doc had me taking 400 mgs every other day instead of every day. Well, my counts started to go up but so did my platelets so he was concerned and wanted Mayo clinic to do another bmb on me. I was scheduled to go to Mayo at the end of March. So at the beginning of March I spoke with my Mayo doc over the phone to find out that when I was first diagnosed that my cells were 98% leukemic and at the end of September when they re did the FISH they were at 3.4%. So I had the FISH re drawn and it showed that 28% of my cells were now leukemic. They figured that is was because I wasn't on the > proper dose and that I wasn not to go off the gleevec for any reason if my anc & white count crashed that they would give me a booster shot. Well, yesterday I had to get the shot. My anc was 504 and my wc was 1.8 but my platelets went from 549 to 739 (they were over a million when I was at Mayo). Mayo told me to watch fro the platelets to come down that was a good sign that the med was working. So my question is do you think that the med isn't working? I posted on another site and got some feed back but I am just so freaked out and upset again over this. Also I was told that CML people have fibrosis in the marrow is this true? Becasue on my lab results it says Reticulin Fibers are increased, grade 3+. How bad is this?? > > Sheila > > --------------------------------- > Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Earth Day > > > --------------------------------- > goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2006 Report Share Posted April 23, 2006 Hi sheila - My name is and I was diagnosed in 2004 and at the time had over 3.5 million platelets - I had two seperate platelet therisis (sp) to bring them down at which time I was only on Agrylin. My doctor was certain I had CML but had not gotten the test results back. Once it was determined he had me start on 400 mg Gleevec and my counts continued to decrease and have stayed normal. I have another BMB in May and this will determine if I have reached a CCR which I have not yet. Be patient and stay with the Gleevec I am sure you will respond more positively. Tracey <traceyincanada@...> wrote: Hi Sheila, It takes some time for the platelets to come down. They aren't as fast as the white cells so try to be patient. There are other drugs available to control platelets if they continue to be a problem (Agrylin). I know of at least one patient who had ET (essential thrombocytosis) along with CML which made his platelet count always high and had nothing to do with the CML being controlled or not so this may be something for them to look into if things persist. I don't know who told you that people with CML have fibrosis in the marrow because the vast majority of us do not. In the old days of Interferon, marrow fibrosis was common and not a good thing but that's no longer the case with Gleevec. I believe that your riticulin fibers are increased simply because your platelets are increased. I really don't think that's anything significant at this point so try not to worry about it. This isn't the same as marrow fibrosis. Take care, Tracey Hello! I've got a question that I'm hoping someone can help me with. I was diagnosed in August 2005 with CML to make a long story short after about 3 weeks my white count and anc crashed and I was taken off the drug for a few weeks then back on and off and so forth. By December I ws so freaked out that I wasn't on the med that my local doc had me taking 400 mgs every other day instead of every day. Well, my counts started to go up but so did my platelets so he was concerned and wanted Mayo clinic to do another bmb on me. I was scheduled to go to Mayo at the end of March. So at the beginning of March I spoke with my Mayo doc over the phone to find out that when I was first diagnosed that my cells were 98% leukemic and at the end of September when they re did the FISH they were at 3.4%. So I had the FISH re drawn and it showed that 28% of my cells were now leukemic. They figured that is was because I wasn't on the > proper dose and that I wasn not to go off the gleevec for any reason if my anc & white count crashed that they would give me a booster shot. Well, yesterday I had to get the shot. My anc was 504 and my wc was 1.8 but my platelets went from 549 to 739 (they were over a million when I was at Mayo). Mayo told me to watch fro the platelets to come down that was a good sign that the med was working. So my question is do you think that the med isn't working? I posted on another site and got some feed back but I am just so freaked out and upset again over this. Also I was told that CML people have fibrosis in the marrow is this true? Becasue on my lab results it says Reticulin Fibers are increased, grade 3+. How bad is this?? > > Sheila > > --------------------------------- > Celebrate Earth Day everyday! Discover 10 things you can do to help slow climate change. Earth Day > > > --------------------------------- > goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.