Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Dear All, As a member/reader here only, I want to thank everyone involved in this latest scenario for overlooking any and all of our combined enthusiastic 'overreactions. especially mine. I get very excited about all these various medical situations, treatments, protocols and I have an almost immediate anger that develops when information is withheld or doors are closed or anything is reserved or secret or limited to only those with a title. I am constantly asking WHY? and what does that mean? That is what I find here with all of us and I would truly hate to see that combined energy " to know " being inhibited in any way within our group. The other thing I find exciting and comforting at the same time is the this groups ability as usual to work things out among ourselves even when is gone. We seem to be a very uninhibited and expressive group as groups go with a need to bring our points out. Along with that type and kind of enthusiasm comes a " highly charged emotional connection " that push's us all individually and seems to drives our need for information and our need to communicate. I truly appreciate that overriding theme on this forum, the main reason I get involved here. There is a sense of honesty and truth that comes with that emotion and I am finding that we all seem to want to be united in our common fight " rather than waste our time getting mad at each other or fighting with each other " . For example how could I or you be personally mad at anyone who posts here? How could they be mad at us personally? Not for a moment, why? " it is all about the information and the process only! We usually don't know anyone here personally and even if we did, I'm sure each of us is a very good person and may have a dog or cat that loves us and our mothers would swear by us anywhere and we all have people who not only love us but like us a lot. So, naturally we get emotional and upset or bothered by medical differences and contrasting information in our common fight, that always happens. But the comforting part, is that as usual we seem to find some quick resolution between ourselves. I agree it is important to Note what IG and Gordon said: IG: " ........that people not check their brains out when they read some of the stuff posted here. It's that simple. My notes have always been pointed in that direction. I don't impugn the motives of anyone who wants to share stuff. But everything, and I mean everything, should be run through an individual's critical filter,....... " Gordon: " .........The discussions over the past month have been very informative and helpful. I see no reason for anyone to take offense. This is a great board for people like me who have CLL and are looking for information. It is understood that no one is a doctor, so the information helps me to prepare and ask questions of my Onc. and to do more search on the web....... " I especially want to thank Chonette for her being so open and putting her personal information there for all to see and much of her investigation. Also, many thanks to Pete for his kind remarks on the board this morning...... I will list some of them here: Chonette: - Quote from Dr. Hamblin: " ............I have seen several patients whose lifespan was unaffected by their CLL who had enough chlorambucil to produce a PR on several occasions, but suffered no inconvenience from it.Because clinical trials take so long to complete we tend to use surrogate end points like response rate and progression free survival. In CLL these can be misleading. Despite having superior response rates and progression free survival times, no single trial or combination of trials has demonstrated that fludarabine gives a longer overall survival than chlorambucil (Leukeran)....... " Pete " .........I was diagnosed in January 2002, I've tried my best to stay positive, upbeat, and full of encouragement. But, we all know that this is hard to do all of the time " . ........... " I will certainly stay with the group since my knowledge of CLL/SLL has improved 110 % percent.......... " That's the best part Pete, that your staying with the group and are learning here. I learn every day here, as when IG pointed out the new discovery of " Cell Proliferation " . Then I went to 's Web site and read all about it. I can't say strongly enough how important I think it is for everyone here to read the CLL Topics Web site information from beginning to end. It's a lot of reading and you can start with your own special areas of need, but the information gathered there by has led the charge and opened everyone's eyes for well over a year now. Dr.'s information as well as Dr. Hamblin's list of posts should be required reading for everyone who has CLL. Most of the answers are there from both of them. However here, thanks to , we get to talk about all our own personal experiences and we get to share our reading and our investigations and " most important all the new information coming out and especially with our particular medical situations, what " might or might not be the best way to go with our treatment. When every doctor you go to has a different protocol that they advise and use for the same cases, that alone should show you how important your own input is in making those treatment decisions. By talking here, we get to help each other with information that is important to making those treatment decisions. Chonette is a good example, she was trapped so to speak in England where she couldn't get Rituxan, so she received information here and other places about Chlorambucil and against all the odds, she has found a temporary remission of sorts and has bought valuable time. She weighed the dangers of Chlorambucil against all the other drugs being offered and she made a choice and it worked for her. has said that is the main point of this site. To help us all with our knowledge of CLL and therefore with making those important decisions with our treatment protocols. Thanks for everyone for my involvement here and I now have to go take care of Dad, we are going down to see the doctor about his ITP. He has received his 4 Rituxan infusions and his platelets were still reading 17 yesterday. So now we have to consider the next step. Either IgG or IVIG (if there is a difference?) or Anti-D..? But Anti-D does usually cause loss of Hgb....so thats out as Dad takes Aranesp every two weeks now to keep his Hgb up to par. So perhaps we have to consider Prednisone, but I'm worried about the negative effects that Prednisone will have on an 85 yr old mans immune system, that's about all he has left is a good immune system, now operating on low WBC and low Neuts.....but still acceptable. Prednisone may cause that to go too low. I am certain that I will probably have to arrange a meeting with s Dr. the man who had the Web interview recently, I forget his name at the moment. Anyway, that's the way it is today Thurs Mar. 17th, 2005. My kindest regards to all, Kurt Re: IG - Chlorambucil/Lukeran You misunderstand the intention of my remarks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.