Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 09/14/06 - Posted from the Daily Record newsroom Vitiello smiles while waiting for the limo to her junior prom. closer to graduation with pals Hanover Pk. acts to change policy for disabled students BY LAURA BRUNO DAILY RECORD Post Comment EAST HANOVER -- Vitiello, 17, a Hanover Park High School student with Down syndrome, would have the opportunity to attend the senior prom and graduation this spring under a new graduation policy introduced by the Hanover Park Regional school board Wednesday night. would not formally graduate with the Class of 2007, since she plans to continue her education in the district until she is 21. However, the revised policy, approved on first reading unanimously by the school board, would let her join the ceremonies with the classmates she's known since kindergarten and receive a " Certificate of Attendance " . The policy will be presented for adoption at the board's Oct. 11 meeting. This June, 's parents, Janice and Tom Vitiello, with the support of the White House and disability advocates around the nation, challenged the district's 20-year-old graduation policy, calling it outdated and inconsiderate of the social and emotional needs of students with disabilities. The district's current policy requires all students to complete their education before attending graduation. Yet, federal law affords students with disabilities until the age of 21 to complete their education. If waited until the age of 21 to attend graduation, she would be surrounded by strangers, the Vitiellos said. Despite feeling relief for her daughter, Janice Vitiello expressed concerns to board members that the draft policy was confusing and could still bar students with disabilities from participating in graduation with their peers. " I believe that this policy, the way it is currently written, will allow my daughter, , to walk in the graduation ceremony. But I am not just here tonight for my daughter, but for all students with disabilities who will come after her, " Janice Vitiello said at the meeting. The revised policy does give blanket permission to students to attend graduation on completion of their fourth year in high school, unlike laws recently passed in Pennsylvania and Illinois. The draft policy says students who will remain in the district beyond their fourth year can choose to participate in senior year activities, including graduation, in their fourth, fifth or sixth school year. They would receive a " Certificate of Attendance " instead of a diploma at the ceremony. However, in order for those students to take part in the senior year ritual with their friends, they still must have met coursework required for graduation by their Individualized Education Plan or IEP. Vitiello said she planned out 's schedule so that her daughter would have met all her course requirements by the end of her fourth year of high school, against the district's advice. The district suggested she stretch the requirements over the six years afforded by federal law. Vitiello wanted her daughter to focus on community job training in her final school years. Others students may want or need to spread their coursework over the six years, Vitiello said. " Walking in a graduation ceremony is not an academic issue, but rather a social issue, " Janice Vitiello told the board Wednesday night. " Requiring students with disabilities to earn their way into the commencement is, I believe, a violation of (the federal law), " Janice Vitiello told the board at the meeting. Board President Jim Neidhardt thanked Vitiello for her comments. " As a board, we have always listened and deliberated every issue to determine what's right for the most number of families in the long run, " he said. No board members questioned Vitiello or the superintendent about her questions on the proposed policy. Superintendent Adamus has defended the proposed requirement, saying students can't expect to just put in their time and expect to attend graduation. They have to show they worked on their programs to get to the ceremony. Generally, the district sets up disabled students' programs so that they meet academic requirements for graduation by their fourth year, Adamus said. There are three students, including , who would be affected by the policy change this year, he said. Each will have met their course requirements by the end of the year if they pass their classes, he said. When asked about the possibility of a student failing a course in the year they want to participate in graduation ceremonies, Adamus said that was highly unlikely. " Realistically, the course is tailor-made for them. It would be pretty tough to fail, " Adamus said. " If they failed, it's because they refused to do the work. " DoE's recommendation Last year, the state Department of Education recommended districts adopt policies that allow students with disabilities to participate in graduation ceremonies with their peers, even if they have not met graduation requirements. Barbara Gantwerk, the state education department's acting assistant commissioner said if a student met their individual graduation requirements what was the need of continuing in school? Gantwerk would not comment on the district's policy, but said the state had asked districts to accommodate students who were not ready to graduate, due to their disability. In addition, a special education advocate and attorney said they were confused by the revised policy. a Lieb, executive director of the New Jersey Coalition for Inclusive Education said the district's draft policy was not clear. If a student meets the requirements of their IEP, then why would they need to continue until the age of 21, she asked. You either graduate or if you're not ready, you continue until you complete your individualized program, she said. " It's extremely confusing how it is written ... I think this will be confusing to parents and others, " Lieb said. " I think they should try to write this in a clearer fashion. " Students who want to walk with their class are not trying to get out of anything, Lieb said, it's just a way for them to participate socially with their peers. Likewise, Harriet Gordon, a Randolph-based education attorney, said she found the policy was " poorly written " and " contradictory " for the same reasons. http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060914/COMMUNITIES/609140351 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.