Guest guest Posted January 26, 2001 Report Share Posted January 26, 2001 Access to HIV treatment is a trade issue. But, not for the organizers of 6th ICAAP. Dear Friends, Many of you must have seen the invitation from the organizers of the 6th International conference on AIDS in Asia Pacific (6thICAAP) calling for submission of abstracts. There is a greater appreciation to the fact that in many Asian countries access to HIV treatment is intricately linked to the issue of how the global trade laws dictates on who could produce HIV medicines, and how it could be distributed. In many countries AIDS treatment activist are engaging in a day-to-day struggle to get the price of HIV medication reduced. They are also trying to encourage the governments to produce the generic HIV medications, and to deal with the implications of the global trade agreements on access to HIV medications. Recently, the Thai AIDS activists have successfully managed to bring down the cost of some of the essential HIV medications. Thai government is trying to regulate the monopoly of some of the HIV medications. Government of India is holding back from issuing licence to produce generic HIV medications due to the fear of potential trade backlash form the global Pharmaceutical industry. The Malaysian prime minister, specifically mentioned about the need to explore the possibility of compulsory licensing of essential HIV medications, during his inauguration speech at the 5th ICAAP The GlaxoWellcome has recently threatened an Indian company, manufacturing HIV medication (strictly under Indian trade laws) with legal action- creating barriers to access to HIV medication. UNAIDS itself is running a project to enhance access to HIV treatment in Vietnam. We urgently need to know the lessons learned from such experiments. However, none of these issues are key topics in treatment and care stream (theme one) selected by the Melbourne 6th ICAAP organizers. What a shame! It appears that the Melbourne organizers are keener to appease the International pharmaceutical industry, than addressing pressing issues related to access to treatment in developing countries in Asia Pacific region. The topics presented in the treatment and care stream looks like the topics of a drug company sponsored conference. The issue of 'stigma and discrimination' is yet another key topic which did not attract the attention of the organizers of the conference. People living with HIV/AIDS in many countries in Asia-pacific region are discriminated in health care, social and cultural settings. Many of them are deprived of their livelihood. In some countries they are subjected to violence and vilification. Many Australians learned the trick of discriminating people, without appearing that they are discriminating them. (Discrimination, at it's most sophisticated form!) It appears that some members the conference organizers also learned this trick. They managed to brush aside the issue of stigma and discrimination altogether from the conference topics The sad truth is that, overall, very limited appreciation to the wider Asia Pacific issue are presented as the key topics of the conference. When Melbourne was selected as the venue for the 6th ICAAP many of us was concerned about the fact that the Australian organisers would end up organizing a fantastic Australian AIDS Conference- Not, an Asia Pacific conference. Unless, corrective measures are taken immediately, our worst fears are likely to happen. Also, it is an insult to the AIDS workers from Asia pacific- to decide Kobe (Japan) as the venue for 7th ICAAP without any consultation with the AIDS community in this region. I would like to remind the conference organizers that they are expected to organise an Asia Pacific AIDS conference, Not an Australian AIDS conference. Also, please don't abuse the opportunity to host the conference as an opportunity for an ego trip for few of the organizers. It appears that tokenism is the major response of the organizers to the anxieties and concerns of people from other Asian Courtiers. I would like to request the conference organizers that a) Please demonstrate an unequivocal commitment to the issue of access to treatment as an issue of trade. And add that as a key topic in the conference. Please declare the conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical industry- if there is any -of the people involved in the programme committee? c) How much money GlaxoWellcome is offering to the conference organizers to call GW as the Major sponsor of the conference? d) Keep the decision to host 7th ICAAP in Kobe (Japan) on hold until a wider consultation is carried out on this issue. (Two ICAAPs consecutively in developed countries would definitely distort the regional priorities) Welcome to Melbourne! Joe Melbourne. Australia E-mail:joe_thomas123@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.